Generalizability of clinical trial efficacy results to a real-world population: An example in migraine prevention.

BACKGROUND: Health care decision makers are often concerned about the external validity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), as their results may not apply to certain patients in the real world who intend to receive treatment. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a methodology for assessing the generalizability of clinical trial results to a real-world population, before sufficient and appropriate real-world effectiveness data are available, using individual patient-level data from an RCT and aggregated baseline data from a real-world French registry in migraine. METHODS: The analyses were conducted in 2 steps. First, individual patient-level baseline data from the multinational CONQUER RCT were weighted to match aggregated real-world InovPain registry patient characteristic data. Matched patient characteristics were sex, age, migraine type and duration, number of monthly migraine headache days, and number of monthly headache days at baseline. Second, the weighted CONQUER patient data were used to reanalyze the primary endpoint of CONQUER (least squares mean change from baseline in the number of monthly migraine headache days during the 3-month double-blind treatment phase) using predefined methodology. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of findings. RESULTS: A total of 462 patients with migraine were randomized and treated with galcanezumab or placebo in CONQUER; aggregated InovPain data were available from 130 patients with migraine. We identified no important differences in baseline patient characteristics between the 2 prespecified populations, suggesting good external validity for CONQUER. Although this limited the extent of observed differences between the original and matched CONQUER populations, weighting of CONQUER data did help harmonize the 2 datasets and allow the results obtained in CONQUER to be generalized to patients more representative of the real-world French population with migraine. Results of weighted analyses suggested that galcanezumab would be superior to placebo for reducing monthly migraine headache days in a clinical trial in patients with episodic or chronic migraine who reflected the characteristics of patients eligible to receive the drug in France. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that our methods may be helpful for assessing the generalizability of clinical trial results to a real-world population before the availability of substantial real-world clinical data.

Cardiovascular Profile of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in France Based on REWIND CVOT Inclusion Criteria: A Real-World Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: The REWIND study demonstrated a cardiovascular (CV) benefit of dulaglutide treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with or without established cardiovascular disease (CVD). The current study aims to describe similarities and differences between characteristics of patients with T2D in France and the REWIND population. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was conducted in France using primary care IQVIA electronic medical records. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with at least one clinical visit and/or glucose-lowering agent prescription in 2019 were identified. The percentages of patients aged ≥ 50 years with established CVD, aged ≥ 55 years with subclinical CVD or aged ≥ 60 years with multiple CV risk factors based on REWIND definitions were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 63,927 patients with T2D were included. Mean age was 67 years, 93% were aged ≥ 50 years and 58% were male. The median time since T2D diagnosis was 5.6 years, mean glycated hemoglobin was 7.1% and mean body mass index was 30.4 kg/m2. Of the patients included in the current study, 59.4% fulfilled REWIND CV criteria; 12.4% of patients were ≥ 50 years old with established CVD; 9.7% of patients were aged ≥ 55 years with subclinical vascular disease and 44.7% were aged ≥ 60 years with ≥ 2 CV risk factors. CONCLUSION: Almost 60% of this primary care French cohort with T2D fulfilled key REWIND CV criteria, with a lower percentage of patients having established CVD than REWIND participants.

Conversations and reactions around severe hypoglycemia (CRASH) global survey of people with type 1 diabetes or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and caregivers: Findings from the French cohort.

AIM: The objective of the CRASH (Conversations and Reactions Around Severe Hypoglycemia) survey was to further our understanding of the characteristics, experience, behavior and conversations with healthcare professionals (HCPs) of people with diabetes (PWD) receiving insulin, and of caregivers (CGs) caring for such people, concerning hypoglycemia requiring external assistance (severe hypoglycemic events [SHEs]). METHODS: CRASH was an online cross-sectional survey conducted across eight countries. PWD with self-reported type 1 (T1D) or insulin-treated type 2 (T2D) diabetes were aged≥18 years and had experienced one or more SHEs in the past 3 years; CGs were non-medical professionals aged ≥18 years, caring for PWD meeting all the above criteria except for PWD age (≥4 rather than ≥18 years). The present report is a descriptive analysis of data from France. RESULTS: Among PWD who had ever discussed SHEs with an HCP, 38.9% of T1D PWD and 50.0% of T2D PWD reported that SHEs were discussed at every consultation; 26.3% and 8.8%, respectively, had not discussed the most recent SHE with an HCP. In total, 35.7% of T1D PWD and 53.8% of T2D PWD reported that glucagon was not available to them at the time of their most recent SHE. Only 16.9% of T1D PWD and 6.5% of T2D PWD who had discussed their most recent SHE with an HCP reported that the HCP recommended obtaining a glucagon kit or asked them to confirm that they already had one. High proportions of PWD and CGs reported that the most recent SHE had made them feel unprepared, scared and helpless and had affected mood, emotional state and activities. CONCLUSION: CRASH survey data from France identify a need for greater discussion about SHEs between HCPs and PWD and the CGs of such people, and reveal gaps in the diabetes education of PWDs and CGs.

