Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Can Geriatr J ; 21(2): 139-142, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29977428

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this pilot study was to explore the potential of eye-tracking technology in monitoring symptoms and predicting outcomes in apathetic Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients treated with methylphenidate (MTP). METHODS: Neuropsychological tests and eye-tracking measurements were completed at baseline and following at least four weeks of treatment with MTP (5-10 mg BID). Eye-movements were measured while patients viewed novel and social stimuli. Cognition, behavior, and apathy were assessed using the Standardized Mini-Mental State Exam (sMMSE), Neuropsychiatric Inventory, and Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES), respectively. RESULTS: Nine patients were included in the analysis (age: median=75, interquartile range=8; sMMSE: median=22, interquartile range=14). Spearman correlations showed that improvement on the AES was associated with increased visual attention towards novel stimuli (ρ7=-0.809, p=.008). Additionally, lower baseline attention towards social images was associated with improvement on the AES (ρ7=0.905, p=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Eye-tracking techniques can be developed as an objective and nonverbal method of monitoring symptoms and treatment outcomes in AD patients.

2.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 55(4): 1339-1349, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27834775

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with selective attention impairments, which could contribute to cognitive and functional deficits. Using visual scanning parameters, selective attention toward novel stimuli, or novelty preference, can be measured by a non-verbal, non-invasive method that may be of value in predicting disease progression. OBJECTIVE: In this longitudinal study, we explored whether novelty preference can predict cognitive decline in AD patients. METHODS: Mild to moderate AD patients viewed slides containing both novel and repeat images. The number of fixations, the average fixation time, and the relative fixation time on the two types of images were measured by an eye-tracking system. Novelty preference was estimated by the differences between the visual scanning parameters on novel and repeat images. Cognition and attention were assessed using the Standardized Mini-Mental Status Examination (sMMSE) and the Conners' Continuous Performance Test (CPT), respectively. Cognition was re-assessed every 6 months for up to 2 years. RESULTS: Multivariate linear regressions of 32 AD patients (14 females, age = 77.9±7.8, baseline sMMSE = 22.2±4.4) indicated that reduced time spent on novel images (t = 2.78, p = 0.010) was also associated with greater decline in sMMSE scores (R2 = 0.41, Adjusted R2 = 0.35, F3,28 = 6.51, p = 0.002), adjusting for attention and baseline sMMSE. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that novelty preference, measured by visual attention scanning technology, may reflect pathophysiological processes that could predict disease progression in the cognitively-impaired.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/complications , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/etiology , Choice Behavior/physiology , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Female , Fixation, Ocular , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Mental Status Schedule , Neuropsychological Tests , Photic Stimulation , Predictive Value of Tests , Young Adult
3.
Curr Alzheimer Res ; 13(10): 1134-44, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27137221

ABSTRACT

Agitation and aggression are common neuropsychiatric symptoms of Alzheimer's disease and are highly prevalent in people with dementia. When pharmacological intervention becomes necessary, current clinical practice guidelines recommend antipsychotics, cholinesterase inhibitors, and some antidepressants. However, those interventions have modest to low efficacy, and those with the highest demonstrated efficacy have significant safety concerns. As a result, current research is focusing on novel compounds that have different mechanisms of action and that may have a better balance of efficacy over safety. The purpose of this review is to evaluate novel pharmacological therapies for the management of agitation and aggression in AD patients. We performed a comprehensive literature search to identify recent novel drugs that are not included in most clinical practice guidelines or are currently undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of agitation and/or aggression in AD. This review suggests that novel treatments, such as cannabinoids, lithium, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics, narcotics, and newer antiepileptic drugs, may provide a safer alternative treatment option for the management of agitation and aggression in AD and requires further study in order to clarify their risks and benefits.


Subject(s)
Aggression/psychology , Alzheimer Disease/complications , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Psychomotor Agitation/drug therapy , Aggression/drug effects , Databases, Bibliographic/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Psychomotor Agitation/etiology
4.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 51(3): 837-46, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26890774

