[Ethical principles for the design of a clinical trial in oncology]. / Règles éthiques pour la conception d'un essai clinique en oncologie.

Clinical research in the area of cancer is of utmost importance in order to improve patient care, both in terms of overall survival and quality of life. The implementation of clinical trials on medicinal products, now falling under EU Regulation 536/2014, is conditioned on prior scientific authorisation from the French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products and a favorable ethical opinion from a Research Ethics Committee (REC). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work is to report on the main problematic issues identified during the evaluation of oncology dossiers by the REC in order to present the expected elements and thus optimise the evaluation procedures. METHODS: The National Conference of the Research Ethics Committees analysed the questions raised by the REC during their evaluation of clinical trials of oncology drugs submitted to the European information system in 2022. RESULTS: Out of a total of fourteen dossiers, nine were subject to ethical questions on the protocol and all dossiers required modifications to the information documents. DISCUSSION: The heterogeneous quality of the dossiers reminds the need to submit well-argued, methodologically robust protocols with supervised research procedures that are safe for the participants. The drafting of information documents needs to be thoroughly reconsidered in order to present clear, concise, loyal and respectful documents for patients' rights.

EVIDENCE trial: design of a phase 2, randomized, controlled, multicenter study comparing flow diversion and traditional endovascular strategy in unruptured saccular wide-necked intracranial aneurysms.

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular treatment of large, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms with coils is associated with low rates of initial angiographic occlusion and high rates of recurrence. The Pipeline™ Embolization Device has shown high rates of complete occlusion in uncontrolled clinical series. METHODS: The study is a prospective, controlled, randomized, multicenter, phase 2 open-label trial. Intention-to-treat population includes age ≥18, unruptured saccular aneurysm located in the intra-dural area, neck diameter ≥4 and ≤10 mm, sac diameter ≥7 mm and ≤20 mm, "dome/neck" ratio is ≥1, diameter of the parent artery ≥2 mm and ≤5 mm, and no prior treatment of the aneurysm. Site can only participate if five patients have been previously treated with the Pipeline device. The primary end point of the study is complete occlusion of the aneurysm on angiogram performed 12 months after the endovascular procedure. Complete aneurysm occlusion is defined as the absence of visible blood flow, grade 1 according to the Raymond scale for the standard procedure group and grade 4 according to the grading scale of Kamran for the flow diverter group. RESULTS: The trial is currently enrolling and results of the data are pending the completion of enrollment and follow-up. CONCLUSION: This paper details the trial design of the French EVIDENCE phase 2 trial, a blinded, controlled randomized trial of wide-neck intra-dural aneurysms amenable to either traditional endovascular strategy or flow diversion with Pipeline device.

Bevacizumab and ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: an updated meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

PURPOSE: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the main cause of central vision loss among individuals aged 50 years or older in developed countries. The aim of this study was to review systematically the effect of bevacizumab compared to ranibizumab in patients with AMD at 1 year. METHODS: A systematic review was performed on Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library and Trial registers to October 2013. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies were randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing bevacizumab with ranibizumab in patients with neovascular AMD. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) estimates were synthesized under fixed- and random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q statistic and I(2). RESULTS: Five RCTs were included, representing 2,686 randomised patients. The meta-analysis confirmed the non-inferiority of bevacizumab compared to ranibizumab for change in visual acuity at 1 year (MD 0.57 letters, -1.80 to 0.66, p = 0.37, I(2) = 0 %). Better anatomical results were found for ranibizumab. Bevacizumab was associated with a 34 % increase in the number of patients with at least one serious systemic adverse event (OR 1.34, 1.08 to 1.66, p = 0.01, I(2) = 0 %). CONCLUSIONS: The pooled evidence confirmed that, compared with ranibizumab, bevacizumab was associated with equivalent effects on visual acuity at 1 year and with a higher risk of systemic serious adverse events. The current available data do not show which types of adverse events occur more frequently. In practice, bevacizumab should be used under a risk-management plan until further studies have been carried out to assess accurately the increased risk of systemic adverse events.

