[Refractory pulmonary edema under ECMO: Is there a place for Rashkind atrioseptotomy?] / Œdème aigu pulmonaire réfractaire sous ECMO : une place pour l'atrioseptotomie de Rashkind ?

Hydrostatic pulmonary edema is a well-known complication of veinoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) caused by increased left ventricle afterload due to reverse blood flow in the aorta. Several techniques are commonly used for left ventricle venting such as intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella® (Abiomed, Danvers, MA), central surgical cannulation or Rahskind atrial septostomy. We reported two cases of hydrostatic pulmonary edema in patients under VA-ECMO for whom it was decided to perform Rashkind technique. The first is a late anterior myocardial infarction complicated with cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock. Refractory hypoxemia due to hydrostatic pulmonary edema conducted us to perform atrial septostomy. The second case is a refractory cardiogenic shock due to left main stent thrombosis myocardial infarction. Procedural transesophageal echocardiography revealed a large left atrial thrombus extended to pulmonary veins preventing the procedure. These two cases illustrate the importance and gravity of pulmonary edema induced by VA-ECMO. The first shows that this technique is feasible, allows great left ventricle unloading and improves hypoxemia. The second underlines the interest of performing transesophageal echocardiography to look for pulmonary veins thrombosis that can take part in the elevation of hydrostatic pressure and forbid Rashkind manoeuver.

Respective role of surface electrocardiogram and His bundle recordings to assess the risk of atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular block (AVB) is common after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is needed in up to 30% of patients. Main predictors of long term AVB are electrocardiographic. The purpose of this study is to assess the prognostic value of serial HV intervals measured before and after TAVR to shorten the timing of PPM implantation. METHODS: His bundle recordings were performed before (HV1), immediately after TAVR (HV2) and at day 2 for Edwards Sapien (ES) and 5 for Medtronic CoreValve (CV) (HV3). PPM indications were high degree AVB before day 5 or prolonged HV interval ≥80ms at the last recording. High degree AVB after discharge was evaluated from the pacemaker memories and ECG at 1 and 6months. RESULTS: Data were obtained in 84 patients (33% CV and 67% ES). HV values were not associated with early or late AVB. PPM were implanted in 27 patients (34%) for documented AVB (n=17, 24%), prolonged HV interval (n=9) or sick sinus syndrome (n=1). Persistent complete AVB during the procedure and postoperative high degree AVB were the only perioperative factors associated with further long term occurrence of high degree AVB (p=0.001 and p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, only postoperative high degree AVB was significant (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Pre- and post-operative HV measurements were not correlated with late AVB after TAVR. Perioperative persistent complete AVB and postoperative high degree AVB are the only factors to predict late AVB and should be considered for the decision of PPM implantation.