Intracochlear overdrive: Characterizing nonlinear wave amplification in the mouse apex.

In this study, we explore nonlinear cochlear amplification by analyzing basilar membrane (BM) motion in the mouse apex. Through in vivo, postmortem, and mechanical suppression recordings, we estimate how the cochlear amplifier nonlinearly shapes the wavenumber of the BM traveling wave, specifically within a frequency range where the short-wave approximation holds. Our findings demonstrate that a straightforward mathematical model, depicting the cochlear amplifier as a wavenumber modifier with strength diminishing monotonically as BM displacement increases, effectively accounts for the various experimental observations. This empirically derived model is subsequently incorporated into a physics-based "overturned" framework of cochlear amplification [see Altoè, Dewey, Charaziak, Oghalai, and Shera (2022), J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 152, 2227-2239] and tested against additional experimental data. Our results demonstrate that the relationships established within the short-wave region remain valid over a much broader frequency range. Furthermore, the model, now exclusively calibrated to BM data, predicts the behavior of the opposing side of the cochlear partition, aligning well with recent experimental observations. The success in reproducing key features of the experimental data and the mathematical simplicity of the resulting model provide strong support for the "overturned" theory of cochlear amplification.

Estimating cochlear impulse responses using frequency sweeps.

Cochlear mechanics tends to be studied using single-location measurements of intracochlear vibrations in response to acoustical stimuli. Such measurements, due to their invasiveness and often the instability of the animal preparation, are difficult to accomplish and, thus, ideally require stimulus paradigms that are time efficient, flexible, and result in high resolution transfer functions. Here, a swept-sine method is adapted for recordings of basilar membrane impulse responses in mice. The frequency of the stimulus was exponentially swept from low to high (upward) or high to low (downward) at varying rates (from slow to fast) and intensities. The cochlear response to the swept-sine was then convolved with the time-reversed stimulus waveform to obtain first and higher order impulse responses. Slow sweeps of either direction produce cochlear first to third order transfer functions equivalent to those measured with pure tones. Fast upward sweeps, on the other hand, generate impulse responses that typically ring longer, as observed in responses obtained using clicks. The ringing of impulse response in mice was of relatively small amplitude and did not affect the magnitude spectra. It is concluded that swept-sine methods offer flexible and time-efficient alternatives to other approaches for recording cochlear impulse responses.

Overturning the mechanisms of cochlear amplification via area deformations of the organ of Corti.

The mammalian ear embeds a cellular amplifier that boosts sound-induced hydromechanical waves as they propagate along the cochlea. The operation of this amplifier is not fully understood and is difficult to disentangle experimentally. In the prevailing view, cochlear waves are amplified by the piezo-electric action of the outer hair cells (OHCs), whose cycle-by-cycle elongations and contractions inject power into the local motion of the basilar membrane (BM). Concomitant deformations of the opposing (or "top") side of the organ of Corti are assumed to play a minor role and are generally neglected. However, analysis of intracochlear motions obtained using optical coherence tomography calls this prevailing view into question. In particular, the analysis suggests that (i) the net local power transfer from the OHCs to the BM is either negative or highly inefficient; and (ii) vibration of the top side of the organ of Corti plays a primary role in traveling-wave amplification. A phenomenological model derived from these observations manifests realistic cochlear responses and suggests that amplification arises almost entirely from OHC-induced deformations of the top side of the organ of Corti. In effect, the model turns classic assumptions about spatial impedance relations and power-flow direction within the sensory epithelium upside down.

The Elusive Cochlear Filter: Wave Origin of Cochlear Cross-Frequency Masking.

