CT-Guided vs. Navigational Bronchoscopic Biopsies for Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: A Single-Institution Retrospective Comparison.

OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer is the second most common cause of death by cancer. Multiple modalities can be used to obtain a tissue sample from a pulmonary nodule. We aimed to compare the yield and adverse events related to transthoracic needle aspiration (TTNA) and Electromagnetic Navigation Biopsy (ENB) at our institution. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study in which all patients referred for evaluation of a pulmonary lesion over 5 years (1 January 2013 to 31 December 2018) were identified. Our primary outcome was to compare the accuracy of TTNA to that of ENB in establishing the diagnosis of pulmonary lesions. Secondary outcomes included the evaluation of the adverse events and the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value of each modality. RESULTS: A total of 1006 patients were analyzed. The mean age of patients in the TTNA and the ENB group was 67.2 ± 11.2 years and 68.3 ± 9.2 years respectively. Local anesthesia was predominantly used for TTNA and moderate sedation was more commonly used in the ENB group. We found ENB to have an accuracy of 57.1%, with a sensitivity of 40.0%, a specificity of 100.0%, a positive predictive value of 100.0%, and a negative predictive value of 40.0%. As for the TTNA, the accuracy was 75.9%, with a sensitivity of 77.5%, a specificity of 61.5%, a positive predictive value of 95.0%, and a negative predictive value of 22.5%. The rate of clinically significant complications was higher in the TTNA group (8.2%) as compared to the ENB group (4.7%) with a p-value < 0.001. CONCLUSION: TTNA was superior to ENB-guided biopsy for the diagnostic evaluation of lung nodules. However, the complication rate was much higher in the TTNA group as compared to the ENB group.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome; A Review of Recent Updates and a Glance into the Future.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a rapidly progressive form of respiratory failure that accounts for 10% of admissions to the ICU and is associated with approximately 40% mortality in severe cases. Despite significant mortality and healthcare burden, the mainstay of management remains supportive care. The recent pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 has re-ignited a worldwide interest in exploring the pathophysiology of ARDS, looking for innovative ideas to treat this disease. Recently, many trials have been published utilizing different pharmacotherapy targets; however, the long-term benefits of these agents remain unknown. Metabolomics profiling and stem cell transplantation offer strong enthusiasm and may completely change the outlook of ARDS management in the near future.

The Use of Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: A Paradigm Shift.

Despite recent developments, evaluation of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL) remains clinically challenging, and the diagnostic yield of many image-guided and bronchoscopy methods is still poor. Furthermore, complications from such procedures, such as pneumothorax and airway hemorrhage, are a major concern. Recently launched robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) platforms are still in the early exploration stage and may provide another tool for achieving PPL evaluation. We present our experience here as a retrospective cohort study describing the 12-month diagnostic yield with the shape-sensing Ion™ platform for minimally invasive peripheral lung biopsy. The study describes forty-two patients undergoing shape sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (ssRAB) at our institute. The early performance trend reveals a lesion localization of 100% and an overall 12-month diagnostic yield of 88.10%. The diagnostic yield for lesions less than 20 mm was 76% and for lesions greater than 20 mm was 100%. We also report our complication profile; we noted no pneumothoraces, excessive bleeding, or post-operative complications. In comparison to traditional bronchoscopy and image-guided modalities, our experience shows that ssRAB can be utilized successfully to travel to extremely small peripheral lesions with a higher diagnostic yield and better safety profile.

Low-dose versus high-dose dexamethasone for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Dexamethasone 6 mg daily for 10 days is the recommended treatment for patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The evidence on the benefit of high-dose dexamethasone is limited. The goal of this study was to assess the effects of 6 mg daily vs. 20 mg daily of dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, randomized, clinical trial involving hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Participants were randomized 1:1 to dexamethasone 6 mg daily or dexamethasone 20 mg daily, and were stratified by the WHO-Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement (OSCI). The primary outcome was clinical improvement equal to or greater than 2 points by OSCI on day 28. Secondary outcomes were 28-day mortality, intensive care unit-free days, and ventilator-free days on day 28. RESULTS: Of the 107 patients who enrolled and completed the follow up, 55 patients enrolled in the low-dose group and 52 patients enrolled in the high-dose group. Treatment with dexamethasone 20 mg daily compared with dexamethasone 6 mg daily did not result in better clinical improvement based on OSCI on day 28 (71.2% vs. 78.2%; odds ratio, 1.45 [0.55-3.86]; p = 0.403). For participants who required high-flow oxygen or noninvasive ventilation at randomization, the 6-mg group had better survival than the 20-mg group on day 28 (100% vs. 57.1%; p = 0.025). Although more participants in the 6-mg group received immune modulators (40% vs. 21.2%; p = 0.035), 50% of death cases in the 20-mg group who required high-flow oxygen or noninvasive ventilation at randomization received immune modulators. CONCLUSIONS: Dexamethasone 20 mg daily did not result in better clinical outcome improvement, and was probably associated with higher 28-day mortality in patients on high-flow oxygen or noninvasive ventilation, compared with dexamethasone 6 mg daily. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinialtrials.gov number, NCT04707534, registered January 13, 2021.

