ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Older adults surviving critical illness often experience new or worsening functional impairments. Modifiable positive psychological constructs, like resilience, may mitigate post-intensive care morbidity. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is pre-ICU resilience associated with: (1) post-ICU survival; (2) the drop in post-ICU functional independence; and (3) a lesser decline of independence before versus after the ICU? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using Medicare-linked Health and Retirement Study surveys from 2006-2018. We included Older adults ≥65 years admitted to an ICU. We calculated resilience before ICU admission. The resilience measure was defined from the Simplified Resilience Score which was previously adapted and validated for the Health and Retirement Study. Resilience was scored using the leave-behind survey normalized to 0 (lowest resilience) to 12 (highest resilience) point scale. Outcomes were survival and probability of functional independence. We modeled survival using Gompertz models and independence using joint survival models adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical variables. We estimated average marginal effects to determine independence probabilities. RESULTS: Across 3,409 patients ≥65 years old admitted to ICUs, pre-existing frailty (30.5%) and cognitive impairment (24.3%) were common. Most patients were previously independent (82.7%). Mechanical ventilation occurred in 14.8% and sepsis in 43.2%. Highest versus lowest resilience had lower risk of post-ICU mortality (aHR 0.81 95% CI [0.70, 0.94]). Higher resilience was associated with greater likelihood in post-ICU independence (estimated probability of independence 5 years post-ICU in highest-to-lowest resilience: 0.53 CI 95% [0.33, 0.74], 0.47 [0.26, 0.68], 0.49 [0.28, 0.70], 0.36 [0.17, 0.55] p<0.01). Resilience was not associated with a difference in the drop of independence across resilience groups, nor a difference in declines of independence post-ICU. INTERPRETATION: ICU survivors with higher resilience had increased rates of survival and functional independence, though the slope of functional decline did not differ by resilience group pre- to post-ICU.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To examine trends in the prevalence of multiorgan dysfunction (MODS), utilization of multi-organ support (MOS), and mortality among patients undergoing cardiac surgery with MODS who received MOS in the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: 183 hospitals in the Premier Healthcare Database. PARTICIPANTS: Adults ≥18 years old undergoing high-risk elective or non-elective cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: none. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The exposure was time (consecutive calendar quarters) January 2008 and June 2018. We analyzed hospital data using day-stamped hospital billing codes and diagnosis and procedure codes to assess MODS prevalence, MOS utilization, and mortality. Among 129,102 elective and 136,190 non-elective high-risk cardiac surgical cases across 183 hospitals, 10,001 (7.7%) and 21,556 (15.8%) of patients developed MODS, respectively. Among patients who experienced MODS, 2,181 (22%) of elective and 5,425 (25%) of non-elective cardiac surgical cases utilized MOS. From 2008-2018, MODS increased in both high-risk elective and non-elective cardiac surgical cases. Similarly, MOS increased in both high-risk elective and non-elective cardiac surgical cases. As a component of MOS, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) increased over time. Over the study period, risk-adjusted mortality, in patients who developed MODS receiving MOS, increased in high-risk non-elective cardiac surgery and decreased in high-risk elective cardiac surgery, despite increasing MODS prevalence and MOS utilization (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing high-risk cardiac surgery in the United States, MODS prevalence and MOS utilization (including MCS) increased over time. Risk-adjusted mortality trends differed in elective and non-elective cardiac surgery. Further research is necessary to optimize outcomes among patients undergoing high-risk cardiac surgery.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Older adults are increasingly admitted to the ICU, and those with disabilities, dementia, frailty, and multimorbidity are vulnerable to adverse outcomes. Little is known about how pre-existing geriatric conditions have changed over time. RESEARCH QUESTION: How have changes in disability, dementia, frailty, and multimorbidity in older adults admitted to the ICU changed from 1998 through 2015? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Medicare-linked Health and Retirement Survey (HRS) data identifying patients 65 years of age and older admitted to an ICU between 1998 and 2015. ICU admission was the unit of analysis. Year of ICU admission was the exposure. Disability, dementia, frailty, and multimorbidity were identified based on responses to HRS surveys before ICU admission. Disability represented the need for assistance with ≥ 1 activity of daily living. Dementia used cognitive and functional measures. Frailty included deficits in ≥ 2 domains (physical, nutritive, cognitive, or sensory function). Multimorbidity represented ≥ 3 self-reported chronic diseases. Time trends in geriatric conditions were modeled as a function of year of ICU admission and were adjusted for age, sex, race or ethnicity, and proxy interview status. RESULTS: Across 6,084 ICU patients, age at admission increased from 77.6 years (95% CI, 76.7-78.4 years) in 1998 to 78.7 years (95% CI, 77.5-79.8 years) in 2015 (P < .001 for trend). The adjusted proportion of ICU admissions with pre-existing disability rose from 15.5% (95% CI, 12.1%-18.8%) in 1998 to 24.0% (95% CI, 18.5%-29.6%) in 2015 (P = .001). Rates of dementia did not change significantly (P = .21). Frailty increased from 36.6% (95% CI, 30.9%-42.3%) in 1998 to 45.0% (95% CI, 39.7%-50.2%) in 2015 (P = .04); multimorbidity rose from 54.4% (95% CI, 49.2%-59.7%) in 1998 to 71.8% (95% CI, 66.3%-77.2%) in 2015 (P < .001). INTERPRETATION: Rates of pre-existing disability, frailty, and multimorbidity in older adults admitted to ICUs increased over time. Geriatric principles need to be deeply integrated into the ICU setting.
