Objective behavior associated with an "ordinary" mild headache: a surprising failure of pain onset to signal self-protective or self-regulatory behavior.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine whether onset of an "ordinary" headache initiated self-protective behavior or self-regulation, as indexed by a reduction in effort expenditure. METHODS: A nonclinical sample was employed. The ambition and performance accuracy of a headache-developing group (n = 23) and a sex-matched, headache-free group (n = 23) was compared during a series of mental arithmetic problems. Embedded within the series of math problems was a task involving recall of a stressor previously found to induce headache in many subjects. RESULTS: Onset of mild head pain did not lead to effort conservation; instead, heightened ambition appeared to characterize the headache-developing participants before as well as after headache onset. Headache-developing subjects also displayed a performance accuracy deficit. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest unusually ambitious, effortful task engagement may contribute to the onset of mild "ordinary" headache. This possibility requires further examination under other controlled conditions as well as in the natural environment.

Neurologic validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test with a pediatric population.

This study investigated the neurologic validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) with a pediatric population; that is, the ability of the test to detect dysfunction in the frontal lobes. Fifty children with diverse etiologies of brain dysfunction were classified via EEG, MRI, or CT as having left hemisphere, right hemisphere, or bilateral frontal, extrafrontal, or multifocal/diffuse regions of brain dysfunction. Findings failed to support the hypotheses that WCST performance is more impaired in frontal lesions than extrafrontal or multifocal/diffuse lesions, or that WCST performance is more impaired in left hemisphere lesions than right. Although the WCST is not helpful in localizing cerebral area of dysfunction, it may still be a clinically useful test for examining processes that children use to solve complex problems.