[Preoperative breast imaging review: Interests and limits of specialized validation in oncology]. / Relecture préopératoire en sénologie : intérêts et limites d'une validation spécialisée en oncologie.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of systematic radiological review by breast specialist radiologist of malignant breast lesion imaging on the therapeutic management of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data collection was performed for patients with histopathologically proved breast cancer or suspicious breast lesion on imaging realized out of our institution. Patients underwent systematic mammary and axillary ultrasound, imaging review and if necessary complementary mammographic images. We analyzed the number of additional breast biopsies and axillary lymph node fine needle aspiration (FNA) with their histopathological results. We assessed their impact by comparing the final surgical treatment to the one planned before review. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventeen patients were included, with a total of 230 BIRADS 0, 4, 5 or 6 breast lesions. Seventy-six additional breast core biopsies were realized, leading to diagnose 43 additional BIRADS 6 lesions (24 infiltrative carcinomas, 9 DCIS and 10 atypical lesions) in 30 patients (13.82%). Thirty-five additional lymph node FNA were realized with 12 metastatic nodes and 3 false negative samples. Imaging review lead to change surgical treatment in 59 patients (27.19%, P<0.01) with modification in breast surgery in 37 patients, axillary surgery in 8 patients and both sites surgery in 12 patients. CONCLUSION: This study shows an impact of systematic radiological review by breast specialist radiologist in therapeutic management of patients treated for malignant breast lesion.

Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women With Local Ductal Carcinoma in Situ to Optimize Surgical Outcomes: Results From the Randomized Phase III Trial IRCIS.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the addition of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to standard radiologic evaluation on the re-intervention rate in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) undergoing breast-conserving surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with biopsy-proven DCIS corresponding to a unifocal microcalcification cluster or a mass less than 30 mm were randomly assigned to undergo MRI or standard evaluation. The primary end point was the re-intervention rate for positive or close margins (< 2 mm) in the 6 months after randomization ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01112254). RESULTS: A total of 360 patients from 10 hospitals in France were included in the study. Of the 352 analyzable patients, 178 were randomly assigned to the MRI arm, and 174 were assigned to the control arm. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 82 of 345 patients with the assessable end point were reoperated for positive or close margins within 6 months, resulting in a re-intervention rate of 20% (35 of 173) in the MRI arm and 27% (47 of 172) in the control arm. The absolute difference of 7% (95% CI, -2% to 16%) corresponded to a relative reduction of 26% (stratified odds ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.1; P = .13). When considering only the per-protocol population with an assessable end point, the difference was 9% (stratified odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.0; P = .05). Total mastectomy rates were 18% (31 of 176) in the MRI arm and 17% (30 of 173) in the control arm (stratified P = .93). For 100 lesions seen on MRI, nonmass-like enhancement was more predominant (82%) than mass enhancement (20%). Nevertheless, no specific morphologic and kinetic parameters for DCIS were identified. CONCLUSION: The study did not show sufficient surgical improvement with the use of preoperative MRI to be clinically relevant in DCIS staging. However, this could be reconsidered with the improvement of new MRI sequences and new modalities in magnetic resonance techniques.

Robotic Stereotactic Boost in Early Breast Cancer, a Phase 2 Trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of a single-fraction 8-Gy stereotactic boost after whole-breast irradiation in early breast cancer. The primary aim of this phase 2 study was to evaluate cutaneous breast toxicity using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4) 3 months after the boost. Secondary objectives were local control, survival, and patient-reported quality of life using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and breast-specific European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-BR 23 questionnaires. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with invasive ductal or lobular pT1-2 breast cancer treated with lumpectomy with clear margins and pN0 were included. Patients requiring chemotherapy were excluded. RESULTS: Twenty-eight eligible patients received the planned boost, and 26 had hormonal therapy. The procedure was technically successful without procedural complications. A median of 3 fiducials were tracked, and 115 beams were used. There were 22 acute grade 1 breast skin toxicities, including fibrosis, pain, erythema, or pigmentation. There were 2 acute grade 2 erythemas. Median skin boost dose was inversely correlated with acute skin toxicity (P = .028). QLQ-C30 scores revealed acute dyspnea and arm symptoms without correlation to the boost dose. Breast symptom QLQ-BR23 scores did not deteriorate, although upset with hair loss and systemic side effects of hormonal therapy were observed. After a median follow-up of 38 months, 1 patient had in-boost-field relapse, and there were 5 late grade 1 and 1 grade 2 skin toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Single-fraction stereotactic boost after conventional whole-breast irradiation in early breast cancer is feasible with minor toxicities. Quality of life and specific breast items showed excellent patient acceptance.

Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on the Surgical Treatment of Patients With Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Requiring Initial Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) in patients for whom mastectomy (MT) was, initially, the only conceivable surgical option. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2007 and 2012, 168 patients from a single center received nCT. Among these patients, we focused on the ones who received nCT (n = 119, [70.8%]) to decrease tumor size and thus to potentially allow a conservative surgical treatment. For these patients, MT was initially the only possible surgical treatment. RESULTS: Among the 119 patients included, 118 presented with an invasive ductal carcinoma. The mean tumor size before nCT, measured using magnetic resonance imaging, was 41.6 mm (range, 15-110 mm) and 25.3 mm (range, 0-90 mm) after nCT. Eighty-six patients (72.3%) underwent BCS, and oncoplastic techniques were used in 29 patients (33.6%). Only 4.3% (5 patients) of patients who were treated with BCS needed additional surgery because of positive surgical margins. The median follow-up was 41.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.2-48.3). Five-year overall survival after BCS and MT were 77% (95% CI, 63-92) and 77% (95% CI, 63-95) respectively. Five-year disease-free survival after BCS and MT were 74% (95% CI, 64-86) and 59% (95% CI, 40-89) (not significant), respectively. CONCLUSION: nCT for selective patients with "chemosensitive" breast tumor leads to a significant "MT to BCS" conversion rate. The type of surgery does not seem to affect the patient's overall and disease-free survival rates. Oncoplastic procedures can help to extend BCS after nCT.

Phase 1 clinical trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy concomitant with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allows stereotactic irradiation of thoracic tumors. It may have a real impact on patients who may not otherwise qualify for breast-conserving surgery. We conducted a phase 1 trial that tested 5 dose levels of SBRT concomitant with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before to surgery. The purpose of the current dose escalation study was to determine the maximum tolerable dose of SBRT in the treatment of breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To define toxicity, we performed dermatologic examinations that included clinical examinations by 2 separate physicians and technical evaluations using colorimetry, dermoscopy, and skin ultrasonography. Dermatologic examinations were performed before NACT, 36 and 56 days after the beginning of NACT, and before surgery. Surgery was performed 4 to 8 weeks after the last chemotherapy session. Efficacy, the primary endpoint, was determined by the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. RESULTS: Maximum tolerable dose was not reached. Only 1 case of dose-limiting toxicity was reported (grade 3 dermatologic toxicity), and SBRT was overall well tolerated. The pCR rate was 36%, with none being observed at the first 2 dose levels, and the highest rate being obtained at dose level 3 (25.5 Gy delivered in 3 fractions). Furthermore, the breast-conserving surgery rate was up to 92% compared with an 8% total mastectomy rate. No surgical complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that SBRT can be safely combined with NACT. Regarding the efficacy endpoints, this trial showed promising results in terms of pCR rate (36%) and breast-conserving rate (92%). The findings provide a strong rationale for extending the study into a phase 2 trial. In view of the absence of correlation between dose and pCR, and given that the data from dose level 3 met the statistical requirements, a dose of 25.5 Gy in 3 fractions should be used for the phase 2 trial.

Robotic stereotactic radioablation concomitant with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast tumors.

PURPOSE: Robotic stereotactic radioablation (RSR) allows stereotactic irradiation of thoracic tumors; however, it has never been used for breast tumors and may have a real potential. We conducted a Phase I study, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), a two-level dose-escalation study (6.5 Gy x 3 fractions and 7.5 Gy x 3 fractions) using RSR and breast-conserving surgery followed by conventional radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To define toxicity, we performed a dermatologic exam (DE) including clinical examination by two independent observers and technical examination by colorimetry, dermoscopy, and skin ultrasound. DE was performed before NACT (DE0), at 36 days (DE1), at 56 days (DE2), after the NACT treatment onset, and before surgery (DE3). Surgery was performed 4-8 weeks after the last chemotherapy session. A pathologic examination was also performed. RESULTS: There were two clinical complete responses and four clinical partial responses at D56 and D85. Maximum tolerable dose was not reached. All patients tolerated RSR with no fatigue; 2 patients presented with mild pain after the third fraction of the treatment. There was no significant toxicity measured with ultrasound and dermoscopy tests. Postoperative irradiation (50 Gy) has been delivered without toxicity. CONCLUSION: The study showed the feasibility of irradiation with RSR combined with chemotherapy and surgery for breast tumors. There was no skin toxicity at a dose of 19.5 Gy or 22.5 Gy delivered in three fractions combined with chemotherapy. Lack of toxicity suggested that the dose could be increased further. Pathologic response was acceptable.

