Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
J Adv Prosthodont ; 8(6): 457-464, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28018563

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether two methods of documentation, print and electronic forms, for the assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in complete denture wearers provide comparable results. The study also quantified the time needed for filling the forms by each method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty participants enrolled in a university clinic answered two forms (a questionnaire for denture satisfaction and OHIP-EDENT). They provided answers with two application methods in a random order, with a one-month interval between them: (1) electronic forms on a tablet computer; and (2) print forms. The methods were compared in terms of mean results, correlation/agreement, internal consistency, and spent time. RESULTS: Mean results for both methods were similar for each denture satisfaction item (100-mm VAS) and OHIP-EDENT summary score. Both questionnaires presented good internal consistency regardless of the application method (Cronbach's α=0.86 or higher). Correlation and agreement between the methods regarding specific items was at least moderate for the majority of cases. Mean time for the electronic and print forms were 9.2 and 8.5 minutes, respectively (paired t test, P=.06, non-significant). CONCLUSION: The electronic method is comparable to print forms for the assessment of important PRO of prosthetic treatment for edentulism, considering the results and time needed. Findings suggest the viability of replacing print forms with a tablet for applying the tested inventories in clinical trials.

2.
Braz Dent J ; 27(4): 430-5, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27652706

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of sealer and light-curing unit on regional bond strength of resin composite to the weakened roots. Ninety roots of incisors were experimentally weakened, subjected to biomechanical preparation and filled with either Endofill, AH Plus or MTA Fillapex The roots were desobturated e reinforced with resin composite and fiber post light-activated with one of the light sources: halogen at 600 mW/ cm2 (QTH-600), LED at 800 mW/ cm2 (LED-800) and LED at 1500 mW/ cm2 (LED-1500). The roots were sectioned in slices from cervical, middle and apical root-reinforcement regions and analyzed by push out test, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Bond strength data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey´s test (α=0.05). Specimens filled with AH Plus had higher bond strength, followed by MTA Fillapex and Endofill (p<0.05). For light-curing unit, LED-1500 presented superior bond strength than LED-800, which was higher than QTH-600 (p<0.05). The cervical region had the greatest mean values (p<0.05) while apical part showed the lowest bond strength (p<0.05). CLMS revealed remaining filling material in the dentinal tubules for all groups. The eugenol-containing sealer (Endofill) compromised the push-out bond strength of composite resin to the root dentin. Bond strength was favored in the cervical region, and when LED-1500 was used.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins , Materials Testing , Tooth Root , Humans
3.
Braz. dent. j ; 27(4): 430-435, July-Aug. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-794606

ABSTRACT

Abstract The aim of this study was to assess the influence of sealer and light-curing unit on regional bond strength of resin composite to the weakened roots. Ninety roots of incisors were experimentally weakened, subjected to biomechanical preparation and filled with either Endofill, AH Plus or MTA Fillapex The roots were desobturated e reinforced with resin composite and fiber post light-activated with one of the light sources: halogen at 600 mW/ cm2 (QTH-600), LED at 800 mW/ cm2 (LED-800) and LED at 1500 mW/ cm2 (LED-1500). The roots were sectioned in slices from cervical, middle and apical root-reinforcement regions and analyzed by push out test, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Bond strength data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey´s test (α=0.05). Specimens filled with AH Plus had higher bond strength, followed by MTA Fillapex and Endofill (p<0.05). For light-curing unit, LED-1500 presented superior bond strength than LED-800, which was higher than QTH-600 (p<0.05). The cervical region had the greatest mean values (p<0.05) while apical part showed the lowest bond strength (p<0.05). CLMS revealed remaining filling material in the dentinal tubules for all groups. The eugenol-containing sealer (Endofill) compromised the push-out bond strength of composite resin to the root dentin. Bond strength was favored in the cervical region, and when LED-1500 was used.


Resumo O objetivo neste estudo foi avaliar a influência do cimento endodôntico e da fonte de luz fotoativadora na resistência de união (RU) regional da resina composta às raízes fragilizadas. Noventa raízes de incisivos foram experimentalmente fragilizados, submetidos ao preparo biomecânico e obturadas com Endofill, AH Plus ou MTA Fillapex. Os canais foram desobturados e reforçados com pinos de fibra de vidro e resina composta fotoativada com uma das fontes de luz: halógena a 600 mW/cm2 (QTH-600), diodo emissor de luz a 800 mW/cm2 (LED-800) e LED a 1500 mW/cm2 (LED-1500). As raízes foram seccionadas em slices provenientes dos terços cervical, médio e apical das regiões da raiz reforçada e analisadas por meio do teste de push out, microscopia eletrônica de varredura (MEV) e microscopia confocal de varredura a laser (MCVL). Os dados de resistência de união foram analisados por ANOVA a três critérios e teste de Tukey (α=0,05). Os espécimes obturados com AH Plus apresentaram maior resistência de união, seguido do MTA Fillapex e do Endofill (p<0,05). Para fonte de luz fotoativadora, LED-1500 apresentou resistência de união superior ao LED-800 que foi maior que QTH-600 (p<0,05). A região cervical obteve as maiores médias (p<0,05), enquanto que a região apical apresentou a menor resistência de união (p<0,05). MCVL revelou remanescente de material endodôntico nos túbulos dentinários para todos os grupos. O cimento contendo eugenol (Endofill) comprometeu a resistência de união da resina composta à dentina radicular. A resistência de união foi favorecida na região cervical, e quando o LED-1500 foi empregado.


