Insulin resistance and metabolic flexibility as drivers of liver and cardiac disease in T2DM.

Metabolic flexibility refers to the ability of tissues to adapt their use of energy sources according to substrate availability and energy demands. This review aims to disentangle the emerging mechanisms through which altered metabolic flexibility and insulin resistance promote NAFLD and heart disease progression. Insulin resistance and metabolic inflexibility are central drivers of hepatic and cardiac diseases in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Both play a critical role in the complex interaction between glucose and lipid metabolism. Disruption of metabolic flexibility results in hyperglycemia and abnormal lipid metabolism, leading to increased accumulation of fat in the liver, contributing to the development and progression of NAFLD. Similarly, insulin resistance affects cardiac glucose metabolism, leading to altered utilization of energy substrates and impaired cardiac function, and influence cardiac lipid metabolism, further exacerbating the progression of heart failure. Regular physical activity promotes metabolic flexibility by increasing energy expenditure and enabling efficient switching between different energy substrates. On the contrary, weight loss achieved through calorie restriction ameliorates insulin sensitivity without improving flexibility. Strategies that mimic the effects of physical exercise, such as pharmacological interventions or targeted lifestyle modifications, show promise in effectively treating both diabetes and NAFLD, finally reducing the risk of advanced liver disease.

LIVE INDIA: Effectiveness of Gla-100 in a Post hoc Pooled Analysis of FINE ASIA and GOAL Registries.

INTRODUCTION: Real-world evidence on insulin glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100) initiation in Indian type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) individuals is limited. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Gla-100 in insulin-naïve T2DM participants from India. METHODS: This post hoc analysis includes real-world data of insulin-naïve Indian participants with T2DM who started Gla-100 treatment in two Asian registries: FINE ASIA and GOAL. Changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight, insulin dose, and incidence of hypoglycemia from baseline to 6 months were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 955 participants with T2DM were identified and analyzed. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] age and duration of diabetes were 54.7 (9.8) years and 9.8 (6.3) years, respectively. Mean HbA1c and FPG were significantly reduced after 6 months of Gla-100 treatment [- 2.07 (1.4) %; - 94.4 (65.2) mg/dl, respectively]. HbA1c targets of < 7.0% and < 7.5% were achieved by 292 (30.6%) and 589 (61.7%) study participants, respectively. The overall incidence of hypoglycemia was low (n = 52; 5.4%); only two participants (0.2%) reported severe hypoglycemia. Insulin was titrated with a mean (SD) increment of 2.5 (5.6) U/day after 6 months, leading to a mean Gla-100 dose of 18.2 (8.9) U/day. Mean body weight remained unchanged from baseline to 6 months (- 0.1 kg). CONCLUSION: In routine clinical practice, Gla-100 significantly improved glycemic parameters after 6 months of treatment with a low risk of hypoglycemia and no weight change in participants with T2DM.

Evolution of Guideline Recommendations on Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Over the Last Two Decades: A Narrative Review.

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus has been increasing worldwide. As the therapeutic options for type 2 diabetes mellitus have evolved over the last 2 decades, national and global guidelines related to type 2 diabetes mellitus pharmacotherapy issued by various organizations have tended to vary in their recommendations. This narrative review aimed to analyze the key recommendations by major global and national guidelines on the initiation of insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus over the last 20 years. Strategies for insulin therapy for titration and intensification were also assessed. All guidelines recommend initiation of insulin (basal/ premixed/other formulations) when glycemic targets are not achieved despite lifestyle measures and oral antidiabetic drugs. In the recent decade, early initiation of insulin has been recommended when the glycated hemoglobin levels are >10% or blood glucose levels are ≥300 mg/dL (16.7 mmol/L). Initiation is recommended at a dose of 10 units or 0.1-0.2 U/kg. Titration is advised to achieve the optimal dosage, while intensification is recommended when glycemic targets are not achieved despite titrating to an acceptable level. Glucose monitoring at periodic intervals is recommended for adequate glycemic control. The guidelines further suggest that the choice of insulin should be individualized, considering the clinical status of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The physicians as well as patients should be a part of the decisions made regarding the therapeutic choice of regimen, preparation, and delivery device.

One-year safety and effectiveness of insulin degludec in patients with diabetes mellitus in routine clinical practice in India-TRUST (Tresiba real-world use study).

