Risk of Acquiring Perioperative COVID-19 During the Initial Pandemic Peak: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of acquiring perioperative COVID-19 infection in previously COVID-19 negative patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: During the initial peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was significant concern of hospital acquired COVID-19 infections. Medical centers rapidly implemented systems to minimize perioperative transmission, including routine preoperative testing, patient isolation, and enhanced cleaning. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, medical records of all adult patients who underwent surgery at our quaternary, acute care hospital between March 15 and May 15, 2020 were reviewed. The risk of preoperatively negative patients developing symptomatic COVID-19 within 2-14 days postoperatively was determined. Surgical characteristics, outcomes, and complications were compared between those with and without acquired perioperative COVID-19 infection. RESULTS: Among 501 negative patients undergoing index surgeries, 9 (1.8%) developed symptomatic COVID-19 in the postoperative period; all occurred before implementation of routine preoperative testing [9/243, 3.7% vs 0/258, 0%, odds ratio (OR): 0.048, P = 0.036]. No patient who was polymerase-chain-reaction negative on the day of surgery (n = 170) developed postoperative infection. Perioperative infection was associated with preoperative diabetes (OR: 3.70, P = 0.042), cardiovascular disease (OR: 3.69, P = 0.043), angiotensin receptor blocker use (OR: 6.58, P = 0.004), and transplant surgery (OR: 11.00, P = 0.002), and multiple complications, readmission (OR: 5.50, P = 0.029) and death (OR: 12.81, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During the initial peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was minimal risk of acquiring symptomatic perioperative COVID-19 infection, especially after the implementation of routine preoperative testing. However, perioperative COVID-19 infection was associated with poor postoperative outcome.

Predicting Chronic Subdural Hematoma Resolution and Time to Resolution Following Surgical Evacuation.

Background: Growing evidence suggests that chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) may have long-term adverse effects even after surgical evacuation. Hematoma recurrence is commonly reported as a short-term, postoperative outcome measure for CSDH, but other measures such as hematoma resolution may provide better insight regarding mechanisms behind longer-term sequelae. This study aims to characterize postoperative resolution times and identify predictors for this relatively unexplored metric. Methods: Consecutive cases (N = 122) of burr hole evacuation for CSDH by a single neurosurgeon at Columbia University Irving Medical Center from 2000 to 2019 were retrospectively identified. Patient characteristics, presenting factors, and date of hematoma resolution were abstracted from the electronic health record. Outcome measures included CSDH resolution at 6 months, surgery-to-resolution time, and inpatient mortality. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine predictors of outcome measures. Results: Hematoma resolution at 6 months was observed in 58 patients (47.5%), and median surgery-to-resolution time was 161 days (IQR: 85-367). Heavy drinking was predictive of non-resolution at 6 months and longer surgery-to-resolution time, while increased age was predictive of non-resolution at 6 months. Antiplatelet agent resumption was associated with non-resolution at 6 months and longer surgery-to-resolution time on univariate analysis but was not significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Postoperative resolution times for most CSDHs are on the order of several months to a year, and delayed resolution is linked to heavy drinking and advanced age. Subsequent prospective studies are needed to directly assess the utility of hematoma resolution as a potential metric for long-term functional and cognitive outcomes of CSDH.