Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 60
Filter
1.
Crit Care Med ; 52(2): 314-330, 2024 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38240510

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Clinical deterioration of patients hospitalized outside the ICU is a source of potentially reversible morbidity and mortality. To address this, some acute care hospitals have implemented systems aimed at detecting and responding to such patients. OBJECTIVES: To provide evidence-based recommendations for hospital clinicians and administrators to optimize recognition and response to clinical deterioration in non-ICU patients. PANEL DESIGN: The 25-member panel included representatives from medicine, nursing, respiratory therapy, pharmacy, patient/family partners, and clinician-methodologists with expertise in developing evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines. METHODS: We generated actionable questions using the Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes (PICO) format and performed a systematic review of the literature to identify and synthesize the best available evidence. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Approach to determine certainty in the evidence and to formulate recommendations and good practice statements (GPSs). RESULTS: The panel issued 10 statements on recognizing and responding to non-ICU patients with critical illness. Healthcare personnel and institutions should ensure that all vital sign acquisition is timely and accurate (GPS). We make no recommendation on the use of continuous vital sign monitoring among unselected patients. We suggest focused education for bedside clinicians in signs of clinical deterioration, and we also suggest that patient/family/care partners' concerns be included in decisions to obtain additional opinions and help (both conditional recommendations). We recommend hospital-wide deployment of a rapid response team or medical emergency team (RRT/MET) with explicit activation criteria (strong recommendation). We make no recommendation about RRT/MET professional composition or inclusion of palliative care members on the responding team but suggest that the skill set of responders should include eliciting patients' goals of care (conditional recommendation). Finally, quality improvement processes should be part of a rapid response system. CONCLUSIONS: The panel provided guidance to inform clinicians and administrators on effective processes to improve the care of patients at-risk for developing critical illness outside the ICU.


Subject(s)
Clinical Deterioration , Critical Care , Humans , Critical Care/standards , Critical Illness/therapy , Evidence-Based Practice , Intensive Care Units
2.
Crit Care Med ; 52(2): 307-313, 2024 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38240509

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Clinical deterioration of patients hospitalized outside the ICU is a source of potentially reversible morbidity and mortality. To address this, some acute care facilities have implemented systems aimed at detecting and responding to such patients. OBJECTIVES: To provide evidence-based recommendations for hospital clinicians and administrators to optimize recognition and response to clinical deterioration in non-ICU patients. PANEL DESIGN: The 25-member panel included representatives from medicine, nursing, respiratory therapy, pharmacy, patient/family partners, and clinician-methodologists with expertise in developing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. METHODS: We generated actionable questions using the Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes format and performed a systematic review of the literature to identify and synthesize the best available evidence. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to determine certainty in the evidence and to formulate recommendations and good practice statements (GPSs). RESULTS: The panel issued 10 statements on recognizing and responding to non-ICU patients with critical illness. Healthcare personnel and institutions should ensure that all vital sign acquisition is timely and accurate (GPS). We make no recommendation on the use of continuous vital sign monitoring among "unselected" patients due to the absence of data regarding the benefit and the potential harms of false positive alarms, the risk of alarm fatigue, and cost. We suggest focused education for bedside clinicians in signs of clinical deterioration, and we also suggest that patient/family/care partners' concerns be included in decisions to obtain additional opinions and help (both conditional recommendations). We recommend hospital-wide deployment of a rapid response team or medical emergency team (RRT/MET) with explicit activation criteria (strong recommendation). We make no recommendation about RRT/MET professional composition or inclusion of palliative care members on the responding team but suggest that the skill set of responders should include eliciting patients' goals of care (conditional recommendation). Finally, quality improvement processes should be part of a rapid response system (GPS). CONCLUSIONS: The panel provided guidance to inform clinicians and administrators on effective processes to improve the care of patients at-risk for developing critical illness outside the ICU.


