Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Laryngoscope ; 130(9): 2153-2159, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31566749

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) incidence is rapidly increasing, as are survival rates, in large part due to the human papillomavirus (HPV). Treatment intensity, however, has remained unchanged, making treatment-related toxicity (i.e., dysphagia) a critical problem for an increasing number of patients. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether pretreatment objective swallowing measures can predict percutaneous fluoroscopic guided gastrostomy tube (PFG) utilization during OPSCC treatment. METHODS: Forty-one newly diagnosed OPSCC patients treated with radiation underwent evaluation of swallow function with modified barium swallow study (MBSS) prior to and at completion of radiation treatment using the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST); a subset of patients were evaluated using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). RESULTS: Patients were male (100%), primarily Caucasian (85.4%) and p16 positive (85.4%) with mean age of 65.7 years. PFG were placed in 70.7% patients (n = 29) and used by 63.4% (n = 26). Pre- and post-treatment DIGEST scores were associated with T-classification (t = -2.9, p = .001, t = -2.7, p = .01) and indicated deteriorating swallow function during treatment (mean change = 0.46 [t = -2.7, p = .01]). DIGEST and MDADI scores were generally not associated with patient PFG utilization. DIGEST and MDADI scores were significantly correlated prior to, but not following completion of treatment. CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment DIGEST and patient reported swallowing outcomes (MDADI) can be useful in identifying patients with unsafe and/or grossly inefficient swallowing function. However, objectively measured swallow function was not associated with PFG utilization. Development of PFG placement algorithms (reactive vs. prophylactic) therefore require additional inputs/metrics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:2153-2159, 2020.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/physiopathology , Deglutition Disorders/therapy , Gastrostomy/statistics & numerical data , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/complications , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Deglutition , Deglutition Disorders/epidemiology , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/complications , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy , United States/epidemiology , Veterans/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...