The mammalian cochlea achieves its remarkable sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and dynamic range by spatially segregating the different frequency components of sound via nonlinear processes that remain only partially understood. As a consequence of the wave-based nature of cochlear processing, the different frequency components of complex sounds interact spatially and nonlinearly, mutually suppressing one another as they propagate. Because understanding nonlinear wave interactions and their effects on hearing appears to require mathematically complex or computationally intensive models, theories of hearing that do not deal specifically with cochlear mechanics have often neglected the spatial nature of suppression phenomena. Here we describe a simple framework consisting of a nonlinear traveling-wave model whose spatial response properties can be estimated from basilar-membrane (BM) transfer functions. Without invoking jazzy details of organ-of-Corti mechanics, the model accounts well for the peculiar frequency-dependence of suppression found in two-tone suppression experiments. In particular, our analysis shows that near the peak of the traveling wave, the amplitude of the BM response depends primarily on the nonlinear properties of the traveling wave in more basal (high-frequency) regions. The proposed framework provides perhaps the simplest representation of cochlear signal processing that accounts for the spatially distributed effects of nonlinear wave propagation. Shifting the perspective from local filters to non-local, spatially distributed processes not only elucidates the character of cochlear signal processing, but also has important consequences for interpreting psychophysical experiments.

Reflection-Source Emissions Evoked with Clicks and Frequency Sweeps: Comparisons Across Levels.

According to coherent reflection theory, otoacoustic emissions (OAE) evoked with clicks (clicked-evoked, CE) or tones (stimulus frequency, SF) originate via the same mechanism. We test this hypothesis in gerbils by investigating the similarity of CE- and SFOAEs across a wide range of stimulus levels. The results show that OAE transfer functions measured in response to clicks and sweeps have nearly equivalent time-frequency characteristics, particularly at low stimulus levels. At high stimulus levels, the two OAE types are more dissimilar, reflecting the different dynamic properties of the evoking stimulus. At mid to high stimulus levels, time-frequency analysis reveals contributions from at least two OAE source components of varying latencies. Interference between these components explains the emergence of strong spectral microstructure. Time-frequency filtering based on mean basilar-membrane (BM) group delays (τBM) shows that late-latency OAE components (latency ~ 1.6τBM) dominate at low stimulus intensities and exhibit highly compressive growth with increasing stimulus intensity. In contrast, early-latency OAE components (~ 0.7τBM) are small at low stimulus levels but can come to dominate the overall response at higher intensities. Although the properties of long-latency OAEs are consistent with an origin via coherent reflection near the peak of the traveling wave, the generation place and/or mechanisms responsible for the early-latency OAE components warrant further investigation. Because their delay remains in constant proportion to τBM across sound intensity, long-latency OAEs, whether evoked with tones or clicks, can be used to predict characteristics of cochlear processing, such as the sharpness of frequency tuning, even at high stimulus levels.

Asymmetry and Microstructure of Temporal-Suppression Patterns in Basilar-Membrane Responses to Clicks: Relation to Tonal Suppression and Traveling-Wave Dispersion.

The cochlea's wave-based signal processing allows it to efficiently decompose a complex acoustic waveform into frequency components. Because cochlear responses are nonlinear, the waves arising from one frequency component of a complex sound can be altered by the presence of others that overlap with it in time and space (e.g., two-tone suppression). Here, we investigate the suppression of basilar-membrane (BM) velocity responses to a transient signal (a test click) by another click or tone. We show that the BM response to the click can be reduced when the stimulus is shortly preceded or followed by another (suppressor) click. More surprisingly, the data reveal two curious dependencies on the interclick interval, Δt. First, the temporal suppression curve (amount of suppression vs. Δt) manifests a pronounced and nearly periodic microstructure. Second, temporal suppression is generally strongest not when the two clicks are presented simultaneously (Δt = 0), but when the suppressor click precedes the test click by a time interval corresponding to one to two periods of the best frequency (BF) at the measurement location. By systematically varying the phase of the suppressor click, we demonstrate that the suppression microstructure arises from alternating constructive and destructive interference between the BM responses to the two clicks. And by comparing temporal and tonal suppression in the same animals, we test the hypothesis that the asymmetry of the temporal-suppression curve around Δt = 0 stems from cochlear dispersion and the well-known asymmetry of tonal suppression around the BF. Just as for two-tone suppression, BM responses to clicks are most suppressed by tones at frequencies just above the BF of the measurement location. On average, the frequency place of maximal suppressibility of the click response predicted from temporal-suppression data agrees with the frequency at which tonal suppression peaks, consistent with our hypothesis.

