Unilateral high-load resistance training influences strength changes in the contralateral arm undergoing low-load training.

OBJECTIVES: Within-subject training models have become common within the exercise literature. However, it is currently unknown if training one arm with a high load would impact muscle size and strength of the opposing arm training with a low load. DESIGN: Parallel group. METHODS: 116 participants were randomized to one of three groups that completed 6-weeks (18 sessions) of elbow flexion exercise. Group 1 trained their dominant arm only, beginning with a one-repetition maximum test (≤5 attempts), followed by four sets of exercise using a weight equivalent to 8-12 repetition maximum. Group 2 completed the same training as Group 1 in their dominant arm, while the non-dominant arm completed four sets of low-load exercise (30-40 repetition maximum). Group 3 trained their non-dominant arm only, performing the same low-load exercise as Group 2. Participants were compared for changes in muscle thickness and elbow flexion one-repetition maximum. RESULTS: The greatest changes in non-dominant strength were present in Groups 1 (Δ 1.5 kg; untrained arm) and 2 (Δ1.1 kg; low-load arm with high load on opposite arm), compared to Group 3 (Δ 0.3 kg; low-load only). Only the arms being directly trained observed changes in muscle thickness (≈Δ 0.25 cm depending on site). CONCLUSIONS: Within-subject training models are potentially problematic when investigating changes in strength (though not muscle growth). This is based on the finding that the untrained limb of Group 1 saw similar changes in strength as the non-dominant limb of Group 2 which were both greater than the low-load training limb of Group 3.

The Effect of Blood Flow Restriction Therapy on Recovery After Experimentally Induced Muscle Weakness and Pain.

ABSTRACT: Wong, V, Dankel, SJ, Spitz, RW, Bell, ZW, Viana, RB, Chatakondi, RN, Abe, T, and Loenneke, JP. The effect of blood flow restriction therapy on recovery after experimentally induced muscle weakness and pain. J Strength Cond Res 36(4): 1147-1152, 2022-The purpose was to determine if blood flow restriction with no external load could be used as a means of active therapy after experimentally induced fatigue and soreness. Twelve women and 7 men (aged 18-35 years) participated in a randomized controlled trial using a within-subject design. The study intervention was 3 consecutive visits. Visit 1 included the fatiguing/soreness-inducing protocol for the elbow flexors, which was performed only once during the study. Torque was measured before/after to confirm individuals began in a weakened state. Subjects then completed blood flow restriction therapy on one arm and the sham therapy on the other. Subjects performed elbow flexion/contraction with no external load on both arms. Torque was measured once more 10 minutes after the fatiguing/soreness-inducing protocol. Twenty-four hours later, soreness and torque were assessed in each arm, followed by another bout of therapy. Forty-eight hours after the initial visit, soreness and torque were measured again. There were no differences (median difference [95% credible interval]) in the recovery of torque between the blood flow restriction and sham therapy conditions at 10 minutes (0.5 [-2.7, 3.8] N·m), 24 hours (-2.34 [-6, 1.14] N·m), or 48 hours (-1.94 [-5.45, 1.33] N·m). There were also no differences in ratings of soreness at 24 hours (-2.48 [-10.05, 5.05]) or 48 hours (2.58 [-4.96, 10.09]). Our results indicate that this specific model of blood flow restriction therapy did not enhance the recovery of the muscle compared with a sham condition without the application of pressure.

Blood Flow Restricted Exercise and Discomfort: A Review.

ABSTRACT: Spitz, RW, Wong, V, Bell, ZW, Viana, RB, Chatakondi, RN, Abe, T, and Loenneke, JP. Blood flow restricted exercise and discomfort: A review. J Strength Cond Res 36(3): 871-879, 2022-Blood flow restriction exercise involves using a pneumatic cuff or elastic band to restrict arterial inflow into the muscle and block venous return out of the muscle during the exercise bout. The resultant ischemia in conjunction with low-load exercise has shown to be beneficial with increasing muscle size and strength. However, a limitation of using blood flow restriction (BFR) is the accompanying discomfort associated with this type of exercise. Factors that may influence discomfort are applied pressure, width of the cuff, cuff material, sex, and training to failure. The goal of this review was to evaluate the existing literature and elucidate how these factors can be manipulated to reduce discomfort during exercise as well as provide possible directions for future research. Thirty-eight different studies were located investigating BFR and discomfort. It was found that BFR training causes more discomfort than exercise without BFR. However, chronic use of BFR may increase tolerability, but discomfort may still be elevated over traditional non-blood flow restricted exercise. Discomfort can be attenuated by the application of lower applied pressures and stopping short of task failure. Finally, in the upper body, wider cuffs seem to increase ratings of discomfort compared with more narrow cuffs. In conclusion, applying the proper-sized cuff and making the applied pressure relative to both the individual and the cuff applied may attenuate discomfort. Reducing discomfort during exercise may help increase adherence to exercise and rehabilitation programs.

