Integrating a pharmacist into an anaesthesiology and critical care department: Is this worthwhile?

Background Operating rooms and Intensive Care Units are places where an optimal management of drugs and medical devices is required. Objective To evaluate the impact of a dedicated pharmacist in an academic Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Department. Setting This study was conducted in the Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Department of Grenoble University Hospital. Method Between November 2013 and June 2017, the drug-related problems occurring in three Intensive Care Units and their corrections by a full-time clinical pharmacist were analyzed using a structured order review instrument. Pharmaceutical costs in the Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Department were analyzed over a 7 year period (2010-2016), during which automated dispensing systems and recurrent meetings to review indications of medications and medical devices were implemented in the department. Main outcome measure Analysis of two issues: correcting drug-related problems and containing pharmaceutical costs. Results A total of 324 drug-related problems were identified. The most frequent problem concerned anti-infective agents (45%), and this was mainly due to the over-dosage of drugs (30%). Dosage adjustments were the most frequent interventions performed by the pharmacist (43%). Over the 7 year period, pharmaceutical costs decreased by 9% (€365,469), while the care activity of the department increased by 55% (+ 12,022 surgical procedures and + 1424 admissions in the ICU). Conclusion Integrating a pharmacist into the Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Department was associated with interventions to correct drug-related problems and containing pharmaceutical costs. Pharmacists should play a central role in such medical environments, to optimize the use of drugs and medical devices.

Are guidelines on the management of non-tuberculous mycobacteria lung infections respected and what are the consequences for patients? A French retrospective study from 2007 to 2014.

Diagnosis and treatment of lung infections caused by non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) remain challenging. Adherence of the clinicians to the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) 2007 guidelines is often incomplete. Between 2007 and 2014, in Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, France, 132 patients had NTM-positive cultures from lower respiratory tract (LRT) samples. We retrospectively collected diagnosis, treatment, and outcome data of patients, and evaluated the adherence of clinicians to ATS/IDSA guidelines and the consequences of patients' prognoses. Using the ATS/IDSA definitions, 31 out of 132 patients (23.5%) were considered infected, 57 out of 132 patients (43.2%) were considered colonised, 33 out of 132 (25%) were contaminated and 11 (8.4%) had missing data. Among the 31 NTM-infected patients, M. avium (23 out of 31, 74.2%) was most frequently involved. The main risk factor for NTM lung infection was underlying lung disease (30 out of 31, 96.8%). Treatment was not appropriate according to current guidelines in 58.1% of infected patients (18 out of 31). Mainly, the antibiotic treatment was installed based on radiological signs (p = 0.0006), sputum results and bronchoalveolar lavage results (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.003 respectively). Most antibiotic regimens included a macrolide (83.4%). Patients receiving appropriate treatment had the same cure rates as those receiving inappropriate treatment (p = 0.22) and similar relapse rates (p = 0.92). Current medical practices for the treatment of NTM lung infections in our institution are not consistent with the ATS/IDSA guidelines. This could potentially affect the prognosis of these patients and favour the emergence of macrolide resistance in NTM species.

Assessment of linezolid prescriptions in three French hospitals.

The use of linezolid to treat gram-positive cocci infections is increasing in France. Linezolid is approved in pneumonia and complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Overuse and misuse of linezolid can favor the emergence and spreading of linezolid-resistant strains. We aimed to assess the appropriateness of linezolid use in French hospitals. This is a multicenter, retrospective study conducted in three tertiary care hospitals. Appropriateness of linezolid indications and adequacy (composite score concerning dosage, route of administration and blood monitoring) were assessed. Over a three-month period, all prescriptions of linezolid were extracted and analyzed by two independent infectious disease experts. Among the 81 initial prescriptions that were evaluated, indication was appropriate in 48% of cases. Among those, 51% complied with international guidelines. Fifty-seven percent of the prescriptions were adequate regarding dosage, route of administration and blood monitoring. Overall, 23% of prescriptions combined both appropriateness and adequacy. The most frequent reasons for inappropriateness were the possibility of choosing narrower-spectrum antibiotics and the empirical use of linezolid in severe sepsis or septic shock. Initial treatment was the most frequently appropriate in bone and joint infection cases (p = 0.001). Our study shows that even if modalities of use were mostly correct, appropriateness of linezolid indications is low. Educational programs are mandatory to improve practices, as well as clinical studies to better assess the efficacy and safety of linezolid in clinical situations other than pneumonia or complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

[Genetic and environmental factors of asthma and allergy: Results of the EGEA study]. / Facteurs génétiques et environnementaux de l'asthme et de l'allergie: synthèse des résultats de l'étude EGEA.

INTRODUCTION AND METHODS: The EGEA study (epidemiological study on the genetics and environment of asthma, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and atopy), which combines a case-control and a family-based study of asthma case (n=2120 subjects) with three surveys over 20 years, aims to identify environmental and genetic factors associated with asthma and asthma-related phenotypes. We summarize the results of the phenotypic characterization and the investigation of environmental and genetic factors of asthma and asthma-related phenotypes obtained since 2007 in the EGEA study (42 articles). RESULTS: Both epidemiological and genetic results confirm the heterogeneity of asthma. These results strengthen the role of the age of disease onset, the allergic status and the level of disease activity in the identification of the different phenotypes of asthma. The deleterious role of active smoking, exposure to air pollution, occupational asthmogenic agents and cleaning products on the prevalence and/or activity of asthma has been confirmed. Accounting for gene-environment interactions allowed the identification of new genetic factors underlying asthma and asthma-related traits and better understanding of their mode of action. CONCLUSION: The EGEA study is contributing to the advances in respiratory research at the international level. The new phenotypic, environmental and biological data available in EGEA study will help characterizing the long-term evolution of asthma and the factors associated to this evolution.