Ten-year follow-up investigation of stroke risk in systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To analyse the long-term risk of ischaemic stroke and the clinical effects of antithrombotics on the risk of haemorrhagic stroke in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a population-based database taken from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients with SLE between 2000 and 2008 were registered and matched with two controls by the index date, age, gender and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). These subjects were followed until either stroke event or 31 December 2013. Adjusted HRs (aHRs) for strokes were estimated with Cox regression models, and the cumulative incidence of ischaemic stroke was analysed by log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: In total, 8310 patients with SLE and 16 620 patients without SLE were included. In general, patients with SLE had higher rates of ischaemic stroke (5.4% vs 3.3%) and haemorrhagic stroke (1.5% vs 0.6%) than in controls. In multivariate analysis adjusted to age, gender, CCI, urbanisation level and antithrombotics uses, aHRs of all strokes, ischaemic stroke and haemorrhagic stroke were 1.73 (95% CI: 1.54 to 1.94), 1.65 (95% CI: 1.45 to 1.87) and 2.24 (95% CI: 1.71 to 2.95), respectively, in patients with SLE. Patients with SLE were significantly more likely to suffer ischaemic stroke than patients without SLE, even 10 years after SLE diagnosis (6.12% vs 3.50%, p<0.001). Antiplatelet use increased the risk of haemorrhagic stroke in SLE group (aHR=1.74, 95% CI: 1.18 to 2.57). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SLE are at greater risk of developing ischaemic stroke that lasts for 10 years. Antiplatelets should be carefully administered to prevent cardiovascular events in patients with SLE due to the risk of haemorrhagic stroke.

Use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors was associated with a lower risk of Parkinson's disease in diabetic patients.

Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for Parkinson's disease (PD). While animal studies have supported the benefits of incretin-based therapies, including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors, in PD, clinical research has yielded controversial results. This cohort study aimed to assess the relationship between PD incidence and the utilization of DPP4 inhibitor in diabetic patients. Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database from 2009 to 2018, diabetic patients receiving metformin plus at least one second-line oral antidiabetic (OAD) were enrolled. The patients were categorized as DPP4 inhibitor users and non-users. Propensity score matching was employed to establish a 1:1 ratio between DPP4 inhibitor users and non-users. Among the 205,910 patients enrolled, 149 were diagnosed with PD during follow-up. The incidence rate was 0.29 per 1000 person-years for DPP4 inhibitor users and 0.55 per 1000 person-years for the non-users. DPP4 inhibitor users exhibited a significantly lower risk of PD (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI 0.39-0.68). Among DPP4 inhibitor users, vildagliptin showed the strongest correlation with a reduction in the risk of PD. This study demonstrates that the use of DPP4 inhibitors along with metformin in diabetic patients is associated with a lower risk of PD compared to those using other OADs.

The association between hyperlipidemia, lipid-lowering drugs and diabetic peripheral neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: Previous studies showed conflicting relationship between hyperlipidemia, lipid-lowering therapy and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). As most of these works emerges from the Western and Australian countries, our study aims to investigate whether hyperlipidemia or lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is associated with DPN in Taiwanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: A cross-sectional, hospital-based observation study in adults with T2D was conducted from January to October 2013. DPN was screened using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument. Data were obtained at the time of enrollment, including medication usage, anthropometric measurements and laboratory examinations. RESULTS: 2,448 participants were enrolled, 524 (21.4%) of whom had DPN. Patients with DPN had significantly lower plasma total cholesterol (185.6 ± 38.6 vs 193.4 ± 42.3 mg/dL) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (114.6 ± 32.7 vs 119 ± 30.8 mg/dL). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that neither hyperlipidemia (adjusted OR (aOR), 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49-1.34) nor LLT (aOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.58-2.09) was associated with DPN. Subgroup analysis revealed that neither total cholesterol (aOR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.2-2.62), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (aOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.2-2.79), statin (aOR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.59-2.03) nor fibrate (aOR, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.33-1.61) was associated with DPN. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that neither hyperlipidemia nor lipid-lowering medication was associated with DPN in adults with T2D. DPN is a multifactorial disease, and our findings indicate that lipid metabolism may play a minor role in its pathogenesis.

Severe lupus flare is associated with a much higher risk of stroke among patients with SLE.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: There are few data on the influence of lupus flare on stroke risk in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In this study, we examined whether a severe lupus flare further increases the risk of stroke among SLE patients. METHODS: Using the Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study from 2000 to 2016. Each patient with SLE was matched to a non-SLE subject in age, sex, and index date. A severe flare of lupus was identified when an SLE patient was admitted for pulse therapy with intravenous methylprednisolone greater than 250 mg in a single hospitalization. SLE patients were divided into severe flare and non-severe flare groups. RESULTS: In total, 334 of 10,006 patients with SLE had a severe lupus flare, and the remaining 9672 patients were assigned to the non-severe flare group. Ischemic stroke occurred in 29 (8.7%), 485 (5%), and 384 (3.8%) of the patients in the severe flare, non-severe flare, and control groups, respectively. Hemorrhagic stroke occurred in 9 (2.7%), 123 (1.3%), and 37 (0.4%) of patients in the severe flare, non-severe flare, and control groups, respectively. Compared with patients in the non-severe flare group, patients with severe flare had a significantly higher risk of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 7.44, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.93-11.25 vs aHR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.26-1.83) and hemorrhagic stroke (aHR = 22.49, 95% CI: 10.09-50.12 vs aHR = 4.47, 95% CI: 2.90-6.90). CONCLUSION: Severe lupus flare is associated with a much higher risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes among SLE patients.