Evaluating video-based consultations in routine clinical practice at a comprehensive cancer center.

INTRODUCTION: Integrating telemedicine into cancer care remains a major challenge. There are little clinical evidence for teleconsultation efficacy and safety in daily oncology practice. This study as a pioneering experience, aimed to analyze patient and physician opinions regarding the implementation of telemedicine consultations, and to identify major limitations of telehealth spread in an oncology institute. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During COVID-19 lockdown, patients and physicians who took part to at least one video-based teleconsultation between March and May 2020, were enrolled in this observational study. All eligible patients received an anonymous online questionnaire. On the other hand, all physicians eligible to participate were asked through email to complete a questionnaire. RESULTS: In this study, 31 physicians and 304 patients consented to participate in this study by answering the questionnaire and were included. Regarding telemedicine satisfaction, 65.8% of patients were satisfied. The lack of clinical examination was the major limitation reported by 77% of patients. Patients belonging to a high socio-professional category were statistically more dissatisfied with the relationship with their doctor (OR = 2.31 and 95% CI [1.12; 4.74]). CONCLUSION: This study showed promising results of incorporating video-based teleconsultations into cancer patient management. Randomized clinical trials are needed in order to accelerate the digital implementation in clinical practice.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer: Safety and efficacy of reverse sequence compared to standard technique?

BACKGROUND: The reverse sequence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, preoperative radiotherapy, mastectomy then immediate breast reconstruction is currently proposed for selected patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Few studies have compared it to the standard sequence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy and radiotherapy with or without differed reconstruction. Our study compares overall (OS) and recurrence-free (RFS) survivals of breast cancer patients treated with reverse sequence compared to the standard technique. METHODS: In this retrospective, single center study at a Comprehensive Cancer Center in France, patients were included if: female, age <65y, had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy and radiotherapy, and were M0. Outcomes for patients treated by reverse sequence (RS) are compared to those for patients treated by standard sequence (ST). Data was collected from medical records. RESULTS: From January 2009 to April 2018, 222 eligible patients were treated, 46 by RS and 176 by ST. Mean follow-up was 61.7 months. Five-year OS and RFS did not differ between groups. 5-yr OS: 88.4% 95%CI [74.1-95.0] for RS and 81.5% 95%CI [74.0-87.0] for ST (P = 0.4412); 5-yr RFS: 78.3% 95%CI [61.9-88.3] for RS and 70.1% 95%CI [62.2-76.7] for ST (P = 0.3003). Overall treatment time was significantly shorter in the RS group, and the rate of severe surgical complications did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: For locally advanced breast cancer patients with an indication for radiation therapy the reverse sequence offers similar safety and efficacy results as the standard treatment while allowing immediate breast reconstruction. However, careful patient selection is necessary, particularly with regard to preoperative lymph node invasion.

Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown in France on the diagnosis and staging of breast cancers in a tertiary cancer centre.

OBJECTIVES: Due to COVID-19, a lockdown took place between March 17 and May 1, 2020, in France. This study evaluates the impact of the lockdown on the diagnosis and staging of breast cancers in a tertiary cancer centre. METHODS: Our database was searched for all consecutive invasive breast cancers diagnosed in our institution during the lockdown (36 working days), during equivalent periods of 36 working days before and after lockdown and a reference period in 2019. The number and staging of breast cancers diagnosed during and after lockdown were compared to the pre-lockdown and reference periods. Tumour maximum diameters were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Proportions of tumour size categories (T), ipsilateral axillary lymph node invasion (N) and presence of distant metastasis (M) were compared using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Compared to the reference period (n = 40 in average), the number of breast cancers diagnosed during lockdown (n = 32) decreased by 20% but increased by 48% after the lockdown (n = 59). After the lockdown, comparatively to the reference period, breast cancers were more often symptomatic (86% vs 57%; p = 0.001) and demonstrated bigger tumour sizes (p = 0.0008), the rates of small tumours (T1) were reduced by 38%, locally advanced cancers (T3, T4) increased by 80% and lymph node invasion increased by 64%. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 lockdown was associated with a 20% decrease in the number of diagnosed breast cancers. Because of delayed diagnosis, breast cancers detected after the lockdown had poorer prognosis with bigger tumour sizes and higher rates of node invasion. KEY POINTS: • The number of breast cancer diagnosed in a large tertiary cancer centre in France decreased by 20% during the first COVID-19 lockdown. • Because of delayed diagnosis, breast cancers demonstrated bigger tumour size and more frequent axillary lymph node invasion after the lockdown. • In case of a new lockdown, breast screening programme and follow-up examinations should not be suspended and patients with clinical symptoms should be encouraged to seek attention promptly.

