ABSTRACT
Background:Reperfusion is the most effective acute treatment for ischemic stroke within a narrow therapeutic time window. Ambulance-based telestroke is a novel way to improve stroke diagnosis and timeliness of treatment. This study aims to (1) assess the usability of our ambulance-based telestroke platform and (2) identify strengths and limitations of the system from the user's perspective.Materials and Methods:An ambulance was equipped with a mobile telemedicine system to perform remote stroke assessments. Scripted scenarios were performed by actors during transport and evaluated by physicians using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Scores obtained during transport were compared with original scripted NIHSS scores. Participants completed the System Usability Scale (SUS), NASA Task Load Index (NASA TLX), audio/video quality scale, and a modified Acceptability of Technology survey to assess perceptions and usability. In addition, interviews were conducted to evaluate user's experience. Descriptive analysis was used for all surveys. Weighted kappa statistics was used to compare the agreement in NIHSS scores.Results:Ninety-one percent (59/65) of mobile scenarios were completed. Median completion time was 9 min (range 4-17 min). There was moderate inter-rater agreement (weighted kappa = 0.46 [95% confidence interval 0.33-0.60, p = 0.0018]) among mobile and original scripted scenarios. The mean SUS score was 68.8 (standard deviation = 15.9). There was variability between usability score and formative feedback among all end-users in the areas of usability issues (i.e., audibility and equipment stability) and safety.Conclusion:Before implementation of a mobile prehospital telestroke program, the use of combined clinical simulation and Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology can improve the quality and optimization of the telemedicine system.
Subject(s)
Ambulances/organization & administration , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/drug therapy , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Attitude of Health Personnel , Humans , Quality of Health Care , Severity of Illness Index , Simulation TrainingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: In this 2-center study, we assessed the technical feasibility and reliability of a low cost, tablet-based mobile telestroke option for ambulance transport and hypothesized that the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) could be performed with similar reliability between remote and bedside examinations. METHODS: We piloted our mobile telemedicine system in 2 geographic regions, central Virginia and the San Francisco Bay Area, utilizing commercial cellular networks for videoconferencing transmission. Standardized patients portrayed scripted stroke scenarios during ambulance transport and were evaluated by independent raters comparing bedside to remote mobile telestroke assessments. We used a mixed-effects regression model to determine intraclass correlation of the NIHSS between bedside and remote examinations (95% confidence interval). RESULTS: We conducted 27 ambulance runs at both sites and successfully completed the NIHSS for all prehospital assessments without prohibitive technical interruption. The mean difference between bedside (face-to-face) and remote (video) NIHSS scores was 0.25 (1.00 to -0.50). Overall, correlation of the NIHSS between bedside and mobile telestroke assessments was 0.96 (0.92-0.98). In the mixed-effects regression model, there were no statistically significant differences accounting for method of evaluation or differences between sites. CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing a low-cost, tablet-based platform and commercial cellular networks, we can reliably perform prehospital neurologic assessments in both rural and urban settings. Further research is needed to establish the reliability and validity of prehospital mobile telestroke assessment in live patients presenting with acute neurologic symptoms.
