Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 61(6): 103497, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35842293

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Various therapies have been tried for Covid disease including the use of antivirals, steroids, monoclonal antibodies and convalescent plasma. METHOD: The study was conducted on convalescent plasma transfused ICU patients. Part A of the study involves clinical outcomes based on gender, age, comorbidities, blood group,and the average length of stay. Part B investigates clinical outcomes in patients transfused with convalescent plasma before and after the November 2021 guidelines. Part C of the study includes patients in cytokine storm and the efficacy of tocilizumab in these patients. RESULT: Out of the 326 ICU patients transfused with convalescent plasma the overall mortality was 152 (53.3 %). On comparing blood groups and clinical outcomes, a clinically significant result was found. A clinically significant association was also seen on comparing the clinical outcome of 18-50 years and 61-70 years age group and in female gender patients. The average number of ICU days had a positive impact on the overall patient survival. Out of the patients in 'cytokine storm' (n = 109), on day 20, the survival percentage in the non-Tocilizumab group showed a downward trend throughout. However, in the Tocilizumab group, the survival percentage remained stable throughout till around day 50. CONCLUSION: Amongst the convalescent plasma transfused ICU patients, females, having blood group B, and an average length of stay of fewer than 20 days had a better chance of survival. The patients given tocilizumab and convalescent plasma had a better chance of survival compared to tocilizumab alone.


Subject(s)
Blood Group Antigens , COVID-19 , Humans , Female , COVID-19/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Cytokine Release Syndrome , Immunization, Passive/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Cytokines , Intensive Care Units , COVID-19 Serotherapy
3.
J Crit Care ; 31(1): 26-30, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26643859

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is used as an initial ventilatory support in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but its utility is unclear, and persistence in those who do not improve may delay intubation and lead to adverse outcomes. Hence, it becomes imperative to have a clear understanding of selecting patients who will benefit from this modality. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we included all consecutive adults, over a 3-year period, who fulfilled criteria for ARDS by the Berlin definition. Basic demographics, ventilatory support, intensive care unit course, and outcome were recorded. RESULTS: Of 170 patients, 96 (56.47%) were initially managed with NIV. Noninvasive ventilation failure was seen in 42 (43.75%) of 96, and low baseline PaO2/FIO2, shock, and ARDS severity were associated with NIV failure. Overall intensive care unit mortality was 63 (37.1%) of 170, and high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, low PaO2/FIO2, shock, and ARDS severity were associated with increased mortality. Noninvasive ventilation failure and mortality were significantly higher in moderate and severe ARDS. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive ventilation maybe useful in selected patients with mild ARDS but should be used with great caution in moderate and severe ARDS, as failure risk is high. In addition, low PaO2/FIO2 and shock are associated with NIV failure. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, shock, low PaO2/FIO2, and ARDS severity are associated with increased mortality.


Subject(s)
Hospital Mortality , Noninvasive Ventilation/methods , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/mortality , Shock, Septic/epidemiology , APACHE , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Blood Gas Analysis , Female , Humans , India , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/virology , Intensive Care Units , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Oxygen/blood , Partial Pressure , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Risk Factors , Sepsis/epidemiology , Sex Factors , Treatment Failure
5.
Lung India ; 32(4): 326-30, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26180380

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural effusion is a major clinical problem associated with primary and metastatic pleural malignancies. Pleural effusions from an unknown primary are responsible for 7-15% of all malignant pleural effusions. Presence of malignant pleural effusion puts the patient in advanced stage and renders the prognosis as poor. AIM: In this study we intend to find out the incidence of malignant pleural effusion, its aetiology and clinical course in patients attending a tertiary care teaching hospital. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients were included in this study. A majority of the patients were in age group 50- 70 years (median age = 58.8 years; range 32- 85 yrs). Male to female ratio was 2.5:1. The major primary cancers were lung cancer (135), lymphoma (40), breast cancer (36), female genital tract (30) gastrointestinal (21), and others (8). In 38 cases primary remained unknown. The yields of pleural fluid cytology, blind pleural biopsy, CT/USG guided pleural biopsy and thoracoscopy were 60%, 49%, 76% and 91% respectively. Chemical pleurodesis yielded complete response in 80%, incomplete response in another 13% patients. Only 136 (44%) cases could be followed up for minimum of 6 months. A majority of them (95, 69.85%) died. CONCLUSION: We conclude that malignant pleural effusion is a commonly misdiagnosed medical entity. Lung cancer is the commonest cause. Despite all efforts, in about 15% of the cases, primary remains undiagnosed. Thoracoscopy/pleuroscopy is a cost effective measure for diagnosis. Chemical pleurodesis provides expected results but mortality remains high.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...