Acute exercise and cognition: A review with testable questions for future research into cognitive enhancement with blood flow restriction.

Blood flow restriction, in combination with low load/intensity exercise, has consistently been shown to increase both muscle size and strength. In contrast, the effects of blood flow restricted exercise on cognition have not been well studied. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is 1) to review the currently available literature investigating the impact of blood flow restricted exercise on cognition and 2) to provide some hypotheses for how blood flow restriction might provide an additive stimulus for augmenting specific cognitive domains above exercise alone. Given the lack of research in this area, the effects of blood flow restricted exercise on cognition are still unclear. We hypothesize that blood flow restricted exercise could potentially enhance several cognitive domains (such as attention, executive functioning, and memory) through increases in lactate production, catecholamine concentration, and PGC-1α expression. We review work that suggests that blood flow restriction is not only a beneficial strategy to improve musculoskeletal function but could also be a favorable method for enhancing multiple domains of cognition. Nonetheless, it must be emphasized this is a hypothesis that currently has only minimal experimental support, and further investigations in the future are necessary to test the hypothesis.

Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Effects of Sex, Cuff Width, and Cuff Pressure on Perceived Lower Body Discomfort.

Narrow cuffs cause less discomfort than wide cuffs immediately following elbow flexion exercise in combination with blood flow restriction, possibly due to a balling up effect of the bicep underneath the cuff. In this study, we sought to examine the impact of cuff width, sex, and pressure on perceived discomfort in the quadriceps, following knee extensions. One hundred participants completed three separate experiments. In Experiment 1, we compared participants' discomfort at rest after using a 5 and a 12 cm cuff. In Experiment 2, we compared the discomfort from these two cuffs after four sets of exercise. In Experiment 3, we used the same exercise protocol as in Experiment 2, but we compared the discomfort between a 12 cm cuff inflated to an inappropriate pressure and a 12 cm cuff inflated to the recommended pressure. We found no sex differences in Experiments 1 and 3. In Experiment 1, the narrow cuff had higher discomfort (16 vs 12 AU). In Experiment 2, men reported higher discomfort than women, with no discomfort differences related to cuff width, though narrow cuffs were most preferred. In Experiment 3, cuffs inflated to a pressure intended for narrow cuffs were associated with higher discomfort, and participants preferred to use it less. In summary, we found no strong evidence for discomfort differences due to cuff width. There was some indication that participants preferred narrow cuffs with pressures inflated to the recommended relative pressure. Muscle shape may influence how cuff width affects discomfort.

Postactivation performance enhancement: Does conditioning one arm augment performance in the other?

The purpose was to determine whether postactivation performance enhancement is specific to the muscle being conditioned or if it is also observed within the homologous muscles of the contralateral limb (after accounting for the warm-up and random error). We also investigated whether this differed based on training status or muscle size. One hundred seven participants (75 untrained; 32 trained) participated in four sessions. Visit 1 included baseline measurements and familiarization. Visits 2-4 included the completion of one of the three experimental conditions: (a) control, (b) same side and (c) crossover completed in a randomized order. The control condition completed all testing except for the conditioning contraction. The same side condition completed the conditioning contraction on the same side as the strength test. The crossover condition completed the conditioning on the arm opposite to the strength test. The variable of interest was the change from baseline in isokinetic strength. Our analysis indicated that of the hypotheses compared, the posterior probabilities (posterior probability of 0.506) favoured the hypothesis that the effect was local and greatest in those who were resistance trained [mean (SD) of 1.4 (2.2) Nm over the control in those resistance trained]. We found no relationship between muscle size and postactivation performance enhancement. In conclusion, there is an influence of training status pertaining to the postactivation performance enhancement effect but no influence from baseline muscle size. It appears unlikely that the effect is due to a systemic mechanism.

