Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Animal ; 18(3): 101100, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38452419

ABSTRACT

The need to integrate more clearly societal expectations on livestock farming has led the authors of this article to consider that livestock farming systems must be redesigned to position health and welfare at the heart of their objectives. This article proposes a vision of the advances in knowledge required at different scales to contribute to this transformation. After defining health and welfare of animals, the article emphasises the need to consider health in a broader perspective, to deepen the question of positive emotional experiences regarding welfare, and raises the question of how to assess these two elements on farms. The positive interactions between health and welfare are presented. Some possible tensions between them are also discussed, in particular when improving welfare by providing a more stimulating and richer environment such as access to outdoor increases the risk of infectious diseases. Jointly improving health and welfare of animals poses a number of questions at various scales, from the animal level to the production chain. At the animal level, the authors highlight the need to explore: the long-term links between better welfare and physiological balance, the role of microbiota, the psycho-neuro-endocrine mechanisms linking positive mental state and health, and the trade-off between the physiological functions of production, reproduction and immunity. At the farm level, in addition to studying the relationships at the group level between welfare, health and production, the paper supports the idea of co-constructing innovative systems with livestock farmers, as well as analysing the cost, acceptability and impact of improved systems on their working conditions and well-being. At the production chain or territory levels, various questions are raised. These include studying the best strategies to improve animal health and welfare while preserving economic viability, the labelling of products and the consumers' willingness to pay, the consequences of heterogeneity in animal traits on the processing of animal products, and the spatial distribution of livestock farming and the organisation of the production and value chain. At the level of the citizen and consumer, one of the challenges is to better inter-relate sanitary and health perspectives on the one hand, and welfare concerns on the other hand. There is also a need to improve citizens' knowledge on livestock farming, and to develop more intense and constructive exchanges between livestock farmers, the livestock industry and citizens. These difficult issues plead for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research involving various scientific disciplines and the different stakeholders, including public policy makers through participatory research.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry , Livestock , Animals , Humans , Farms , Animal Welfare , Farmers
2.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 69(6): 4009-4015, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36083807

ABSTRACT

Pig outdoor farming is gaining popularity and commercial success in the European Union, and its expansion, together with an increasing wild boar population, facilitates interactions between domestic and wild suids. In the Southern French Department of Ardèche, several episodes of mass mortalities due to infection with an enteropathogenic strain of Escherichia coli causing oedema disease (OD) were reported in wild boar populations between 2013 and 2016. In order to investigate a potential link between those events and the frequency of interactions between wild boar and domestic pig, we analyzed regional vegetation and hunting bag data and implemented a semi-structured questionnaire survey among a total of 30 outdoor pig farmers and 30 hunters distributed inside and outside the identified area of OD emergence. One third of interviewed farmers (11/30) had experienced intrusions of wild boars in domestic pig premises during the previous year. Similarly, 23% of interviewed hunters reported interactions between wild boar and feral free-ranging pigs in recent years, and 60% reported the observation of free-ranging pigs with a phenotypic feature of Vietnamese pot-bellied pigs (55%). Our analysis identified that in the OD emergence area, several factors could facilitate the transmission of pathogens between wild and domestic suids including a predominance of forested vegetation, a higher estimated wild boar density, weaker levels of farm biosecurity, a higher level of reported wild boar intrusions in pig farms and several reports of feral pot-bellied pig presence. Although our sample was limited, our study suggested a widespread occurrence of situations facilitating the transmission of pathogens between wild and domestic suids. Similar studies in other rural regions in the European Union are recommended, in order to promote preparedness for the emergence and circulation of shared swine pathogens.


Subject(s)
Escherichia coli Infections , Swine Diseases , Animals , Swine , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , France/epidemiology , Animals, Wild , Surveys and Questionnaires , Escherichia coli , Edema/veterinary , Sus scrofa , Swine Diseases/epidemiology
3.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 65(3): 746-757, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29322645