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Apathy, one of the most prevalent neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease (AD), can be difficult to assess as cognition deteriorates. There is a need for more objective assessments that do not rely on patient insight, communicative capacities, or caregiver observation. OBJECTIVE: We measured visual scanning behavior, using an eye-tracker, to explore attentional bias in the presence of competing stimuli to assess apathy in AD patients. METHODS: Mild-to-moderate AD patients (Standardized Mini-Mental Status Examination, sMMSE >10) were assessed for apathy (Neuropsychiatric Inventory [NPI] apathy, Apathy Evaluation Scale [AES]). Participants were presented with 16 slides, each containing 4 images of different emotional themes (2 neutral, 1 social, 1 dysphoric). The duration of time spent, and fixation frequency on images were measured. RESULTS: Of the 36 AD patients (14 females, age = 78.2±7.8, sMMSE = 22.4±3.5) included, 17 had significant apathy (based on NPI apathy ≥4) and 19 did not. These groups had comparable age and sMMSE. Repeated-measures analysis of covariance models, controlling for total NPI, showed group (apathetic versus non-apathetic) by image (social versus dysphoric) interactions for duration (F(1,32) = 4.31, p = 0.046) and fixation frequency (F(1,32) = 11.34, p = 0.002). Apathetic patients demonstrated reduced duration and fixation frequency on social images compared with non-apathetic patients. Additionally, linear regression models suggest that more severe apathy predicted decreasing fixation frequency on social images (R2 = 0.26, Adjusted R2 = 0.19, F(3,32) = 3.65, p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that diminished attentional bias toward social-themed stimuli is a marker of apathy in AD. Measurements of visual scanning behavior may have the potential to predict and monitor treatment response in apathy.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Apathy , Attentional Bias , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/physiopathology , Cognition , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emotions , Eye Movement Measurements , Eye Movements , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Photic Stimulation , Severity of Illness Index , Social Perception
5.
CNS Drugs ; 29(8): 615-23, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26271310

ABSTRACT

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is frequently associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) such as agitation and aggression, especially in the moderate to severe stages of the illness. The limited efficacy and high-risk profiles of current pharmacotherapies for the management of agitation and aggression in AD have driven the search for safer pharmacological alternatives. Over the past few years, there has been a growing interest in the therapeutic potential of medications that target the endocannabinoid system (ECS). The behavioural effects of ECS medications, as well as their ability to modulate neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, make targeting this system potentially relevant in AD. This article summarizes the literature to date supporting this rationale and evaluates clinical studies investigating cannabinoids for agitation and aggression in AD. Letters, case studies, and controlled trials from four electronic databases were included. While findings from six studies showed significant benefits from synthetic cannabinoids­dronabinol or nabilone­on agitation and aggression, definitive conclusions were limited by small sample sizes, short trial duration, and lack of placebo control in some of these studies. Given the relevance and findings to date, methodologically rigorous prospective clinical trials are recommended to determine the safety and efficacy of cannabinoids for the treatment of agitation and aggression in dementia and AD.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Cannabinoids/pharmacology , Psychomotor Agitation/drug therapy , Aggression/drug effects , Alzheimer Disease/physiopathology , Animals , Cannabinoids/adverse effects , Endocannabinoids/metabolism , Humans , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Psychomotor Agitation/etiology
6.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra ; 5(3): 492-502, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26955382

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with selective attention impairments, which could contribute to cognitive and functional deficits. Selective attention can be explored through examination of novelty preference. AIMS: In this study, we quantified novelty preference in AD patients by measuring visual scanning behaviour using an eye tracking paradigm. METHODS: Mild-to-moderate AD patients and elderly controls viewed slides containing novel and repeated images simultaneously. The outcome measure was time spent on specific images, with novelty preference defined by greater relative fixation time (RFT) on novel versus repeated images. Cognitive status (Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination, SMMSE) and attention (Digit Span, DS) were also measured. RESULTS: AD patients (age 79.2 ± 6.7 years, SMMSE 22.2 ± 4.0, n = 41) and controls (age 76.2 ± 6.4 years, SMMSE 28.1 ± 2.0, n = 24) were similar in age, education and sex. Compared with controls, AD patients had lower RFT on novel than on repeated images (F1,63 = 11.18, p = 0.001). Further, reduced RFT was associated with lower scores on SMMSE (r63 = 0.288, p = 0.020) and DS (r63 = 0.269, p = 0.030). Within individuals, novelty preference was detected in 92.3% of patients and in 100% of controls. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that novelty preference, measured by visual scanning behaviour, can differentiate cognitively healthy and impaired people and may offer a nonverbal, less cognitively demanding method of assessing selective attention.

