Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20
Filter
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(2): 457-460, 2024 02 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37897407

ABSTRACT

Cerebral malaria is an important cause of mortality and neurodisability in endemic regions. We show magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features suggestive of cytotoxic and vasogenic cerebral edema followed by microhemorrhages in 2 adult UK cases, comparing them with an Indian cohort. Long-term follow-up images correlate ongoing changes with residual functional impairment.


Subject(s)
Brain Edema , Malaria, Cerebral , Adult , Humans , Malaria, Cerebral/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/adverse effects , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Brain Edema/etiology , Brain Edema/pathology
2.
BMJ ; 380: e070295, 2023 02 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36737076
3.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 16(10): e0010799, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36264976

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Leprosy is rare in the United Kingdom (UK), but migration from endemic countries results in new cases being diagnosed each year. We documented the clinical presentation of leprosy in a non-endemic setting. METHODS: Demographic and clinical data on all new cases of leprosy managed in the Leprosy Clinic at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London between 1995 and 2018 were analysed. RESULTS: 157 individuals with a median age of 34 (range 13-85) years were included. 67.5% were male. Patients came from 34 different countries and most contracted leprosy before migrating to the UK. Eighty-two (51.6%) acquired the infection in India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal and Pakistan. 30 patients (19.1%) acquired leprosy in Africa, including 11 from Nigeria. Seven patients were born in Europe; three acquired their leprosy infection in Africa, three in South East Asia, and one in Europe. The mean interval between arrival in the UK and symptom onset was 5.87 years (SD 10.33), the longest time to diagnosis was 20 years. Borderline tuberculoid leprosy (n = 71, 42.0%), and lepromatous leprosy (n =, 53 33.1%) were the commonest Ridley Jopling types. Dermatologists were the specialists diagnosing leprosy most often. Individuals were treated with World Health Organization recommended drug regimens (rifampicin, dapsone and clofazimine). CONCLUSION: Leprosy is not a disease of travellers but develops after residence in an leprosy endemic area. The number of individuals from a leprosy endemic country reflect both the leprosy prevalence and the migration rates to the United Kingdom. There are challenges in diagnosing leprosy in non-endemic areas and clinicians need to recognise the symptoms and signs of leprosy.


Subject(s)
Leprosy, Borderline , Leprosy, Lepromatous , Leprosy , Humans , Male , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , London , Leprosy/epidemiology , Leprosy, Lepromatous/drug therapy , Leprosy, Borderline/drug therapy , Nigeria
4.
J Neurochem ; 161(2): 146-157, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35137414

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 infection can damage the nervous system with multiple neurological manifestations described. However, there is limited understanding of the mechanisms underlying COVID-19 neurological injury. This is a cross-sectional exploratory prospective biomarker cohort study of 21 patients with COVID-19 neurological syndromes (Guillain-Barre Syndrome [GBS], encephalitis, encephalopathy, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis [ADEM], intracranial hypertension, and central pain syndrome) and 23 healthy COVID-19 negative controls. We measured cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum biomarkers of amyloid processing, neuronal injury (neurofilament light), astrocyte activation (GFAp), and neuroinflammation (tissue necrosis factor [TNF] ɑ, interleukin [IL]-6, IL-1ß, IL-8). Patients with COVID-19 neurological syndromes had significantly reduced CSF soluble amyloid precursor protein (sAPP)-ɑ (p = 0.004) and sAPPß (p = 0.03) as well as amyloid ß (Aß) 40 (p = 5.2 × 10-8 ), Aß42 (p = 3.5 × 10-7 ), and Aß42/Aß40 ratio (p = 0.005) compared to controls. Patients with COVID-19 neurological syndromes showed significantly increased neurofilament light (NfL, p = 0.001) and this negatively correlated with sAPPɑ and sAPPß. Conversely, GFAp was significantly reduced in COVID-19 neurological syndromes (p = 0.0001) and this positively correlated with sAPPɑ and sAPPß. COVID-19 neurological patients also displayed significantly increased CSF proinflammatory cytokines and these negatively correlated with sAPPɑ and sAPPß. A sensitivity analysis of COVID-19-associated GBS revealed a non-significant trend toward greater impairment of amyloid processing in COVID-19 central than peripheral neurological syndromes. This pilot study raises the possibility that patients with COVID-19-associated neurological syndromes exhibit impaired amyloid processing. Altered amyloid processing was linked to neuronal injury and neuroinflammation but reduced astrocyte activation.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Amyloidosis , COVID-19 , Alzheimer Disease/cerebrospinal fluid , Amyloid beta-Peptides/metabolism , Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor/cerebrospinal fluid , Biomarkers/cerebrospinal fluid , COVID-19/complications , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
5.
EClinicalMedicine ; 39: 101070, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34401683

