ABSTRACT
Identifying the risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bacteremia in cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients would allow earlier initiation of an appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment. This is a prospective multicenter observational study in patients from 12 centers in Argentina, who presented with cancer or hematopoietic stem-cell transplant and developed Enterobacterales bacteremia. A multiple logistic regression model identified risk factors for CRE bacteremia, and a score was developed according to the regression coefficient. This was validated by the bootstrap resampling technique. Four hundred and forty-three patients with Enterobacterales bacteremia were included: 59 with CRE and 384 with carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales (CSE). The risk factors that were identified and the points assigned to each of them were: ≥10 days of hospitalization until bacteremia: OR 4.03, 95% CI 1.88-8.66 (2 points); previous antibiotics > 7 days: OR 4.65, 95% CI 2.29-9.46 (2 points); current colonization with KPC-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales: 33.08, 95% CI 11.74-93.25 (5 points). With a cut-off of 7 points, a sensitivity of 35.59%, specificity of 98.43%, PPV of 77.7%, and NPV of 90.9% were obtained. The overall performance of the score was satisfactory (AUROC of 0.85, 95% CI 0.80-0.91). Finally, the post-test probability of CRE occurrence in patients with none of the risk factors was 1.9%, which would virtually rule out the presence of CRE bacteremia.
ABSTRACT
Glutathione S-transferase Mu 1 (GSTM1) and glutathione S-transferase theta 1 (GSTT1) enzymes are glutathione-S-transferases with broad significance for susceptibility or resistance to multifactorial human diseases, as well as detoxification of environmental chemicals and drugs. Moreover, some individuals may have a complete deletion of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes, which can contribute to patient-to-patient variability in drug safety and efficacy. GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene deletion frequencies can vary according to ethnicity and continental origin of the studied population with implications for achieving the goal of precision/personalized medicine in clinical practice. We report here a worldwide systematic review of the null genotypes in these two clinically important genes by continents, ethnicities, and therapeutic areas (TAs). Searches were performed in the PubMed database covering the period from 1992 to 2020. Out of the 1925 articles included, most studies analyzed European individuals, corroborating the literature failure for not adequately considering the non-European ethnicities. The frequency of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes was higher in patients than in healthy volunteers. Conversely, in East Asians, higher frequencies of the null genotypes were observed in healthy volunteers than patients. Oncology was the most intensively studied TA (57% of the articles) in relation to GSTM1 and GSTT1. In all, these results demonstrate that there is an important gap in the literature in terms of failure to consider a broader range of populations, as well as diseases wherein GSTM1 and GSTT1 variations have clinical and biological implications. To achieve precision/personalized medicine on a global/worldwide scale, with equity and inclusiveness, this knowledge/research gap ought to be remedied in studies of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest systematic review conducted to date addressing the GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes worldwide. The analyses from the 1925 articles highlighted the current knowledge gaps in different TAs, ethnicities, and populations. Filling these gaps is of importance, given the role these genes play in relation to the metabolism of substances to which we have frequent contact with, the associations observed between their deletion and diseases such as cancer, in addition to the interethnic differences observed for the deletion frequencies of these genes.