Subject(s)
Humans , Composite Resins , Materials Testing , Tooth Root
4.
Braz Dent J ; 25(3): 225-31, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25252258

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength to the dentin of an adhesive material used for root reinforcement light activated with different sources. Roots were divided into 4 groups (n=15) according to the light source used to activate the resin reinforcement: GI, non-weakened roots (control); GII, halogen light (H) 600 mW/cm²; GIII, LED 800 mW/cm² and GIV, LED 1500 mW/cm². The reinforcement was done with adhesive, composite resin and fiberglass posts. After 24 h, the specimens were sectioned and the first slice of each post region was used in the push out test in a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Failure modes of the debonded specimens were examined. Data (MPa) were analyzed by ANOVA and Holm-Sidak test (α=0.05). The second slice from each region was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). LED-1500 (4.69 ± 1.74) provided bond strength similar to the control group (5.05 ± 2.63) and statistically different from H-600 (1.96 ± 0.94) and LED-800 (2.75 ± 1.90), which were similar to each other (p<0.05). Cervical (4.16 ± 2.32) and middle (4.43 ± 2.32) regions showed higher bond strength than the apical (2.25 ± 1.50) (p<0.05). There was a prevalence of adhesive failures in H-600 and LED-800 and cohesive failures in LED-1500. SEM showed the formation of long, numerous and fine tags. It was concluded that LED-1500 provided higher bond strength of resin reinforcement to the dentin.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins , Dental Bonding , Light , Tooth Root , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
5.
Braz. dent. j ; 25(3): 225-231, 07/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-722163

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength to the dentin of an adhesive material used for root reinforcement light activated with different sources. Roots were divided into 4 groups (n=15) according to the light source used to activate the resin reinforcement: GI, non-weakened roots (control); GII, halogen light (H) 600 mW/cm2; GIII, LED 800 mW/cm2 and GIV, LED 1500 mW/cm2. The reinforcement was done with adhesive, composite resin and fiberglass posts. After 24 h, the specimens were sectioned and the first slice of each post region was used in the push out test in a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Failure modes of the debonded specimens were examined. Data (MPa) were analyzed by ANOVA and Holm-Sidak test (=0.05). The second slice from each region was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). LED-1500 (4.69 ± 1.74) provided bond strength similar to the control group (5.05 ± 2.63) and statistically different from H-600 (1.96 ± 0.94) and LED-800 (2.75 ± 1.90), which were similar to each other (p<0.05). Cervical (4.16 ± 2.32) and middle (4.43 ± 2.32) regions showed higher bond strength than the apical (2.25 ± 1.50) (p<0.05). There was a prevalence of adhesive failures in H-600 and LED-800 and cohesive failures in LED-1500. SEM showed the formation of long, numerous and fine tags. It was concluded that LED-1500 provided higher bond strength of resin reinforcement to the dentin.


O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a resistência de união à dentina de uma resina utilizada para reforço de raiz, ativada com diferentes fontes de luz. De acordo com a fonte de luz utilizada as raízes foram divididas em 4 grupos (n = 15): GI, raízes não fragilizadas (controle); GII, luz halógena (H) 600 mW/cm2; GIII, LED 800 mW/cm2 e GIV, LED 1500 mW/cm2. O reforço foi feito com adesivo, resina composta e pino de fibra de vidro. Após 24 h, os espécimes foram seccionados e o primeiro slice de cada região utilizado para o teste de união push out, na máquina de ensaios universais com 0,5 mm/min, e o tipo da falha avaliada. Os dados obtidos (MPa) foram analisados utilizando os testes de ANOVA e Holm-Sidak (=0.05). O segundo slice de cada região foi analisado por microscopia eletrônica de varredura (MEV). O LED-1500 (4.69 ± 1.74) proporcionou resistência a união similar ao controle (5.05 ± 2.63) e estatisticamente diferente do H-600 (1.96 ± 0.94) e LED-800 (2.75 ± 1.90), que são similares entre si (p<0.05). As regiões cervical (4.16 ± 2.32) e média (4.43 ± 2.32) apresentaram alta resistência à união quando comparadas à região apical (2.25 ± 1.50) (p<0.05). Houve uma predominância de falhas adesivas com as fontes de luzes H-600 e LED-800 e coesivas com o LED-1500. A análise em MEV demonstrou a formação de longos tags resinosos. Desta forma, pode-se concluir que o LED-1500 proporcionou maior resistência à resina utilizada para o reforço da dentina radicular.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins , Dental Bonding , Light , Tooth Root , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
6.
Braz. dent. sci ; 17(3): 11-18, 2014. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: lil-743041

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of this study is to present the applicability of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) in oral rehabilitation, especially in endodontically treated teeth, based on its indication, methods, advantages and limitations through a literature review. Material and Methods: The search was conducted on National Library of Medicine’s Pub Med, Google search and Science Direct databases including the keywords “finite element analysis”, “oral rehabilitation” and “endodontics”. Results: A total of 412 articles were found, 42 were carefully selected by two subject matter experts for discussion including 21 articles focusing on the applicability of FEA to endodontically treated teeth. Conclusion: The FEA is a versatile, low-cost and efficient approach for reliable evaluation of complex structures, as oral rehabilitation treatments.


Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo é apresentar a aplicabilidade do Método dos Elementos Finitos (MEF) na reabilitação oral, especialmente em dentes tratados endodonticamente, destacando sua indicação, métodos, vantagens e limitações por meio de uma revisão de literatura. Material e Métodos: A busca foi realizada na Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina do PubMed, pesquisa Google e Science Direct, incluindo as palavras-chave: “análise de elementos finitos”, “reabilitação oral” e “endodontia”. Resultados: Um total de 412 artigos foram encontrados, sendo que 42 foram cuidadosamente selecionados por dois especialistas no assunto para a discussão e incluídos 21 artigos com foco na aplicabilidade do MEF para dentes tratados endodonticamente. Conclusão: O MEF é uma abordagem versátil, de baixo custo e eficaz para avaliação de estruturas complexas, como tratamentos de reabilitação oral.


Subject(s)
Endodontics , Finite Element Analysis , Mouth Rehabilitation
7.
J Appl Oral Sci ; 21(3): 219-24, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23857648

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the fracture toughness (FT) of denture base and autopolymerizing reline resins, with and without thermocycling (T). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Specimens of each material (denture base acrylic resin - Lucitone 550 - L; autopolymerizing reline resins - Ufi Gel Hard-UH, Tokuyama Rebase II-TR, New Truliner-NT and Kooliner-K), were produced, notched and divided into two groups (n=10): CG (control group of autopolymerizing reline resins and L): FT tests were performed after polymerization; TG (thermocycled group): FT tests were performed after T (5°C and 55°C for 5,000 cycles). RESULTS: Results (MPa.m1/2) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p=0.05). L exhibited the highest FT mean values in both groups (CG - 2.33; TG - 2.17). For the CG groups, NT showed the highest FT (1.64) among the autopolymerizing reline resins, and K the lowest (1.04). After T, when the autopolymerizing reline resins were compared, a statistically significant difference in FT was found only between the NT (1.46) and TR (1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Thermocycling increased the FT of K and did not influence the FT of L, UH, TR and NT.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Denture Bases , Denture Rebasing , Polymerization , Silicone Elastomers/chemistry , Analysis of Variance , Dental Restoration Failure , Humans , Materials Testing , Stress, Mechanical , Temperature , Time Factors
8.
J. appl. oral sci ; 21(3): 219-224, May/Jun/2013. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-679323

ABSTRACT

Objective This study evaluated the fracture toughness (FT) of denture base and autopolymerizing reline resins, with and without thermocycling (T). Material and Methods Specimens of each material (denture base acrylic resin - Lucitone 550 – L; autopolymerizing reline resins - Ufi Gel Hard–UH, Tokuyama Rebase II-TR, New Truliner–NT and Kooliner-K), were produced, notched and divided into two groups (n=10): CG (control group of autopolymerizing reline resins and L): FT tests were performed after polymerization; TG (thermocycled group): FT tests were performed after T (5°C and 55°C for 5,000 cycles). Results: Results (MPa.m1/2) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p=0.05). L exhibited the highest FT mean values in both groups (CG - 2.33; TG - 2.17). For the CG groups, NT showed the highest FT (1.64) among the autopolymerizing reline resins, and K the lowest (1.04). After T, when the autopolymerizing reline resins were compared, a statistically significant difference in FT was found only between the NT (1.46) and TR (1.00). Conclusions Thermocycling increased the FT of K and did not influence the FT of L, UH, TR and NT. .


Subject(s)
Humans , Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Denture Bases , Denture Rebasing , Polymerization , Silicone Elastomers/chemistry , Analysis of Variance , Dental Restoration Failure , Materials Testing , Stress, Mechanical , Temperature , Time Factors
9.
Rev. bras. odontol ; 70(1): 12-16, Jan.-Jun. 2013. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-720360

ABSTRACT

Este estudo avaliou o limite de fadiga (LF), determinado pelo método escada, e o efeito da ciclagem mecânica sobre a resistência à flexão (RF) da porcelana feldspática Duceragold. Corpos de prova (25 x 5 x 2 mm) foram confeccionados de acordo com as instruções do fabricante e submetidos ao ensaio de RF (n = 10), em três pontos. Para determinação do LF (n = 30), foram utilizados carregamento inicial de 60% da RF, tensão incremental de 3% da RF, 10.000 ciclos e 2 Hz. Os dados foram submetidos à Anova e teste de Tukey (p < 0,05). Embora os ciclos propostos não tenham reduzido estatisticamente a RF, análises fractográficas evidenciaram estrias, sinais característicos de fadiga mecânica.