Fate of protocols submitted to a French national funding scheme: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The fate of clinical research projects funded by a grant has been investigated, but there is no information on the projects which did not receive funding. The fate of these projects is not known: do they apply for and/or receive funding from other sources or are they carried out without specific funding? PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to describe all clinical research projects submitted to a French national funding scheme (PHRC 2000) and to assess project initiation, completion and publication status taking into account whether or not they received funding. METHODS: This study is a retrospective cohort. The initial project characteristics were retrieved from the submission files and follow-up information was collected from the primary investigator. The percentages of projects started, completed and published were studied. RESULTS: A total of 481 projects were studied. Follow-up information was obtained for 366. Overall, 185 projects were initiated (51%); 139 of them were funded by the PHRC 2000 or other sources. The most commonly cited reason for not initiating a project was a lack of funding. Subsequently, 121 of the projects initiated were completed (65%). Accrual difficulties were the main reason cited to explain why studies were stopped prematurely or were still ongoing. Finally, 88 of the completed projects were published (73%). Amongst the completed projects, the only factor explaining publication was the statistical significance of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Obtainment of funding was a determining factor for project initiation. However, once initiated, the funding did not influence completion or publication.

ELLIPSE Study: a Phase 1 study evaluating the tolerance of bevacizumab nasal spray in the treatment of epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is a dominantly inherited genetic vascular disorder in which epistaxis is the most frequent manifestation, responsible for high morbidity. Management of this symptom has no standard, and local treatments are often aggressive. Their efficacy is variable and has not been proven. Anti-angiogenic drugs, such as bevacizumab, are a new treatment strategy. Its systemic administration in patients with HHT improves liver damage-related symptoms and epistaxis. To limit the systemic adverse effects of bevacizumab and to ease administration, a local administration seems suitable. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the tolerance of increasing doses of bevacizumab administered as a nasal spray in patients with HHT-related epistaxis. Secondary objectives were to study the bioavailability and efficacy of bevacizumab against epistaxis when given as a nasal spray. METHODOLOGY: Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, monocentric study performed sequentially (dose escalation) on 5 groups of 8 patients. Each group was made up of 6 verum and 2 placebos. Five increasing doses of bevacizumab nasal spray (25 mg/mL) were evaluated: 12.5, 25, 50, 75 and 100 mg. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included between October 2011 and October 2012. Bevacizumab nasal spray was well tolerated in all patients and the drug was not detected in their serum. No dose limiting toxicity was observed. No efficacy was observed at any dose in this study. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, bevacizumab nasal spray is a safe treatment of epistaxis in HHT. However, a randomized Phase 2 study is needed to determine its efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier #NCT01507480.

A new prognostic clinicopathological classification of pituitary adenomas: a multicentric case-control study of 410 patients with 8 years post-operative follow-up.

Pituitary adenomas are currently classified by histological, immunocytochemical and numerous ultrastructural characteristics lacking unequivocal prognostic correlations. We investigated the prognostic value of a new clinicopathological classification with grades based on invasion and proliferation. This retrospective multicentric case-control study comprised 410 patients who had surgery for a pituitary tumour with long-term follow-up. Using pituitary magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of cavernous or sphenoid sinus invasion, immunocytochemistry, markers of the cell cycle (Ki-67, mitoses) and p53, tumours were classified according to size (micro, macro and giant), type (PRL, GH, FSH/LH, ACTH and TSH) and grade (grade 1a: non-invasive, 1b: non-invasive and proliferative, 2a: invasive, 2b: invasive and proliferative, and 3: metastatic). The association between patient status at 8-year follow-up and age, sex, and classification was evaluated by two multivariate analyses assessing disease- or recurrence/progression-free status. At 8 years after surgery, 195 patients were disease-free (controls) and 215 patients were not (cases). In 125 of the cases the tumours had recurred or progressed. Analyses of disease-free and recurrence/progression-free status revealed the significant prognostic value (p < 0.001; p < 0.05) of age, tumour type, and grade across all tumour types and for each tumour type. Invasive and proliferative tumours (grade 2b) had a poor prognosis with an increased probability of tumour persistence or progression of 25- or 12-fold, respectively, as compared to non-invasive tumours (grade 1a). This new, easy to use clinicopathological classification of pituitary endocrine tumours has demonstrated its prognostic worth by strongly predicting the probability of post-operative complete remission or tumour progression and so could help clinicians choose the best post-operative therapy.