Subject(s)
Clinical Deterioration , Critical Care , Humans , Critical Care/standards , Critical Illness/therapy , Intensive Care Units , Quality Improvement
3.
Am Surg ; 86(7): 826-829, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32916072

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The need to reverse the coagulation impairment caused by chronic antiplatelet agents in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with acute traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (TICH) remains controversial. We sought to determine whether emergent platelet transfusion reduces the incidence of hemorrhage expansion, mortality, or need for neurosurgical intervention such as intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, burr holes, or craniotomy. METHODS: All adult blunt TICH patients (age ≥16 years) over a 4-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with penetrating TBI, blunt TBI without TICH on admission computed tomography (CT), receiving warfarin, not on antiplatelet agents, or requiring immediate operative intervention were excluded. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they received a platelet transfusion: reversal group (RV) versus no reversal group (NR). Patient outcomes were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: 169 blunt TBI patients on chronic antiplatelet therapy were studied (102 RV group, 67 NR group). The groups were well matched with regard to age, Injury Severity Score, Abbreviated Injury Scale-head, Glasgow Coma Score, mechanism of injury, need for intubation, time to initial CT scan, and hospital length of stay. Immediate platelet transfusion did not alter the occurrence of TICH extension on follow-up CT (26% vs 21%, P = .71), TBI-specific mortality (9% vs 13%, P = .45), need for ICP monitor (2% vs 3%, P = 1.0), burr hole (1% vs 3%, P = .56), or craniotomy (1% vs 3%, P = .56). DISCUSSION: Immediate platelet transfusion is unnecessary in blunt TBI patients on chronic antiplatelet therapy who do not require immediate craniotomy.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic/therapy , Cerebral Hemorrhage, Traumatic/prevention & control , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Platelet Transfusion , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/mortality , Cerebral Hemorrhage, Traumatic/epidemiology , Craniotomy , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/mortality , Young Adult
4.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 88(3): 372-378, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32107352

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: On the morning of June 12, 2016, an armed assailant entered the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando, Florida, and initiated an assault that killed 49 people and injured 53. The regional Level I trauma center and two community hospitals responded to this mass casualty incident. A detailed analysis was performed to guide hospitals who strive to prepare for future similar events. METHODS: A retrospective review of all victim charts and/or autopsy reports was performed to identify victim presentation patterns, injuries sustained, and surgical resources required. Patients were stratified into three groups: survivors who received care at the regional Level I trauma center, survivors who received care at one of two local community hospitals, and decedents. RESULTS: Of the 102 victims, 40 died at the scene and 9 died upon arrival to the Level I trauma center. The remaining 53 victims received definitive medical care and survived. Twenty-nine victims were admitted to the trauma center and five victims to a community hospital. The remaining 19 victims were treated and discharged that day. Decedents sustained significantly more bullet impacts than survivors (4 ± 3 vs. 2 ± 1; p = 0.008) and body regions injured (3 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 1; p = 0.0002). Gunshots to the head, chest, and abdominal body regions were significantly more common among decedents than survivors (p < 0.0001). Eighty-two percent of admitted patients required surgery in the first 24 hours. Essential resources in the first 24 hours included trauma surgeons, emergency room physicians, orthopedic/hand surgeons, anesthesiologists, vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, intensivists, and hospitalists. CONCLUSION: Mass shooting events are associated with high mortality. Survivors commonly sustain multiple, life-threatening ballistic injuries requiring emergent surgery and extensive hospital resources. Given the increasing frequency of mass shootings, all hospitals must have a coordinated plan to respond to a mass casualty event. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological Study, level V.


Subject(s)
Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Mass Casualty Incidents , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Florida/epidemiology , Hospitals, Community/organization & administration , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Wounds, Gunshot/mortality
5.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open ; 3(1): e000210, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30402561

ABSTRACT

Care during mass casualty events (MCE) has improved during the last 15 years. Military and civilian collaboration has led to partnerships which augment the response to MCE. Much has been written about strategies to deliver care during an MCE, but there is little about how to transition back to normal operations after an event. A panel discussion entitled The Day(s) After: Lessons Learned from Trauma Team Management in the Aftermath of an Unexpected Mass Casualty Event at the 76th Annual American Association for the Surgery of Trauma meeting on September 13, 2017 brought together a cadre of military and civilian surgeons with experience in MCEs. The events described were the First Battle of Mogadishu (1993), the Second Battle of Fallujah (2004), the Bagram Detention Center Rocket Attack (2014), the Boston Marathon Bombing (2013), the Asiana Flight 214 Plane Crash (2013), the Baltimore Riots (2015), and the Orlando Pulse Night Club Shooting (2016). This article focuses on the lessons learned from military and civilian surgeons in the days after MCEs.