This study evaluated the fatigue limit (FL) by the staircase method and the effect of mechanical cycling on the flexural strength (FS) of Duceragold feldspathic porcelain. Specimens (25 x 5 x 2 mm) were made according to manufacturer’s directions and submitted to t hree-point fl exural s trength t est (n = 10). To d etermine FL (n = 30; 10,000 cycles; 2 Hz), an initial loading of 60% of the FS and an incremental loading (step) of 3% of the FS were used. Data were analyzed by Anova and Tukey´s test (p < 0.05). Although the proposed cycles have not reduced FS significantly, fractography analysis showed striation, characteristic signs of mechanical fatigue.


Subject(s)
Dental Materials , Dental Porcelain , Materials Science , Flexural Strength
10.
Araraquara; s.n; 2013. 178 p. ilus, tab, graf.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-867798

ABSTRACT

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a citotoxicidade de 3 resinas acrílicas (RA) para bases de prótese sendo duas polimerizadas por energia de microondas (Vipi Wave-VW e Nature Cryl-NC) e uma fotoativada (Eclipse-E); e a biocompatibilidade de materiais reembasadores resilientes (MRR), sendo 2 à base de silicone (Ufi Gel P e Sofreliner S), 2 à base de resina acrílica (Durabase Soft e Trusoft) e 2 condicionadores de tecidos (Softone e Coe Comfort) por meio de análises do metabolismo celular, da morfologia celular, do padrão de morte celular, da proliferação celular e da expressão do fator de crescimento TGFß 1, da integrina α5ß1 e de citocinas. A análise das RA foi realizada com células L929; para os MRR, as análises foram realizadas utilizando-se células L929, e/ou HaCaT e/ou RAW 264,7. Os resultados obtidos foram submetidos à análise estatística, realizada ao nível de significância de 5%. Todos os materiais quando testados com eluatos não apresentaram efeitos citotóxicos, e quando testados em contato direto (MTT e azul de alamar) alteraram significativamente a viabilidade celular, tendo sido os menores valores observados para o material NC quando comparado ao E. Para os materiais reembasadores o T, S e C. Maior taxa de necrose e apoptose foram observadas para os eluatos de todos os materiais quando avaliados no período de 24 horas; além disso, foi demonstrado que os materiais avaliados podem desencadear a expressão do TGFß 1, da integrina α5ß1 e de proteínas inflamatórias (fator de necrose tumoral - TNF-α, da citocina IL-1ß e de 5 quimiocinas: CCL2, CCL3, CCL5, CXCL2 e CXCL4). Sendo assim, de acordo com as limitações do presente estudo, pode-se concluir que a resina Nature Cryl resultou em menor viabilidade celular que a resina Eclipse e que os materiais Ufi Gel P e Sofreliner S apresentaram, em geral, melhor bicompatibilidade dentre os materiais reembasadores resilientes avaliados


The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity of 3 denture base acrylic resins with different polymerization methods (Eclipse, Vipi Wave and Nature Cryl) and the biocompatibility of soft lining materials, 2 silicone-based (Ufi Gel P and Sofreliner S), 2 acrylic-based (Durabase Soft and Trusoft) and 2 tissue conditioners (Softone and Coe Comfort), by analysing cell metabolism, cell morphology, pattern of cell death, cell proliferation and expression of growth factor TGFß 1, integrin α5ß1 and cytokines. For the acrylic resins, analyses were made with L929 cells, while for the resilient lining materials, analyzes were performed using L929, and/or HaCaT and/or RAW 264.7 cells. Results were statistically analyzed, at a significance level of 5%. The 24 and 48-h eluates from all materials were not cytotoxic to the cells. For the direct contact tests (MTT and Alamar Blue), a significant effect on cell viability was found, with the lowest values observed for materials NC when compared with E and between the reliners Trusoft, Softone and Coe Comfort. For all materials, increased rate of necrosis and apoptosis were observed for the 24 hs eluates. It was also demonstrated that all materials tested can trigger the expression of TGFß 1, α5ß1 integrin and inflammatory proteins (tumor necrosis factor -TNFα, cytokine IL-1ß and 5 chemokines- CCL2, CCL3, CCL5, CXCL2 and CXCL4). Thus, within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the denture base acrylic resin Nature Cryl resulted in lower cell viability compared to the Eclipse resin and that the materials Ufi Gel P and Sofreliner S showed better biocompatibility among the soft liner materials evaluated


Subject(s)
Denture Liners , Cytotoxicity, Immunologic , Materials Testing , Acrylic Resins , In Vitro Techniques
11.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (5): CD009109, 2012 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22592736

