Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 29
Filter
1.
South Asian J Cancer ; 13(1): 33-37, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721108

ABSTRACT

Dr. Vikram GotaCovid-19 has led to significant mortality worldwide, with an increased risk in cancer patients. Vaccination provides significant protection against the infection. The study focuses on the immunogenicity and effectiveness of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in cancer patients within a real-world setting. Blood samples for measuring Covid antibody titers against the receptor binding domain were collected according to a convenient sparse sampling strategy in a real-world setting, with the days of the collection coinciding with their hospital appointment. The antibody titers between different groups were analyzed descriptively. A total of 56 patients were enrolled in the study. There was no apparent effect in antibody titers between patients with solid tumors and hematological malignancies (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 36.80 ± 41.18 vs. 52.02 ± 26.27), among patients who were undergoing chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or local therapy (mean ± SD: 42.50 ± 44.46 vs. 50.06 ± 51.39 vs. 28.70 ± 25.03), and in patients with up to 90 days and more than 90 days' interval between their last treatment and date of vaccination (mean ± SD: 38.96 ± 42.66 vs. 40.51 ± 38.65). Additionally, there were only 2/56 patients with breakthrough infection, which points out the effectiveness of this vaccine in cancer patients. The ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine has activity in cancer regardless of the tumor type, type of treatment, or time from the last treatment.

2.
Vox Sang ; 118(11): 921-929, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37772675

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Repeated blood donation is a well-known cause of iron deficiency among donors. However, present scientific literature lacks comprehensive evidence regarding the impact of regular plateletpheresis procedures on body iron reserves. In this study, we aimed to detect and correlate iron deficiency (using iron indices) with the frequency of platelet donations. Additionally, we also analysed the correlation between other iron and haematological indices with serum ferritin to determine cost-effective parameters that may serve as an initial screening approach to determine which donors should be subjected to serum ferritin testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 180 male participants from our platelet donor registry were enrolled in this observational cross-sectional study. Enrolment questionnaires were administered to eligible donors, and biological samples were collected during plateletpheresis donation. Biological tests such as complete blood count, reticulocyte indices, iron indices, vitamin B12 and folate were performed. RESULTS: Donors with ≥12 donations per year showed the highest prevalence of low ferritin (serum ferritin: 15-30 ng/mL) and absent iron stores (serum ferritin <15 ng/mL) (41.3% and 26.7%, respectively). Ferritin showed a significant negative correlation with recent (r = -0.346) and lifetime donations (r = -0.196). The efficacy of other indices for identifying iron depletion was much better using a serum ferritin value <15 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: Regular plateletpheresis donations can lead to varying severities of non-anaemic iron deficiency. Blood centres must regularly monitor frequent plateletpheresis donors (especially donors with more than 11 donations in a calendar year) and ideally maintain their serum ferritin above 30 ng/mL.


Subject(s)
Iron Deficiencies , Iron , Humans , Male , Plateletpheresis , Blood Donors , Ferritins , Hemoglobins/analysis
3.
Transpl Immunol ; 81: 101925, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37648032

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), vitamin D deficiency has been variably associated with increased complications, primarily graft versus host disease (GvHD), with a potential impact on survival. Results from various studies however, have not been consistent. This analysis was conducted to study the impact of peri-transplant vitamin D levels on transplant outcomes in patients with acute leukemia (AL) who underwent HLA matched (related/unrelated) HSCT. METHODS: This was a single center retrospective study. Patients of AL including Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Mixed Phenotypic Acute Leukemia (MPAL) who underwent fully matched or 9/10 transplants (related/unrelated) between 2008 and 2019 were included. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 levels ≤20 ng/ml. Those with deficiency received replacement with oral vitamin D at a dose of 60,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks followed by maintenance with daily vitamin D (800 IU/day). Vitamin D levels were repeated at 4 months from start of replacement. For patients who received correction, repeat levels >20 ng/ml were considered replete. Based on vitamin D levels in the peri-transplant period (within 120 days of transplant), patients were categorised as either vitamin D replete (> 20 ng/ml) or deplete (≤ 20 ng/ml). Peri-transplant vitamin D status was correlated with transplant outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 133 patients included, 31 were deplete (median vitamin D 15.0 ng/ml) and 102 were replete (median vitamin D 34 ng/ml) at time of transplant. Both groups were matched for age, diagnosis, EBMT score and disease risk index (DRI). There were no differences in time to neutrophil or platelet engraftment, CMV reactivation, acute GvHD (aGvHD) or chronic GvHD (cGvHD) between the two groups. Relapse rate, Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were also comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The incidence of vitamin D deficiency was high in our patient cohort. Patients who were vitamin D deficient at the time of transplant did not have inferior outcomes, suggesting a limited role of vitamin D in influencing transplant outcomes.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Vitamin D Deficiency , Humans , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/etiology , Acute Disease , Stem Cell Transplantation , Transplantation Conditioning/methods
4.
J Lab Physicians ; 15(2): 264-268, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37323610