A comparison of ear-canal-reflectance measurement methods in an ear simulator.

Ear-canal reflectance has been researched extensively for diagnosing conductive hearing disorders and compensating for the ear-canal acoustics in non-invasive measurements of the auditory system. Little emphasis, however, has been placed on assessing measurement accuracy and variability. In this paper, a number of ear-canal-reflectance measurement methods reported in the literature are utilized and compared. Measurement variation seems to arise chiefly from three factors: the residual ear-canal length, the ear-probe insertion angle, and the measurement frequency bandwidth. Calculation of the ear-canal reflectance from the measured ear-canal impedance requires estimating the ear-canal characteristic impedance in situ. The variability in ear-canal estimated characteristic impedance and reflectance due to these principal factors is assessed in an idealized controlled setup using a uniform occluded-ear simulator. In addition, the influence of this measurement variability on reflectance-based methods for calibrating stimulus levels is evaluated and, by operating the condenser microphone of the occluded-ear simulator as an electro-static speaker, the variability in estimating the emitted pressure from the ear is determined. The various measurement methods differ widely in their robustness to variations in the three principal factors influencing the accuracy and variability of ear-canal reflectance.

On the calculation of reflectance in non-uniform ear canals.

Ear-canal reflectance is useful for quantifying the conductive status of the middle ear because it can be measured non-invasively at a distance from the tympanic membrane. Deriving the ear-canal reflectance requires decomposing the total acoustic pressure into its forward- and reverse-propagating components. This decomposition is conveniently achieved using formulas that involve the input and characteristic impedances of the ear canal. The characteristic impedance is defined as the ratio of sound pressure to volume flow of a propagating wave and, for uniform waveguides, the plane-wave characteristic impedance is a real-valued constant. However, in non-uniform waveguides, the characteristic impedances are complex-valued quantities, depend on the direction of propagation, and more accurately characterize a propagating wave in a non-uniform ear canal. In this paper, relevant properties of the plane-wave and spherical-wave characteristic impedances are reviewed. In addition, the utility of the plane-wave and spherical-wave reflectances in representing the reflection occurring due to the middle ear, calibrating stimulus levels, and characterizing the emitted pressure in simulated non-uniform ear canals is investigated and compared.

Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.

OBJECTIVE: The stimuli used to evoke otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are typically calibrated based on the total SPL measured at the probe microphone. However, due to the acoustics of the ear-canal space (i.e., standing-wave interference), this method can underestimate the stimulus pressure reaching the tympanic membrane at certain frequencies. To mitigate this effect, stimulus calibrations based on forward pressure level (FPL) can be applied. Furthermore, the influence of ear-canal acoustics on measured OAE levels can be compensated by expressing them in emitted pressure level (EPL). To date, studies have used artificial shallow versus deep probe fits to assess the effects of calibration method on changes in probe insertion. In an attempt to better simulate a clinical setting, the combined effects of FPL calibration of stimulus level and EPL compensation of OAE level on response variability during routine (noncontrived) probe fittings were examined. DESIGN: The distortion component of the distortion-product OAE (DPOAE) and the stimulus-frequency OAE (SFOAE) were recorded at low and moderate stimulus levels in 20 normal-hearing young-adult subjects across a five-octave range. In each subject, three different calibration approaches were compared: (1) the conventional SPL-based stimulus calibration with OAE levels expressed in SPL; (2) FPL stimulus calibration with OAEs expressed in SPL; and (3) FPL stimulus calibration with OAEs expressed in EPL. Test and retest measurements were obtained during the same session and, in a subset of subjects, several months after the initial test. The effects of these different procedures on the inter- and intra-subject variability of OAE levels were assessed across frequency and level. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the inter-subject variability of OAE levels across the three calibration approaches. However, there was a significant effect on OAE intra-subject variability. The FPL/EPL approach resulted in the overall lowest test-rest differences in DPOAE level for frequencies above 4 kHz, where standing-wave interference is strongest. The benefit was modest, ranging on average from 0.5 to 2 dB and was strongest at the lower stimulus level. SFOAE level variability did not show significant differences among the three procedures, perhaps due to insufficient signal-to-noise ratio and nonoptimized stimulus levels. Correlations were found between the short-term replicability of DPOAEs and the benefit derived from the FPL/EPL procedure: the more variable the DPOAE, the stronger the benefit conferred by the advanced calibration methods. CONCLUSIONS: Stimulus and response calibration procedures designed to mitigate the effects of standing-wave interference on both the stimulus and the OAE enhance the repeatability of OAE measurements and reduce their dependence on probe position, even when probe shifts are small. Modest but significant improvements in short-term test-retest repeatability were observed in the mid- to high-frequency region when using combined FPL/EPL procedures. The authors posit that the benefit will be greater in a more heterogeneous group of subjects and when different testers participate in the fitting and refitting of subjects, which is a common practice in the audiology clinic. The impact of calibration approach on OAE inter-subject variability was not significant, possibly due to a homogeneous subject population and because factors other than probe position are at play.