Resource Use and Cost of Alzheimer's Disease in France: 18-Month Results from the GERAS Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: There is little longitudinal data on resource use and costs associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) in France. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate resource use and societal costs associated with AD in a French cohort of patients and their caregivers and the effect of patient cognitive decline on costs over an 18-month period. METHODS: Community-dwelling patients with mild, moderate, or moderately severe/severe AD dementia (n = 419) were followed-up for 18 months. Total societal costs were estimated by applying 2010 unit costs to resource use, including outpatient visits, hospital days, institutionalization, and caregiver hours. Cognitive function was assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination scores. RESULTS: Mean cumulative total costs over the 18-month period were €24,140 for patients with mild AD dementia, €34,287 for those with moderate AD dementia, and €44,171 for those with moderately severe/severe AD dementia (P < 0.001; ANOVA comparison between severity groups). The biggest contributor to total societal costs was caregiver informal care (>50% of total costs at all stages of AD dementia). Cognitive decline (≥3-point decrease in Mini-Mental State Examination score or institutionalization) was associated with a 12.5% increase in total costs (P = 0.02). Significant differences were observed across severity groups for caregiver time (P < 0.001); mean monthly caregiver time increased at each time point over the 18 months in each severity group. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing severity of AD dementia in France is associated with increased use of resources as well as increased total societal and patient costs; informal care was the greatest cost contributor. Clinically meaningful cognitive decline is associated with significantly increased costs.

The Cost-effectiveness of Dulaglutide 1.5mg versus Exenatide QW for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in France.

INTRODUCTION: Dulaglutide is a novel onceweekly administered glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this analysis was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus exenatide QW for the management of T2DM in France. METHODS: The QuintilesIMS CORE Diabetes Model was used to estimate the expected lifetime direct medical costs and outcomes of T2DM from the perspective of the French National Health Service. In the absence of head-to-head data, relative efficacy was derived from a network meta-analysis. Patient cohort characteristics were derived from the AWARD-2 trial. All patients were assumed to remain on treatment for 2 years before escalating to insulin therapy. Costs included treatment costs and costs associated with long-term complications of T2DM. Utilities were estimated based on a recent systematic review. One-way sensitivity analyses (OWSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs) were generated. RESULTS: Dulaglutide 1.5 mg was associated with lower costs (lifetime costs €41,562 vs €43,021) and increased health benefits (lifetime quality-adjusted life years: QALYs 9.804 vs 9.757) versus exenatide QW for the treatment of T2DM in France. OWSA and PSA indicated that results were robust across a range of plausible input parameters. The CEAC indicated a 99.5% probability that dulaglutide would be considered cost-effective at a willingness to pay of €30,000. CONCLUSION: Dulaglutide 1.5 mg reduced expected costs and increased expected QALYs when compared against exenatide QW for the treatment of T2DM in France. Compared with exenatide QW, dulaglutide 1.5 mg can provide additional health benefits for patients with T2DM and may result in cost savings for payers. FUNDING: Eli Lilly.

Prasugrel Use in Real Life: A Report From the Outpatient Setting in France.