Objective: This post-authorization safety study (PASS) was conducted to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of insulin degludec in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) requiring insulin therapy in routine clinical practice in India. Methods: Data on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and adverse events (AEs) were collected up to 12 months after insulin degludec initiation. Results: A total of 1057 adult patients with DM were enrolled, including 60.07% males with the mean duration of 22.2 ± 21.90 years with type 1 DM and 10.1 ± 7.37 years with type 2 DM and the mean HbA1c of 9.6 ± 1.9%. Insulin degludec was prescribed to improve HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Insulin degludec daily dose was increased from 14.8 ± 8.0 U to 18.0 ± 9.46 U over 12 months resulting in a significant decrease of HbA1c by 1.8 ± 1.68% compared with baseline. There were 84 events of confirmed hypoglycemia in 51 patients during the 12-month follow-up period, and 44 AEs were reported in 2.6% of patients, of which 2 AEs were serious and unrelated to the drug. Conclusion: Insulin degludec is well tolerated in patients with DM. It improves glycemic control with reduced HbA1c, FPG, and postprandial glucose, with a low risk of hypoglycemia.

A Practitioner's Toolkit for Insulin Motivation in Adults with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Evidence-Based Recommendations from an International Expert Panel.

AIM: To develop an evidence-based expert group opinion on the role of insulin motivation to overcome insulin distress during different stages of insulin therapy and to propose a practitioner's toolkit for insulin motivation in the management of diabetes mellitus (DM). BACKGROUND: Insulin distress, an emotional response of the patient to the suggested use of insulin, acts as a major barrier to insulin therapy in the management of DM. Addressing patient-, physician- and drug-related factors is important to overcome insulin distress. Strengthening of communication between physicians and patients with diabetes and enhancing the patients' coping skills are prerequisites to create a sense of comfort with the use of insulin. Insulin motivation is key to achieving targeted goals in diabetes care. A group of endocrinologists came together at an international meeting held in India to develop tool kits that would aid a practitioner in implementing insulin motivation strategies at different stages of the journey through insulin therapy, including pre-initiation, initiation, titration and intensification. During the meeting, emphasis was placed on the challenges and limitations faced by both physicians and patients with diabetes during each stage of the journey through insulinization. REVIEW RESULTS: After review of evidence and discussions, the expert group provided recommendations on strategies for improved insulin acceptance, empowering behavior change in patients with DM, approaches for motivating patients to initiate and maintain insulin therapy and best practices for insulin motivation at the pre-initiation, initiation, titration and intensification stages of insulin therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In the management of DM, bringing in positive behavioral change by motivating the patient to improve treatment adherence helps overcome insulin distress and achieve treatment goals.

GOAL study: clinical and non-clinical predictive factors for achieving glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes in real clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: The American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes guidelines recommend to individualize treatment targets/strategies in inadequately controlled patients by lifestyle management and glucose-lowering drugs to decrease the burden of diabetes-related complications. This real-world practice study aimed to assess predictive factors for achieving the glycemic hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at 6 months as targeted by the treating physician in adults with type 2 diabetes who required initiation of basal insulin, initiation of bolus insulin, or modification from basal or premixed insulin to new insulin regimen containing insulin glargine and/or insulin glulisine. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an international, multicenter, observational survey with 12-month follow-up time in adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled conducted in 10 developing countries. RESULTS: Overall, 2704 patients (mean age: 54.6 years, body mass index: 28.7 kg/m2; Caucasian: 46.1%, type 2 diabetes duration: 10.1 years) with poor glycemic control (mean HbA1c: 9.7% (83 mmol/mol), fasting blood glucose: 196.8 mg/dL) were eligible. At 6 months, advanced age, Caucasian ethnicity, shorter type 2 diabetes duration (>10 vs 1 year, p<0.0001), lower baseline HbA1c (≥ 8.5% vs <7%, p<0.0001) and no intake of oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) (none vs 2, p=0.02) were predictive factors for achieving glycemic goal as targeted by the treating physician. Absolute changes in the mean HbA1c of -1.7% and -2% were observed from baseline to 6 and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Along with some well-known predictive factors, this study suggested that early insulin regimen treatment initiation and/or intensification allowed patients to promote glycemic control.

Liraglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Liraglutide (victoza, Novo Nordisk A/S) is human GLP-1 analogue developed by recombinant DNA technology. It is indicated along with diet and exercise in management of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in adults. Liraglutide has been made available in India recently. Present review evaluates the efficacy and safety of liraglutide in T2DM and its comparison with other incretin based therapies. Liraglutide has been evaluated as monotherapy, in combination with one, two and three oral antidiabetic drugs similarly to routine clinical practice. These studies reported greater improvement in glycaemic control with liraglutide compared with comparators. Evaluation up to 2 years revealed sustained improvement in glycaemic control with liraglutide use. Liraglutide was well tolerated except for mild to moderate gastro-intestinal adverse events, which declined after continuation of therapy. Low risk of hypoglycaemia was reported with liraglutide therapy. Greater efficacy than other incretin based therapies was noted with liraglutide. Liraglutide has an important place in the management of T2DM. Apart from glycaemic control it also provides some important non-glycaemic benefits in terms of improving beta-cell function, weight reduction, and reduction in systolic blood pressure thereby overcoming the present therapeutic gap.