Cochlear Frequency Tuning and Otoacoustic Emissions.

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) evoked from the inner ear are the barely audible, signature byproduct of the delicate hydromechanical amplifier that evolved within its bony walls. Compared to the sounds evoked from the ears of common laboratory animals, OAEs from human ears have exceptionally long delays, typically exceeding those of cats, guinea pigs, and chinchillas by a factor of two to three. This review asks "Why are human OAE delays so long?" and recounts efforts to locate answers in the characteristics of mechanical frequency selectivity in the inner ear. The road to understanding species differences in OAE delay leads to the identification of new invariances and to the emergence of new questions.

Temporal Suppression of Clicked-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and Basilar-Membrane Motion in Gerbils.

Otoacoustic emissions evoked by a click (CEOAEs) can be reduced if the evoking sound is preceded or followed by another ("suppressor") click. Studying the temporal suppression of CEOAEs can provide insights into the dynamics of cochlear nonlinearity. However, temporal suppression has never been measured in basilar-membrane (BM) motion. Thus, it remains unclear whether the characteristics of CEOAE temporal suppression are reflected in BM responses. Here we simultaneously measured ear-canal pressure and BM velocity (laser Doppler vibrometry) in response to clicks in gerbil. When the suppressor click preceded the evoking click, CEOAEs were maximally suppressed for interclick intervals (ICIs) equivalent to ~2 periods of the analyzed frequency (9-14 kHz). Maximal temporal suppression at nonzero ICIs has been previously observed in human CEOAEs. BM responses to clicks were maximally reduced when the suppressor click preceded the evoking one by ~1 period of the characteristic frequency (CF ~14 kHz). Thus, the "delayed" characteristics of CEOAE temporal suppression are reflected in BM motion, although on a different time scale. When the suppressor click followed the evoking click, CEOAEs were augmented rather than suppressed, while enhancement was not observed in BM motion at the CF. This result indicates that some aspects of CEOAE temporal suppression are intrinsic to CEOAE generation mechanisms and/or to places that are not reflected in a BM motion at a single-location.

Spectral Ripples in Round-Window Cochlear Microphonics: Evidence for Multiple Generation Mechanisms.

