Patient-reported outcome and experience measures (POEM) of a community-based glaucoma clinic in Cambridge, UK: an observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Glaucoma care demand in UK hospitals has exploded in recent years. This has resulted in a push to community (shared, virtual, etc) care models to reduce the burden on hospital systems and on patients. The study aimed to ascertain patient's experiences around various aspects of their care delivered in community clinics. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Glaucoma Community Clinic, Cambridge, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-six consecutive patients (M:F 47:49, mean age 70±12 years), recruited from July to September 2022. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients completed a modified glaucoma patient-reported outcome and experience measure (POEM) regarding their clinic experience and perspective on their diagnosis, treatment and fear of blindness. Patient's thoughts of feeling safe under the community clinical team were gathered. Patient demographics including age, gender, postcodes and education history were used to find their corresponding Lower-Layer Super Output Areas and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Patients had positive perceptions of their clinic experience. Ninety-six per cent of patients reported that their experience of attending the community clinic was comfortable, and 93% (n=92) felt the experience was the same as expected from the hospital. Feeling safe under the clinician team produced a mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 90 (SD 15) and feeling care was organised produced a mean VAS score of 87 (SD 17). Age, gender, disease characteristics and socioeconomic status had no influence on perceived experience. Patients aged <60 years had significantly lower understanding of their diagnosis compared with older groups (p=0.027, η2=0.076), as did suspect glaucoma patients when compared with primary open glaucoma patients (p=0.045, η2=0.085). CONCLUSIONS: A large majority of patients expressed a positive experience, felt safe under the care of their clinical team and their care was well organised. Relatively younger patients (<60 years) and those with no confirmed diagnosis would likely benefit from more consultation time and educational materials to improve their understanding of glaucoma.

Developing refractive management recommendations for patients undergoing cataract surgery: A Delphi study.

PURPOSE: Currently, there are no UK optometric guidelines regarding the pre and postoperative refractive management of patients undergoing cataract surgery. This study used a Delphi method to gain consensus on best practice. METHODS: Eighteen recommendations targeted areas of concern/variability in advice that were highlighted in an earlier focus group study of refractive management for patients who had received cataract surgery. These covered three topics: preoperative target refraction discussions, postoperative refractive management and driving advice postoperatively. The recommendations were then developed using evidence from optometry and ophthalmology clinical expertise and the research literature. Eighteen recommendations underwent a process of agreement and modification using a Delphi study consisting of a panel of 22 highly experienced optometrists (N = 11, 25 years mean clinical experience) and ophthalmologists (N = 11, 17 years mean clinical experience) who rated and commented upon the importance and feasibility of each recommendation. The responses were considered by the research team and the recommendations modified and/or removed prior to a second Delphi round of responses to a modified series of recommendations. Consensus of opinion was defined as greater than 80% of panellists 'agreed' or 'strongly agreed' on the recommendation for both importance and feasibility. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 18 recommendations reached consensus in the first round. A second round of the Delphi method saw 17 modified recommendations scored and commented upon by 20 clinicians. Fifteen recommendations reached consensus after two rounds of the Delphi method. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations to guide the pre and postoperative refractive management of patients undergoing cataract surgery were agreed between highly experienced optometrists and ophthalmologists using a 2-round Delphi method. Patients would benefit from consistent target refraction discussions, postoperative refractive management and driving advice, and recommendations were of particular benefit to less experienced optometrists.

Investigating target refraction advice provided to cataract surgery patients by UK optometrists and ophthalmologists.