6.
World J Surg ; 42(10): 3210-3214, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29616320

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The open abdomen (OA) is commonly utilized as a technique during damage control laparotomy (DCL). We propose that a selected group of these OA patients can be extubated prior to abdominal closure to decrease ventilator days and risk of pneumonia. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed at a Level I trauma center on all adult trauma patients with an OA following DCL. Patients were stratified into two groups: extubated prior to (PRE) and extubated after (POST) abdominal closure. Successful extubation in the PRE group was measured by the absence of re-intubation. The two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors for successful extubation prior to abdominal closure. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were in the PRE group, and 59 patients in the POST group. There were no differences between the groups with regard to age, gender, or hours from admission to completion of DCL. The PRE group had a significantly higher incidence of penetrating trauma (77 vs. 53%; p = 0.02), a significantly lower number of days from OA to extubation [0.6 (0.2-1.1) vs. 3.4 (2--8) days; p < 0.001], and a significant decrease in pneumonia (10 vs. 31%; p = 0.04). Two patients in each group required re-intubation [PRE (6%) vs. POST (3%); p = 0.61]. In a multivariate binominal logistic regression, penetrating trauma (p = 0.024), GCS on admission (p < 0.0001), and Injury Severity Score (p = 0.024) were identified as independent predictors for successful extubation. CONCLUSION: Presence of an OA following DCL does not require mechanical ventilation. Extubation of appropriate trauma patients prior to abdominal closure decreases pneumonia and hospital length of stay.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/surgery , Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques , Airway Extubation , Laparotomy/methods , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Abdominal Cavity/surgery , Abdominal Injuries/complications , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Pneumonia, Bacterial/etiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Trauma Centers , Young Adult
7.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 84(1): 133-138, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28640779

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Society of Vascular Surgery (SVS) guidelines currently suggest thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for grade II-IV and nonoperative management (NOM) for grade I blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI). However, there is increasing evidence that grade II may also be observed safely. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of TEVAR and NOM for grade I-IV BTAI and determine if grade II can be safely observed with NOM. METHODS: The records of patients with BTAI from 2004 to 2015 at a Level I trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were separated into two groups: TEVAR versus NOM. All BTAIs were graded according to the SVS guidelines. Minimal aortic injury (MAI) was defined as BTAI grade I and II. Failure of NOM was defined as aortic rupture after admission or progression on subsequent computed tomography (CT) imaging requiring TEVAR or open thoracotomy repair (OTR). Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U and χ tests. RESULTS: A total of 105 adult patients (≥16 years) with BTAI were identified over the 11-year period. Of these, 17 patients who died soon after arrival and 17 who underwent OTR were excluded. Of the remaining 71 patients, 30 had MAI (14 TEVAR vs. 16 NOM). There were no failures in either group. No patients with MAI in either group died from complications of aortic lesions. Follow-up CT imaging was performed on all MAI patients. Follow-up CT scans for all TEVAR patients showed stable stents with no leak. Follow-up CT in the NOM group showed progression in two patients neither required subsequent OTR or TEVAR. CONCLUSIONS: Although the SVS guidelines suggest TEVAR for grade II-IV and NOM for grade I BTAI, NOM may be safely used in grade II BTAI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.


Subject(s)
Aorta, Thoracic/injuries , Endovascular Procedures , Vascular System Injuries/therapy , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
J Surg Educ ; 74(6): e74-e80, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28781134

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychological effect of a mass casualty shooting event on general surgery residents. DESIGN: Three and 7 months following the Pulse nightclub mass casualty shooting, the mental well-being of general surgery residents employed at the receiving institution was evaluated. A voluntary and anonymous screening questionnaire for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depression (MD) was administered. Responses were stratified into 2 groups; residents who worked (ON-CALL) and residents who did not work (OFF-CALL) the night of the event. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests and are reported as median with interquartile range (IQR) or percentage. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one general surgery residents. RESULTS: Twenty-four residents (77%) returned the 3-month questionnaire: 10 ON-CALL and 14 OFF-CALL. There was no difference in PTSD and MD between the 2 groups (30% vs. 14%; p = 0.61) and (30% vs. 7%; p = 0.27), respectively. Twenty-three of the 24 residents responded to the 7-month questionnaire. Over time, the incidence of PTSD did not resolve in the ON-CALL group, but did resolve in the OFF-CALL group (30% vs. 0%; p = 0.07). There was no significant change in the incidence of MD in either group (30% vs. 8%; p = 0.28). At 7 months postevent, more residents in both groups stated that they had sought counseling (30% vs. 44%; p = 0.65) and (0% vs. 15%; p = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: The emotional toll associated with this mass casualty event had a substantial effect upon the general surgery residents involved. With the incidence of PTSD and MD identified, we believe that all residents should be provided with counseling following such events.


