Substitution for PCP, disruption of prepulse inhibition and hyperactivity induced by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists: preferential involvement of the NR2B rather than NR2A subunit.

The non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist phencyclidine (PCP) is known to produce a discriminative stimulus in rats. The first aim of the present study was to investigate which NMDA receptor subtype(s) is involved in this effect of PCP. Rats were trained to discriminate PCP (2 mg/kg; i.p.) from saline in a two lever operant task. The NMDA channel blocker, (+)MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg; i.p.) and the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist SDZ 220-581 (3 mg/kg; i.p.) produced 76% of PCP-lever selection (ED50=0.045 and 2 mg/kg, respectively), whereas their respective inactive enantiomers (-)MK-801 (0.025-0.1 mg/kg) and SDZ 221-653 (2-5 mg/kg) induced less than 30% of PCP-appropriate responding. Another competitive NMDA antagonist, SDZ EAB-515 (30 mg/kg; i.p.), induced 63% of PCP-lever responding (ED50=23.48 mg/kg). The selective antagonist of NMDA receptors containing the NR1A/NR2B-subunits Ro 25-6981 (20 mg/kg; i.p.) resulted in a complete substitution (more than 80% of PCP-lever selection) for PCP (ED50=8.59 mg/kg). In contrast, the NR1A/NR2A NMDA receptor-preferring antagonist NVP-AAM077 (2-10 mg/kg; i.p.) failed to produce PCP-like discriminative stimuli. At high doses SDZ 220-581 (ED50=2.44), NVP-AAM077 (ED50=8.33) and SDZ EAB-515 (ED50=25.81) decreased the performance of the rats in this operant task. The ability of these NMDA receptor antagonists to disrupt the prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response and to alter locomotor activity was also studied. PCP (0.5-2 mg/kg; s.c.), SDZ 220-581 (0.5-5 mg/kg; s.c.), SDZ EAB-515 (1-30 mg/kg; i.p.) and Ro 25-6981 (5-20 mg/kg; i.p.) disrupted PPI and at high doses produced hyperlocomotion. In contrast, NVP-AAM077 (5-20 mg/kg; i.p.) did not disrupt PPI and reduced locomotor activity. In conclusion, it appears that the NMDA receptor containing the NR2B, rather than the NR2A subunit, may play a major role in the PCP-like discriminative stimulus. In addition, sensory motor gating disturbances associated with NMDA antagonists do not seem to result from a blockade of NR1/NR2A-containing NMDA receptors.

Evidence for regulation of body temperature in rats by dopamine D2 receptor and possible influence of D1 but not D3 and D4 receptors.

The dopamine D(3) receptor agonist PD 128907 decreased body temperature in the rat. The selective dopamine D(3) and D(4) receptor antagonists, A-437203 and L-745,870, respectively, did not prevent this effect. In contrast, PD 128907-induced hypothermia was antagonized by SCH 23390, a selective D(1) receptor antagonist, and by L-741,626, a selective D(2) receptor antagonist. Moreover, the selective D(2) receptor agonist trihydroxy-N-n-propylnoraporphine (TNPA) elicited a robust hypothermia which was prevented by pretreatment with L-741,626 but not by A-437203. In agreement with previous data obtained in D(3) knock-out mice, present results suggest that D(2) rather than D(3) receptors mediate dopamine receptor agonist-induced hypothermia in rats. In addition, it appears that both D(1) and D(2) receptors may be involved in a cooperative manner.

Behavioral effects of cannabinoid agents in animals.

Two subtypes of cannabinoid receptors have been identified to date, the CB1 receptor, essentially located in the CNS, but also in peripheral tissues, and the CB2 receptor, found only at the periphery. The identification of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC) as the major active component of marijuana (Cannabis sativa), the recent emergence of potent synthetic ligands and the identification of anandamide and sn-2 arachidonylglycerol as putative endogenous ligands for cannabinoid receptors in the brain, have contributed to advancing cannabinoid pharmacology and approaching the neurobiological mechanisms involved in physiological and behavioral effects of cannabinoids. Most of the agonists exhibit nonselective affinity for CB1/CB2 receptors, and delta9-THC and anandamide probably act as partial agonists. Some recently synthesized molecules are highly selective for CB2 receptors, whereas selective agonists for the CB1 receptors are not yet available. A small number of antagonists exist that display a high selectivity for either CB1 or CB2 receptors. Cannabinomimetics produce complex pharmacological and behavioral effects that probably involve numerous neuronal substrates. Interactions with dopamine, acetylcholine, opiate, and GABAergic systems have been demonstrated in several brain structures. In animals, cannabinoid agonists such as delta9-THC, WIN 55,212-2, and CP 55,940 produce a characteristic combination of four symptoms, hypothermia, analgesia, hypoactivity, and catalepsy. They are reversed by the selective CB1 receptor antagonist, SR 141716, providing good evidence for the involvement of CB1-related mechanisms. Anandamide exhibits several differences, compared with other agonists. In particular, hypothermia, analgesia, and catalepsy induced by this endogenous ligand are not reversed by SR 141716. Cannabinoid-related processes seem also involved in cognition, memory, anxiety, control of appetite, emesis, inflammatory, and immune responses. Agonists may induce biphasic effects, for example, hyperactivity at low doses and severe motor deficits at larger doses. Intriguingly, although cannabis is widely used as recreational drug in humans, only a few studies revealed an appetitive potential of cannabimimetics in animals, and evidence for aversive effects of delta9-THC, WIN 55,212-2, and CP 55,940 is more readily obtained in a variety of tests. The selective blockade of CB1 receptors by SR 141716 impaired the perception of the appetitive value of positive reinforcers (food, cocaine, morphine) and reduced the motivation for sucrose, beer and alcohol consumption, indicating that positive incentive and/or motivational processes could be under a permissive control of CB1-related mechanisms. There is little evidence that cannabinoid systems are activated under basal conditions. However, by using SR 141716 as a tool, a tonic involvement of a CB1-mediated cannabinoid link has been demonstrated, notably in animals suffering from chronic pain, faced with anxiogenic stimuli or highly motivational reinforcers. Some effects of SR 141716 also suggest that CB1-related mechanisms exert a tonic control on cognitive processes. Extensive basic research is still needed to elucidate the roles of cannabinoid systems, both in the brain and at the periphery, in normal physiology and in diseases. Additional compounds, such as selective CB1 receptor agonists, ligands that do not cross the blood brain barrier, drugs interfering with synthesis, degradation or uptake of endogenous ligand(s) of CB receptors, are especially needed to understand when and how cannabinoid systems are activated. In turn, new therapeutic strategies would likely to emerge.

