Insomnia and Poor Sleep in CKD: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Rationale & Objective: Poor sleep quality and insomnia are pervasive among patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, these health issues have not been systematically evaluated. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting & Study Populations: Adult patients with CKD not receiving kidney replacement therapy (KRT), as well as adults receiving KRT, including hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation. Selection Criteria for Studies: A systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, and PsycNET, was conducted for articles published between January 1, 1990, and September 28, 2018. Data Extraction: Data on the prevalences of poor sleep quality and insomnia in patients with CKD, including those receiving and not receiving KRT, were extracted. Analytical Approach: Pooled prevalences were estimated using a random-effects meta-analysis and were stratified according to age, CKD stage, World Health Organization region, risk of bias, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score, and the different criteria for insomnia that were used at diagnosis. Results: Of 3,708 articles, 93 were selected, and significant methodological heterogeneity was present. The pooled prevalences of poor sleep quality for CKD without KRT, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation were 59% (95% CI, 44%-73%), 68% (95% CI, 64%-73%), 67% (95% CI, 44%-86%), and 46% (95% CI, 34%-59%), respectively. The corresponding prevalences of insomnia were 48% (95% CI, 30%-67%), 46% (95% CI, 39%-54%), 61% (95% CI, 41%-79%), and 26% (95% CI, 9%-49%), respectively. Insomnia was significantly more prevalent among patients aged 51-60 years and those aged >60 years than among those aged <50 years. The prevalence of insomnia in the European region was the lowest of all World Health Organization regions. Limitations: High interstudy heterogeneity. Conclusions: Approximately half of the patients with advanced CKD had poor sleep quality or insomnia, and the prevalence was even higher among those who received KRT. Kidney transplantation may reduce the burden of poor sleep quality and insomnia.

Paradoxical mortality of high estimated glomerular filtration rate reversed by 24-h urine creatinine excretion rate adjustment: sarcopenia matters.

BACKGROUND: Muscle wasting may explain the paradoxical mortality of patients with high estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) derived from equation methods. However, empirical evidence and solutions remain insufficient. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we compared the performance of equation methods for predicting all-cause mortality; we used 24-h creatinine clearance (24-h CrCl), equation-based eGFRs, and a new eGFR estimating equation weighting for population 24-h urine creatinine excretion rate (U-CER). From 2003 to 2018, we identified 4986 patients whose data constituted the first 24-h CrCl measurement data in the Clinical Research Data Repository of China Medical University Hospital and were followed up for at least 5 years after careful exclusion. Three GFR estimation equations [the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study, and Taiwanese MDRD], 24-h CrCl, and 24-h U-CER-adjusted eGFR were used. RESULTS: A high correlation was observed among the eGFR levels derived from the equation methods (0.995-1.000); however, the correlation decreased to 0.895-0.914 when equation methods were compared with the 24-h CrCl or 24-h U-CER-adjusted equation-based eGFR. In the Bland-Altman plots, the average discrepancy between the equation methods and the 24-h CrCl method was close to zero (maximal bias range: 5.12 for the Taiwanese MDRD equation vs. 24-h CrCl), but the range in limit of agreement was wide, from ±43.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 for the CKD-EPI equation to ±54.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 for the Taiwanese MDRD equation. A J-shaped dose-response relationship was observed between all equation-based eGFRs and all-cause mortality. Only 24-h CrCl exhibited a non-linear negative dose-response relationship with all-cause mortality. After adjustment for 24-h U-CER in the statistical model, the paradoxical increase in mortality risk for an eGFR of >90 mL/min/1.73 m2 returned to null. When 24-h U-CER was used directly to correct eGFR, the monotonic non-linear negative relationship with all-cause mortality was almost identical to that of 24-h CrCl. CONCLUSIONS: The 24-h U-CER-adjusted eGFR and 24-h CrCl are viable options for informing mortality risk. The 24-h U-CER adjustment method can be practically implemented to eGFR-based care and effectively mitigate the inherent confounding biases from individual's muscle mass amount due to both sex and racial differences.

The ratio and difference of urine protein-to-creatinine ratio and albumin-to-creatinine ratio facilitate risk prediction of all-cause mortality.

The role of the difference and ratio of albuminuria (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, uACR) and proteinuria (urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, uPCR) has not been systematically evaluated with all-cause mortality. We retrospectively analyzed 2904 patients with concurrently measured uACR and uPCR from the same urine specimen in a tertiary hospital in Taiwan. The urinary albumin-to-protein ratio (uAPR) was derived by dividing uACR by uPCR, whereas urinary non-albumin protein (uNAP) was calculated by subtracting uACR from uPCR. Conventional severity categories of uACR and uPCR were also used to establish a concordance matrix and develop a corresponding risk matrix. The median age at enrollment was 58.6 years (interquartile range 45.4-70.8). During the 12,391 person-years of follow-up, 657 deaths occurred. For each doubling increase in uPCR, uACR, and uNAP, the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of all-cause mortality were 1.29 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-1.35), 1.12 (1.09-1.16), and 1.41 (1.34-1.49), respectively. For each 10% increase in uAPR, it was 1.02 (95% CI 0.98-1.06). The linear dose-response association with all-cause mortality was only observed with uPCR and uNAP. The 3 × 3 risk matrices revealed that patients with severe proteinuria and normal albuminuria had the highest risk of all-cause mortality (aHR 5.25, 95% CI 1.88, 14.63). uNAP significantly improved the discriminative performance compared to that of uPCR (c statistics: 0.834 vs. 0.828, p-value = 0.032). Our study findings advocate for simultaneous measurements of uPCR and uACR in daily practice to derive uAPR and uNAP, which can provide a better mortality prognostic assessment.