Value of MRI in the surgical planning of invasive lobular breast carcinoma: a prospective and a retrospective study of 57 cases: comparison with physical examination, conventional imaging, and histology.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the surgical planning of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC)-a diagnostic challenge for radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with histologically proven ILC were studied between 1998 and 2006. All patients underwent physical examination, mammography, ultrasound, and MRI. All anomalies detected were graded using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification, and careful research was made for the presence of multifocal/multicentric disease. RESULTS: On MRI, 72% of images were visualized as masses and 18% corresponded to non-mass-like enhancements. The size correlations, compared with histological findings, were .88 (MRI; P<.001), .57 (ultrasound), .53 (physical examination), and .40 (mammography). The kappa correlations for multifocality were .87 (MRI), .22 (ultrasound), and .22 (mammography). MRI had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 87%. Forty-nine percent of therapeutic strategy cases were modified. CONCLUSION: MRI is unquestionably valuable for the management of ILC. It provides the most accurate estimate of tumor size and is highly sensitive for multifocal disease. Its main drawback is its lack of specificity, which requires preoperative histological verification. MRI often justifies the modification of the initial therapeutic strategy, generally ruling out conservative procedures.

Long-term results of hypofractionated radiotherapy and hormonal therapy without surgery for breast cancer in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate early and late reactions, local control, disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival of elderly breast cancer patients treated with definitive once-a-week hypofractionated radiotherapy together with hormonal therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1987 and 1999, 115 patients with a median age of 83 presenting with 124 non-metastatic breast carcinoma were treated with definitive once weekly hypofractionated radiotherapy associated with hormonal therapy. The main reasons for adopting this schedule were patient refusal of surgery, very old age, locally advanced case, and/or comorbid disease. Radiation was delivered as once-a-week, 6.5 Gy for a total breast dose of 32.5 Gy in five fractions, followed with 1-3 fractions of 6.5 Gy to the tumour site. The median follow-up was 41 months. RESULTS: Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy led to 56% reduction of the tumour volume. Late reactions occurred in 46 patients; they were mild to moderate in 87% of these patients. The Kaplan-Meier rate was 52% of patients, with 6% experiencing grade 3 reactions. The 5-year local progression-free rate was 78%. The corresponding cause-specific survival was 71%, and was influenced by T classification, nodal status, oestrogen receptors and the total dose. The first three factors retained an independent prognostic impact on multivariate analysis. The 5-year overall survival was 38%. It was affected by the T classification, lymph node involvement and the performance status (PS). Using a multivariate analysis, only T classification and PS were identified as independent factors regarding overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive hypofractionated radiotherapy allows a good local control, with acceptable toxicity. This schedule associated with hormonal therapy is a good alternative to surgery in non-operable old patients and in case of patient refusal to surgery and to standard fractionation.

Vacuum-assisted breast biopsies. Experience at the Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center (Nice, France).

This article presents the results of the first 318 aspiration-guided breast macrobiopsies performed using a dedicated table at the Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center (Nice, France) between January 2001 and November 2002. A total of 288 procedures (90%) was performed for microcalcifications whereas that of 30 (10%) was performed for isolated opacities. There were 170 American College of Radiology (ACR) Category 4 (53.45%), 35 ACR 5 (11%), 111 ACR 3 (34.9%), and 2 ACR 2 lesions. There were 233 benign lesions that included 19 cases of atypical epithelial hyperplasia. Of the 85 malignant lesions, 33 had an invasive component. Seven of the atypical epithelial hyperplasia cases and all of the malignant lesions were managed surgically. Atypical epithelial hyperplasia was underestimated in 28.57% of the cases; ductal carcinomas in situ, in 21.15%. The positive predictive value of ACR 4 for the diagnosis of malignancy was 24.7% (42/128 cases), versus that of 12.6% for ACR 3 (14/97 cases). Among the 233 benign lesions, 128 were classified as ACR 4 and 6 as ACR 5 (all of these procedures obviated surgery). The advantages, drawbacks, and limitations of the technique are analyzed and indications are discussed, particularly for ACR 3 lesions.

Rhabdomyosarcoma of the breast.

AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the first imaging studies of a primary embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the breast in an adult woman. PATIENT: This 45-year-old woman was seen for investigation of a palpable mass in the left breast. Examinations included mammography, Doppler ultrasound, and MRI. The diagnosis was made after surgical biopsy. Treatment consisted in neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by quadrantectomy and interstitial curietherapy. Imaging studies were performed both prior to and during therapy (i.e., after three then after six courses of chemotherapy). Imaging findings were correlated with histopathological findings. RESULTS: Mammography was not very contributive as the breasts were dense, particularly in the external left quadrants. On ultrasound, the mass had a tissue density and sharp contours; the mass was not highly vascularized on Doppler. MRI revealed a mass that enhanced markedly on both early and late contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences and was hyperintense on T2-weighted sequences. MRI appeared to be the best technique for the evaluation of the residual tissue. CONCLUSION: Rhabdomyosarcoma is a rare tumor in adults; to our knowledge, this is the first report describing the imaging features and value of MRI for the work-up and follow-up of mammary rhabdomyosarcoma.