Solid-type adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast, a distinct molecular entity enriched in NOTCH and CREBBP mutations.

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the breast with a predominant solid pattern is difficult to diagnose with certainty and differentiate from more common triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) of basal-phenotype. To better characterize solid ACC, we performed a clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular comparative analysis of 33 ACCs of the breast comprising 17 solid variant ACCs and 16 conventional ACCs. Solid ACCs displayed basaloid morphology with an exclusive or predominant epithelial cell population associated with decreased myoepithelial differentiation, while demonstrating MYB protein overexpression similar to the more common type of ACC. Strong and diffuse MYB expression by immunochemistry was observed in 14/17 (82%) of solid ACCs while MYB rearrangements were detected by break apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in only 3/16 (19%) of solid ACCs. Conversely, weak MYB immunohistochemical expression was observed in only 7/204 (3%) of TNBC. Solid ACCs displayed a transcriptomic profile distinct from conventional ACCs with 549 genes showing a highly significant differential expression between conventional and solid ACC [false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.01; log2FC > |1|]. EnrichR and Kegg Pathway analyses identified PI3K-Akt and focal adhesion signaling pathways as significantly overexpressed in conventional ACCs compared with solid ACCs which significantly overexpressed the nitrogen metabolism pathway. CREBBP mutations and NOTCH activating gene mutations were only present in solid ACCs, concerning 5/16 (31%) of cases for each gene. Tumors with NOTCH activating mutations displayed a strong diffuse nuclear NICD1 staining, an established marker of Notch pathway activation. Solid ACCs also differed from basal-type TNBC, with fewer TP53 mutations and a more stable genomic profile on array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). In summary, solid-type ACC of the breast is a distinct molecular entity within the ACC family and is different from common basal-type TNBC. MYB is a diagnostically useful biomarker of solid ACC and NOTCH could be a novel potential therapeutic target in 30% of cases.

Long-Term Follow-up of Immediate Latissimus Dorsi Flap Reconstruction After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy for Invasive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The treatment sequence involving a mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) via the latissimus dorsi flap technique after chemotherapy and radiotherapy is not common. Our experience of this alternative to the standard treatment at our institute is reported herein. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study. We enrolled patients who received this so-called "inverse" sequence for invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer between 2009 and 2016. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients, aged between 24 and 65 years, with a mean body mass index of 24.5 underwent this treatment. Most involved T2 (59.6%, n = 32), multifocal (55.8%, n = 29) tumors, and 57.7% (n = 30) of the patients presented with axillary lymph node involvement. All patients had received sequential chemotherapy and 50 Gy of radiation. Pathological complete response (pCR) was found in 51.3% (n = 20), of cases in the traditional inverse sequence group, using Chevalier and Sataloff classifications (T and N pCR). Postoperatively, 1 patient required surgical revision because of a hematoma, 42 (80.8%) presented with lymphocele, 3 had impaired would healing, and 2 had more than 5 cm of skin necrosis on the front flap. Median follow-up was 61.9 months and the median time between diagnosis and surgery was 9.7 months. Three patients presented with metastases, 2 with local recurrence, and 1 patient died of cancer. No contralateral or lymph node recurrence was discovered. CONCLUSION: This treatment sequence, the feasibility of which was shown in this study, is an alternative for patients who want an IBR to avoid the time spent without one breast. This practice requires upstream multidisciplinary cooperation for optimal patient screening.

A single-center study on total mastectomy versus skin-sparing mastectomy in case of pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

INTRODUCTION: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for 15% of all breast cancers and generally, the prognosis is good if treated optimally. The standard treatment includes breast conservative surgery along with adjuvant radiotherapy. Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) preserves the breast skin envelope but its oncological safety poses a few concerns. Moreover, no DCIS-specific studies have compared the local recurrence (LR) rate following total mastectomy (TM) or SSM. We evaluated the LR rate in DCIS patients who underwent either TM or SSM. METHODS: This is a retrospective study on women who underwent mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction or secondary reconstruction for pure DCIS of the breast. All patients treated at Institut Bergonié by mastectomy for DCIS from January 1990 to December 2010 were included. LR and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated. RESULTS: The study population included 399 patients who were categorized into two groups, 207 in the TM group and 192 in the SSM group. At 10 years of follow-up, the LR rate was 0.97% in the TM group and 1.04% in the SSM group (p = NS). The OS of the entire population was 94.7% [95% CI; 91.6-96.7], 92.8% [95% CI, 87.9-95.8] for the TM group and 96.8% [95% CI, 91.6-98.8] for the SSM group. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the LR rate following mastectomy is low, regardless of the surgical technique used, with an excellent OS at 10 years.