ABSTRACT

On the Mediterranean island of Corsica, cohabitation between sympatric domestic pigs and Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa) is common and widespread and can facilitate the maintenance and dissemination of several pathogens detrimental for the pig industry or human health. In this study, we monitored a population of free-ranging domestic pigs reared in extensive conditions within a 800-ha property located in Central Corsica which was frequently visited by a sympatric population of wild boar between 2013 and 2015. We used GPS collars to assess evidence of a spatially shared environment. Subsequently, we analysed by PFGE of XbaI-restricted DNA if those populations shared faecal Escherichia coli clones that would indicate contact and compared these results with those collected in a distant (separated by at least 50 km) population of wild boar used as control. Results showed that one of eight wild boars sampled in the study area shed E. coli XbaI clones identical to clones isolated from domestic pig sounders from the farm, while wild boar populations sampled in distant parts of the study area shared no identical clone with the domestic pigs monitored. Interestingly, within the sampled pigs, two identical clones were found in 2013 and in 2015, indicating a long-time persisting colonization type. Although the method of isolation of E. coli and PFGE typing of the isolates requires intensive laboratory work, it is applicable under field conditions to monitor potential infectious contacts. It also provides evidence of exchange of microorganisms between sympatric domestic pigs and wild boar populations.


Subject(s)
Escherichia coli Infections/transmission , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Feces/microbiology , Sus scrofa/microbiology , Animals , Environmental Biomarkers , France , Humans
4.
Prev Vet Med ; 121(3-4): 246-56, 2015 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26216476

ABSTRACT

Corsica is a French Mediterranean island with traditional extensive pig farming oriented towards the production of high quality cured meat products. The increasing success of these cured products in continental Europe has triggered the development and organisation of an extensive pig farming industry. However, these pig farming practices have seldom been described and analysed to understand the potential risk of introduction and spread of infectious diseases. We conducted a cross-sectional study in Corsica in 2013 to characterise the main pig management practices and to identify groups of farms with similar practices and therefore homogeneous risk of introduction and spread of infectious diseases. We interviewed 68 pig farmers and investigated different farm management practices which could lead to contact between herds, such as trading animals, sharing pastures, feed and reproduction management (direct contacts), slaughtering and carcass waste management, and contacts with people and vehicles (indirect contacts). The practices were described and the farms grouped by multiple factor and hierarchical clustering analyses. Results revealed interesting patterns in the introduction and spread of infectious disease, such as the seasonality of pig production, the potential local spread of diseases in pastures due to the presence of free-ranging boars, carcasses, and animal waste. Multivariate analyses identified four groups of farms with different levels of risk of the spread of infectious disease, illustrating changes in farmers' customs from free-range uncontrolled farming systems to more controlled systems aimed at the production of high quality pork products. These results will be useful to more realistically simulate the spread of infectious diseases among Corsican pig farms and highlight the need for awareness raising campaigns among the stakeholders to reduce risky practices.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry/methods , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Animals , Cluster Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , France/epidemiology , Multivariate Analysis , Risk Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires , Swine , Swine Diseases/etiology
5.
Ann Microbiol (Paris) ; 128(2): 255-62, 1977.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-197864

ABSTRACT

A simple detection method of enteroviruses and adenoviruses in drinking water has been performed, using adsorption-elution on to cellulose nitrate membranes. Average of enteroviruses recovering is varying from 23 to 80% when 30 liters of water containing 60 PFU are monitored. Only 10% of adenoviruses are recovered in the same conditions. This method allowed us to detect 12 PFU of enteroviruses in 120 liters of water. Recovering of 1 PFU in 10 liters when examining more than 100 liters is reproducible.


Subject(s)
Adenoviridae/isolation & purification , Enterovirus/isolation & purification , Water Microbiology , Ultrafiltration
6.
Ann Microbiol (Paris) ; 127(3): 439-46, 1976 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-182051

ABSTRACT

The filtration through cellulose nitrate membranes of a poliovirus type II suspension in distilled water alone or with added mineral salts (NaCl, MgCl2, AlCl3) results in adsorption of the virus. The maximal adsorption is obtained with NaCl. A detergent in the virus suspension or a pretreatment of the membranes with calf serum prevents this adsorption. Elution of the adsorbed enteroviruses is achieved with alcaline and proteinaceous buffer.


Subject(s)
Enterovirus , Micropore Filters , Poliovirus , Adsorption , Aluminum/pharmacology , Animals , Blood , Cattle , Cellulose , Enterovirus/isolation & purification , Magnesium/pharmacology , Poliovirus/isolation & purification , Polysorbates/pharmacology , Salts , Sodium Chloride/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...