Conditioning participants to a relative pressure: implications for practical blood flow restriction.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a valid method of applying blood flow restriction when the pressure cannot be known. This method involves conditioning the individual to what the goal pressure should be, such that the participant is able to recognize the sensation associated with that specific pressure. APPROACH: Participants were conditioned to 40% of their arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) by oscillating between pressures that were too high (60%) and pressures that were too low (20%). Incorrect pressures were used to highlight pressure sensations surrounding the correct pressure that participants would be asked to later identify. Participants made attempts to estimate pressures at 5 min and 24 h following the conditioning stimulus. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 40 participants completed this study. Estimated pressures at 5 min post conditioning were similar to the target pressure (-2 (-7, 3) mmHg; probability of H0: 0.675). However, pressures at 24 h post conditioning were underestimated as compared to the target pressure (-7 (-13, -2) mmHg). Additionally, pressures at 24 h appeared to be less than that at 5 min (-4.7 (-8.6, 0.9) mmHg; probability of H1: 0.84). The average absolute error was 11.2 mmHg (7.4% AOP) for 5 min and 14.0 mmHg (9.2% AOP) at 24 h. SIGNIFICANCE: Although pressure estimations were underestimated at 24 h post conditioning, the majority of estimated pressures were between the upper and lower pressures used for the conditioning stimulus. Future research is needed to clarify and potentially refine what appears to be a promising method of estimation.

Muscle swelling following blood flow-restricted exercise does not differ between cuff widths in the proximal or distal portions of the upper leg.

The purpose was to understand how wider cuffs, covering larger portions of the limb, may affect acute muscle swelling when used during low-load knee extension exercise with blood flow restriction. A total of 96 individuals (53 females and 43 males) completed two visits, with visit one used for measuring maximal strength and arterial occlusion pressure (AOP), and visit two to compare between a narrow (5 cm) and a wide (12 cm) cuff for acute changes in muscle thickness and echo intensity following exercise. Ultrasound measurements were completed at a proximal and distal site within both legs, with the proximal site located beneath the cuff within the leg exercising using the wide cuff. Study findings indicate that the difference in acute changes for muscle thickness [median difference (95% credible interval) of 0.009 (-0.03, 0.05) cm] and echo intensity [median difference (95% credible interval) of 0.79 (-0.28, 1.89) AU] between cuff widths did not differ between proximal and distal sites. Additionally, acute changes in muscle thickness did not differ between cuff widths, sexes or participants who had AOP measured and those who were estimated. Lastly, acute changes in echo intensity did not differ between cuff widths and those who had AOP measured and those who were estimated. However, there was evidence showing how there might be greater reductions in echo intensity for females at the distal site. The previously observed attenuation of muscle growth under the cuff is unlikely to be related to differences in the acute muscle swelling response.

Influence of sex and resistance training status on orofacial muscle strength and morphology in healthy adults between the ages of 18 and 40: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the orofacial muscle strength and facial muscle thickness between resistance-trained and non-resistance trained men and women. METHODS: Resistance-trained (25 men and 22 women) and non-resistance trained (21 men and 30 women) adults (18-40 years) had standard measurements of orofacial muscle strength (ie, anterior tongue elevation, cheek compression, and lip compression) and ultrasound measurements of facial muscle thickness. Body composition (percent fat, etc.) was estimated using ultrasound prediction Equations. A Bayesian analysis of variance (ANOVA) with between subject factors of training status (yes/no) and sex (man/woman) were used to determine differences in muscle size and strength. RESULTS: Body mass, height, and percent fat were similar between resistance-trained and non-resistance trained individuals, while appendicular lean mass was higher in resistance-trained. There were no differences in orofacial muscle strength between resistance-trained and non-resistance trained. However, men had greater strength in every task except for anterior tongue strength which was similar between sexes (men: 66 vs women: 64 kPa). Handgrip strength was greater in men and in those who were resistance-trained. The frontalis muscle was greater in women than in men and in those who were non-resistance-trained than those resistance-trained. None of the other muscles differed by training status, however, all were greater in men. CONCLUSION: Results from our cross-sectional study would suggest that exercise-stimulation to the facial muscles during resistance training of the limbs and trunk did not reach a level where orofacial muscle strength could be changed. Sex differences in facial muscle thickness are very unique, although the reasons are unclear.

Exercise induced changes in echo intensity within the muscle: a brief review.