7.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 26(2): 239-46, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24169147

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effect of methylphenidate (MPH) on attention in Alzheimer's disease (AD). MPH has shown to improve apathy in AD, and both apathy and attention have been related to dopaminergic function. The goal was to investigate MPH effects on attention in AD and assess the relationship between attention and apathy responses. METHODS: MPH (10 mg PO twice daily) or placebo was administered for six weeks in a randomized, double-blind trial in mild-to-moderate AD outpatients with apathy (Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Apathy ≥ 4). Attention was measured with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--Digit Span (DS) subtest (DS forward, selective attention) and apathy with the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES). A mixed effects linear regression estimated the difference in change from baseline between treatment groups, defined as δ (MPH (DS week 6-DS baseline)) - (placebo (DS week 6-DS baseline)). RESULTS: In 60 patients (37 females, age = 76 ± 8, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) = 20 ± 5, NPI Apathy = 7 ± 2), the change in DS forward (δ = 0.87 (95% CI: 0.06-1.68), p = 0.03) and DS total (δ = 1.01 (95% CI: 0.09-1.93), p = 0.03) favored MPH over placebo. Of 57 completers, 17 patients had improved apathy (≥3.3 points on the AES from baseline to end point) and 40 did not. There were no significant associations between AES and NPI Apathy with DS change scores in the MPH, placebo, AES responder, or non-responder groups. DS scores did not predict apathy response to MPH treatment. CONCLUSION: These results suggest MPH can improve attention and apathy in AD; however, the effects appear independent in this population.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Apathy/drug effects , Attention/drug effects , Methylphenidate , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/administration & dosage , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Monitoring/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Methylphenidate/administration & dosage , Methylphenidate/adverse effects , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Treatment Outcome
8.
Neurobiol Aging ; 33(7): 1482.e17-29, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22305186

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Higher intake of omega-3 fatty acids (n-3 FAs) is associated with a reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and milder forms of cognitive impairment (e.g. cognitive impairment no dementia [CIND]); however, findings from interventional trials are inconsistent. This meta-analysis examined the neuropsychological benefit of n-3 FAs in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled studies (RCTs) including healthy, CIND, or AD subjects. METHODS: Literature was searched using Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) up to September 2011. Treatment effects were summarized across cognitive subdomains, and effect sizes were estimated using Hedge's g and random effects modeling. RESULTS: Ten RCTs were combined quantitatively. There was no effect of n-3 FAs on composite memory (g = 0.04 [95% CI: -0.06-0.14], N = 934/812, p = 0.452). When examined by domain, no overall benefit for immediate recall (0.04 [-0.05-0.13], N = 934/812, p = 0.358) was detected; however, an effect in CIND subjects (0.16 [0.01-0.31], N = 349/327, p = 0.034) was found. A benefit for attention and processing speed was also detected in CIND (0.30 [0.02-0.57], N = 107/86, p = 0.035), but not healthy subjects. Benefits for delayed recall, recognition memory, or working memory and executive function were not observed. Treatment did not benefit AD patients as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog). No differences in adverse events (AE), dropout, or dropout due to AE between groups were observed. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest an effect of n-3 FAs within specific cognitive domains in CIND, but not in healthy or AD subjects.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/drug therapy , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/administration & dosage , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Humans , Mental Recall/drug effects , Mental Recall/physiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Treatment Outcome
9.
Drugs ; 71(15): 2031-65, 2011 Oct 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21985169

ABSTRACT

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive and ultimately fatal condition that causes debilitating memory loss and extensive deterioration of cognitive and functional abilities. Currently available treatments for AD (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine) are symptomatic and do not decelerate or prevent the progression of the disease. These therapies demonstrate modest, but particularly consistent, benefit for cognition, global status and functional ability. The search for disease-modifying interventions has focused largely on compounds targeting the amyloid-ß pathway. To date, the treatments targeting this pathway, such as tramiprosate and semagacestat, have been unsuccessful in demonstrating efficacy in clinical stages of testing. At this point, it is likely that not only amyloid-ß aggregation but other possible neuronal mechanisms - such as hyperphosphorylated tau, neuro-inflammation and other processes - play important roles in the pathophysiology of this multifactorial disorder. Development of better disease models and biomarkers is essential for the advancement of knowledge of the disease mechanisms. This systematic review critically examines the efficacy and safety data for currently approved drugs and emerging treatments in AD, as well as discussing the present and future directions of innovation in this field.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Cholinesterase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Nootropic Agents/therapeutic use , Alzheimer Disease/physiopathology , Amyloid beta-Peptides/drug effects , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Severity of Illness Index , tau Proteins/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...