The cochlear microphonic (CM) results from the vector sum of outer hair cell transduction currents excited by a stimulus. The classical theory of CM generation-that the response measured at the round window is dominated by cellular sources located within the tail region of the basilar membrane (BM) excitation pattern-predicts that CM amplitude and phase vary little with stimulus frequency. Contrary to expectations, CM amplitude and phase-gradient delay measured in response to low-level tones in chinchillas demonstrate a striking, quasiperiodic pattern of spectral ripples, even at frequencies > 5 kHz, where interference with neurophonic potentials is unlikely. The spectral ripples were reduced in the presence of a moderate-level saturating tone at a nearby frequency. When converted to the time domain, only the delayed CM energy was diminished in the presence of the saturator. We hypothesize that the ripples represent an interference pattern produced by CM components with different phase gradients: an early-latency component originating within the tail region of the BM excitation and two delayed components that depend on active cochlear processing near the peak region of the traveling wave. Using time windowing, we show that the early, middle, and late components have delays corresponding to estimated middle-ear transmission, cochlear forward delays, and cochlear round-trip delays, respectively. By extending the classical model of CM generation to include mechanical and electrical irregularities, we propose that middle components are generated through a mechanism of "coherent summation" analogous to the production of reflection-source otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), while the late components arise through a process of internal cochlear reflection related to the generation of stimulus-frequency OAEs. Although early-latency components from the passive tail region typically dominate the round-window CM, at low stimulus levels, substantial contributions from components shaped by active cochlear processing provide a new avenue for improving CM measurements as assays of cochlear health.

Using Cochlear Microphonic Potentials to Localize Peripheral Hearing Loss.

The cochlear microphonic (CM) is created primarily by the receptor currents of outer hair cells (OHCs) and may therefore be useful for identifying cochlear regions with impaired OHCs. However, the CM measured across the frequency range with round-window or ear-canal electrodes lacks place-specificity as it is dominated by cellular sources located most proximal to the recording site (e.g., at the cochlear base). To overcome this limitation, we extract the "residual" CM (rCM), defined as the complex difference between the CM measured with and without an additional tone (saturating tone, ST). If the ST saturates receptor currents near the peak of its excitation pattern, then the rCM should reflect the activity of OHCs in that region. To test this idea, we measured round-window CMs in chinchillas in response to low-level probe tones presented alone or with an ST ranging from 1 to 2.6 times the probe frequency. CMs were measured both before and after inducing a local impairment in cochlear function (a 4-kHz notch-type acoustic trauma). Following the acoustic trauma, little change was observed in the probe-alone CM. In contrast, rCMs were reduced in a frequency-specific manner. When shifts in rCM levels were plotted vs. the ST frequency, they matched well the frequency range of shifts in neural thresholds. These results suggest that rCMs originate near the cochlear place tuned to the ST frequency and thus can be used to assess OHC function in that region. Our interpretation of the data is supported by predictions of a simple phenomenological model of CM generation and two-tone interactions. The model indicates that the sensitivity of rCM to acoustic trauma is governed by changes in cochlear response at the ST tonotopic place rather than at the probe place. The model also suggests that a combination of CM and rCM measurements could be used to assess both the site and etiology of sensory hearing loss in clinical applications.

Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) provide an acoustic fingerprint of the inner ear, and changes in this fingerprint may indicate changes in cochlear function arising from efferent modulation, aging, noise trauma, and/or exposure to harmful agents. However, the reproducibility and diagnostic power of OAE measurements is compromised by the variable acoustics of the ear canal, in particular, by multiple reflections and the emergence of standing waves at relevant frequencies. Even when stimulus levels are controlled using methods that circumvent standing-wave problems (e.g., forward-pressure-level calibration), distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels vary with probe location by 10-15 dB near half-wave resonant frequencies. The method presented here estimates the initial outgoing OAE pressure wave at the eardrum from measurements of the conventional OAE, allowing one to separate the emitted OAE from the many reflections trapped in the ear canal. The emitted pressure level (EPL) represents the OAE level that would be recorded were the ear canal replaced by an infinite tube with no reflections. When DPOAEs are expressed using EPL, their variation with probe location decreases to the test-retest repeatability of measurements obtained at similar probe positions. EPL provides a powerful way to reduce the variability of OAE measurements and improve their ability to detect cochlear changes.

Dynamics of cochlear nonlinearity: Automatic gain control or instantaneous damping?

