ABSTRACT
Infections are common complications in end of life (EOL). However, clinicians have minimal guidance regarding antibiotic decision-making in EOL care, leading to the overuse of antibiotics. While symptom relief is frequently cited as a major reason for antibiotic use in EOL, antibiotics have not been shown to provide significant improvement in symptoms outside of urinary tract infections. In addition, when prognosis is expected to be in the range of days to weeks, antibiotics have not been shown to provide significant survival benefit. Antibiotics can be beneficial in EOL care in appropriate scenarios, but the current widespread use of antibiotics in EOL requires reevaluation. There needs to be broader efforts to think about antibiotics like other invasive medical procedures in which benefits and risks are weighed, recognizing that not all patients in EOL who receive antibiotics will benefit. In addition, during care planning process, discussing and documenting antibiotic preferences will be beneficial. Non-antibiotic symptom management should be incorporated to plan of care when infection is suspected. Ultimately, the use of antibiotics at EOL should be for the clear benefit for the recipient and should be guided by the type of infection and its clinical course, patients' primary disease and its prognosis, and the preferences of patients or surrogate decision makers.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Education and specific training on serious illness communication skills for radiation oncology residents is lacking. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires radiation oncology residents to demonstrate interpersonal and communication skills; however, implementing specific training to address this poses an ongoing challenge. This study assesses the feasibility and effectiveness of a radiation oncology specific serious illness communication curriculum at a single radiation oncology residency program. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The primary objectives were to assess observable communication skills among radiation oncology residents and their perceived level of preparedness and comfort with patient encounters surrounding serious illness. Each resident participated in a baseline simulated patient encounter. Two virtual half-day experience-based learning sessions led by faculty experts trained in teaching serious illness communication were held. The training consisted of brief didactic teaching, with the emphasis on small group guided practice with simulated patients in scenarios specific to radiation oncology. Each resident participated in a postcourse simulated patient encounter. Three blinded faculty trained in serious illness communication completed objective assessments of observable communication skills to compare pre- and postcourse performance. RESULTS: A t test based on validated assessments reviewed by blinded faculty demonstrated significant improvement in overall observable communication skills among radiation oncology residents in the postcourse encounter compared with the precourse encounter (P = .0067). Overall, 8 of 9 (89%) residents felt more comfortable and prepared with radiation oncology-specific serious illness communication after the course compared with prior. The simulated patients rated the overall average resident performance higher on the postcourse assessment (Likert 4.89/5) compared with the precourse assessment (Likert 4.09/5), which trended toward a significant improvement (P = .0515). CONCLUSIONS: Radiation oncology residents had a significant improvement in observable communication skills after participating in an experience-based training curriculum. This course can serve as an adaptable model that may be implemented by other radiation oncology residency programs.