Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 153: 111008, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34986444

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric esophageal button battery (BB) injury occurs rapidly and continues to be a significant source of morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, a BB that no longer supplies power to a device can still have enough residual voltage to cause injury within the body. Development of additional prevention strategies for consumers may reduce esophageal injury risk. METHODS: In this study, 24 commercially available button batteries (BBs) were horizontally and vertically wrapped (2 layers, full circumferential coverage, 90° apart) with 6 different types of common household tapes (Scotch®/clear, Scotch®/Magic, masking tape, packing tape/clear, packing tape/brown, black electrical tape) and left at room temperature for 30 days. In addition, 6 of the CR2032 batteries covered with each type of tape were placed in a cadaveric piglet esophageal model for a 4-h period and then compared to controls without tape for tissue pH changes and visible tissue injury. RESULTS: None of the tape-wrapped batteries showed voltage changes nor presented any hazard stemming from BB ingestion. All 6 tape covered batteries placed in the cadaveric piglet esophageal tissue model demonstrated no visible tissue injury and no change in tissue pH in contrast to the controls. Review of BB packaging language from various brands of commercially available CR2032 batteries showed that none had specific disposal recommendations. CONCLUSION: Both BB and electronics manufacturers should consider instructing the use of common household tape options to cover these BB immediately after removal from a device for either recycling or disposal. Such precautions may help to reduce related ingestion injuries in children.


Subject(s)
Foreign Bodies , Animals , Child , Electric Power Supplies , Esophagus , Family Characteristics , Foreign Bodies/prevention & control , Humans , Risk Reduction Behavior , Swine
2.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 279(2): 595-607, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34241671

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to systematically review the international literature for dynamic sleep magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a diagnostic tool in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), to perform meta-analysis on the quantitative data from the review, and to discuss its implications in future research and potential clinical applications. STUDY DESIGN: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed, followed by a detailed analysis of the relevant data that has been published on the topic. METHODS: Clinical key, Uptodate, Ovid, Ebscohost, Pubmed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Dynamed, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Once the search was completed, dynamic sleep MRI data were analyzed. RESULTS: Nineteen articles reported on 410 OSA patients and 79 controls that underwent dynamic sleep MRI and were included in this review. For meta-analysis of dynamic sleep MRI data, eight articles presented relevant data on 160 OSA patients. Obstruction was reported as follows: retropalatal (RP) 98%, retroglossal (RG) 41% and hypopharyngeal (HP) in 5%. Lateral pharyngeal wall (LPW) collapse was found in 35/73 (48%) patients. The combinations of RP + RG were observed in 24% and RP + RG + LPW in 16%. If sedation was used, 98% of study participants fell asleep compared to 66% of unsedated participants. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic sleep MRI has demonstrated that nearly all patients have retropalatal obstruction, retroglossal obstruction is common and hypopharyngeal obstruction is rare. Nearly all patients (98%) who are sedated are able to fall asleep during the MRI. There is significant heterogeneity in the literature and standardization is needed.


Subject(s)
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Pharynx , Sleep , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnostic imaging
3.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am ; 52(1): 149-161, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30309675

ABSTRACT

The pediatric button battery (BB) hazard has been recognized for several decades. In 2012, the National Button Battery Task Force was established, and most manufacturers have improved warning labels, more secure packaging, and made BB compartments in products are more secure. Tissue neutralization before BB removal (ie, honey or sucralfate/Carafate®) is an effective way to reduce the rate of BB injury. In absence of visible perforation, 0.25% sterile acetic acid esophageal tissue irrigation at time of BB removal is recommended as a neutralization strategy to mitigate injury progression. Future BB design changes could eliminate esophageal tissue injury.


Subject(s)
Electric Power Supplies/standards , Esophagus , Foreign Bodies/prevention & control , Foreign Bodies/surgery , Advisory Committees , Electric Power Supplies/adverse effects , Foreign Bodies/etiology , Humans , Pediatrics , Product Labeling/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...