Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 15(6): e0234186, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32502179

ABSTRACT

The objective of this double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab 0.05% eye drops in dry eye patients. This study included Dry Eye Workshop Study (DEWS) Grade 3-4 dry eye participants (n = 31) whose tear break-up time (TBUT) was ≤5 seconds(s). Participants were randomized to undergo treatment with either bevacizumab 0.05% eye drops (n = 19) or placebo (n = 12). The primary outcome was TBUT, and the proportion of responders (increase of ≥3s in TBUT at week 12), ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, Schirmer test, and Oxford scheme grade were secondary outcomes. All outcomes were measured at 1-, 4- and 12 weeks. TBUT in bevacizumab group differed significantly from TBUT in placebo group within 12 weeks (P = 0.001). Moreover, the improvement of TBUT in bevacizumab group versus placebo group at 4- and 12 weeks differed significantly from that difference at baseline (P = 0.002 and P = 0.003, respectively). The proportion of participants achieving increase of 3 seconds or more of TBUT at week 12 in the bevacizumab group was significantly greater than that in the placebo group (P = 0.02). Oxford scheme grade at 1-, 4- and 12 weeks differed significantly from the values at baseline in bevacizumab group (P = 0.001, P = 0.01, and P = 0.03, respectively). OSDI scores at 1-, 4- and 12-week follow-ups were significantly lower than that at baseline in bevacizumab group (P<0.001 at each follow-up). Schirmer test were not significantly different within or between groups (the lowest P = 0.92). No adverse events occurred in this study. Patients treated with bevacizumab 0.05% eye drops showed significant improvement in tear film stability, corneal staining and symptoms.


Subject(s)
Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Dry Eye Syndromes/drug therapy , Administration, Topical , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
2.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 10(10): 3022-38, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25483693

ABSTRACT

Development of effective vaccines against emerging infectious diseases (EID) can take as much or more than a decade to progress from pathogen isolation/identification to clinical approval. As a result, conventional approaches fail to produce field-ready vaccines before the EID has spread extensively. Lassa is a prototypical emerging infectious disease endemic to West Africa for which no successful vaccine is available. We established the VaxCelerate Consortium to address the need for more rapid vaccine development by creating a platform capable of generating and pre-clinically testing a new vaccine against specific pathogen targets in less than 120 d A self-assembling vaccine is at the core of the approach. It consists of a fusion protein composed of the immunostimulatory Mycobacterium tuberculosis heat shock protein 70 (MtbHSP70) and the biotin binding protein, avidin. Mixing the resulting protein (MAV) with biotinylated pathogen-specific immunogenic peptides yields a self-assembled vaccine (SAV). To meet the time constraint imposed on this project, we used a distributed R&D model involving experts in the fields of protein engineering and production, bioinformatics, peptide synthesis/design and GMP/GLP manufacturing and testing standards. SAV immunogenicity was first tested using H1N1 influenza specific peptides and the entire VaxCelerate process was then tested in a mock live-fire exercise targeting Lassa fever virus. We demonstrated that the Lassa fever vaccine induced significantly increased class II peptide specific interferon-γ CD4(+) T cell responses in HLA-DR3 transgenic mice compared to peptide or MAV alone controls. We thereby demonstrated that our SAV in combination with a distributed development model may facilitate accelerated regulatory review by using an identical design for each vaccine and by applying safety and efficacy assessment tools that are more relevant to human vaccine responses than current animal models.


Subject(s)
Avidin/immunology , Bacterial Proteins/immunology , HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins/immunology , Lassa Fever/immunology , Lassa Fever/prevention & control , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Animals , Avidin/therapeutic use , Bacterial Proteins/therapeutic use , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/prevention & control , Female , HLA-DR3 Antigen/genetics , HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins/therapeutic use , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Interferon-gamma/immunology , Lassa virus/immunology , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Transgenic , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/immunology , Ovalbumin/immunology , Protein Engineering , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/immunology , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/therapeutic use , Viral Vaccines/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...