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endodontic treatment, involves removal of the dental pulp and its replacement by a root canal filling. Restoration of root filled teeth can be challenging due to structural differences between vital and non-vital root filled teeth. Direct restoration involves placement of a restorative material e.g. amalgam or composite directly into the tooth. Indirect restorations consist of cast metal or ceramic (porcelain) crowns. The choice of restoration depends on the amount of remaining tooth which may influence long term survival and cost. The comparative in service clinical performance of crowns or conventional fillings used to restore root filled teeth is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of restoration of endodontically treated teeth (with or without post and core) by crowns versus conventional filling materials. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases: the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE via OVID, EMBASE via OVID, CINAHL via EBSCO, LILACS via BIREME and the reference lists of articles as well as ongoing trials registries.There were no restrictions regarding language or date of publication. Date of last search was 13 February 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-randomised controlled trials in participants with permanent teeth which have undergone endodontic treatment. Single full coverage crowns compared with any type of filling materials for direct restoration, as well as indirect partial restorations (e.g. inlays and onlays). Comparisons considered the type of post and core used (cast or prefabricated post), if any. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: One trial judged to be at high risk of bias due to missing outcome data, was included. 117 participants with a root filled premolar tooth restored with a carbon fibre post, were randomised to either a full coverage metal-ceramic crown or direct adhesive composite restoration. At 3 years there was no reported difference between the non-catastrophic failure rates in both groups. Decementation of the post and marginal gap formation occurred in a small number of teeth. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support or refute the effectiveness of conventional fillings over crowns for the restoration of root filled teeth. Until more evidence becomes available clinicians should continue to base decisions on how to restore root filled teeth on their own clinical experience, whilst taking into consideration the individual circumstances and preferences of their patients.


Subject(s)
Crowns , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Tooth Root , Tooth, Nonvital/rehabilitation , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Post and Core Technique , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
12.
J Prosthet Dent ; 107(2): 114-27, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22304746

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Adverse reactions to the materials used for the fabrication and reline of removable denture bases have been observed. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the published literature on the cytotoxicity of denture base and hard reline materials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MEDLINE via PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases for the period January 1979 to December 2009 were searched with the following key words: (biocompatibility OR cytotoxic* OR allergy OR "burning mouth" OR "cell culture techniques") AND ("acrylic resins" OR denture OR monomer OR relin* OR "denture liners"). The inclusion criteria included in vitro studies using either animal or human cells, in which the cytotoxicity of the denture base and hard chairside reline resins was tested. Studies of resilient lining materials and those that evaluated other parameters such as genotoxicity and mutagenicity were excluded. Articles published in the English language and in peer-reviewed journals focusing on the cytotoxicity of these materials were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 1443 articles were identified through the search. From these, 20 studies were judged to meet the selection criteria and were included in the review. In the majority of the studies, continuous cell lines were exposed to eluates of specimens made from the materials, and mitochondrial activity was used to estimate cell viability. The tested acrylic resins were grouped according to 5 major categories: (1) heat-polymerized; (2) microwave-polymerized; (3) autopolymerizing; (4) light-polymerized; and (5) hard chairside reliners. CONCLUSIONS: This review provided some evidence that the heat-polymerized resins showed lower cytotoxic effects than autopolymerizing denture base acrylic resins and light or dual polymerized reline resins. However, because of the large number of variables in the reviewed literature, a definitive conclusion could not be drawn.


Subject(s)
Dental Materials/toxicity , Denture Bases , Denture Liners , Acrylic Resins/toxicity , Animals , Biocompatible Materials/toxicity , Denture, Partial, Removable , Humans , Materials Testing , Polymers/toxicity
13.
Gerodontology ; 29(2): e858-64, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22103841

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the fracture toughness (FT) of one denture base (Lucitone 550 - L) and four hard reline resins [Ufi Gel Hard (UH), Tokuyama Rebase II (TR), New Truliner (NT) and Kooliner (K)], and the effect of long-term water storage on this property. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty specimens (40 × 8 × 4 mm) of each material were made, and FT was assessed after polymerisation (control of reliners), after 48 ± 2 h in water at 37°C (control of denture base resin) and after storage in water at 37°C for 7, 90 or 180 days (all materials). Data (MPa.m(1/2) ) were analysed by two-way anova and Games-Howell test (p = 0.05). RESULTS: Resin L exhibited the highest FT mean values. After 180 days of storage, FT mean values of L (3.37), UH (1.53) and K (1.20) were higher than those of the other periods. FT mean values of NT decreased from control (1.63) to 7 days (1.30) and then remained constant. FT mean values of TR (1.13) were similar in all periods of analysis. CONCLUSION: The denture base resin L showed higher FT mean values than the reline resins. Long-term water storage increased the FT of L, UH and K, reduced the FT of NT and did not influence the FT of TR.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Dental Materials/chemistry , Denture Bases , Denture Liners , Denture Rebasing , Water/chemistry , Humans , Immersion , Materials Testing , Methacrylates/chemistry , Polymerization , Silicone Elastomers/chemistry , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Temperature , Time Factors
14.
Dent Mater ; 26(10): 1017-23, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20650509