Involvement of central cannabinoid (CB1) receptors in the establishment of place conditioning in rats.

The involvement of cannabinoid processes in positive reinforcement was studied using an unbiased, one-compartment, conditioned place preference (CPP) procedure in rats. This was achieved by examining the ability of the selective antagonist of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor subtype, SR 141716, to counteract the CPP supported by classical reinforcers. The acquisition of CPP induced by cocaine (2 mg/kg), morphine (4 mg/kg) and food (standard chow and sucrose pellets) was dose-dependently blocked by pre-pairing administration of SR 141716 (0.03-3 mg/kg). However, SR 141716 (up to 10 mg/kg) did not significantly counteract the expression of cocaine-induced CPP. On the other hand, the synthetic CB receptor agonist, WIN 55212-2 (0.3-1 mg/kg), established a robust place aversion (CPA), as already described with other agonists, and CPP was never observed, even at 100-fold lower doses. The aversive effect of WIN 55212-2 was reversed by SR 141716 (0.3-1 mg/kg), suggesting that it was accounted for by the stimulation of CB1 receptors. These findings indicate that, on their own, CB receptor agonists are unable to generate the processes necessary to induce a pleasurable state in animals, as assessed in place conditioning procedures. Nevertheless, a cannabinoid link may be involved in the neurobiological events, allowing the perception of the rewarding value of various kinds of reinforcers. However, a permanent endogenous cannabinoid tone seems unlikely to be necessary to ensure the organism a basal hedonic level since, given alone, SR 141716 supported neither CPP nor CPA.

Selective inhibition of sucrose and ethanol intake by SR 141716, an antagonist of central cannabinoid (CB1) receptors.

SR 141716, a selective central CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist, markedly and selectively reduces sucrose feeding and drinking as well as neuropeptide Y-induced sucrose drinking in rats. SR 141716 also decreases ethanol consumption in C57BL/6 mice. In contrast, blockade of CB1 receptors only marginally affects regular chow intake or water drinking. The active doses of SR 141716 (0.3-3 mg/kg) are in the range known to antagonize the characteristic effects induced by cannabinoid receptor agonists. These results suggest for the first time that endogenous cannabinoid systems may modulate the appetitive value of sucrose and ethanol, perhaps by affecting the activity of brain reward systems.

Effects of dopaminergic D3-receptor-preferring ligands on the acquisition of place conditioning in rats.

The involvement of a D3 receptor-mediated control of dopamine (DA) function in motivational processes was investigated in rats by examining the ability of two D3 receptor-preferring ligands (7-OH-DPAT and l-nafadotride) to establish incentive learning and/or to modulate the reinforcing properties of food. This was done using a place conditioning procedure which consisted of repeated pairings of a drug (or food + drug) with a single environmental cue, the floor texture of an open field. (+/-)7-OH-DPAT, a partially selective D3 receptor agonist, produced a biphasic effect: the time spent on the drug-paired texture was reduced by 4 and 8µg/kg and lengthened by 4.0mg/kg, suggesting intrinsic aversive and appetitive potentials, depending on the dose. The D3 receptor preferring antagonist, l-nafadotride, did not establish place conditioning and seemed therefore devoid of intrinsic reinforcing properties. However, when food was provided during the conditioning sessions preceded by drug administration, a low dose of l-nafadotride (0.12mg/kg) but not higher doses, lengthened the time spent on the food-paired texture. Although the preferential affinity ratio of the two ligands in favour of the D3 vs. D2 subtype is low, these results suggest that DA function in the structures involved in incentive learning could be controlled through inhibitory D3 (or 'D2-like') receptor-mediated processes. Conditioned place aversion would indicate an impaired DA transmission due to a selective stimulation of these receptors, whereas their selective blockade would induce the inverse effect, providing that DA release was sufficient (as during eating) in the pathways involved in reward-related processes. The reversal of the effects of the two compounds at larger doses would likely result from an interaction with other subtypes of 'D2-like' receptors.