Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Harm Reduct J ; 15(1): 14, 2018 03 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29558943

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Street-involved youth who use illicit drugs are at high risk for health-related harms; however, the profile of youth at greatest risk of hospitalization has not been well described. We sought to characterize hospitalization among street-involved youth who use illicit drugs and identify the most frequent medical reasons for hospitalization among this population. METHODS: From January 2005 to May 2016, data were collected from the At-Risk Youth Study (ARYS), a prospective cohort study of street-involved youth in Vancouver, Canada. Multivariable generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to identify factors associated with hospitalization. RESULTS: Among 1216 participants, 373 (30.7%) individuals reported hospitalization in the previous 6 months at some point during the study period. The top three reported medical reasons for hospital admission were the following: mental illness (37.77%), physical trauma (12.77%), and drug-related issues (12.59%). Factors significantly associated with hospitalization were the following: past diagnosis of a mental illness (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.85; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.47-2.33), frequent cocaine use (AOR = 2.15; 95% CI 1.37-3.37), non-fatal overdose (AOR = 1.76; 95% CI 1.37-2.25), and homelessness (AOR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.16-1.68) (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that mental illness is a key driver of hospitalization among our sample. Comprehensive approaches to mental health and substance use in addition to stable housing offer promising opportunities to decrease hospitalization among this vulnerable population.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Ill-Housed Persons/statistics & numerical data , Illicit Drugs , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Adult , Canada/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young Adult
2.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse ; 44(2): 143-146, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29190156

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of risky opioid use, opioid use disorder, and related harms continue to rise among youth (adolescents and young adults age 15-25) in North America. With an increasing number of opioid overdoses, there remain significant barriers to care for youth with opioid use disorder, and there is an urgent need to expand evidence-based care for treatment of opioid use disorder among this population. Based on the extensive literature on treatment of opioid use disorder among adults, medicated-assisted treatment is likely to be an important or even essential component of treatment of opioid use disorder for most youth. In this article, we outline the current dilemmas and questions regarding the use of medication-assisted treatment among youth with opioid use disorder and propose some potential solutions based on the current evidence.


Subject(s)
Buprenorphine/therapeutic use , Methadone/therapeutic use , Naltrexone/therapeutic use , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods , Young Adult
3.
J Addict Med ; 12(1): 80-83, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28930773

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Relapse to opioid use is common after rapid opioid withdrawal. As a result, short-term tapers of opioid agonist/partial agonist medications, such as methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone, are no longer recommended by recent clinical care guidelines for the management of opioid use disorder. Nonetheless, rapid tapers are still commonplace in medically supervised withdrawal settings. CASE SUMMARY: We report a case of an individual with opioid use disorder who was prescribed a rapid buprenorphine/naloxone taper in a medically supervised withdrawal facility and who had a subsequent opioid overdose and death after discharge. DISCUSSION: The fatal outcome in this case study underscores the potential severe harms associated with use of rapid tapers. Given the increased overdose risk, tapers should be avoided and continuing care strategies, such as maintenance pharmacotherapy, should be initiated in medically supervised withdrawal settings.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/poisoning , Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Drug Overdose/physiopathology , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/drug therapy , Adult , Fatal Outcome , Humans , Male , Opiate Substitution Treatment
4.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy ; 12(1): 50, 2017 Dec 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29212504

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the initiation of injection drug use has been well characterized among at-risk youth, factors that support or impede cessation of injection drug use have received less attention. We sought to identify socioeconomic factors associated with cessation of injection drug use among street-involved youth. METHODS: From September 2005 to May 2015, data were collected from the At-Risk Youth Study (ARYS), a prospective cohort study of street-involved youth in Vancouver, Canada. Multivariate extended Cox regression was utilized to identify socioeconomic factors associated with cessation of injection drug use for six months or longer among youth who were actively injecting. RESULTS: Among 383 participants, 171 (44.6%) youth reported having ceased injection (crude incidence density 22 per 100 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 19-26) at some point during study follow-up. Youth who had recently dealt drugs (adjusted hazard ration [AHR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29-0.87), engaged in prohibited street-based income generation (AHR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.24-0.69), and engaged in illegal income generating activities (AHR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06-0.61) were significantly less likely to report cessation of injection drug use. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that socioeconomic factors, in particular engagement in prohibited street-based and illegal income generating activities, may pose barriers to ceasing injection drug use among this population. Effort to improve access to stable and secure income, as well as employment opportunities may assist youth in transitioning away from injection drug use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Our study is not a randomized controlled trial; thus the trial registration is not applicable.


Subject(s)
Homeless Youth/psychology , Socioeconomic Factors , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Canada/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Risk Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...