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of the monomers isobutyl methacrylate (IBMA) and 1,6-hexanediol dimethacrylate (1,6-HDMA), the plasticizer di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP), and the degradation by-products methacrylic acid (MA) and benzoic acid (BA) on L929 cells. Based on previous investigations on the release of these compounds from hard chairside reline resins, a range of concentrations (micromol/L) were selected for the cytotoxicity tests (IBMA, 5.49-1406.57; 1,6-HDMA, 1.22-39.32; DBP, 1.12-143.8; MA, 9.07-581; BA, 3.19-409). METHODS: Cytotoxic effects were assessed using MTT and (3)H-thymidine assays after the cells had been exposed to the test compounds at the given concentrations for 24 h. Cytotoxicity was rated based on cell viability relative to controls (cells exposed to medium without test substances). RESULTS: DNA synthesis activity was inhibited by all compounds. Mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity decreased in cells treated with monomers, plasticizer and MA by-product, whereas no cytotoxic effect was observed on contact with BA at the majority of concentrations tested. The ranges of suppression for (3)H-thymidine assay were: IBMA, 25-95%; 1,6-HDMA, 95-98%; DBP, 40-98%; MA, 97-99%; BA, 54-71%. For MTT assay, the ranges of suppression were: IBMA, 0-96%; 1,6-HDMA, 26-89%; DBP, 17-80%; MA, 52-66%; BA, 0-27%. The (3)H-thymidine assay was more sensitive than the MTT assay. SIGNIFICANCE: This study evaluated the cytotoxicity of a wide range of concentrations of monomers (IBMA and 1,6-HDMA), plasticizer (DBP) and degradation by-products (MA and BA), including those expected to be released from hard chairside reline resins. The differences observed in the cytotoxicity of these compounds, along with other properties, may assist the dental practitioners in the selection of reline materials with improved service life performance and low risk of adverse reactions in patients who wear relined dentures.


Subject(s)
Benzoic Acid/toxicity , Cell Survival/drug effects , Denture Liners/adverse effects , Methacrylates/toxicity , Plasticizers/toxicity , Animals , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , DNA Damage , Denture Rebasing/adverse effects , Dibutyl Phthalate/toxicity , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Fibroblasts/drug effects , L Cells , Mice , Mitochondrial Membrane Transport Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors , Tetrazolium Salts/metabolism , Thymidine/metabolism
15.
J Appl Oral Sci ; 18(2): 104-9, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20485919

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Open access publishing is becoming increasingly popular within the biomedical sciences. SciELO, the Scientific Electronic Library Online, is a digital library covering a selected collection of Brazilian scientific journals many of which provide open access to full-text articles.This library includes a number of dental journals some of which may include reports of clinical trials in English, Portuguese and/or Spanish. Thus, SciELO could play an important role as a source of evidence for dental healthcare interventions especially if it yields a sizeable number of high quality reports. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify reports of clinical trials by handsearching of dental journals that are accessible through SciELO, and to assess the overall quality of these reports. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic versions of six Brazilian dental Journals indexed in SciELO were handsearched at www.scielo.br in September 2008. Reports of clinical trials were identified and classified as controlled clinical trials (CCTs - prospective, experimental studies comparing 2 or more healthcare interventions in human beings) or randomized controlled trials (RCTs - a random allocation method is clearly reported), according to Cochrane eligibility criteria. CRITERIA TO ASSESS METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY INCLUDED: method of randomization, concealment of treatment allocation, blinded outcome assessment, handling of withdrawals and losses and whether an intention-to-treat analysis had been carried out. RESULTS: The search retrieved 33 CCTs and 43 RCTs. A majority of the reports provided no description of either the method of randomization (75.3%) or concealment of the allocation sequence (84.2%). Participants and outcome assessors were reported as blinded in only 31.2% of the reports. Withdrawals and losses were only clearly described in 6.5% of the reports and none mentioned an intention-to-treat analysis or any similar procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that a substantial number of reports of trials and systematic reviews are available in the dental journals listed in SciELO, and that these could provide valuable evidence for clinical decision making. However, it is clear that the quality of a number of these reports is of some concern and that improvement in the conduct and reporting of these trials could be achieved if authors adhered to internationally accepted guidelines, e.g. the CONSORT statement.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Databases, Bibliographic , Brazil , Humans , Review Literature as Topic
16.
J. appl. oral sci ; 18(2): 104-109, Mar.-Apr. 2010. ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: lil-550414