Lymph node positivity in different early breast carcinoma phenotypes: a predictive model.

BACKGROUND: A strong correlation between breast cancer (BC) molecular subtypes and axillary status has been shown. It would be useful to predict the probability of lymph node (LN) positivity. OBJECTIVE: To develop the performance of multivariable models to predict LN metastases, including nomograms derived from logistic regression with clinical, pathologic variables provided by tumor surgical results or only by biopsy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort was randomly divided into two separate patient sets: a training set and a validation set. In the training set, we used multivariable logistic regression techniques to build different predictive nomograms for the risk of developing LN metastases. The discrimination ability and calibration accuracy of the resulting nomograms were evaluated on the training and validation set. RESULTS: Consecutive sample of 12,572 early BC patients with sentinel node biopsies and no neoadjuvant therapy. In our predictive macro metastases LN model, the areas under curve (AUC) values were 0.780 and 0.717 respectively for pathologic and pre-operative model, with a good calibration, and results with validation data set were similar: AUC respectively of 0.796 and 0.725. Among the list of candidate's regression variables, on the training set we identified age, tumor size, LVI, and molecular subtype as statistically significant factors for predicting the risk of LN metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Several nomograms were reported to predict risk of SLN involvement and NSN involvement. We propose a new calculation model to assess this risk of positive LN with similar performance which could be useful to choose management strategies, to avoid axillary LN staging or to propose ALND for patients with high level probability of major axillary LN involvement but also to propose immediate breast reconstruction when post mastectomy radiotherapy is not required for patients without LN macro metastasis.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy validation for large tumors.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) remains under discussion for large size tumors. The aim of this work has been to study the false negative rate (FNR) of SLNB for large tumors and predictive factors of false negative (FN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A study of a multicentric cohort, involved patients presenting N0 breast cancer with a SLNB eventually completed by complementary axillary lymph node dissection (cALND). The main criteria were the FNR and the predictive factors of FN. RESULTS: 12.415 patients were included: 748 with tumors ≥30 mm, 1101 with tumors >20 and < 30 mm and 10.566 with tumors ≤20 mm, with a cALND respectively for 501 patients (67%), 523 (62.1%) and 2775 (26.3%). The FNR were respectively: 3.05% (IC95%: 1.3-4.8) for tumors ≥30 mm*, 3.5% (1.8-5.2) for tumors >20 and < 30 mm*, 1.8% (1-2.4) for tumors ≤20 mm (p < 0.05) (*Not significant). At multivariate analysis, SN number harvested ≤2 (OR:2.0, p = 0.023) and tumor size >20 and < 30 mm (OR:2.07, p = 0.017) were significant predictive factors of FN, without significant value for tumor size ≥30 mm (OR:1.83, p = 0.073). CONCLUSION: The FNR of SLNB was not higher amongst large size tumors compared to tumors of a smaller size. These results support the validation of SNLB for tumors up to 50 mm.

Exclusive intraoperative radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer in elderly patients (>70 years): proportion of eligible patients and local recurrence-free survival.

BACKGROUND: To estimate the proportion of elderly patients (>70 years) with breast cancer eligible for an Exclusive IntraOperative RadioTherapy (E-IORT) and to evaluate their local recurrence-free survival rate. METHODS: This retrospective study examining two cohorts focuses on patients over 70 years old: a multi-centric cohort of 1411 elderly patients and a mono-centric cohort of 592 elderly patients. All patients underwent conservative surgery followed by external radiotherapy for T0-T3 N0-N1 invasive breast cancer, between 1980 and 2008. RESULTS: Within each cohort two groups were identified according to the inclusion criteria of the RIOP trial (R group) and TARGIT E study (T group). Each group was divided into two sub-groups, patients eligible (E) or non-eligible (nE) for IORT. The population of patients that were eligible in the TARGIT E study but not in the RIOP trial were also studied in both cohorts. The proportion of patients eligible for IORT was calculated, according to the eligibility criteria of each study. A comparison of the 5-year local or locoregional recurrence-free survival rate between eligible vs non-eligible patients was made. In both cohorts, the proportion of patients eligible according to the RIOP trial's eligibility criteria was 35.4 and 19.3%, and according to the TARGIT E study criteria was 60.9 and 45.3%. The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival rate was not significantly different between RE and RnE groups, TE and TnE groups. In both cohorts RE and (TE-RE) groups were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Our results encourage further necessary studies to define and to extend the eligibility criteria for per operative exclusive radiotherapy.