PURPOSE: To determine whether UK optometrists and ophthalmologists provide target refraction advice to patients prior to cataract surgery, and when this should first be discussed. METHODS: Optometrists and ophthalmologists were asked to complete a survey of two clinical vignettes (both older patients with cataract; a pre-operative myope who routinely read without glasses and a patient using a monovision approach), plus multiple choice and short answer questions either using hard copy or online. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 437 optometrists and 50 ophthalmologists. Optometrists who reported they would provide target refraction advice were more experienced (median 22 years) than those who would leave this to the Hospital Eye Service (median 10 years). The former group reported it was in the patients' best interest to make an informed decision as they had seen many myopic patients who read uncorrected pre-operatively, and were unhappy that they could no longer do so after surgery. Inexperienced optometrists reported that they did not want to overstep their authority and left the decision to the ophthalmologist. The ophthalmologists estimated their percentage of emmetropic target refractions over the last year to have been 90%. CONCLUSION: Currently, some long-term myopes become dissatisfied after cataract surgery due to an emmetropic target refraction that leaves them unable to read without glasses as they did prior to surgery. Although experienced optometrists are aware of this and attempt to discuss this issue with patients, less experienced optometrists tend not to. This suggests that target refraction needs greater exposure in university training and continuing professional development. To provide patients with the knowledge to make informed decisions regarding their surgery, we suggest an agreed protocol within funded direct referral schemes of initial target refraction discussions by optometrists to introduce the idea of refractive outcomes and outline options, with further discussion with the ophthalmologist to clarify understanding.

Feasibility of Implementing Recommendations to Reduce Fall Risk in Older People: A Delphi Study.

SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides guidance for the implementation of recommendations for falls prevention in optometry practice, through synthesis with the optometrists' viewpoint as a major stakeholder. Educators and clinicians can adopt the revised recommendations and associated implementation strategies in this research for successful integration into optometric practice. PURPOSE: Recommendations for optometrists to help prevent falls in older patients were published in 2019 by Optometry Australia. This study used the Delphi technique to gain perspectives on the feasibility of implementing the recommendations in optometric practice. METHODS: A Delphi consensus process consisted of two rounds of anonymous questionnaires administered between October 2019 and February 2020. A panel of 12 optometrists scored and commented on the importance and feasibility of 28 recommendations based on a published evidence synthesis by Optometry Australia and a pilot Delphi round. Panelists were invited if they had at least 5-year experience in optometry practice and were involved in post-cataract surgery refractive management regularly in the past 12 months. RESULTS: Twenty-four recommendations reached consensus after the Delphi process. Recommendations that reached consensus but had low uptake in the panelists' practices were history taking about risk of falls and provision of advice to patients to seek professional home modification. Four recommendations did not reach consensus because they were perceived to be too prescriptive and less feasible to execute in real-world settings. To improve the compliance of patients to recommendations to reduce the risk of falls, panelists recommended involving patients in decision making and practice staff should be involved in falls prevention messaging. CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi panel supported the feasibility of most of the recommendations in optometric practice and provided suggestions to improve their implementation. Further research is needed to evaluate the implementation and benefits of these recommendations, designed to make optometric practice more effective in preventing patient falls.

When is refraction stable following routine cataract surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: We systematically reviewed the literature to investigate when refraction is stable following routine cataract surgery implanting monofocal intraocular lenses. Current advice recommends obtaining new spectacles 4-6 weeks following surgery. Due to advancements in surgical techniques, we hypothesised that refractive stability would be achieved earlier, which could have major short-term improvements in quality of life for patients. METHODS: Medline, CINAHL, AMED, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched with key words chosen to find articles, which assessed refraction following uncomplicated cataract surgery. Citation chains and the reference lists of all included papers were searched. Unpublished literature was identified using OpenGrey (www.opengrey.eu). The review considered studies that measured refraction at regular intervals following surgery until stability was achieved. RESULTS: The search identified 6,680 papers. Two reviewers independently screened the abstracts and nine papers were found to fit the criteria, of which five were included in the meta-analysis. The quality of the papers was evaluated using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) instrument. Meta-analysis of 301 patients' data of spherical, cylindrical and spherical equivalent correction were performed using Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5.3) (https://revman.cochrane.org/). Refraction at 1-week versus the gold standard of 4-weeks showed no significant difference for sphere data (effect size and 95% confidence interval of; ES = 0.00, 95% CI: -0.17, 0.17; p = 1.00), cylindrical data (ES = +0.06; 95% CI: -0.05, 0.17; p = 0.31), and spherical equivalent (ES = -0.01; 95% CI: -0.12, 0.10; p = 0.90). Heterogeneity was non-significant (I2  < 25%) for all refractive elements. Data were similar for 2- versus 4-weeks post-surgery. Acquired data from one study highlighted a small number of patients with very unstable cylindrical corrections at 1-week post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: No statistical difference was found when comparing sphere, cylindrical and spherical equivalent values at 1- and 4-weeks post cataract surgery. This suggests that new glasses could be provided 1-week after surgery. However, from a clinical perspective, a small number of patients (~7%) from an acquired dataset (N = 72) showed very unstable cylindrical corrections at 1-week. Further work is needed to determine why this is the case and how these patients can be detected.

