ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve repair is limited by Wallerian degeneration coupled with the slow and inconsistent rates of nerve regrowth. In more proximal injuries, delayed nerve regeneration can cause debilitating muscle atrophy. Topical application of polyethylene glycol (PEG) during neurorrhaphy facilitates the fusion of severed axonal membranes, immediately restoring action potentials across the coaptation site. In preclinical animal models, PEG-fusion resulted in remarkable early functional recovery. METHODS: This is the first randomized clinical trial comparing functional outcomes between PEG-fusion and standard neurorrhaphy. Participants with digital nerve transections were followed up at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was assessed using the Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC) rating for sensory recovery at each timepoint. Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and static two-point discrimination determined MRCC ratings. Postoperative quality of life was measured using the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ). RESULTS: Forty-eight transected digital nerves (25 control, 23 PEG) across twenty-two patients were analyzed. PEG-fused nerves demonstrated significantly higher MRCC scores at 2 weeks (OR 16.95, 95% CI: 1.79 - 160.38, p = 0.008) and 1 month (OR 13.40, 95% CI: 1.64 - 109.77, p = 0.009). Participants in the PEG cohort also had significantly higher average MHQ scores at 2 weeks (Hodge's g 1.28, 95% CI: 0.23 - 2.30, p = 0.0163) and 1 month (Hodge's g 1.02, 95% CI: 0.04 - 1.99, p = 0.049). No participants had adverse events related to the study drug. CONCLUSION: PEG-fusion promotes early sensory recovery and improved patient well-being following peripheral nerve repair of digital nerves.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patient education materials are commonly reported to be difficult to understand. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to use crowdsourcing to improve patient education materials at our institution. METHODS: This was a department-wide quality improvement project to increase organizational health literacy. There are 6 phases of this pilot study: (1) evaluating preexisting patient education materials, (2) evaluating online patient education materials at the society (the American Society of Plastic Surgeon) and government level (Medline Plus), (3) redesigning our patient education material and reevaluating the education material, (4) crowdsourcing to evaluate understandability of the new patient education material, (5) data analysis, and (6) incorporating crowdsourcing suggestions to the patient education material. RESULTS: Breast-related patient education materials are not easy to read at the institution level, the society level, and the government level. Our new implant-based breast reconstruction patient education material is easy to read as demonstrated by the crowdsourcing evaluation. More than 90% of the participants reported our material is "very easy to understand" or "easy to understand." The crowdsourcing process took 1.5 days, with 700 workers responding to the survey. The total cost was $9. After incorporating participants' feedback into the finalized material, the readability of the material is at the recommended reading level. The material also had the recommended length (between 400 and 800 words). DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrated a pathway for clinicians to efficiently obtain a large amount of feedback to improve patient education materials. Crowdsourcing is an effective tool to improve organizational health literacy.
Subject(s)
Crowdsourcing , Humans , Pilot Projects , Patient Education as Topic , Breast , Educational StatusABSTRACT
To introduce image characteristics of double-chambered right ventricle on cardiac computed tomography and set a diagnostic criterion for the diagnosis. We retrospectively collected and measured the right ventricular constrictive ratio on computed tomography images in children who had simple ventricular septal defects in the past 10 years, because double-chambered right ventricle is often associated with ventricular septal defects. The right ventricular constrictive ratio was defined as the subinfundibular cross-sectional intraluminal area during end-systole divided by the area during end-diastole in the same patient. We compared the right ventricular constrictive ratio between subjects with concomitant double-chambered right ventricle and those without. 52 children were included, and 23 (44.2%) of them have concomitant double-chambered right ventricle. In most cases (n = 21; 91.3%), the hypertrophied muscular bundles occur just inferior to the level of the supraventricular crest in the right ventricle. Mean right ventricular constrictive ratio in patients with double-chambered right ventricle (15%) was significantly smaller than that without (29%). A cut-off value of a right ventricular constrictive ratio less than 20.1% was established to diagnose double-chambered right ventricle with an 89.7% sensitivity and 78. 3% specificity. Right ventricular constrictive ratio can be a valuable asset for the preoperative diagnosis of double-chambered right ventricle with cardiac computed tomography.