Medical device assessment: scientific evidence examined by the French national agency for health - a descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: Scientific evidence supports decision-making on the use of implantable medical devices (IMDs) in clinical practice, but IMDs are thought to be far less investigated than drugs. In the USA, studies have shown that approval process of high-risk medical devices was often based on insufficiently robust studies, suggesting that evidence prior to marketing may not be adequate. This study aimed to ascertain level of evidence available for IMDs access to reimbursement in France. METHODS: The objective was to examine the scientific evidence used for IMDs assessment by the French National Authority for Health. We collected all public documents summarising supportive clinical data and opinions concerning IMDs issued in 2008. An opinion qualifies the expected benefit (EB) of the IMD assessed as sufficient or insufficient, and if sufficient, the level of improvement of the expected benefit (IEB) on a scale from major (level I) to no improvement (level V). For each opinion, the study with the highest level of evidence of efficacy data, and its design were collected, or, where no studies were available, any other data sources used to establish the opinion. RESULTS: One hundred and two opinions were analysed, with 72 reporting at least one study used for assessment (70.6%). When considering the study with the highest level of evidence: 34 were clinical non-comparative studies (47.2%); 29 were clinical comparative studies of which 25 randomised controlled trials (40.3%); 5 were meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (6.9%); and 4 were systematic literature reviews (5.6%). The opinions were significantly different according to the study design (p < 0.001). The most frequent design for insufficient EB, IEB level V and IEB level IV was a non-comparative study (10/19, 52.6%; 15/24, 62.5%; and 8/15, 53.3%; respectively). For the 30 opinions with no supporting clinical study, 16 (53.3%) were based on an expert-based process, 9 (30.0%) were based on the conclusions of a previous opinion (all concluding IEB level V), and 5 (16.7%) reported no data (concluding insufficient EB for 4 and IEB level V for 1). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that level of evidence of clinical evaluation of IMDs is low and needs to be improved.

How to improve specific databases for clinical data in rare diseases? The example of hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia.

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of reference centres for rare diseases are multiple and mainly concern disease management and coordination between specialties, but they also have to improve knowledge through epidemiological studies and biomedical research. A first database was created by the hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia network to achieve these objectives, but facing a lack of data entered in the first database, we established a new database, named CIROCO (Clinical Investigation for the Rendu-Osler Cohort). This new database was constructed after the first database assessment. METHODS: We listed all difficulties encountered in the first database. We focused on three themes: database technical characteristics, database design (the number and characteristics of variables and the overall structure) and data entry. Based on this expertise, we defined the characteristics that should lead to an optimization of the database. We then compared the performance of these databases in terms of available data. RESULTS: The first database had 1273 fields spread out on 14 forms. A total of 838 patients was entered from 2001 to 2005 and among the 1273 fields, 205 (16%) had no data at all. The new database gathered 362 fields from the first database and 173 new fields. These fields were rearranged into 443 variables. A total of 1410 patients directly seen by the clinicians were entered. For patients seen by clinicians each variable used for defining the disease was available for at least 93% of patients. CONCLUSION: Items to be included in a specific database should be carefully selected in order to achieve good results and an epidemiological utility.

Cultured autologous oral mucosal epithelial cell sheet (CAOMECS) transplantation for the treatment of corneal limbal epithelial stem cell deficiency.