ABSTRACT

Objective Radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) are important treatment options in patients with head and neck cancers. A common complication of this is microbial colonization or infection of mucosal surfaces. These infections may commonly be due to bacteria or yeasts. Salivary proteins with their buffering activity and immunoglobulin, especially immunoglobulin A (IgA), protect oral tissue, mucosal surfaces, and teeth from various microorganisms. This study characterizes the common microorganisms encountered and evaluates the role of salivary IgA in predicting microbial infections in this group of patients with mucositis. Methods A total of 150 adult head and neck cancer patients on CTRT were evaluated at baseline and at the end of 3 and 6 weeks, respectively. Oral swabs collected from buccal mucosa were processed in the microbiology laboratory for the presence of microorganisms. Saliva was processed for IgA level estimation on Siemens Dimension Automated biochemistry analyzer. Results Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumonia e were the most common organisms found in our patients, followed by Escherichia coli and group A beta-hemolytic Streptococci . A significant increase ( p = 0.0203) in the incidence of bacterial infection was observed in post-CTRT patients (61%) compared to pre-CTRT patients (49.33%). There was significant increase in levels of salivary IgA ( p = 0.003) in patients with bacterial and fungal infection ( n = 135/267) when compared to those in samples showing no growth ( n = 66/183). Conclusion A significant increase in the incidence of bacterial infection in post-CTRT patients was observed in this study. This study also indicated that postoperative head and neck cancer patients with oral mucositis that developed an infection were associated with high salivary IgA levels, and it may serve as a surrogate biomarker of infection in these patients.

5.
Drug Metab Pers Ther ; 38(3): 227-236, 2023 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37098129

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This real-world study was conducted to assess the adverse effects following immunization (AEFI) and immunogenicity of ChAdO×1 nCoV-19 vaccine in terms of neutralising antibody titers and to study the effects of covariates such as age, sex, comorbidities and prior COVID status on these outcomes. Also, the effectiveness of the vaccine based on interval between the two doses was also investigated. METHODS: A total of 512 participants (M/F=274/238) aged 35(18-87) years comprising a mixed population of healthcare workers, other frontline workers and general public were enrolled between March and May 2021. Records for adverse events if any were collected telephonically by following up with participants up to 6 months post first dose and graded as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5. Blood samples for measuring antibody titers against the receptor binding domain (RBD) were collected serially using a convenient sampling strategy up to 6 months after the first dose. Data on breakthrough COVID infection was collected telephonically till December 2021. RESULTS: Incidence of local reactions was higher after first dose at 33.4 % (171/512) compared to those after second dose at 12.9 % (66/512). Commonest side effect observed was injection site pain after the first (87.1 %; 149/171) and second (87.9 %; 56/66) dose respectively. Among systemic reactions, fever was the most common manifestation followed by myalgia and headache. Female sex (p<0⸱001) and age less than 60 years (p<0⸱001) had significantly higher predilection for systemic toxicities. Age ≤60 years (p=0.024) and prior-COVID (p<0.001) were found to be significantly associated with higher antibody titers, however, no association was found between these variables and breakthrough COVID infection. Longer spacing between the doses (≥6 weeks) was found to offer better protection against breakthrough infection compared to a spacing of 4 weeks. All breakthroughs were mild-moderate in severity, not requiring hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine is apparently safe and effective against SARS-CoV-2 virus infection. Prior COVID infection and younger age group achieve higher antibody titers, but no additional protection. Delaying the second dose up to at least 6 weeks is more effective compared to shorter spacing between doses.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Humans , Female , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , India/epidemiology , Breakthrough Infections
6.
Toxicol Rep ; 9: 1204-1212, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36518386