Echo intensity is the mean pixel intensity of a specific region of interest from an ultrasound image. This variable has been increasingly used in the literature as a physiological marker. Although there has been an increased interest in reporting changes in echo intensity in response to exercise, little consensus exists as to what a change in echo intensity represents physiologically. The purpose of this paper is to review some of the earliest, as well as the most up to date literature regarding the changes in echo intensity in response to exercise. Echo intensity has been used to measure muscle quality, muscle damage, acute swelling, and intramuscular glycogen. The changes in echo intensity, however, are not consistent throughout the literature and often times lead to conclusions that seem contrary to the physiologic effects of exercise. For example, echo intensity increases in conjunction with increases in strength, contrary to what would be expected if echo intensity was a marker of muscle quality/muscle damage. It is conceivable that a change in echo intensity represents a range of physiologic effects at different time points. We recommend that these effects should be determined experimentally in order to rule out what echo intensity might and might not represent. Until this is done, caution should be employed when interpreting changes in echo intensity with acute and chronic exercise.

Assessing differential responders and mean changes in muscle size, strength, and the crossover effect to 2 distinct resistance training protocols.

The objective of this study was to determine differences in 2 distinct resistance training protocols and if true variability can be detected after accounting for random error. Individuals (n = 151) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: (i) a traditional exercise group performing 4 sets to failure; (ii) a group performing a 1-repetition maximum (1RM) test; and (iii) a time-matched nonexercise control group. Both exercise groups performed 18 sessions of elbow flexion exercise over 6 weeks. While both training groups increased 1RM strength similarly (∼2.4 kg), true variability was only present in the traditional exercise group (true variability = 1.80 kg). Only the 1RM group increased untrained arm 1RM strength (1.5 kg), while only the traditional group increased ultrasound measured muscle thickness (∼0.23 cm). Despite these mean increases, no true variability was present for untrained arm strength or muscle hypertrophy in either training group. In conclusion, these findings demonstrate the importance of taking into consideration the magnitude of random error when classifying differential responders, as many studies may be classifying high and low responders as those who have the greatest amount of random error present. Additionally, our mean results demonstrate that strength is largely driven by task specificity, and the crossover effect of strength may be load dependent. Novelty Many studies examining differential responders to exercise do not account for random error. True variability was present in 1RM strength gains, but the variability in muscle hypertrophy and isokinetic strength changes could not be distinguished from random error. The crossover effect of strength may differ based on the protocol employed.

The Perceived Tightness Scale Does Not Provide Reliable Estimates of Blood Flow Restriction Pressure.

CONTEXT: The perceived tightness scale is suggested to be an effective method for setting subocclusive pressures with practical blood flow restriction. However, the reliability of this scale is unknown and is important as the reliability will ultimately dictate the usefulness of this method. OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability of the perceived tightness scale and investigate if the reliability differs by sex. DESIGN: Within-participant, repeated-measures. SETTING: University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four participants (12 men and 12 women) were tested over 3 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) and the pressure at which the participants rated a 7 out of 10 on the perceived tightness scale in the upper arm and upper leg. RESULTS: The percentage coefficient of variation for the measurement was approximately 12%, with no effect of sex in the upper (median δ [95% credible interval]: 0.016 [-0.741, 0.752]) or lower body (median δ [95% credible interval]: 0.266 [-0.396, 0.999]). This would produce an overestimation/underestimation of ∼25% from the mean perceived pressure in the upper body and ∼20% in the lower body. Participants rated pressures above their AOP for the upper body and below for the lower body. At the group level, there were differences in participants' ratings for their relative AOP (7 out of 10) between day 1 and days 2 and 3 for the lower body, but no differences between sexes for the upper or lower body. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the perceived tightness scale does not provide reliable estimates of relative pressures over multiple visits. This method resulted in a wide range of relative AOPs within the same individual across days. This may preclude the use of this scale to set the pressure for those implementing practical blood flow restriction in the laboratory, gym, or clinic.

The position of the cuff bladder has a large impact on the pressure needed for blood flow restriction.

OBJECTIVE: A recent study suggested that measuring the blood flow restriction pressure every training session may not be needed given the relative stability of this measurement over an eight week period of time. However, within clinical and research settings, various personnel may apply the cuff differently resulting in the cuff bladder being in dissimilar positions. Understanding the effect (if any) of bladder position may help with the standardization of blood flow restriction and ensure the proper stimulus is applied. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to measure and compare arterial occlusion pressures in the lower body between medial and lateral bladder positions. APPROACH: Thirty-two participants volunteered to have their arterial occlusion pressure measured thrice in their right leg. The 12 cm cuff was applied twice with the bladder covering the inner portion of their thigh (to establish agreement with itself) and once with the bladder covering the lateral portion. Effects are reported as median (95% credible interval). MAIN RESULTS: There was evidence the outside bladder position required greater pressure to occlude blood flow than the inside position (median difference of 13.56 (7.29, 19.84) mmHg). The agreement between inside and outside bladder positions had a mean difference of 14.3 (lower limit of agreement -19.7, upper limit of agreement 48.3) mmHg. The agreement was worse with individuals with larger thigh circumferences (r = 0.558 (0.24, 0.74)). SIGNIFICANCE: Cuff bladder position should be standardized to account for pressure differences. Standardizing bladder position may reduce the need to measure arterial occlusion pressure every time blood flow restriction is used.