Management of life-threatening malignant central airway obstruction: A novel approach of using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with tumor debulking and stenting.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an artificial lung or heart used to oxygenate and circulate blood. Veno-venous ECMO is most commonly used as an emergency therapy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but it has the potential to be useful in other respiratory-related diseases. We report a case where ECMO successfully allowed for interventional pulmonary procedures in a patient with life-threatening tracheal obstruction secondary to lung cancer, requiring tumor debulking and silicone Y stent placement. The patient was a 44-year-old male who was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for an advanced stage subcarinal tumor invading into the trachea and bilateral main stem bronchi. The tumor was unresectable, and the first attempt to debulk the tumor was terminated due to the risk of complete airway occlusion. With the help of ECMO, the second attempt at tumor debulking was successful, and a Y stent was placed. The patient regained ventilation in both lungs and was transferred out of the ICU on day 2 post-op. The pathology confirmed squamous cell carcinoma, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) 99%. The patient received immunotherapy after hospital discharge. ECMO has the potential to be useful for patients with severe tracheal obstructions and compromised respiratory systems. For patients with certain types of lung cancer, who are good candidates for novel immunotherapies and targeted therapies, it offers a potential bridging therapy for procedures that would otherwise be too dangerous and should be considered when traditional treatments for these patients fail.

Transvascular endosonographic-guided needle biopsy of intrathoracic lesions.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy techniques, including endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), are currently the standard of care for the assessment of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Traditionally, passing the needle through and through vascular structures has been avoided owing to the risk of bleeding. In this study, we evaluated the safety and diagnostic accuracy of transvascular endosonographic-guided biopsies of mediastinal, hilar and lung lesions. Our hypothesis is that the approach is safe and adds to the endoscopic armamentarium, avoiding the need for surgical biopsy in specifically selected cases. METHODS: One hundred patients who underwent transvascular EBUS- or EUS-guided biopsy between 2012 and 2018 were identified from a prospective interventional endoscopy database. RESULTS: Biopsy was performed under EUS guidance in 65 patients and under EBUS guidance in 35 patients. The most frequent targets were the mediastinum (60 patients), lung (21 patients), and hilar lymph nodes (16 patients). The aorta was the vessel most commonly traversed (n = 57), followed by the pulmonary artery (n = 33). A median of 2 passes were performed per target (range, 1-5). The samples were adequate to make a diagnosis in 80 patients, and the endoscopic diagnosis was a malignancy in 62 patients. The overall sensitivity was 71.5%, and the accuracy was 74.5%. There were no observed intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications. A delayed complication, aortic pseudoaneurysm, was observed in 1 patient. Follow-up was completed in 84 patients, with a median duration of 12.3 ± 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: Transvascular endosonographic-guided biopsy is an important adjunct to conventional endoscopic techniques and allows the thoracic endoscopist to obtain biopsy specimens from intrathoracic lesions that are not accessible without vascular puncture.

Diagnosis and management of peripheral lung nodule.

A solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is a well-defined radiographic opacity up to 3 cm in diameter that is surrounded by unaltered aerated lung. Frequently, it is an incidental finding on chest radiographs and chest CT scans. Determining the probability of malignancy is the first step in the evaluation of SPN. This can be done by looking at specific risk factors and the rate of radiographic progression. Subsequent management is guided by the type of the nodule. Patients with solid nodules and low pretest probability can be followed radiographically; those with high probability, who are good surgical candidates, can be referred for surgical resection. When the pretest probability is in the intermediate range additional testing such as biopsy should be done. Various modalities are now available to obtain tissue diagnosis. These modalities differ in their yield and complication rate. Patients with SPN should be well informed of each approach's risks and benefits and should be able to make an informed decision regarding the different diagnostic and therapeutic modalities.

Radial Probe Ultrasound-Guided Cryobiopsy.

Fluoroscopy-guided transbronchial forceps biopsy has a low diagnostic yield in patients with radiographic suspicion of interstitial lung disease. Cryobiopsy has a higher diagnostic yield likely due to preserved lung architecture and larger biopsies; however, there is an increased risk of major airway bleeding and pneumothorax. Simultaneous use of endobronchial balloon blocker allows for containment of bleeding after cryobiopsy to the affected lobe. In the current article we describe use of radial ultrasound in identification of a target lung parenchyma without a major blood vessel adjacent to distal bronchi. After fluoroscopic marking of the selected airway a 3 second cryobiopsy was performed after localization of cryoprobe. Simultaneous use of radial ultrasound and fluoroscopy can possibly decrease bleeding complication associated with cryobiopsy in patients with suspected interstitial lung disease.

Frequency of hypoxic events in patients on a mechanical ventilator.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation is an important tool in the management of respiratory failure in the critically ill patient. Although mechanical ventilation can be a life-saving intervention, it is also known to carry several side-effects and risks. Adequate oxygenation is one of the primary goals of mechanical ventilation. However, while on mechanical ventilation, patients frequently experience hypoxic events resulting from various causes, which need to be properly evaluated and treated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained by prospectively reviewing all intensive care admissions during the period from March 2009 to March 2010 at a 651-bed urban medical center. Patients who developed hypoxemia (oxygen saturation ≤88% and a PaO2≤60 torrs) while on mechanical ventilation were investigated for the cause of hypoxic event. RESULTS: During the study period, 955 patients required mechanical ventilation from which 79 developed acute hypoxia. The causes of acute hypoxia in decreasing order of occurrences were pulmonary edema, atelectasis, pneumothorax, pneumonia, ARDS, endotracheal tube malfunction, airway bleeding, and pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate evaluation of all hypoxic events must begin at the bedside. A step-by-step approach must include a thorough physical examination. Evaluation of the endotracheal tube can immediately reveal dislodgement, bleeding, and secretions. Correlation of physical examination findings with those on chest radiograph is essential. Each hypoxic event requires a different intervention depending on its etiology. Instead of simply increasing the fraction of oxygen in the inspired air to overcome hypoxia, a concerted effort in appropriate problem solving can reduce the likelihood of an incorrect diagnosis and management response.