ABSTRACT

Withaferin-A (WA) is the principle component of Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha). It has several biological activities including anti-cancer, anti-diabetic, neuroprotective, hepatoprotective and immune-modulatory properties. The acute and sub-acute toxicity of oral WA was investigated in mice. In the acute toxicity study, up to 2000 mg/kg of WA was well tolerated without any signs of toxicity or death. In the sub-acute toxicity study, mice were orally administered 10, 70 and 500 mg/kg of WA respectively, daily for 28 days. Upon physiological, serum chemistry, hematology and histopathogical examination, no features suggestive of drug-induced toxicity were observed at any dose levels, thereby confirming the No-Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) to be at least 500 mg/kg. Furthermore, the oral bioavailability of WA was evaluated using single intravenous and oral doses of 10 mg/kg and 70 mg/kg respectively using sparse sampling strategy. Bioanalysis was carried out using a validated LC-MS/MS method. The AUC of WA was found to be 3996.9 ± 557.6 ng/mL*h and 141.7 ± 16.8 ng/mL*h for the intravenous and oral routes of administration respectively. The oral bioavailability was determined to be 1.8%. To conclude, WA was found to be extremely safe even at high doses, with a low oral bioavailability.

7.
Drug Chem Toxicol ; : 1-14, 2022 Jul 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35899689

ABSTRACT

5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone (5NQ) or juglone is a bioactive molecule found in walnuts and has shown therapeutic effects in various disease models. Limited information is available regarding the toxicity of 5NQ, thereby limiting the clinical development of this drug. In the present study, oral acute (50, 300 and 2000 mg/kg) and sub-acute toxicity (5, 15 and 50 mg/kg) was assessed in mice to evaluate the safety of 5NQ. The acute toxicity study identified 118 mg/kg as the point-of-departure dose (POD) for single oral administration of 5NQ using benchmark dose modeling (BMD). Repeated administration of 5NQ at doses of 15 and 50 mg/kg/day caused reduction in food consumption and body weight of mice along with alterations in liver and renal function. Histopathological assessment revealed significant damage to hepatic and renal tissues at all doses in the acute toxicity study, and at higher doses of 15 and 50 mg/kg in the sub-acute toxicity study. We observed dose dependent mortality in sub-acute toxicity study and the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) was established as < 5 mg/kg/day. Modeling the survival response in sub-acute toxicity study identified 1.74 mg/kg/day as the POD for repeated administration of 5NQ. Serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were most sensitive to 5NQ administration with a lower limit of BMD interval (BMDL) of 1.1 × 10-3 mg/kg/day. The benchmark doses reported in the study can be further used to determine a reference dose of 5NQ for human risk assessment.

9.
Int J Clin Pract ; 2022: 2449068, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35685574

ABSTRACT

Background: This manuscript describes the genetic features of SARS-CoV-2 mutations, prevalent phylogenetic lineages, and the disease severity amongst COVID-19-vaccinated individuals in a tertiary cancer hospital during the second wave of the pandemic in Mumbai, India. Methods: This observational study included 159 COVID-19 patients during the second wave of the pandemic from 17th March to 1st June 2021 at a tertiary cancer care centre in Mumbai. The cohort comprised of healthcare workers, staff relatives, cancer patients, and patient relatives. For comparison, 700 SARS-CoV-2 genomes sequenced during the first wave (23rd April to 25th September 2020) at the same centre were also analysed. Patients were assigned to nonvaccinated (no vaccination or <14 days from the 1st dose, n = 92), dose 1(≥14 days from the 1st dose to <14 days from the 2nd dose, n = 29), and dose 2 (≥14 days from the 2nd dose, n = 38) groups. Primary measure was the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 genomic lineages among different groups. In addition, severity of COVID-19 was assessed according to clinical and genomic variables. Results: Kappa B.1.1671.1 and delta B.1.617.2 variants contributed to an overwhelming majority of sequenced genomes (unvaccinated: 40/92, 43.5% kappa, 46/92, 50% delta; dose 1: 14/29, 48.3% kappa, 15/29, 51.7% delta; and dose 2: 23/38, 60.5% kappa, 14/38 36.8% delta). The proportion of the kappa and delta variants did not differ significantly across the unvaccinated, dose 1, and dose 2 groups (p = 0.27). There was no occurrence of severe COVID-19 in the dose 2 group (0/38, 0% vs. 14/121, 11.6%; p = 0.02). SARS-CoV-2 genomes from all three severe COVID-19 patients in the vaccinated group belonged to the delta lineage (3/28, 10.7% vs. 0/39, 0.0%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Sequencing analysis of SARS-COV-2 genomes from Mumbai during the second wave of COVID-19 suggests the prevalence of the kappa B.1.617.1 and the delta B.1.627.2 variants among both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Continued evaluation of genomic sequencing data from breakthrough COVID-19 is necessary for monitoring the properties of evolving variants of concern and formulating appropriate immune response boosting and therapeutic strategies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Genomics , Humans , Phylogeny , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
10.
Int J Infect Dis ; 118: 95-103, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35192951