Measurements of basilar-membrane (BM) motion show that the compressive nonlinearity of cochlear mechanical responses is not an instantaneous phenomenon. For this reason, the cochlear amplifier has been thought to incorporate an automatic gain control (AGC) mechanism characterized by a finite reaction time. This paper studies the effect of instantaneous nonlinear damping on the responses of oscillatory systems. The principal results are that (i) instantaneous nonlinear damping produces a noninstantaneous gain control that differs markedly from typical AGC strategies; (ii) the kinetics of compressive nonlinearity implied by the finite reaction time of an AGC system appear inconsistent with the nonlinear dynamics measured on the gerbil basilar membrane; and (iii) conversely, those nonlinear dynamics can be reproduced using an harmonic oscillator with instantaneous nonlinear damping. Furthermore, existing cochlear models that include instantaneous gain-control mechanisms capture the principal kinetics of BM nonlinearity. Thus, an AGC system with finite reaction time appears neither necessary nor sufficient to explain nonlinear gain control in the cochlea.

Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.

Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) appear to be well suited for assessing frequency selectivity because, at least on theoretical grounds, they originate over a restricted region of the cochlea near the characteristic place of the evoking tone. In support of this view, we previously found good agreement between SFOAE suppression tuning curves (SF-STCs) and a control measure of frequency selectivity (compound action potential suppression tuning curves (CAP-STC)) for frequencies above 3 kHz in chinchillas. For lower frequencies, however, SF-STCs and were over five times broader than the CAP-STCs and demonstrated more high-pass rather than narrow band-pass filter characteristics. Here, we test the hypothesis that the broad tuning of low-frequency SF-STCs is because emissions originate over a broad region of the cochlea extending basal to the characteristic place of the evoking tone. We removed contributions of the hypothesized basally located SFOAE sources by either pre-suppressing them with a high-frequency interference tone (IT; 4.2, 6.2, or 9.2 kHz at 75 dB sound pressure level (SPL)) or by inducing acoustic trauma at high frequencies (exposures to 8, 5, and lastly 3-kHz tones at 110-115 dB SPL). The 1-kHz SF-STCs and CAP-STCs were measured for baseline, IT present and following the acoustic trauma conditions in anesthetized chinchillas. The IT and acoustic trauma affected SF-STCs in an almost indistinguishable way. The SF-STCs changed progressively from a broad high-pass to narrow band-pass shape as the frequency of the IT was lowered and for subsequent exposures to lower-frequency tones. Both results were in agreement with the "basal sources" hypothesis. In contrast, CAP-STCs were not changed by either manipulation, indicating that neither the IT nor acoustic trauma affected the 1-kHz characteristic place. Thus, unlike CAPs, SFOAEs cannot be considered as a place-specific measure of cochlear function at low frequencies, at least in chinchillas.

Exploration of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in hearing-impaired listeners.

OBJECTIVE: Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) can provide useful measures of tuning of auditory filters. We previously established that stimulus-frequency (SF) OAE suppression tuning curves (STCs) reflect major features of behavioral tuning (psychophysical tuning curves, PTCs) in normally-hearing listeners. Here, we aim to evaluate whether SFOAE STCs reflect changes in PTC tuning in cases of abnormal hearing. DESIGN: PTCs and SFOAE STCs were obtained at 1 kHz and/or 4 kHz probe frequencies. For exploratory purposes, we collected SFOAEs measured across a wide frequency range and contrasted them to commonly measured distortion product (DP) OAEs. STUDY SAMPLE: Thirteen listeners with varying degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. RESULTS: Except for a few listeners with the most hearing loss, the listeners had normal/nearly normal PTCs. However, attempts to record SFOAE STCs in hearing-impaired listeners were challenging and sometimes unsuccessful due to the high level of noise at the SFOAE frequency, which is not a factor for DPOAEs. In cases of successful measurements of SFOAE STCs there was a large variability in agreement between SFOAE STC and PTC tuning. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that SFOAE STCs cannot substitute for PTCs in cases of abnormal hearing, at least with the paradigm adopted in this study.

Estimating cochlear frequency selectivity with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas.

