Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Anim Cogn ; 25(6): 1505-1515, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35570243

ABSTRACT

Recruitment is a process by which animals can initiate collective movements: the action of an individual prompts conspecifics to follow. Although it has been hypothesized that animals may be able to intentionally recruit others, there is no experimental evidence of this to date. We tested this hypothesis in two pairs of Tonkean macaques in a situation requiring the subjects to find a food site in a 2800 m2 area, and approach the site together to release rewards. Each subject was informed of the location of either highly or little-valued rewards. We recorded attention-action sequences in which an individual checked that his partner was attending to him before moving, and also simple departures (i.e., not preceded by eye contact). Analyses showed that sequences were more often followed by recruitment and leading the partner to a baited site than simple departures were. Moreover, subjects used attention-action sequences more frequently when informed of the location of the highly valued reward. This may be explained by the fact that the more motivated they were by the expected rewards, the more likely they were to actively recruit their partner. No such effect was found when subjects performed simple departures. We conclude that Tonkean macaques are capable of intentional recruitment because the subjects voluntarily behaved with the goal of influencing their partner's movement: they checked that the partner was paying attention to them and prompted him to follow by moving. Such performances can be accounted for either by associative learning or by intentional communication.


Subject(s)
Macaca , Reward , Male , Animals , Food
2.
J Environ Manage ; 218: 388-401, 2018 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29704834

ABSTRACT

The role of ecological science in environmental management has been discussed by many authors who recognize that there is a persistent gap between ecological science and environmental management. Here we develop theory through different perspectives based on knowledge types, research categories and research-management interface types, which we combine into a common framework. To draw out insights for bridging this gap, we build our case by:We point out the complementarities as well as the specificities and limitations of the different types of ecological research, ecological knowledge and research-management interfaces, which is of major importance for environmental management and research policies.


Subject(s)
Ecology , Knowledge , Conservation of Natural Resources , Research
3.
Chemphyschem ; 7(9): 1921-9, 2006 Sep 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16865758

ABSTRACT

Electrolytes based on lithium oligoether sulfate, and dissolved in liquid or polymer solvents, are studied. Their properties in term of ionic conductivities, transference numbers, diffusion coefficients, and electrochemical stabilities are reported. The comparison between NMR and electrochemical data, that is, transference numbers and conductivities, provides important information about the existence of ion pairs and aggregates. A fairly good agreement can be noticed between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energies and the stability of the salts towards oxidation in relation with the length of the oligoether tail.

4.
Primates ; 46(4): 241-8, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15886864

ABSTRACT

To assess how brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) delay gratification and maximize payoff, we carried out four experiments in which six subjects could exchange food pieces with a human experimenter. The pieces differed either in quality or quantity. In qualitative exchanges, all subjects gave a piece of food to receive another of higher value. When the difference of value between the rewards to be returned and those expected was higher, subjects performed better. Only two subjects refrained from nibbling the piece of food before returning it. All subjects performed two or three qualitative exchanges in succession to obtain a given reward. In quantitative exchanges, three subjects returned a food item to obtain a bigger one, but two of them nibbled the item before returning it. Individual differences were marked. Subjects had some difficulties when the food to be returned was similar or equal in quality to that expected.


Subject(s)
Cebus/physiology , Cooperative Behavior , Feeding Behavior/physiology , Social Behavior , Animals , Decision Making/physiology , Food Preferences , Humans , Observation , Reward
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...