PURPOSE: Total bilateral corneal limbal epithelial stem cell deficiency (LSCD) cannot be treated with the surgical transplantation of autologous limbus or cultured autologous limbal epithelium. Transplantation of allogenic limbal epithelium is possible but requires immunosuppressive treatments. Cultured autologous oral mucosal epithelial cell sheet (CAOMECS) is a transparent, resistant, viable, and rapidly bioadhesive cell sheet, cultured with the UpCell-Insert technology (CellSeed, Inc., Tokyo, Japan), which allows for grafting onto the patient's corneal stroma without suturing. It has therefore been proposed as an alternative treatment for LSCD. METHODS: The objectives were to assess the safety and efficacy of CAOMECS, using a prospective Gehan's design. Safety was measured in terms of ocular adverse events during the study period, and efficacy was measured using a composite criterion based on epithelial defect, punctate epithelial keratopathy, conjunctival epithelium on the cornea, number of vascular pediculi, and vessel activity. RESULTS: CAOMECS was found to be safe and effective. In total, 26 eyes of 25 patients received a graft. Two patients experienced serious adverse events classified as not product related. Twenty-five patients were included in the efficacy analysis, as one patient was lost to follow-up. The treatment was found to be effective in 16 of 25 patients at 360 days after grafting. Of the 23 patients who completed follow-up at 360 days, 22 had no ulcers, and 19 showed a decrease in the severity of the punctate epithelial keratopathy. CONCLUSIONS: CAOMECS is a well-tolerated and safe tissue-engineered product. These results suggest its efficacy for reconstructing the ocular surface in patients with total bilateral corneal LSCD.

Pain tolerance and obstructive sleep apnea in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with painful conditions often suffer from sleep disturbances. However, changes in sleep pattern per se could also influence pain tolerance. Untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) causes major disturbances in sleep pattern. The aim of this study was to assess whether continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment in elderly patients with OSA would result in improved pain tolerance. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind crossover study. SETTING: Geriatric sleep center based in Antoine Charial University Hospital (Lyon, France). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 13 consecutive OSA patients aged 70 and older randomly assigned CPAP treatment (lowCPAP versus highCPAP). Eleven patients completed the study. MEASUREMENTS: Overnight sleep recording, electrical pain tolerance assessment, and visual analog scale for sleep quality were performed. RESULTS: Both low- and highCPAP treatment significantly improved respiratory parameters. However, compared with baseline, the electrical pain tolerance score was significantly enhanced (analgesic effect) only under highCPAP treatment (21.2 ± 10.9 versus 28.4 ± 16.0; P = .03). CONCLUSION: The treatment of OSA with CPAP would have an analgesic effect. This would represent a unique outcome attributed to CPAP treatment. Given the high prevalence of both OSA and chronic pain conditions in the elderly; our findings could hold many implications for very large segments of the elderly population.

Abstracting stage in population-based cancer registries: the example of oral cavity and oropharynx cancers.

Population-based cancer registries (PBCRs) are instruments to provide cancer incidence to promote cancer control and etiological research. A setting of mandatory (standard) variables is routinely collected for patient and tumor. One recommended variable is tumor stage, which supplies information on disease status and is an essential prognostic factor. However, it is not considered as necessary information to be collected by the PBCR. There are studies showing the value of stage as a prognostic variable to evaluate survival, socio-economic status, race and ethnics differences. Our aim is to analyze the feasibility of PBCRs in abstracting TNM for oral cavity and oropharynx. These topographies were selected due to the clinical accessibility of stage tumors by visual inspection and palpation. About 23% of the PBCRs who contributed to CI5-IX indicated their collection of TNM stage for all cancer sites. We analyzed 23,935 cases of oral cavity (OCC) and oropharynx cancer (OPC) from 13 PBCRs. Complete TNM stage for OCC was 52.7% for males and 47.6% for females; for OPC, it was 56% in both genders. Incomplete stage on OCC and OPC ranged from 22 to 25%. Missing was about 18-27% (most common in oral cavity). Missing stage was significantly higher in males for OCC aged > or =70 years, OR 1,64 (1.39-1.94). Our results demonstrate that OPC tend to have more stage, when compared with OCC. Even if it can be diagnosed by visual inspection, these results highlight the fact that information on stage can be a reliable indicator of access to healthcare and diagnosis awareness. Our results demonstrate that is feasible for PBCR to collect stage, although improving completeness of this information needs further technical training and international recommendation to adopt TNM stage as a standard variable for the PBCRs.