It has been suggested that the tuning of the cochlear filters can be derived from measures of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs). Two approaches have been proposed to estimate cochlear frequency selectivity using OAEs evoked with a single tone (stimulus-frequency (SF)) OAEs: based on SFOAE group delays (SF-GDs) and on SFOAE suppression tuning curves (SF-STCs). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether either SF-GDs or SF-STCs obtained with low probe levels (30 dB SPL) correlate with more direct measures of cochlear tuning (compound action potential suppression tuning curves (CAP-STCs)) in chinchillas. The SFOAE-based estimates of tuning covaried with CAP-STCs tuning for >3 kHz probe frequencies, indicating that these measures are related to cochlear frequency selectivity. However, the relationship may be too weak to predict tuning with either SFOAE method in an individual. The SF-GD prediction of tuning was sharper than CAP-STC tuning. On the other hand, SF-STCs were consistently broader than CAP-STCs implying that SFOAEs may have less restricted region of generation in the cochlea than CAPs. Inclusion of <3 kHz data in a statistical model resulted in no significant or borderline significant covariation among the three methods: neither SFOAE test appears to reliably estimate an individual's CAP-STC tuning at low-frequencies. At the group level, SF-GDs and CAP-STCs showed similar tuning at low frequencies, while SF-STCs were over five times broader than the CAP-STCs indicating that low-frequency SFOAE may originate over a very broad region of the cochlea extending ≥5 mm basal to the tonotopic place of the probe.

Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

As shown by the work of Kemp and Chum in 1980, stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves (SFOAE STCs) have potential to objectively estimate behaviorally measured tuning curves. To date, this potential has not been tested. This study aims to do so by comparing SFOAE STCs and behavioral measures of tuning (simultaneous masking psychophysical tuning curves, PTCs) in 10 normal-hearing listeners for frequency ranges centered around 1,000 and 4,000 Hz at low probe levels. Additionally, SFOAE STCs were collected for varying conditions (probe level and suppression criterion) to identify the optimal parameters for comparison with behavioral data and to evaluate how these conditions affect the features of SFOAE STCs. SFOAE STCs qualitatively resembled PTCs: they demonstrated band-pass characteristics and asymmetric shapes with steeper high-frequency sides than low, but unlike PTCs they were consistently tuned to frequencies just above the probe frequency. When averaged across subjects the shapes of SFOAE STCs and PTCs showed agreement for most recording conditions, suggesting that PTCs are predominantly shaped by the frequency-selective filtering and suppressive effects of the cochlea. Individual SFOAE STCs often demonstrated irregular shapes (e.g., "double-tips"), particularly for the 1,000-Hz probe, which were not observed for the same subject's PTC. These results show the limited utility of SFOAE STCs to assess tuning in an individual. The irregularly shaped SFOAE STCs may be attributed to contributions from SFOAE sources distributed over a region of the basilar membrane extending beyond the probe characteristic place, as suggested by a repeatable pattern of SFOAE residual phase shifts observed in individual data.

Time-efficient measures of auditory frequency selectivity.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare two recently proposed methods for fast measurements of psychophysical tuning curves (fast-PTCs) in terms of resulting tuning curve features and training effects. DESIGN: Fast-PTCs with swept-noise (SN) and gated-noise (GN) maskers were measured at signal frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. The effect of amplitude modulating the signal in the GN condition was evaluated. Two PTC runs were obtained for each condition to assess training effects. STUDY SAMPLE: Eight normally-hearing young adults participated in the study. RESULTS: The SN and GN methods resulted in similar estimates of frequency selectivity when training effects were considered. Amplitude modulating the tone in the GN method reduced the effect of training. On average, SN-PTCs were most repeatable compared to the two other methods and they were not affected by training. Estimation of the shift in the PTC tip frequency was not affected by the measurement method or training effects. Fast-PTC methods resulted in similar estimates of tuning as compared to published notched-noise data. CONCLUSIONS: The SN method and the GN procedure with amplitude modulated signals allowed for time-efficient estimation of frequency selectivity that was unaffected by training.