In vitro and in vivo comparison of two-, three- and four-point Dixon techniques for clinical intramuscular fat quantification at 3 T.

OBJECTIVE: To compare Dixon-based MRI techniques for intramuscular fat quantification at 3 T with MR spectroscopy (MRS) in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: In vitro, two- three- and four-point mDixon (Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands) sequences with 10°, 20° and 30° flip angles were acquired from seven test phantoms with sunflower oil-water percentages of 0-60% sunflower oil and calculated fat-water ratios compared with MRS. In vivo, two- three- and four-point mDixon sequences with 10° flip angle were acquired and compared with MRS in the vastus medialis of nine healthy volunteers (aged 30.6 ± 5.3 years; body mass index 22.2 ± 2.6). RESULTS: In vitro, all mDixon sequences correlated significantly with MRS (r > 0.97, p < 0.002). The measured phantom percentage fat depended significantly on the flip angle (p ≤ 0.001) and mDixon sequence (p = 0.005). Flip angle was the dominant factor influencing agreement with MRS. Increasing the flip angle significantly increased the overestimation of the mDixon sequences compared with MRS. In vivo, a significant difference was observed between sequences (p < 0.001), with all mDixon sequences overestimating the intramuscular fat content of the vastus medialis muscle compared with MRS. Two-point mDixon agreed best with MRS and had comparable variability with the other mDixon sequences. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that mDixon techniques have good linearity and low variability for use in intramuscular fat quantification. To avoid significant fat overestimation with short repetition time, a low flip angle should be used to reduce T1 effects. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This is the first study investigating the optimal mDixon parameters for intramuscular fat quantification compared with MRS in vivo and in vitro.

Rectal tumour volume (GTV) delineation using T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI: Implications for radiotherapy planning.

PURPOSE: To compare the rectal tumour gross target volume (GTV) delineated on T2 weighted (T2W MRI) and diffusion weighted MRI (DWI) images by two different observers and to assess if agreement is improved by DWI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 27 consecutive patients (15 male, range 27.1-88.8 years, mean 66.9 years) underwent 1.5T MRI prior to chemoradiation (45Gy in 25 fractions; oral capecitabine 850mg/m(2)), including axial T2W MRI (TR=6600ms, TE=90ms) and DWI (TR=3000ms, TE=77ms, b=0, 100, 800s/mm(2)). 3D tumour volume (cm(3)) was measured by volume of interest (VOI) analysis by two independent readers for the T2W MRI and b800 DWI axial images, and the T2W MRI and DWI volumes compared using Mann-Whitney test. Observer agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman statistics. Significance was at 5%. RESULTS: Artefacts precluded DWI analysis in 1 patient. In the remaining 26 patients evaluated, median (range) T2W MRI MRI and DWI (b=800s/mm(2)) 3D GTVin cm(3) were 33.97 (4.44-199.8) and 31.38 (2.43-228), respectively, for Reader One and 43.78 (7.57-267.7) and 42.45 (3.68-251) for Reader Two. T2W MRI GTVs were slightly larger but not statistically different from DWI volumes: p=0.52 Reader One; p=0.92 Reader Two. Interobserver mean difference (95% limits of agreement) for T2W MRI and DWI GTVs were -9.84 (-54.96 to +35.28) cm(3) and -14.79 (-54.01 to +24.43) cm(3) respectively. CONCLUSION: Smaller DWI volumes may result from better tumour conspicuity but overall observer agreement is not improved by DWI.