[Direct medical cost of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in anaemia treatment of chronic renal failure patient: a literature review]. / Coût médical direct des agents stimulant l'érythropoïèse dans le traitement de l'anémie chez le patient insuffisant rénal chronique: revue de la littérature.

INTRODUCTION: Management of anaemia in chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) represents an important medico-economic challenge because of the great number of patients and the cost of the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA). The aim of this study was to identify determinants of the costs associated with these treatments in order to choose, with equal efficacy, the most efficient ASE. METHOD: A bibliographic research was realised by Medline database interrogation. RESULTS: Among the direct medical costs, five studies showed that acquisition of epoetine alfa (EA) compared to darbepoetin alfa (DA) was less expensive. Concerning the costs associated with the route of administration, the subcutaneous injection (SC) of epoetine allowed a gain in costs because of the decrease of doses compared to the intravenous (IV) route. The switch from EA in SC to DA in IV, for hemodialysis patients, was associated with a reduction of the number of injections and with a treatment's cost lower by DA than by EA. Costs related to the regimen of administration, notably those related to nursing, medical and pharmaceutical time, were negligible towards those associated to the acquisition of the ASE. Finally, the costs of the therapeutic follow-up and treatment of the adverse effects of the ASE were similar between the EA and the DA. CONCLUSION: The costs associated with the prices of acquisition of the ASE, negotiated by the structure of care, represent the most important part of the direct medical costs.

Oral cavity cancer in developed and in developing countries: population-based incidence.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of oral cavity cancer (OCC) is not well documented because it is rarely described in accord with the anatomic definition but is usually grouped with oropharyngeal subsites. We studied the incidence of OCC in developed and in developing countries. METHODS: The age-standardized and age-specific incidence rates of OCC were calculated for the period 1998-2002, using the topographic definition used by the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC), based on data from CI5-IX. RESULTS: The highest rates are observed in Pakistan, Brazil, India, and France and were consistent with country-specific risk factors and their prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: In developing countries, people are exposed to a wider range of risk factors, starting at younger ages, and primary prevention measures and policies are needed. Awareness of professionals must be improved to identify people at risk and target them for prevention and to minimize the consequences of OCC.

Alcohol intake and oral cavity cancer risk among men in a prospective study in Kerala, India.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of alcohol drinking and patterns of consumption in oral cancer incidence and mortality in a cohort study using data from the Trivandrum Oral Cancer Screening Study, India. METHODS: At baseline, the study participants completed a lifestyle questionnaire including items on frequency and duration of alcohol consumption. They were followed up for oral cancer incidence and mortality. Data from 32 347 subjects, of whom 134 eventually developed oral cancer, were analysed to estimate risk of oral cancer incidence and mortality according to drinking patterns, using a Cox regression model adjusted for age, religion, education, occupation, body mass index (BMI), standard of living index, chewing habits, smoking habits, and vegetable and fruit intake. RESULTS: Current and past drinkers were each associated with significantly increased risk of developing oral cancer. The hazard ratio increased significantly by 49% (95% CI = 1-121%) among current drinkers and 90% (95% CI = 13-218%) among past drinkers. A significant dose-response relationship between intake frequency, duration and oral cancer risk (incidence and mortality) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: As with other lifestyle factors, alcohol intake plays an important role in oral carcinogenesis in this population, and understanding this role is relevant to developing public health policies targeting at-risk population.

