Single-center surgical site infection rate after peripheral ECMO decannulation and surgical repair.

Objective: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to provide heart-lung bypass support in cases of acute respiratory and cardiac failure. The two main classifications of ECMO are venoarterial (VA) and venovenous (VV). After the patient recovers from an acute state, ECMO decannulation from the groin often requires femoral exploration and vessel repair. This study was performed to quantify the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) after ECMO decannulation. Methods: Retrospective single-institutional review of patients requiring ECMO from January 2016 to October 2019 was conducted. The study examined incidence of SSI. We evaluated preoperative risk factors, VA versus VV ECMO, Szilagyi infection score, and postoperative management. Results: Initial search began with 176 ECMO cases, of which 106 patients were deceased before development of any infection. Eighteen were eliminated because of central ECMO access, and four were lost to chart privacy. Of the 154 patients requiring femoral ECMO, 48 (31%) survived, with 22 VA and 26 VV ECMO. Twelve patients were classified as infected, resulting in an overall SSI rate of 25%. Surgical repair of the femoral arterial cannulation site was required in the 22 VA ECMO patients, and 10 of these became infected, resulting in an infection rate of 45%. The remaining two infected were VV ECMO and did not require surgery. The VV ECMO SSI rate was 7.7%. The infected group of VA ECMO consisted of eight primary surgical repairs and two patch repairs. Eight of the patients required multiple reoperations and two required antibiotics and wound care alone. There was no instance of limb loss. Statistical analysis showed intraoperative transfusion of >250 ml and blood loss of >300 ml as the only predictive factors of infection. The Szilagyi score was found to be worse in patients requiring patch angioplasty. Conclusion: Surgical repair of ECMO arterial cannulation sites had postoperative SSIs in nearly half of the patients (45%). The VV ECMO SSI rate was found to be 7.7%. Severity of infection was worse in more complicated repairs. Overall ECMO mortality was high at 69%. Although we found no clear correlation with common risk factors, transfusions >250 ml and blood loss >300 ml were found to be predictive. Vascular surgeons should be aware of high risk of SSI with repair of femoral ECMO cannulation sites.

Increasing ablation distance peripheral to the saphenofemoral junction may result in a diminished rate of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: The treatment of venous insufficiency using endovenous laser ablation or radiofrequency ablation may result in endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT), a form of deep venous thrombosis. This study sought to assess whether increasing the ablation distance peripheral to the deep venous junction would result in a reduction in the incidence of EHIT II. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database from April 2007 to December 2011. Consecutive patients undergoing great saphenous vein (GSV) or small saphenous vein (SSV) ablation were evaluated. Previous to February 2011, all venous ablations were performed 2 cm peripheral to the saphenofemoral or saphenopopliteal junction (group I). Subsequent to February 2011, ablations were performed greater than or equal to 2.5 cm peripheral to the respective deep system junction (group II). The primary outcome was the development of EHIT II or greater (ie, thrombus protruding into the deep venous system but comprising less than 50% of the deep vein lumen). Secondary outcomes included procedure-site complications such as thrombophlebitis and hematomas. χ(2) tests were performed for all discrete variables, and unpaired Student's t-tests were performed for all continuous variables. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 4223 procedures were performed among group I (n = 3239) and group II (n = 984). Patient demographics were similar between the two groups; however, the CEAP classification was higher by a small margin in group II, and the result was significant (group I: 2.6% ± 0.9% vs group II: 2.8% ± 1.0%; P = .006). The incidence of EHIT II was 76 in group I and 13 in group II. This represented a trend toward diminished frequency in group II as compared with group I (group I: 2.3% vs group II: 1.3%; P = .066). There were no reported cases of EHIT III or IV in this patient cohort. Patients who developed an EHIT II in group I were treated using anticoagulation 54% of the time, and patients who developed an EHIT II in group II were treated using anticoagulation 100% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that changing the treatment distance from 2 cm to greater than or equal to 2.5 cm peripheral to the deep venous junction may result in a diminished incidence of EHIT II. Ongoing evaluation is required to validate these results and to affirm the long-term durability of this technique.

Arteriovenous fistula after endovenous ablation for varicose veins.

Endovenous ablation, using radiofrequency or laser, is becoming the mainstay of treatment for symptomatic varicose veins in the setting of saphenous vein incompetency. Both procedures have been shown to produce high rates of truncal vein occlusion with few complications. This article presents three patients who developed arteriovenous fistula (AVF) following great saphenous vein treatment: two following radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and one following laser ablation. This is the first published report of AVF following RFA for which operative details are known. We review the literature and discuss possible causes and management of this rare complication.