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Open access publishing is becoming increasingly popular within the biomedical sciences. SciELO, the Scientific Electronic Library Online, is a digital library covering a selected collection of Brazilian scientific journals many of which provide open access to full-text articles.This library includes a number of dental journals some of which may include reports of clinical trials in English, Portuguese and/or Spanish. Thus, SciELO could play an important role as a source of evidence for dental healthcare interventions especially if it yields a sizeable number of high quality reports. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify reports of clinical trials by handsearching of dental journals that are accessible through SciELO, and to assess the overall quality of these reports. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic versions of six Brazilian dental Journals indexed in SciELO were handsearched at www.scielo.br in September 2008. Reports of clinical trials were identified and classified as controlled clinical trials (CCTs - prospective, experimental studies comparing 2 or more healthcare interventions in human beings) or randomized controlled trials (RCTs - a random allocation method is clearly reported), according to Cochrane eligibility criteria. CRITERIA TO ASSESS METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY INCLUDED: method of randomization, concealment of treatment allocation, blinded outcome assessment, handling of withdrawals and losses and whether an intention-to-treat analysis had been carried out. RESULTS: The search retrieved 33 CCTs and 43 RCTs. A majority of the reports provided no description of either the method of randomization (75.3 percent) or concealment of the allocation sequence (84.2 percent). Participants and outcome assessors were reported as blinded in only 31.2 percent of the reports. Withdrawals and losses were only clearly described in 6.5 percent of the reports and none mentioned an intention-to-treat analysis or any similar ...


Subject(s)
Humans , Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Databases, Bibliographic , Brazil , Review Literature as Topic
17.
Rev. odontol. UNESP (Online) ; 38(5): 318-323, set.-out. 2009. tab, ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-874786

ABSTRACT

O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar o efeito do processamento por injeção (método da cera perdida) na resistência à flexão, em três pontos, de porcelanas feldspáticas convencionalmente obtidas por sinterização. Foram avaliadas as porcelanas Ceramco-2, Duceragold, Duceram-Plus, Excelsior, Omega-900, Symbio, Vitadur-Alpha e VMK-95. Como controle, foi também utilizada a porcelana Cergogold, fornecida na forma de pastilhas pré-sinterizadas e processada exclusivamente por injeção. Corpos de prova em forma de barra (n = 10), com dimensões de 25 × 5 × 2 mm (ISO-6872), foram confeccionados em matrizes metálicas e processados, por sinterização ou injeção, nas temperaturas de cocção indicadas pelos fabricantes. Os ensaios foram realizados em equipamento MTS-810 (Material Test System, EUA), com célula de carga de 10 kN e velocidade de 0,5 mm.min-1. Os resultados, submetidos à análise de variância (p menor ou igual a 0,05), mostraram que o processamento por injeção foi capaz de proporcionar maior resistência à fexão para as porcelanas Duceram-Plus, Excelsior, Omega-900, Symbio e VMK-95 (p < 0,001). Nessa mesma condição experimental, a porcelana Cergogold mostrou-se estatisticamente superior apenas à porcelana Vitadur-Alpha, sendo inferior à porcelana Omega-900 e semelhante às demais (p < 0,001). A resistência à fexão das porcelanas Ceramco-2, Duceragold e Vitadur-Alpha não foi influenciada pelo processo de obtenção (p < 0,001).


The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of injection process, on the three-point flexural strength on feldspathic ceramic, fabricated by sintering technique. The ceramics evaluated were Duceragold, Duceram Plus, Excelsior, Omega 900, Symbio,Vitadur Alpha, VMK 95 and Ceramco 2. Cergogold, that the processing technique is based on a conventional injection moulding, was used for control. The bar-shaped specimens (n = 10) with the size of 25 × 5 × 2 mm (ISO-6872) were fabricated in a metal mould and processed by injection or sinterized, according to manufacturing specifcations. The fexural test was performed in a MTS 810 testing machine (Material Test System, USA), with a 10 kN load cell and a crosshead speed of 0.05 mm.min-1. The data (MPa) were subjected to analysis of variance (p less than or equal to 0.05), and showed that the injection processed enhance the flexural strength of Duceram-Plus, Excelsior, Omega-900, Symbio and VMK-95 (p < 0.001). In this experimental condition, the ceramic Cergogold showed high value than Vitadur-Alpha, was inferior to the ceramic Omega-900, but there were no signifcant difference with the others (p < 0.001). The flexural strength was not influenced by the processing method for the ceramics Ceramco-2, Duceragold and Vitadur-Alpha.


Subject(s)
Ceramics , Flexural Strength , Injections , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Dental Porcelain , Materials Testing
18.
Braz Dent J ; 20(2): 127-31, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19738945