Inadequate dissemination of phase I trials: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Drug development is ideally a logical sequence in which information from small early studies (Phase I) is subsequently used to inform and plan larger, more definitive studies (Phases II-IV). Phase I trials are unique because they generally provide the first evaluation of new drugs in humans. The conduct and dissemination of Phase I trials have not previously been empirically evaluated. Our objective was to describe the initiation, completion, and publication of Phase I trials in comparison with Phase II-IV trials. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We reviewed a cohort of all protocols approved by a sample of ethics committees in France from January 1, 1994 to December 31, 1994. The comparison of 140 Phase I trials with 304 Phase II-IV trials, showed that Phase I studies were more likely to be initiated (133/140 [95%] versus 269/304 [88%]), more likely to be completed (127/133 [95%] versus 218/269 [81%]), and more likely to produce confirmatory results (71/83 [86%] versus 125/175 [71%]) than Phase II-IV trials. Publication was less frequent for Phase I studies (21/127 [17%] versus 93/218 [43%]), even if only accounting for studies providing confirmatory results (18/71 [25%] versus 79/125 [63%]). CONCLUSIONS: The initiation, completion, and publications of Phase I trials are different from those of other studies. Moreover, the results of these trials should be published in order to ensure the integrity of the overall body of scientific knowledge, and ultimately the safety of future trial participants and patients.

Prognostic factors of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis from a registry of 72 patients.

CONCLUSIONS: The database revealed severity factors relating to human papillomavirus (HPV) type and age at diagnosis. While not exhaustive, the database is easy to use and could serve for a European multicentre epidemiological study. OBJECTIVES: To propose a database as a starting point for a national registry and to estimate prognostic factors in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study carried out in a tertiary care teaching hospital. From January 2005 to July 2007, epidemiological, clinical and treatment information on patients undergoing endoscopy for RRP in the department was entered in a database. Data were collected on three forms: the first comprised information about disease history before assessment in the department, the second about the disease and its treatment in the department, and the third about evolution after treatment. RESULTS: Data on 72 patients were entered into an RRP database between January 2005 and July 2007. In all, 82% had already been treated for RRP in a different centre; 24 had juvenile-onset (JORRP) and 48 adult-onset (AORRP) papillomatosis. Cidovir injections had been administered to 91% of the patients. Histology found nine cases of dysplasia, one of carcinoma in situ and one of invasive carcinoma. Subglottic and tracheal locations were significantly more frequent in JORRP than in AORRP, as were the maximum Derkay scores and annual numbers of endoscopies. Patients with type 11 HPV had significantly more endoscopies per year than those with type 6.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: an estimate of the average cost in the hospital setting in France.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a severe drug adverse effect with possible dramatic consequences. The risk is 0.1% to 5%. The costs of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in France were estimated using the Programme Médicalisé des Systèmes d'Information (PMSI) national discharge database. Hospitalizations with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia were identified using diagnostic codes. Costs were assessed from the perspective of the French Sickness Fund or hospitals. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia could be the reason of admission or could occur during the stay and lead to a different tariff or to additional costs associated with extra length of stay. Direct costs were also estimated from experts' opinions. A sensitivity analysis was performed from data collected in 1 center. During 2005, 445 hospitalizations with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia codes were identified. For 45 patients, the main diagnosis was heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; for the remaining 400 patients, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia occurred during the hospital stay. Tariffs and extra costs were used to estimate an overall average cost of 3230 for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. For patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia as main diagnosis, the average cost was 3400; for the patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia that occurred during the stay, 1910 was due to an increased of the tariff and 3348 to an increased length of stay. Estimated direct costs of an episode were 3350 to 3700. Different methods were used to arrive at an estimated cost of 3500 for a heparin-induced thrombocytopenia episode for inpatients. One limitation of the study is that heparin-induced thrombocytopenia tends to be underreported by physicians during hospitalization.