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are sparse longitudinal data on SARS-CoV-2 infection after previous infection and after partial or full vaccination. METHODS: This study of a cohort of healthcare workers used Kaplan-Meier analysis with appropriate definition of events and censoring and used Cox models to assess outcomes, with data cut-off on June 18, 2021. RESULTS: A total of 1806 individuals with median age of 32 (18-64) years, 1483 (82.1%) with at least one vaccine dose, 1085 (60.1%) with 2 vaccine doses, 408 (22.6%) with at least one episode of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 6 (1.47%) with 2 episodes of infection were included in the analysis. At median follow-up of 38.4 weeks after first SARS-CoV-2 infection (n=408), the 52-week probability of reinfection was 2.2% (95% CI, 1.0-4.91%); and at median follow-up of 13.3 weeks after second dose, the 16-week probability of breakthrough infection was 5.6% (95% CI, 4.33-7.23%), which was significantly higher among those without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection versus with previous infection (6.4% vs 1.8%, p=0.016, adjusted Cox HR=3.49, 95% CI, 1.09-11.20, p=0.036) and females versus males (7.9% vs 3.8%, p=0.007, adjusted Cox HR=2.06, 95% CI 1.19-3.56, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There was low probability of reinfection after previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and higher vaccine breakthrough infections among females and those without previous infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Reinfection/epidemiology , Reinfection/prevention & control
11.
Immunol Cell Biol ; 100(1): 61-73, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34582592

ABSTRACT

Recent studies have highlighted multiple immune perturbations related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection-associated respiratory disease [coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)]. Some of them were associated with immunopathogenesis of severe COVID-19. However, reports on immunological indicators of severe COVID-19 in the early phase of infection in patients with comorbidities such as cancer are scarce. We prospectively studied about 200 immune response parameters, including a comprehensive immune-cell profile, inflammatory cytokines and other parameters, in 95 patients with COVID-19 (37 cancer patients without active disease and intensive chemo/immunotherapy, 58 patients without cancer) and 21 healthy donors. Of 95 patients, 41 had severe disease, and the remaining 54 were categorized as having a nonsevere disease. We evaluated the association of immune response parameters with severe COVID-19. By principal component analysis, three immune signatures defining characteristic immune responses in COVID-19 patients were found. Immune cell perturbations, in particular, decreased levels of circulating dendritic cells (DCs) along with reduced levels of CD4 T-cell subsets such as regulatory T cells (Tregs ), type 1 T helper (Th1) and Th9; additionally, relative expansion of effector natural killer (NK) cells were significantly associated with severe COVID-19. Compared with patients without cancer, the levels of terminal effector CD4 T cells, Tregs , Th9, effector NK cells, B cells, intermediate-type monocytes and myeloid DCs were significantly lower in cancer patients with mild and severe COVID-19. We concluded that severely depleted circulating myeloid DCs and helper T subsets in the initial phase of infection were strongly associated with severe COVID-19 independent of age, type of comorbidity and other parameters. Thus, our study describes the early immune response associated with severe COVID-19 in cancer patients without intensive chemo/immunotherapy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasms , Humans , Immunity , Neoplasms/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , T-Lymphocyte Subsets
12.
Drug Metab Pers Ther ; 37(2): 219-222, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34854273