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the effect of denture base polymer type (heat- and microwave-polymerized), ridge lap surface treatment (with and without methyl methacrylate-MMA etching) and thermocycling on the microtensile bond strength (microTBS) of Biotone acrylic teeth. Flat-ground, ridge-lap surface of posterior artificial teeth were bonded to cylinders of each denture base resin, resulting in the following groups (n=6): G1a - Clássico/with MMA etching; G1b - Clássico/without MMA etching; G2a - OndaCryl/with MMA etching; G2b - OndaCryl/without MMA etching. Rectangular bar specimens with a cross-sectional area of 1 mm(2) were prepared. Half of the bars in each group were thermocycled (5,000 cycles between 4 degrees C and 60 degrees C). microTBS testing was performed in an universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed statistically by three-way ANOVA (alpha=0.05). There was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) for the factors (resin, surface treatment,and thermocycling) or their interactions. The mean microTBS values (MPa) and standard deviations were as follows: Thermocycling - G1a: 41.00 (14.00); G1b: 31.00 (17.00); G2a: 50.00 (27.00); G2b: 40.00 (18.00); No thermocycling - G1a: 37.00 (14.00); G1b: 43.00 (25.00); G2a: 43.00 (14.00); G2b: 40.00 (27.00). The microTBS of Biotone artificial teeth to the denture base acrylic resins was not influenced by the polymer type, surface treatment or thermocycling.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins , Dental Bonding/methods , Denture Bases , Tooth, Artificial , Dental Etching , Dental Stress Analysis , Materials Testing , Random Allocation , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength
19.
J. appl. oral sci ; 17(3): 155-160, May-June 2009. ilus, graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-514025

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of one- (Xeno III, Dentsply) and two-step (Tyrian-One Step Plus, Bisco) self-etching adhesive systems bonded to dentin and cemented to chemically cured (C&B Metabond) or light-cured paste of a dual-cure resin cement (Variolink II, Ivoclar) within a short (24 h) and long period of evaluation (90 days). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty recently extracted human molars had their roots removed and their occlusal dentin exposed and ground wet with 600-grit SiC paper. After application of one of the adhesives, the resin cement was applied to the bonded surface and a composite resin block was incrementally built up to a height of 5 mm (n=10). The restored teeth were stored in distilled water at 37ºC for 7 days. The teeth were then cut along two axes (x and y), producing beam-shaped specimens with 0.8 mm² cross-sectional area, which were subjected to µTBS testing at a crosshead speed of 0.05 mm/min and stressed to failure after 24 h or 90 days of storage in water. The µTBS data in MPa were subjected to three-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test (α= 0.05). RESULTS: The interaction effect for all three factors was statistically significant (three-way ANOVA, p<0.001). All eight experimental means (MPa) were compared by the Tukey's test (p<0.05) and the following results were obtained: Tyrian-One Step Plus /C&B/24 h (22.4±7.3); Tyrian-One Step Plus /Variolink II/24 h (39.4±11.6); Xeno III/C&B/24 h (40.3±12.9); Xeno III/Variolink II/24 h (25.8±10.5); Tyrian-One Step Plus /C&B/90 d (22.1±12.8) Tyrian-One Step Plus/VariolinkII/90 d (24.2±14.2); Xeno III/C&B/90 d (27.0±13.5); Xeno III/Variolink II/90 d (33.0±8.9). CONCLUSIONS: Xeno III/Variolink II was the luting agent/adhesive combination that provided the most promising bond strength after 90 days of storage in water.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adhesives , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Dental Bonding , Dentin-Bonding Agents , Resin Cements , Dental Stress Analysis , Materials Testing , Molar , Tensile Strength , Water
20.
J Appl Oral Sci ; 17(3): 155-60, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19466243

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (microTBS) of one- (Xeno III, Dentsply) and two-step (Tyrian-One Step Plus, Bisco) self-etching adhesive systems bonded to dentin and cemented to chemically cured (C&B Metabond) or light-cured paste of a dual-cure resin cement (Variolink II, Ivoclar) within a short (24 h) and long period of evaluation (90 days). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty recently extracted human molars had their roots removed and their occlusal dentin exposed and ground wet with 600-grit SiC paper. After application of one of the adhesives, the resin cement was applied to the bonded surface and a composite resin block was incrementally built up to a height of 5 mm (n=10). The restored teeth were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 7 days. The teeth were then cut along two axes (x and y), producing beam-shaped specimens with 0.8 mm(2) cross-sectional area, which were subjected to microTBS testing at a crosshead speed of 0.05 mm/min and stressed to failure after 24 h or 90 days of storage in water. The microTBS data in MPa were subjected to three-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test (alpha= 0.05). RESULTS: The interaction effect for all three factors was statistically significant (three-way ANOVA, p<0.001). All eight experimental means (MPa) were compared by the Tukey's test (p<0.05) and the following results were obtained: Tyrian-One Step Plus /C&B/24 h (22.4+/-7.3); Tyrian-One Step Plus /Variolink II/24 h (39.4+/-11.6); Xeno III/C&B/24 h (40.3+/-12.9); Xeno III/Variolink II/24 h (25.8+/-10.5); Tyrian-One Step Plus /C&B/90 d (22.1+/-12.8) Tyrian-One Step Plus/VariolinkII/90 d (24.2+/-14.2); Xeno III/C&B/90 d (27.0+/-13.5); Xeno III/Variolink II/90 d (33.0+/-8.9). CONCLUSIONS: Xeno III/Variolink II was the luting agent/adhesive combination that provided the most promising bond strength after 90 days of storage in water.


Subject(s)
Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Adhesives , Dental Bonding , Dentin-Bonding Agents , Resin Cements , Dental Stress Analysis , Humans , Materials Testing , Molar , Tensile Strength , Water
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...