Contributors to Physician Burnout and Well-Being in Forensic Psychiatrists in Canada.

The experience of burnout in forensic psychiatrists has not been well studied, with most studies focusing on the experiences of forensic nurses, the impact of vicarious trauma and compassion fatigue in forensic mental health professionals, and the risk of posttraumatic stress disorder related to workplace exposures. This study reports on a national survey (34% response rate) conducted with forensic psychiatrists across Canada to understand the rate of, and contributors to, burnout and professional fulfillment. Just over half of the physician respondents reported experiencing burnout, which is in line with other recent surveys in Canada that have indicated elevated levels of burnout since the onset of the pandemic. The highest rates were found among early-career psychiatrists and those whose values did not align with their workplace. Intellectual stimulation, the interface with the legal system, and flexibility in one's job were all strongly linked with professional fulfillment. The goal of this survey was not only to identify rates and variables affecting burnout and wellness in this population but also to expand the dialogue on potential interventions at institutional and systems levels that can reduce burnout, promote professional fulfillment, and enhance recruitment and retention in the field of forensic psychiatry.

A Comprehensive Framework to Advance Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in a Forensic Service.

Minority and Indigenous populations have disproportionate representation within forensic mental health services. Social determinants of health and systemic discrimination have contributed to the difficulties these populations have in accessing care, as well as significant differences in care trajectories. In addition, staffing and structural equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) challenges permeate forensic systems as in other health care settings. There is little literature to guide forensic mental health services in how best to provide equitable, diverse, and inclusive practices for patients, families, and staff. The forensic service at a major urban center in the Canadian province of Ontario has adapted an EDI framework to describe the processes employed to organize and integrate EDI principles and initiatives within a culture of learning and continuous improvement. This Forensic EDI Framework is composed of six domains: Organizational Commitment, Staff/Workforce Competencies, Service Access and Delivery, Promoting Responsiveness, Community Outreach, and Data Collection. Initiatives within each of these domains form the foundation of a sustainable platform for forensic service EDI practices that will promote lasting change.

Toward a New Model of Training in Canadian Forensic Psychiatry.

The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada has recently introduced a new model of training for residents and fellows in all specialties and subspecialties, including forensic psychiatry. This model, Competence by Design, is intended to improve the training of residents with the goal of increasing the competence of practicing specialists. In the Competence by Design model, training is broken down into four distinct phases. Residents prompt their supervisor proactively when they are ready to be assessed on a specific task, and the feedback is specific and corrective. A resident's performance of each designated task is reviewed by a competency committee, which decides when the trainee is ready to move on to the next phase. In this article, we review some of the problems with the current model of training and explore how this new model will improve upon this training. We anticipate that this model will prove effective at improving training in forensic psychiatry.

Ethics, Empathy, and Detached Concern in Forensic Psychiatry.

Clinical medical ethics are ruled by the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence. In forensic psychiatry, however, the duty to serve as an agent of the justice system overrules these principles; thus, examination subjects may indeed experience harms incurred by the psychiatrist's testimony. Alan Stone argued more than 30 years ago that the participation of psychiatrists in legal proceedings runs two essential and opposing risks: skewing justice to serve patients and deceiving patients to serve justice. In this article, we review the major lines of response and critique stemming from Stone's article. We focus on the use of empathy in examination and evaluation, a topic central to the ongoing discussion and debate. We then describe detached concern, a concept with a long history in medical education but new to discussions of ethics and empathy in forensic psychiatry. We conclude by proposing this concept as a useful addition to thought, discussion, and, above all, practice. We argue specifically that detached concern can help practitioners, seasoned and novice alike, to avail the benefits and manage the ethics risks of using empathy in evaluations.

Measurement-based care in forensic psychiatry.

Measurement-based care (MBC) is the systematic evaluation of a patient's symptoms or factors before or during an encounter. It is used to inform treatment and behavioral health interventions. This article argues that MBC is the natural consequence flowing from evidence-based practice. In this article, MBC is defined and explained in detail. Barriers to the implementation of MBC are presented and methods of selecting a measurement tool are evaluated. The article describes areas where MBC can be applied in forensic settings, and specific risk assessment tools are presented and evaluated, including the HCR-20v3, DASA-IV, DUNDRUM, and CGIC. The article emphasizes how imperative it is that physicians use MBC and discusses why forensic practice is ideally suited to MBC.

Management of COVID-19 Response in a Secure Forensic Mental Health Setting: Réponse à la gestion de la COVID-19 dans un établissement sécurisé de santé mentale et de psychiatrie légale.

OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presents major challenges to places of detention, including secure forensic hospitals. International guidance presents a range of approaches to assist in decreasing the risk of COVID-19 outbreaks as well as responses to manage outbreaks of infection should they occur. METHODS: We conducted a literature search on pandemic or outbreak management in forensic mental health settings, including gray literature sources, from 2000 to April 2020. We describe the evolution of a COVID-19 outbreak in our own facility, and the design, and staffing of a forensic isolation unit. RESULTS: We found a range of useful guidance but no published experience of implementing these approaches. We experienced outbreaks of COVID-19 on two secure forensic units with 13 patients and 10 staff becoming positive. One patient died. The outbreaks lasted for 41 days on each unit from declaration to resolution. We describe the approaches taken to reduction of infection risk, social distancing and changes to the care delivery model. CONCLUSIONS: Forensic secure settings present major challenges as some proposals for pandemic management such as decarceration or early release are not possible, and facilities may present challenges to achieve sustained social distancing. Assertive testing, cohorting, and isolation units are appropriate responses to these challenges.