Subject(s)
General Surgery/education , Mass Casualty Incidents/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Surgeons/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/etiology , Depression/physiopathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Internship and Residency/methods , Male , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/etiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/physiopathology , Stress, Psychological , Time Factors , Trauma Centers , United States
9.
Am Surg ; 83(6): 673-676, 2017 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28637573

ABSTRACT

Bed availability remains a constant struggle for tertiary care centers resulting in the use of management protocols to streamline patient care and reduce length of stay (LOS). A standardized perioperative management protocol for uncomplicated acute appendicitis (UA) was implemented in April 2014 to decrease both CT scan usage and LOS. Patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for UA from April 2012 to May 2013 (PRE group) and April 2014 to May 2015 (POST group) were compared retrospectively. There were no differences in patient demographics or clinical findings between the groups. All patients in the PRE group had a CT scan for the diagnosis of appendicitis, whereas there was a 14 per cent decrease in the POST group (P = 0.002). There was a significant decrease in median LOS between the groups [PRE 1.3 vs POST 0.9 days; (P < 0.001)]. There was no difference in subsequent emergency department visits for complications [3 (4%) vs 4 (4%); P = 1.0] or 30-day readmission rate [1 (1%) vs 5 (5%); P = 0.22] between the groups. A standardized perioperative management protocol for UA patients significantly decreased CT scan utilization and LOS without compromising patient care.


Subject(s)
Appendectomy , Appendicitis/surgery , Laparoscopy , Adult , Appendectomy/methods , Appendicitis/diagnostic imaging , Body Mass Index , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
11.
Am Surg ; 81(11): 1134-7, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26672583

ABSTRACT

Obesity incidence in the trauma population is increasing. Abdominal compartment syndrome has poor outcomes when left untreated. Surgeons may treat obese patients differently because of concern for increased morbidity and mortality. We studied the effects of body mass index (BMI) on resource utilization and outcome. An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective review of trauma patients requiring temporary abdominal closure (TAC) was performed. Patients were stratified as follows: Group 1-BMI = 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m(2), Group 2-BMI = 25 to 29.9 kg/m(2), Group 3-BMI = 30 to 39.9 kg/m(2), Group 4-BMI ≥ 40 kg/m(2). Demographic data, illness severity as defined by Injury Severity Score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Score Version II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score Version II scores, resource utilization, fascial closure rate, and survival were collected. About 380 patients required TAC. Median age of Group 1 was significantly lower than Groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.001). Severity of illness did not differ. Group 4 had a longer intensive care unit stay compared with Groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.005). Group 4 required mechanical ventilation longer than Group 1 (P = 0.027). Hospital stay, fascial closure, and survival were equivalent. Obese trauma patients with TAC have a longer intensive care unit stay and more ventilator days, but there is no difference in survival or type of closure. TAC can be used safely in trauma patients with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2).


Subject(s)
Abdomen/surgery , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Obesity/complications , Wounds and Injuries/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Body Mass Index , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay , Middle Aged , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies
12.
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther ; 47 Spec No: s63-77, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26588481

