Subject(s)
Colic/complications , Kidney Diseases/complications , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Kidney Pelvis , Aged , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Male , Recurrence , UrotheliumABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Pelvis/diagnostic imaging , Renal Colic/complications , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/complications , Kidney Pelvis/pathology , Urography/methods , UrographyABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Urography/methods , Urinary Bladder/diagnostic imaging , Urinary Bladder/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim was to validate the Spanish version of the Self-Esteem and Relationship Questionnaire (SEAR), specific for patients with erectile dysfunction (ED), and based on the concept of self-esteem, for use in research and clinical practice in Spain. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Observational, prospective, multisite, study comparing patients with ED (IIEF questionnaire score < 26 points), with a score (3/4) 16 points in the Self-Esteem domain of the SEAR questionnaire and undergoing treatment with sildenafil (group A), and healthy control subjects without ED. Patients with ED were assessed at baseline and after 3 months' treatment. RESULTS: Among 586 evaluable subjects (504 patients with ED and 82 health subjects) the questionnaire showed: a) adequate feasibility with a percentage of patients without response < 5%; b) adequate reliability with Cronbach alpha coefficients for the total and all domains (Sexual-Relationship, Confidence, Self-Esteem, and Overall-Relationship), of SEAR questionnaire, respectively: 0.92, 0.89, 0.84, 0.75, and 0.82 un patients, and 0.86, 0.80, 0.73, 0.56 and 0.74 un healthy subjects; c) adequate discriminatory validity between patients and healthy subjects (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.0001), and between patients with vaying degrees of ED (Kruskall-Wallis test, p < 0.05); d) adequate convergent/divergent validity (correlations > 0.5 with the IIEF questionnaire and r > 0.3 and < 0.5 with Mental Health domain score of SF-12 questionnaire); e) adequate construct validity, obtaining 2 domains: Sexual-Relationship, and Confidence, and f) adequate sensitivity to clinical changes (SES: 2.1/SRM: 1.5/SEM: 4.4/MID: 13.1). Mark scores were estimated. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the SEAR questionnaire showed adequate and similar psychometric properties to those shown with the original English version.
Subject(s)
Erectile Dysfunction/psychology , Interpersonal Relations , Self Concept , Surveys and Questionnaires , Humans , Language , Male , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Fundamento y objetivo: Validar la versión española del cuestionario específico para disfunción eréctil SEAR (Self-Esteem And Relationship Questionnaire), centrado en el concepto de autoestima, para su uso en la investigación y/o práctica clínica en España. Pacientes y método: Estudio observacional, prospectivo, multicéntrico y comparativo entre pacientes con disfunción eréctil (DE) puntuación inferior a 26 puntos en cuestionario IIEF (Índice Internacional de Función Eréctil) y con ¾ 16 puntos o menos en la dimensión Autoestima del cuestionario SEAR, en tratamiento con sildenafilo (grupo A), y sujetos controles sanos sin DE (grupo B). Se evaluó a los pacientes con DE en la visita basal y a los 3 meses de tratamiento. Resultados: El cuestionario mostró en 586 sujetos valorables (504 pacientes con DE y 82 sujetos sanos): a) adecuada factibilidad, con porcentaje de pacientes sin respuesta inferior al 5%; b) adecuada fiabilidad, con coeficientes alfa de Cronbach para SEAR total y dimensiones Relaciones sexuales, Autoconfianza, Autoestima y Relaciones en General, respectivamente de 0,92, 0,89, 0,84, 0,75 y 0,82 en los pacientes, y de 0,86, 0,80, 0,73, 0,56 y 0,74 en sujetos sanos; c) adecuada validez discriminante entre pacientes y sujetos sanos (prueba Mann-Whitney p 0,5 con cuestionario IIEF, y r 0,3 con escala Salud Mental del cuestionario SF-12); e) adecuada validez de constructo, encontrando las dimensiones Relaciones Sexuales y Autoconfianza, y f) adecuada sensibilidad para detectar cambios clínicos (tamaño del efecto estandarizado: 2,1; respuesta media estandarizada: 1,5; error estándar de medida: 4,4; diferencia mínimamente importante: 13,1). Se estimaron las puntuaciones de referencia. Conclusiones: La versión española del cuestionario SEAR mostró propiedades psicométricas adecuadas y similares a las de la versión original en inglés
Background and objective: The aim was to validate the Spanish version of the Self-Esteem and Relationship Questionnaire (SEAR), specific for patients with erectile dysfunction (ED), and based on the concept of self-esteem, for use in research and clinical practice in Spain. Patients and method: Observational, prospective, multisite, study comparing patients with ED (IIEF questionnaire score 0.5 with the IIEF questionnaire and r > 0.3 and < 0.5 with Mental Health domain score of SF-12 questionnaire); e) adequate construct validity, obtaining 2 domains: Sexual-Relationship, and Confidence, and f) adequate sensitivity to clinical changes (SES: 2.1/SRM: 1.5/SEM: 4.4/MID: 13.1). Mark scores were estimated. Conclusions: The Spanish version of the SEAR questionnaire showed adequate and similar psychometric properties to those shown with the original English version