The contraction history of the muscle and strength change: lessons learned from unilateral training models.

Participation in resistance exercise is encouraged throughout the lifetime, offering such benefits as improved strength and muscle mass accretion. Considerable research has been completed on this topic within the past several decades, with the current narrative dictating that increased muscle size yields further increases in muscle strength. However, there remain unanswered questions relating to the observation that certain training interventions yield only one specific adaptation (strength or size). Studies investigating resistance training often include either bilateral or unilateral exercise programs. Unilateral exercise programs are often used as they allow for comparison between two separate training interventions within the same individual. This is viewed as an advantage, relating to statistical power, but a limitation insofar as one intervention could be confounded by the intervention within the opposing limb. For example, when only one limb is trained both limbs often get stronger (albeit to differing magnitudes), termed the cross-education effect. However, we propose that when both limbs are trained that the cross-education effect may not occur and that the adaptations produced are reflective of the contraction history of the muscle. Herein, we discuss ways to test the idea that strength change may be dictated by the contraction history of the muscle. If each limb responds only to the contraction history within each limb (as opposed to the opposite limb), then this would have immediate ramifications for research design. Furthermore, this would certainly be of importance among injured populations undergoing rehabilitation, seeking to find the most efficacious exercise regimens.

The impact of cuff width and biological sex on cuff preference and the perceived discomfort to blood-flow-restricted arm exercise.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of cuff width, sex, and applied pressure on the perceived discomfort associated with blood flow restriction at rest and following exercise. APPROACH: Experiment 1 (n = 96) consisted of four sets of biceps exercise to failure with a narrow and wide cuff inflated to the same relative pressure. Experiment 2 (n = 87) compared two wide cuffs, one of which was inflated to a relative pressure obtained from a narrow cuff. Experiment 3 (n = 50) compared the discomfort of wide and narrow cuffs at rest. Effects are presented as median δ (95% credible interval). MAIN RESULTS: There was no sex effect for any variable of interest. In Experiment 1, the narrow cuff resulted in less discomfort than the wide cuff (39.3 versus 42.5; median δ -0.388 (-0.670, -0.109)). Participants also rated the narrow cuff as more preferable. Experiment 2 found that a wide cuff inflated to a narrow cuffs pressure resulted in greater discomfort than a wide cuff (44 versus 40.9; median δ: 0.420 (0.118, 0.716)). Experiment 3 found no difference between cuff widths. SIGNIFICANCE: Blood flow restricted exercise with a narrow cuff results in less discomfort than a wider cuff inflated to the same relative pressure. This effect is not observed at rest and suggests that the wide cuff produces a differential environment compared to a narrow cuff when combined with exercise. Additionally, applying a pressure meant for a narrow cuff to a wide cuff augments the applied pressure and subsequent discomfort to blood flow restricted exercise.

The influence of biological sex and cuff width on muscle swelling, echo intensity, and the fatigue response to blood flow restricted exercise.

The purpose was to determine if the muscle swelling, echo intensity, and fatigue responses to blood flow restriction differs based on cuff width (Experiment 1), applied pressure (Experiment 2), and sex. Ultrasound of muscle was taken before and after exercise. In Experiment 1 (n = 96), men swelled more than women and more with a narrow cuff than a wide cuff (0.60 cm vs. 0.52 cm). Expressed as a percentage change, there were no longer differences between cuffs (Narrow: 15% vs. Wide: 14%) or sex (Men: 14% vs. Women: 15%). Echo intensity remained unchanged. Women required more repetitions to reach task failure in sets 2, 3, and 4. In Experiment 2 (n = 87), men swelled more than women (Men: 0.46 cm vs. Women: 0.31 cm). Expressed as a percentage change, there were no differences. Echo intensity decreased in both conditions and to a greater extent with a higher applied pressure. If the acute muscle swelling response is important for initiating long term adaptation, then our results indicate that neither cuff width, sex, nor applied pressure will differentially impact the adaptation observed via this mechanism. Changes in echo intensity were inconsistent and the utility of this measurement may need to be reconsidered.