ABSTRACT

The Abdominal Compartment Society (www.wsacs.org) previously created highly cited Consensus Definitions/Management Guidelines related to intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Implicit in this previous work, was a commitment to regularly reassess and update in relation to evolving research. Two years preceding the Fifth World Congress on Abdominal Compartment Syndrome, an International Guidelines committee began preparation. An oversight/steering committee formulated key clinical questions regarding IAH/ /ACS based on polling of the Executive to redundancy, structured according to the Patient, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO) format. Scientific consultations were obtained from Methodological GRADE experts and a series of educational teleconferences were conducted to educate scientific review teams from among the wscacs. org membership. Each team conducted systematic or structured reviews to identify relevant studies and prepared evidence summaries and draft Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) recommendations. The evidence and draft recommendations were presented and debated in person over four days. Updated consensus definitions and management statements were derived using a modified Delphi method. A writingcommittee subsequently compiled the results utilizing frequent Internet discussion and Delphi voting methods to compile a robust online Master Report and a concise peer-reviewed summarizing publication. A dedicated Paediatric Guidelines Subcommittee reviewed all recommendations and either accepted or revised them for appropriateness in children. Of the original 12 IAH/ACS definitions proposed in 2006, three (25%) were accepted unanimously, with four (33%) accepted by > 80%, and four (33%) accepted by > 50%, but required discussion to produce revised definitions. One (8%) was rejected by > 50%. In addition to previous 2006 definitions, the panel also defined the open abdomen, lateralization of the abdominal musculature, polycompartment syndrome, abdominal compliance, and suggested a refined open abdomen classification system. Recommendations were possible regarding intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement, approach to sustained IAH, philosophy of protocolized IAP management and same-hospital-stay fascial closure, use of decompressive laparotomy, and negative pressure wound therapy. Consensus suggestions included use of non-invasive therapies for treating IAH/ACS, considering body position and IAP, damage control resuscitation, prophylactic open abdomen usage, and prudence in early biological mesh usage. No recommendations were made for the use of diuretics, albumin, renal replacement therapies, and utilizing abdominal perfusion pressure as a resuscitation-endpoint. Collaborating Methodological Guideline Development and Clinical Experts produced Consensus Definitions/Clinical Management statements encompassing the most contemporary evidence. Data summaries now exist for clinically relevant IAH/ACS questions, which will facilitate future scientific reanalysis.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Intra-Abdominal Hypertension/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Time Factors
13.
Am Surg ; 81(1): 81-5, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25569070

ABSTRACT

Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurements are essential to the diagnosis and management of patients with intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), plateau pressure (Pplat), and mean airway pressure (Paw) are used by some surgeons as surrogate estimates of IAP during abdominal closure. Thirty mechanically ventilated surgical/trauma patients with risk factors for IAH/ACS underwent simultaneous triplicate measurements of PIP, Pplat, Paw, and IAP. PIP, Pplat, and Paw were compared with IAP using both coefficient of determination and Bland and Altman analysis. The coefficient of determination for each airway pressure in predicting change in IAP was: PIP 5 per cent (P = 0.24), Pplat 17 per cent (P = 0.02), and Paw 15 per cent (P = 0.03). Bland and Altman analysis identified that marked variability exists between airway pressure and IAP measurements: PIP 19.3 ± 18.7 mmHg, Pplat 11.1 ± 13.7 mmHg, and Paw 2.0 ± 9.8 mmHg. Airway pressures do not accurately reflect IAP and cannot be substituted for IAP measurements in patients at risk for IAH/ACS.


Subject(s)
Compartment Syndromes/physiopathology , Intra-Abdominal Hypertension/physiopathology , Respiratory System/physiopathology , Abdominal Cavity/physiopathology , Compartment Syndromes/diagnosis , Compartment Syndromes/prevention & control , Female , Florida , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Intra-Abdominal Hypertension/diagnosis , Intra-Abdominal Hypertension/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Function Tests , Risk Factors
14.
J Am Coll Surg ; 218(4): 695-703, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24529805

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Debate exists within the surgical education community about whether 5 years is sufficient time to train a general surgeon, whether graduating chief residents are confident in their skills, why residents choose to do fellowships, and the scope of general surgery practice today. STUDY DESIGN: In May 2013, a 16-question online survey was sent to every general surgery program director in the United States for dissemination to each graduating chief resident (CR). RESULTS: Of the 297 surveys returned, 76% of CRs trained at university programs, 81% trained at 5-year programs, and 28% were going directly into general surgery practice. The 77% of CRs who had done >950 cases were significantly more comfortable than those who had done less (p < 0.0001). Only a few CRs were uncomfortable performing a laparoscopic colectomy (7%) or a colonoscopy (6%), and 80% were comfortable being on call at a Level I trauma center. Compared with other procedures, CRs were most uncomfortable with open common bile duct explorations (27%), pancreaticoduodenectomies (38%), hepatic lobectomies (48%), and esophagectomies (60%) (p < 0.00001). Of those going into fellowships, 67% said they truly had an interest in that specialty and only 7% said it was because they were not confident in their surgical skills. CONCLUSIONS: Current graduates of general surgery residencies appear to be confident in their skills, including care of the trauma patient. Fellowships are being chosen primarily because of an interest in the subspecialty. General surgery residency no longer provides adequate training in esophageal or hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Graduate , General Surgery/education , Internship and Residency , Physicians/psychology , Self Efficacy , Career Choice , Data Collection , Fellowships and Scholarships , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Specialties, Surgical/education , United States
15.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 76(2): 303-9; discussion 309-10, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24458038

