Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Injury ; 41(2): 147-50, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19647820

ABSTRACT

Although there is much in the literature regarding pin site infections, there is no accepted, validated method for documenting their state. We present a system for reliably labelling pin sites on any ring fixator construct and an easy-to-remember grading system to document the state of each pin site. Each site is graded in terms of erythema, pain and discharge to give a 3-point scale, named "Good", "Bad" and "Ugly" for ease of recall. This system was tested for intra- and inter-observer reproducibility. 15 patients undergoing elective limb reconstruction were recruited. A total of 218 pin sites were independently scored by 2 examiners. 82 were then re-examined later by the same examiners. 514 pin sites were felt to be "Good", 80 "Bad" and 6 "Ugly". The reproducibility of the system was found to be excellent. We feel our system gives a quick, reliable and reproducible method to monitor individual pin sites and their response to treatment.


Subject(s)
Bone Nails/adverse effects , Ilizarov Technique/instrumentation , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Clinical Protocols , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Humans , Observer Variation , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Reproducibility of Results , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...