Ceftriaxone use for acute otitis media: Associated factors in a large U.S. primary care population.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians in the authors' primary care academic practice have anecdotally perceived an increased use of intramuscular (IM) ceftriaxone, particularly for otitis-conjunctivitis in recent years (pre-pandemic). Increasing rates of ceftriaxone administration for acute otitis media (AOM) may be an important marker of antimicrobial resistance. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize the population of patients who received ceftriaxone for treatment of AOM, testing our hypothesis that patients with concomitant conjunctivitis would have increased rates of ceftriaxone receipt. DESIGN/METHODS: We reviewed cases of AOM at a large U.S. primary care practice from August 2017 to July 2019. We determined the association between each of the following variables and ceftriaxone injection using multivariate analysis: age at AOM diagnosis, provider type, insurance (public vs private), season of year, and presence of conjunctivitis. RESULTS: There were 6028 AOM episodes in 5195 patients resulting in a total of 7688 patient encounters. Of these episodes, 642 (10.7%) had a concurrent diagnosis of conjunctivitis; 362 (6.0%) ultimately received ceftriaxone. Conjunctivitis was the strongest predictor of treatment with ceftriaxone. The proportion of episodes with conjunctivitis treated with ceftriaxone was 14.5% (93/642) versus 5.0% (269/5386) without conjunctivitis (p < 0.0001). Patients who received ceftriaxone were younger; mean age (SD) for patients receiving ceftriaxone was 14.0 (8.8) months versus 25.0 (23.4) months (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION(S): There is a strong correlation between the presence of conjunctivitis and receipt of IM ceftriaxone in this large U.S. academic primary care clinic. Younger age was also associated with ceftriaxone treatment. Further study on emerging resistance patterns and implications for management of AOM in young children is warranted.

Cost-effectiveness of routine rapid human immunodeficiency virus antibody testing before DNA-PCR testing for early diagnosis of infants in resource-limited settings.

BACKGROUND: Infants born to HIV-infected women should receive HIV testing to allow early diagnosis and treatment. Recommendations for resource-limited settings stress laboratory-based virologic assays. While effective, these tests are logistically complex and expensive. This study explored the cost-effectiveness of incorporating initial screening with rapid HIV tests (RHT) into the conventional testing algorithm to screen-out HIV-uninfected infants, thereby reducing the need for costly virologic testing. METHODS: Data on HIV prevalence, RHT sensitivity and specificity, and costs were collected from 820 HIV-exposed children (1.5-18 months) attending 2 postnatal screening programs in Uganda during July 2005 to December 2006. Cost-effectiveness models compared the conventional testing algorithm DNA polymerase chain reaction (DNA-PCR with Roche Amplicor v1.5) with a modified algorithm (initial RHT to screen-out HIV-uninfected infants before DNA-PCR). RESULTS: The model estimated that the conventional algorithm would identify 94.3% (91.8%-94.7%) of HIV-infected infants, compared with 87.8% (79.4%-90.5%) for a modified algorithm using RHT (HIV 1/2 Determine) and excluding the need for DNA-PCR for HIV antibody-negative infants. Costs per infant were $23.47 ($23.32-$23.76) for the conventional algorithm and between $22.75 ($21.89-$23.31) and $7.58 ($6.41-$10.75) for the modified algorithm, depending on infant age and symptoms. Compared with the conventional algorithm, costs per HIV-infected infant identified using the modified algorithm were higher in 1.5-to 3-month-old infants, but significantly lower in 3-month-old and older infants. Models replicating the whole infant testing program showed the modified algorithm would have marginally lower sensitivity, but would reduce total program costs by 27% to 40%, producing an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1489 ($686-$6781) for the conventional versus modified algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: Screening infants with RHT before DNA-PCR is cost-effective in infants 3 months old or older. Incorporating RHT into early infant testing programs could improve cost-effectiveness and reduce program costs.