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-dependent spinal cord-injured (SCI) patients require significant resources related to ventilator dependence. Diaphragm pacing (DP) has been shown to successfully replace mechanical ventilators for chronic ventilator-dependent tetraplegics. Early use of DP following SCI has not been described. Here, we report our multicenter review experience with the use of DP in the initial hospitalization after SCI. METHODS: Under institutional review board approval for humanitarian use device, we retrospectively reviewed our multicenter nonrandomized interventional protocol of laparoscopic diaphragm motor point mapping with electrode implantation and subsequent diaphragm conditioning and ventilator weaning. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients with an average age of 31 years (range, 17-65 years) with only two females were identified. Mechanism of injury included motor vehicle collision (7), diving (6), gunshot wounds (4), falls (4), athletic injuries (3), bicycle collision (2), heavy object falling on spine (2), and motorcycle collision (1). Elapsed time from injury to surgery was 40 days (range, 3-112 days). Seven (24%) of the 29 patients who were evaluated for the DP placement had nonstimulatable diaphragms from either phrenic nerve damage or infarction of the involved phrenic motor neurons and were not implanted. Of the stimulatable patients undergoing DP, 72% (16 of 22) were completely free of ventilator support in an average of 10.2 days. For the remaining six DP patients, two had delayed weans of 180 days, three had partial weans using DP at times during the day, and one patient successfully implanted went to a long-term acute care hospital and subsequently had life-prolonging measures withdrawn. Eight patients (36%) had complete recovery of respiration, and DP wires were removed. CONCLUSION: Early laparoscopic diaphragm mapping and DP implantation can successfully wean traumatic cervical SCI patients from ventilator support. Early laparoscopic mapping is also diagnostic in that a nonstimulatable diaphragm is a convincing evidence of an inability to wean from ventilator support, and long-term ventilator management can be immediately instituted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level V.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Electrodes, Implanted , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Ventilator Weaning/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Diaphragm/innervation , Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Quadriplegia/diagnosis , Quadriplegia/therapy , Recovery of Function , Respiration , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Spinal Cord Injuries/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
16.
17.
Am Surg ; 79(11): 1207-12, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24165259

ABSTRACT

Pain control after traumatic rib fracture is essential to avoid respiratory complications and prolonged hospitalization. Narcotics are commonly used, but adjunctive medications such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may be beneficial. Twenty-one patients with traumatic rib fractures treated with both narcotics and intravenous ibuprofen (IVIb) (Treatment) were retrospectively compared with 21 age- and rib fracture-matched patients who received narcotics alone (Control). Pain medication requirements over the first 7 hospital days were evaluated. Mean daily IVIb dose was 2070 ± 880 mg. Daily intravenous morphine-equivalent requirement was 19 ± 16 vs 32 ± 24 mg (P < 0.0001). Daily narcotic requirement was significantly decreased in the Treatment group on Days 3 through 7 (P < 0.05). Total weekly narcotic requirement was significantly less among Treatment patients (P = 0.004). Highest and lowest daily pain scores were lower in the Treatment group (P < 0.05). Hospital length of stay was 4.4 ± 3.4 versus 5.4 ± 2.9 days (P = 0.32). There were no significant complications associated with IVIb therapy. Early IVIb therapy in patients with traumatic rib fractures significantly decreases narcotic requirement and results in clinically significant decreases in hospital length of stay. IVIb therapy should be initiated in patients with traumatic rib fractures to improve patient comfort and reduce narcotic requirement.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Ibuprofen/administration & dosage , Narcotics/administration & dosage , Pain/prevention & control , Rib Fractures/complications , Adult , Aged , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Rib Fractures/therapy , Treatment Outcome
18.
Am Surg ; 79(9): 928-32, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24069993