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Autoanalyzers are used in clinical haematology for analysis of blood samples in clinical as well as in nonclinical studies. The results from these analyzers vary from machine to machine. In this study, we compared the lymphocyte and neutrophil count of mouse blood between ADVIA 2120i, Horiba Yumizen H2500 and CellaVision analyzers against manual counting as gold standard. METHODS: Blood samples from 28 female BALB/c mice were collected and analyzed. Agreement between different autoanalyzers and manual counting were determined by Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: A high level of agreement was found between CellaVision and manual technique for lymphocyte (bias=4.75, 95% limits of agreement -14 to 24) and neutrophil count (bias=0.68 [-17 to 19]). Agreement in lymphocyte count was also observed between ADVIA and manual counting, but to a lesser extent compared to CellaVision (bias=13.9 [-10.45 to 38.27]). However, no agreement was observed for ADVIA (Neutrophils), Horiba (lymphocytes and neutrophils) with manual counting. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that CellaVision could be used for the differential counting of neutrophil and lymphocytes in mouse blood sample.


Subject(s)
Hematology , Neutrophils , Animals , Female , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Lymphocytes , Mice
13.
Cancer Med ; 10(24): 8777-8788, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34786866

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is paucity of data regarding clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters and outcomes of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in cancer versus non-cancer patients, particularly from India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an observational, single-centre, retrospective analysis of patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 hospitalised in our institution between 22 May 2020 and 1 December 2020. We compared baseline clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters and outcomes of COVID-19 (overall mortality, time to discharge) between cancer and non-cancer patients. RESULTS: A total of 200 COVID-19 infection episodes were analysed of which 109 (54.5%) were patients with cancer and 91 (45.5%) were patients without cancer. The median age was 43 (interquartile range [IQR]:32-57), 51 (IQR: 33-62) and 38 (IQR: 31.5-49.3) years; of whole cohort, cancer and non-cancer patients, respectively. Comparison of outcomes showed that oxygen requirement (31.2% [95% CI: 22.6-40.7] vs. 17.6% [95% CI: 10.4-26.9]; p = 0.03), median time to discharge (11 days [IQR: 6.75-16] vs. 6 days [IQR: 3-9.75]; p < 0.001) and mortality (10.0% [95% CI: 5.2-17.3] vs. 1.1% [95% CI: 0.03-5.9]; p = 0.017) were significantly higher in patients with cancer. In univariable analysis, factors associated with higher mortality in the whole cohort included diagnosis of cancer (10.1% vs. 1.1%; p = 0.027; odds ratio [OR]: 7.04), age ≥60 (17.4% vs. 2.6%; p = 0.001; OR: 7.38), oxygen requirement (22% vs. 0.6%; p < 0.001; OR: 29.01), chest infiltrates (19.2% vs. 1.4%; p < 0.001; OR: 22.65), baseline absolute lymphocyte count <1 × 109 /L (10.8% vs. 1.9%; p = 0.023; OR:5.1), C-reactive protein >1 mg% (12.8% vs. 0%; p = 0.027; OR: 24.69), serum procalcitonin >0.05 ng/ml (22.65% vs. 0%; p = 0.004; OR: 4.49) and interleukin-6 >6 pg/ml (10.8% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.036; OR: 3.08). In multivariable logistic regression, factors significantly associated with mortality were oxygen requirement (p = 0.005; OR: 13.11) and high baseline procalcitonin level (p = 0.014; OR: 37.6). CONCLUSION: Cancer patients with COVID-19 have higher mortality and require longer hospital stay. High procalcitonin levels and oxygen requirement during admission are other factors that affect outcomes adversely.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Neoplasms/complications , Adult , COVID-19/mortality , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/virology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tertiary Care Centers
14.
Indian J Med Res ; 153(5&6): 585-590, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34414920