Is there a link between dizziness and vision? A systematic review.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature to investigate the link (if any) between vision and dizziness. METHODS: Medline, CINAHL, AMED, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library were searched with keywords chosen to find articles which investigated the causes of dizziness and considered vision as a possible trigger. Citation chaining of all included papers was performed in addition to the hand searching of all reference lists. Unpublished literature was identified using www.opengrey.eu. The review considered studies involving adults which link, measure or attempt to improve any aspect of vision in relation to dizziness. RESULTS: Nine thousand six hundred and eighty one possible references were found, and the abstracts were screened independently by two reviewers to determine if they should be included in the study. Thirteen papers were found which investigated whether dizziness was linked to an assessment of vision. Visual impairment measures were crude and typically self-report, or Snellen visual acuity with little or no measurement details. Five studies found an independent link between dizziness and vision, five found a weak association (typically finding a link when univariate analyses were used, but not when multivariate analyses were used), and three found no association. Studies finding a strong link were usually cross-sectional with a large study population whereas those finding a weak association had relatively small numbers of participants. Studies which did not find an association used a broad definition of dizziness that included the term light-headedness, an unreliable Rosenbaum near visual acuity chart or an unusual categorisation of visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that dizziness (although likely not 'light-headedness') is linked with poor vision although further studies using more appropriate measures of vision are recommended.

Cost savings using a protocol approach to manage anemia in a hemodialysis unit.

BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend using anemia management protocols to guide treatment. The objective of this study was to determine if an anemia management protocol would improve hemoglobin (Hgb) indices in hemodialysis patients and to measure whether the protocol would reduce the use and cost of darbepoetin alfa (DBO) and intravenous (IV) iron in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: An anemia management protocol was created and implemented for hemodialysis patients at our institution. A retrospective observational review of the use of DBO and IV iron as well as changes in Hgb, transferrin saturation and ferritin in 174 patients was conducted 6 months before and after implementation of the anemia protocol. RESULTS: The number of Hgb measurements in the target range increased from 44.3 to 46.0% (p = 0.48) after protocol implementation. The mean weekly dose of DBO was reduced from 34.56 ± 31.12 to 31.11 ± 28.64 µg post-protocol implementation (p = 0.011), which translated to a cost savings of USD 41,649 over 6 months. The mean monthly IV iron dose also decreased from 139.56 ± 98.83 to 97.65 ± 79.05 mg (p < 0.005), a cost savings of USD 18,594 over the same time period. CONCLUSION: The use of an anemia management protocol resulted in the deprescribing of DBO and iron agents while increasing the number of patients in the target Hgb range, which led to significant cost savings in the treatment of anemia.

Crosstalk between huntingtin and syntaxin 1A regulates N-type calcium channels.

We have identified a novel interaction between huntingtin (htt) and N-type calcium channels, a channel key in coupling calcium influx with synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Htt is a widely expressed 350-kDa cytosolic protein bearing an N-terminal polyglutamine tract. Htt is proteolytically cleaved by calpains and caspases and the resultant htt N-terminal fragments have been proposed to be biologically active; however, the cellular function of htt and/or the htt fragments remains enigmatic. We show that N-terminal fragments of htt (consisting of exon1) and full-length htt associate with the synaptic protein interaction (synprint) region of the N-type calcium channel. Given that synprint has previously been shown to bind syntaxin 1A and that this association elicits inhibition of N-type calcium channels, we tested whether htt(exon1) affects the modulation of these channels. Our data indicate that htt(exon1) enhances calcium influx by blocking syntaxin 1A inhibition of N-type calcium channels and attributes a key role for htt N-terminal fragments in the fine tuning of neurotransmission.