Breast cancer in young women: Pathologic features and molecular phenotype.

PURPOSE: Controversy exists about the prognosis of breast cancer in young women. Our objective was to describe clinicopathological and prognostic features to improve adjuvant treatment indications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multi centre study including fifteen French hospitals. Disease-free survival's data, clinical and pathological criteria were collected. RESULTS: 5815 patients were included, 15.6% of them where between 35 and 40 years old and 8.7% below 35. In 94% of the cases, a palpable masse was found in patients ≤35 years old. Triple negative and HER2 tumors were predominantly found in patients ≤35 (22.2% and 22.1%, p < 0.01). A young age ≤40 years (p < 0.001; hazard ratio [HR]: 2.05; 95% confidence limit [CL]: 1.60-2.63) or ≤35 years (p < 0.001; [HR]: 3.86; 95% [CL]: 2.69-5.53) impacted on the indication of chemotherapy. Age ≤35 (p < 0.001; [HR]: 2.01; 95% [CL]: 1.36-2.95) was a significantly negative factor on disease-free survival. Chemotherapy (p < 0.006; [HR]: 0.6; 95% [CL]: 0.40-0.86) and positive hormone receptor status (p < 0.001; [HR]: 0.6; 95% [CL]: 0.54-0.79) appeared to be protector factors. Patients under 36, had a significantly higher rate of local recurrence and distant metastasis compared to patients >35-40 (21.5 vs. 15.4% and 21.8 vs. 12.6%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Young women present a different distribution of molecular phenotypes with more luminal B and triple negative tumors with a higher grade and more lymph node involvement. A young age, must be taken as a pejorative prognostic factor and must play a part in indication of adjuvant therapy.

A Prospective Study on Skin-Sparing Mastectomy for Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Latissimus Dorsi Flap After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Invasive Breast Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is increasingly used in invasive breast cancer. However, adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) can increase the rate of local complications. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the morbidity of SSM-IBR after neoadjuvant CT and RT. METHODS: A French prospective pilot study of women aged 18-75 years with invasive breast cancer requiring mastectomy after CT and RT. Reconstruction was performed using autologous latissimus dorsi flap with or without prosthesis. The primary endpoint was the skin necrosis rate within 6 months, while secondary endpoints included pathological complete response rate (pCR) and global morbidity. RESULTS: Among 94 patients included in this study, 83 were analyzed (mean age 45.2 ± 9.5 years, T1 23.6 %, T2 55.6 %, T3 18.1 %). All but one patient received anthracyclines and taxanes, and all patients received RT (49.3 ± 5.2 Gy) before SSM-IBR. Prostheses were used for IBR in 32 patients (mean volume 256 ± 73 mm(3)). Five patients had necrosis (≤2 cm(2), 2-10 cm(2) and >10 cm(2), in three, one, and one cases, respectively), and they all recovered without revision surgery. Among 50 patients who underwent upfront mastectomy, 36 % achieved pCR. CONCLUSIONS: SSM-IBR performed after CT and RT is safe, with an acceptable local morbidity rate. Long-term data are needed to evaluate recurrence rates.

Sentinel lymph node identification using superparamagnetic iron oxide particles versus radioisotope: The French Sentimag feasibility trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The French Sentimag feasibility trial evaluated a new method for the localization of breast cancer sentinel lymph node (SLN) using Sienna+®, superparamagnetic iron oxide particles, and Sentimag® detection in comparison to the standard technique (isotopes ± blue dye). METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicentric paired comparison trial on 115 patients. SLN localization was performed using both the magnetic technique and the standard method. Detection rate and concordance between magnetic and standard tracers were calculated. Post-operative complications were assessed after 30 days. RESULTS: Results are based on 108 patients. SLN identification rate was 98.1% [93.5-99.8] for both methods, 97.2% [92.1-99.4] for Sienna+® and 95.4% [89.5-98.5] for standard technique. A mean of 2.1 SLNs per patient was removed. The concordance rate was 99.0% [94.7-100.0%] per patient and 97.4% [94.1-99.2] per node. Forty-six patients (43.4%) had nodal involvement. Among involved SLNs, concordance rate was 97.7% [88.0-99.9] per patient and 98.1% [90.1-100.0] per node. CONCLUSIONS: This new magnetic tracer is a feasible method and a promising alternative to the isotope. It could offer benefits for ambulatory surgery or sites without nuclear medicine departments. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:501-507. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Eligibility criteria for intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer: study employing 12,025 patients treated in two cohorts.