The objective of this study was to provide descriptive statistics on patterns of prasugrel usage in the outpatient setting in France. This retrospective study was conducted to describe treatment patterns for prasugrel in the outpatient setting in France using the Intercontinental Marketing Services (IMS) Disease Analyzer database, which collates electronic medical records updated by a nationally representative database of 1200 French general practitioners (GPs). Anonymous data were collected prospectively at each follow-up visit. The study population consisted of patients with ≥1 prescription for prasugrel in the outpatient setting from its launch date to 3 years post-launch. Patients were followed up from the date of the first prescription for prasugrel recorded in the database until they died, changed GP, or reached the end of the study, whichever came first. In France, the IMS Disease Analyzer included 1052 patients receiving ≥1 prescription of prasugrel from January 2010 until October 2012. Eighty-five percent of the population was male. The mean age was 58 years; 94.3% were age <75 years, and 95.0% weighed ≥60 kg. Of the total, 99.8% of patients were prescribed a daily maintenance dose of 10 mg, and 0.2% had a history of transient ischemic attack/stroke. Concomitant medications were antiplatelet agents (100%; aspirin, 93.7%), lipid-lowering agents (90.1%), ß-blockers (83.7%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (62.2%), and anti-ulcer medications (55.1%). The results reflect good usage of prasugrel by French GPs in the outpatient setting, with excellent implementation of the Prasugrel European Summary Product Characteristics.

Effectiveness of two formulations of oral olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder in a natural setting: results from a 1-year European observational study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the proportion of patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder who discontinued treatment with one of two oral formulations of olanzapine within 12 months in outpatient settings in Germany, Greece, and France. METHODS: This 1-year, prospective, observational study included patients who had recently initiated treatment with olanzapine-coated tablets (OC) or the orodispersible (OD) formulation. Primary endpoint was olanzapine discontinuation for any reason. Clinical and functional status were also evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 927 enrolled patients, 903 were included in the analyses (612 patients with schizophrenia, 291 with bipolar disorder). Within 12 months, 46 of 903 patients discontinued olanzapine. Most (95%) patients remained on olanzapine for 12 months with similar rates for patients with either diagnosis (94.5% for schizophrenia, 94.9% for bipolar disorder) and for both formulations (93.7% with OC, 95.3% with OD). The only factor significantly associated with time to discontinuation was baseline disease severity. Patients with more severe disease at baseline had a lower discontinuation risk. There were significant improvements in functioning and well-being and non-significant improvements in therapeutic alliance and compliance. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference was seen between discontinuation rates of the two formulations. Higher baseline severity was associated with a lower discontinuation rate.

Strategies of treatment with olanzapine in schizophrenic patients during stable phase: results of a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: There is an ongoing debate regarding doses of antipsychotic in stable schizophrenia patients. This French pilot study was undertaken to estimate two strategies of treatment with olanzapine in stable phase - maintenance of the acute dose or dose reduction. METHOD: 6 months open, randomized trial comparing two strategies of treatment with olanzapine in 97 schizophrenia stabilized outpatients. RESULTS: Mean daily doses at 6 months in the olanzapine full dose (OFD) and reduction dose (ORD) groups were respectively 18.1 mg and 13.3 mg. 4 patients (8%) relapsed in the ORD group versus 3 (6%) in the OFD group. A secondary analysis reflecting more real life setting showed a numerically higher rate of relapse in the dose reduction group (20% versus 10%). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that maintenance treatment with olanzapine, beyond 4 months, with the same dose that was effective acutely could be useful to prevent new psychiatric hospitalization.

Remission in the outpatient care of schizophrenia: 3-year results from the Schizophrenia Outpatients Health Outcomes (SOHO) study in France.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the contribution of socio-demographics, clinical profile and psychotropic treatment on remission in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: Among 933 French outpatients recruited in the European observational Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes study (SOHO), 563 were followed-up for 3 years, had at most one missing visit, and were included in the analysis. Symptomatic remission was defined as a score of 3 (mild severity) or less on the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia (CGI) overall, positive, negative and cognitive symptom scales, maintained for at least 6 months and without hospitalization. A logistic regression model was used to analyse the factors associated with time in remission. RESULTS: 60.6% of patients achieved remission during the 3-year follow-up. Patients never treated before inclusion in the study (OR=2.3) and those having paid employment (OR=1.4) were more likely to achieve remission. Higher baseline clinical severity was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of achieving remission: CGI overall (OR=0.67), CGI positive (OR=0.85) and CGI negative (OR=0.74). Compared with olanzapine, other atypicals (OR=0.71) and conventional antipsychotics (OR=0.69) were associated with a lower probability of achieving remission. CONCLUSIONS: Remission can be achieved in a high proportion of patients. Factors such as being previously untreated, having paid employment and taking olanzapine are predictors of remission.