Efficacy and safety of lenalidomide treatment in multiple myeloma (MM) patients--Report of the Polish Myeloma Group.

UNLABELLED: The aim of the multi-centre retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide (LEN) therapy in patients with resistant or relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) as well as in patients with stable disease (LEN used due to neurological complications). The primary endpoint of this study was an overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were as follows: time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and the safety of drug use. Data were collected in 19 centres of the Polish Multiple Myeloma Study Group. The study group consisted of 306 subjects: 153 females and 153 males. In 115 patients (38.8%, group A), a resistant myeloma was diagnosed; in 135 (44.1%, group B) a relapse, and in 56 (18.3%, group C) a stable disease were stated. In 92.8% of patients, LEN+DEX combination was used; in remaining group, LEN monotherapy or a combination therapy LEN+bortezomib or LEN+bendamustine and other were used. In the entire study group, ORR was 75.5% (including 12.4% patients achieving complete remission [CR] or stringent CR [sCR]). Median time to progression (TTP) was 20 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 33.3 months. The regression model for "treatment response" was on the borderline of statistical significance (p=0.07), however the number of LEN treatment cycles ≥ 6 (R(2)=17.2%), baseline LDH level (R(2)=1.1%) and no ASCT use (R(2)=1.7%) where the factors most affecting treatment response achievement. The regression model for dependant variable--"overall survival"--was statistically significant (p=0.0000004). Factors with the most impact on OS were as follows: number of LEN cycles treatment ≥ 6 (R(2)=16.7%), treatment response achievement (R(2)=6.9%), ß-2-microglobulin (ß-2-M) level (R(2)=4.8%), renal function (R(2)=3.0%) and lack of 3/4 grade adverse events (R(2)=1.4%). SUMMARY: LEN is an effective and safe therapeutic option, even in intensively treated resistant and relapsed MM patients, as well as in patients with stable disease and previous treatment-induced neurological complications. In particular, the number of LEN treatment cycles ≥ 6 was the factor which affected treatment response achievement the most, together with an important impact on OS.

High-dose melphalan and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in primary amyloidosis: single-center results.

BACKGROUND: Systemic immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis (AL) is a plasma cell dyscrasia resulting in multisystem organ failure and death. Autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) has been widely used to treat patients with AL. However, treatment-related mortality remains high and reported series are subject to selection bias. METHODS: To define the role of patient selection in stem cell transplantation, we evaluated 24 consecutive AL patients transplanted at our center. RESULTS: Complete hematologic response was achieved in all 20 patients surviving >100 days posttransplantation. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate after ASCT was 78.5%. The 5- and 10-year progression-free and OS rates were 57% and 47%, respectively. Treatment-related deaths owing to cardiovascular problems occurred in 16% of cases. CONCLUSION: ASCT for AL amyloidosis can be safely performed in experienced transplantation centers, and increased risk is associated mainly with cardiovascular system involvement.

Treatment for primary refractory Hodgkin's disease: a comparison of high-dose chemotherapy followed by ASCT with conventional therapy.

Our previously published study showed promising results of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with primary resistant Hodgkin's disease (HD). Probabilities of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 years were 55 and 36%, respectively. The present study was undertaken to compare these results with conventionally treated patients and thus evaluate therapeutic options. Retrospective data on 76 adult patients who underwent ASCT were matched with 76 conventionally treated patients from 17 centers. Comparison of clinical characteristics in both groups showed that ASCT patients were younger (24 vs 31.5 years, P=0.001), more frequently presented with 'B' symptoms (P=0.03) and that more patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) had elevated LDH (P=0.03). In univariate analyses, bulky disease (P=0.0043) and complete resistance to standard CT (P=0.051) were found to be risk factors for OS. In a multivariate survival analysis only bulky disease was found to an independent prognostic factor (P=0.005). There was no difference in survival between the treatment groups with 5 years OS 33.7 (CI: 23-46) in the ASCT group and 35.6% (CI: 25-50) for the CT group (P=0.92). We conclude that ASCT is not superior to standard CT for treatment of patients with primary refractory HD.