ABSTRACT

The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has spread all over the world due to rapid person-to-person transmission. More information about viral load dynamics and replication is needed for clarity on duration of infectiousness of an individual, along with its implications on transmission. This is important to healthcare facilities and public health authorities in formulating guidance on the duration of isolation for patients and return to work criteria for healthcare workers. The duration of detection of viral RNA by molecular methods in the upper respiratory tract has ranged from 2 to 12 wk. Viral RNA detection by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) does not necessarily mean that the individual is infectious to others, as the detected virus may not be replication competent. Infectious virus is generally not shed beyond 20 days of the onset of symptoms in most patients, including severely ill and immunocompromised, as indicated by failure to isolate replication-competent virus beyond this timeline in available studies. Further, detection of neutralizing antibodies in the serum, although associated with positive RT-PCR, is generally not associated with infectious virus shedding as indicated by negative viral cultures beyond this period. In this review, we analyze the current literature on the dynamics of viral load, culture, seroconversion and their implications on infectivity and the duration of isolation precautions for COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , RNA, Viral , Humans , Policy , RNA, Viral/genetics , SARS-CoV-2 , Seroconversion , Viral Load
16.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 23(4): e13576, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33523551

ABSTRACT

Recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) are an immunocompromised group who are likely to develop severe complications and mortality because of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We report here a 61-year-old male patient of primary myelofibrosis who underwent an allo-HSCT 6 years earlier, had chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) involving the liver, lung, eyes, and skin, (with recurrent episodes of pulmonary infections) who developed severe COVID-19. The patient was treated with tocilizumab, and a combination of lopinavir/ritonavir, ribavirin, interferon-ß1b. He was discharged after 31 days with full recovery. Tocilizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against IL6, has been shown to benefit respiratory manifestations in severe COVID19. However, this is first report, to our knowledge, of its use and benefit in a post HSCT recipient.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects
17.
J Lab Physicians ; 11(3): 229-233, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31579248

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Major clinical decisions are based on the laboratory test results where preanalytical errors are an important cause of repeat collections in patients. Identification of problem areas and continuous training of phlebotomy staff are important tools in reducing these errors. AIMS: In this study, we looked at the most common causes of sample rejection in our setting and the efficacy of the corrective measures and training processes for staff in reducing preanalytical errors. SETTINGS AND DESIGNS: This prospective study was conducted at the laboratory diagnostic services of a tertiary care oncology center, with a hematopoietic stem cell transplant unit during the period of 2012-2017 in two phases. Sample rejections from various wards were analyzed for types of rejections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the first phase, we analyzed the problem areas (year 2012). Following a root cause analysis, current practices of training were altered. In the second phase (2013-2017), we studied the effects of these measures. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The percent variation and P value for significance in sample rejections were calculated. RESULTS: During the year 2012, 0.36% samples were rejected by laboratory. Following interventions in the period from 2013 to 2017, samples rejected dropped to 0.19% (P < 0.0001), 0.09% (P < 0.0001), 0.09% (P = 0.8387), 0.05% (P = 0.0004), and 0.05% (P = 0.329), respectively. The reduction was significant from surgical oncology ward (P = 0.0107) and intensive care unit (P = 0.0007). From 2013 to 2017, errors significantly reduced to 0.015% for hemolyzed samples (P = 0.0001), 0.005% for contaminated samples, 0.036% for clotted samples, and 0.019% for labeling errors. CONCLUSION: Intervention in the form of targeted training helps reduce errors and improves the quality of results generated and contributes to better clinical outcomes.

19.
Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol ; 37(1): 20-4, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27051152

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This increased risk of bacterial infections in the cancer patient is further compounded by the rising trends of antibiotic resistance in commonly implicated organisms. In the Indian setting this is particularly true in case of Gram negative bacilli such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter spp. Increasing resistance among Gram positive organisms is also a matter of concern. The aim of this study was to document the common organisms isolated from bacterial infections in cancer patients and describe their antibiotic susceptibilities. METHODS: We conducted a 6 month study of all isolates from blood, urine, skin/soft tissue and respiratory samples of patients received from medical and surgical oncology units in our hospital. All samples were processed as per standard microbiology laboratory operating procedures. Isolates were identified to species level and susceptibility tests were performed as per Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines -2012. RESULTS: A total of 285 specimens from medical oncology (114) and surgical oncology services (171) were cultured. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter spp. were most commonly encountered. More than half of the Acinetobacter strains were resistant to carbapenems. Resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae to cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones and carbapenems was >50%. Of the Staphylococcus aureus isolates 41.67% were methicillin resistant. CONCLUSION: There is, in general, a high level of antibiotic resistance among gram negative bacilli, particularly E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter spp. Resistance among Gram positives is not as acute, although the MRSA incidence is increasing.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...