ABSTRACT

Recent studies have suggested improved outcomes in surgical patients with healthcare insurance, whereas several others have noted disparities in access to health care, the care provided, and the aftercare of uninsured patients. Several different strategies exist in the management and prevention of the open abdomen secondary to abdominal compartment syndrome. To date, no study has evaluated the effects of race and insurance in patients with an open abdomen (OA). A retrospective review from our OA database was queried. All patients with an OA from January 2002 to December 2010 were included for analysis. Data analyzed included patients' demographics, race, insurance status, hospital charges, Injury Severity Scores, and outcomes. Insured patients were identified and compared with their uninsured counterparts. A total of 720 patients were treated for an OA during the study period. Of these, 273 (37.9%) died within their hospital stay. Patients who died were noted to be older and sicker with higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Simplified Acute Physiologic Scores (27.6 vs. 18.2, P < 0.001 and 54.6 vs. 38.5, P < 0.001, respectively). Logistic regression analysis revealed that age, APACHE II, and Injury Severity Scores were independently associated with mortality. From our categorical variables, race was not associated with worse outcomes. In addition, being uninsured was significantly associated with increased mortality (odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.6; P = 0.05). "Self-pay" status was associated with increased mortality even after adjusting for severity of illness. Further studies incorporating baseline comorbidities need to be undertaken to further assess the reasons for these disparities.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Diseases/surgery , Healthcare Disparities , Insurance Coverage/economics , Laparotomy/economics , Racial Groups , Trauma Centers/economics , Adult , Confidence Intervals , Digestive System Diseases/economics , Digestive System Diseases/ethnology , Female , Florida/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Length of Stay/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
19.
World J Surg ; 37(9): 2018-30, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23674252

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The open abdomen has become a common procedure in the management of complex abdominal problems and has improved patient survival. The method of temporary abdominal closure (TAC) may play a role in patient outcome. METHODS: A prospective, observational, open-label study was performed to evaluate two TAC techniques in surgical and trauma patients requiring open abdomen management: Barker's vacuum-packing technique (BVPT) and the ABThera(TM) open abdomen negative pressure therapy system (NPWT). Study endpoints were days to and rate of 30-day primary fascial closure (PFC) and 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Altogether, 280 patients were enrolled from 20 study sites. Among them, 168 patients underwent at least 48 hours of consistent TAC therapy (111 NPWT, 57 BVPT). The two study groups were well matched demographically. Median days to PFC were 9 days for NPWT versus 12 days for BVPT (p = 0.12). The 30-day PFC rate was 69 % for NPWT and 51 % for BVPT (p = 0.03). The 30-day all-cause mortality was 14 % for NPWT and 30 % for BVPT (p = 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that patients treated with NPWT were significantly more likely to survive than the BVPT patients [odds ratio 3.17 (95 % confidence interval 1.22-8.26); p = 0.02] after controlling for age, severity of illness, and cumulative fluid administration. CONCLUSIONS: Active NPWT is associated with significantly higher 30-day PFC rates and lower 30-day all-cause mortality among patients who require an open abdomen for at least 48 h during treatment for critical illness.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods , Adult , Critical Illness , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
20.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 73(3): 629-39, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22929494

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Open abdominal management with negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is increasingly used for critically ill trauma and surgery patients. We sought to determine the comparative efficacy and safety of NPWT versus alternate temporary abdominal closure (TAC) techniques in critically ill adults with open abdominal wounds. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of published and unpublished comparative studies. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Database, the Center for Reviews and Dissemination, clinical trials registries, and bibliographies of included articles. Two authors independently abstracted data on study design, methodological quality, patient characteristics, and outcomes. RESULTS: Among 2,715 citations identified, 2 randomized controlled trials and 9 cohort studies (3 prospective/6 retrospective) met inclusion criteria. Methodological quality of included prospective studies was moderate. One randomized controlled trial observed an improved fascial closure rate (relative risk [RR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-5.3) and length of hospital stay after addition of retention sutured sequential fascial closure to the Kinetic Concepts Inc. (KCI) vacuum-assisted closure (VAC). Another reported a trend toward enhanced fascial closure using the KCI VAC versus Barker's vacuum pack (RR, 2.6; 95% CI, 0.95-7.1). A prospective cohort study observed improved mortality (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.92) and fascial closure (RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0) for patients who received the ABThera versus Barker's vacuum pack. Another noted a reduced arterial lactate, intra-abdominal pressure, and hospital stay for those fitted with the KCI VAC versus Bogotá bag. Most included retrospective studies exhibited low methodological quality and reported no mortality or fascial closure benefit for NPWT. CONCLUSION: Limited prospective comparative data suggests that NPWT versus alternate TAC techniques may be linked with improved outcomes. However, the clinical heterogeneity and quality of available studies preclude definitive conclusions regarding the preferential use of NPWT over alternate TAC techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, level III.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries/mortality , Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Wound Healing/physiology , Abdominal Injuries/diagnosis , Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques , Cohort Studies , Critical Illness/mortality , Critical Illness/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Intensive Care Units , Male , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Assessment , Surgical Wound Infection/mortality , Survival Analysis , Trauma Centers , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...