BACKGROUND: We wished to estimate the proportion of patients with breast cancer eligible for an exclusive targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT) and to evaluate their survival without local recurrence. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective study examining two cohorts. The first cohort was multicentric (G3S) and contained 7580 patients. The second cohort was monocentric (cohort 2) comprising 4445 patients. All patients underwent conservative surgery followed by external radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer (T0-T3, N0-N1) between 1980 and 2005. Within each cohort, two groups were isolated according to the inclusion criteria of the TARGIT A study (T group) and RIOP trial (R group).In the multicentric cohort (G3S) eligible patients for TARGIT A and RIOP trials were T1E and R1E subgroups, respectively. In cohort number 2, the corresponding subgroups were T2E and R2E. Similarly, non-eligible patients were T1nE, R1nE and T2nE, and R2nE.The eligible groups in the TARGIT A study that were not eligible in the RIOP trial (TE-RE) were also studied. The proportion of patients eligible for TARGIT was calculated according to the criteria of each study. A comparison was made of the 5-year survival without local or locoregional recurrence between the TE versus TnE, RE versus RnE, and RE versus (TE-RE) groups. RESULTS: In G3S and cohort 2, the proportion of patients eligible for TARGIT was, respectively, 53.2% and 33.9% according the criteria of the TARGIT A study, and 21% and 8% according the criteria of the RIOP trial. Survival without five-year locoregional recurrence was significantly different between T1E and T1nE groups (97.6% versus 97% [log rank=0.009]), R1E and R1nE groups (98% versus 97.1% [log rank=0.011]), T2E and T2nE groups (96.6% versus 93.1% [log rank<0. 0001]) and R2E and R2nE groups (98.6% versus 94% [log rank=0.001]). In both cohorts, no significant difference was found between RE and (TE-RE) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Almost 50% of T0-2 N0 patients could be eligible for TARGIT.

[Neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer: implications for the pathologist]. / Place du pathologiste dans la prise en charge néoadjuvante des cancers du sein.

These past few years, neoadjuvant strategy has taken an increasing place in the management of breast cancer patients. This strategy is mainly indicated to obtain a tumour bulk regression allowing a breast conserving surgery in patients that otherwise would have undergone mastectomy. Of note, development of new chemotherapy agents and targeted therapies has critically helped in the progress of neoadjuvant strategy as it is currently associated with better pathological response rates. In this context, the pathologist is at the crossroad of this multidisciplinary process. First, he provides on the initial core needle biopsy the tumour pathological characteristics that are critical for the choice of treatment strategy, i.e. histological type, histological grade, proliferative activity (mitotic count and Ki67/MIB1 index labeling), hormone receptor status (oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor) and HER2 status. Secondly, the pathologist evaluates the pathological response and the status of surgical margins with regards to the residual tumour on the surgical specimen after neoadjuvant treatment. These parameters are important for the management of the patient, since it has been shown that complete pathological response is associated with improved disease free survival. Several grading systems are used to assess the pathological response in breast and axillary lymph nodes. The most frequently used in France are currently the systems described by Sataloff et al. and Chevallier et al. In this review, we detail the different steps involving the pathologist in neoadjuvant setting, with special regards to the quality process and future perspectives such as emerging predictive biomarkers.

Validation and limitations of use of a breast cancer nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after positive sentinel node biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) is currently under discussion in the literature. The breast cancer nomogram (BCN), an online tool developed by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), aims to predict the risk of positive non-SLN in SLN-positive patients. The purpose of this study was to test the accuracy of the nomogram on patients with macrometastatic and micrometastatic SLN-positive biopsy findings. METHODS: Patient characteristics, tumor pathology, and positive SLN characteristics were collected on 588 consecutive patients who underwent completion ALND. The MSKCC BCN tool was used to calculate risk of metastases for all 588 cases that included a subgroup of the 213 patients with SLN micrometastases. The BCN was performed for positive SLN biopsy findings regardless of the method of metastasis detection. Evaluation of the BCN was performed by the area under the curve method. RESULTS: The BCN applied to all 588 patients achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of .724 (range, .677-.771) compared with .76 in the MSKCC study. When the tool was applied solely to micrometastases found by hematoxylin and eosin staining and metastases found by immunohistochemistry, the area under the ROC was .538 (range, .423-.653). CONCLUSIONS: The MSKCC nomogram has been validated for all the patients having a metastatic SLN at the Institut Curie. However, this model was not reliably predictive for positive non-SLN in cases with micrometastic positive SLN.