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A high prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies has been reported in case series of patients with neurological manifestations and COVID-19; however, the pathogenicity of antiphospholipid antibodies in COVID-19 neurology remains unclear. METHODS: This single-centre cross-sectional study included 106 adult patients: 30 hospitalised COVID-neurological cases, 47 non-neurological COVID-hospitalised controls, and 29 COVID-non-hospitalised controls, recruited between March and July 2020. We evaluated nine antiphospholipid antibodies: anticardiolipin antibodies [aCL] IgA, IgM, IgG; anti-beta-2 glycoprotein-1 [aß2GPI] IgA, IgM, IgG; anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin [aPS/PT] IgM, IgG; and anti-domain I ß2GPI (aD1ß2GPI) IgG. FINDINGS: There was a high prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in the COVID-neurological (73.3%) and non-neurological COVID-hospitalised controls (76.6%) in contrast to the COVID-non-hospitalised controls (48.2%). aPS/PT IgG titres were significantly higher in the COVID-neurological group compared to both control groups (p < 0.001). Moderate-high titre of aPS/PT IgG was found in 2 out of 3 (67%) patients with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis [ADEM]. aPS/PT IgG titres negatively correlated with oxygen requirement (FiO2 R=-0.15 p = 0.040) and was associated with venous thromboembolism (p = 0.043). In contrast, aCL IgA (p < 0.001) and IgG (p < 0.001) was associated with non-neurological COVID-hospitalised controls compared to the other groups and correlated positively with d-dimer and creatinine but negatively with FiO2. INTERPRETATION: Our findings show that aPS/PT IgG is associated with COVID-19-associated ADEM. In contrast, aCL IgA and IgG are seen much more frequently in non-neurological hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Characterisation of antiphospholipid antibody persistence and potential longitudinal clinical impact are required to guide appropriate management. FUNDING: This work is supported by UCL Queen Square Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) and Moorfields BRC grants (#560441 and #557595). LB is supported by a Wellcome Trust Fellowship (222102/Z/20/Z). RWP is supported by an Alzheimer's Association Clinician Scientist Fellowship (AACSF-20-685780) and the UK Dementia Research Institute. KB is supported by the Swedish Research Council (#2017-00915) and the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the County Councils, the ALF-agreement (#ALFGBG-715986). HZ is a Wallenberg Scholar supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (#2018-02532), the European Research Council (#681712), Swedish State Support for Clinical Research (#ALFGBG-720931), the Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF), USA (#201809-2016862), and theUK Dementia Research Institute at UCL. BDM is supported by grants from the MRC/UKRI (MR/V007181/1), MRC (MR/T028750/1) and Wellcome (ISSF201902/3). MSZ, MH and RS are supported by the UCL/UCLH NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and MSZ is supported by Queen Square National Brain Appeal.

6.
Brain Commun ; 3(3): fcab099, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34396099

ABSTRACT

Preliminary pathological and biomarker data suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection can damage the nervous system. To understand what, where and how damage occurs, we collected serum and CSF from patients with COVID-19 and characterized neurological syndromes involving the PNS and CNS (n = 34). We measured biomarkers of neuronal damage and neuroinflammation, and compared these with non-neurological control groups, which included patients with (n = 94) and without (n = 24) COVID-19. We detected increased concentrations of neurofilament light, a dynamic biomarker of neuronal damage, in the CSF of those with CNS inflammation (encephalitis and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis) [14 800 pg/ml (400, 32 400)], compared to those with encephalopathy [1410 pg/ml (756, 1446)], peripheral syndromes (Guillain-Barré syndrome) [740 pg/ml (507, 881)] and controls [872 pg/ml (654, 1200)]. Serum neurofilament light levels were elevated across patients hospitalized with COVID-19, irrespective of neurological manifestations. There was not the usual close correlation between CSF and serum neurofilament light, suggesting serum neurofilament light elevation in the non-neurological patients may reflect peripheral nerve damage in response to severe illness. We did not find significantly elevated levels of serum neurofilament light in community cases of COVID-19 arguing against significant neurological damage. Glial fibrillary acidic protein, a marker of astrocytic activation, was not elevated in the CSF or serum of any group, suggesting astrocytic activation is not a major mediator of neuronal damage in COVID-19.

7.
Trials ; 22(1): 193, 2021 Mar 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33685502

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this trial is to assess whether early antiviral therapy in outpatients with COVID-19 with either favipiravir plus lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir alone, or favipiravir alone, is associated with a decrease in viral load of SARS-CoV-2 compared with placebo. TRIAL DESIGN: FLARE is a phase IIA randomised, double-blind, 2x2 factorial placebo-controlled, interventional trial. PARTICIPANTS: This trial is being conducted in the United Kingdom, with Royal Free Hospital, London as the lead site. Participants are non-hospitalised adults with highly suspected COVID-19 within the first 5 days of symptom onset, or who have tested positive with SARS-CoV-2 causing COVID-19 within the first 7 days of symptom onset, or who are asymptomatic but tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 for the first time within the last 48 hours. Inclusion criteria are as follows: 1. Any adult with the following: Symptoms compatible with COVID-19 disease (Fever >37.8°C on at least one occasion AND either cough and/ or anosmia) within the first 5 days of symptom onset (date/time of enrolment must be within the first 5 days of symptom onset) OR ANY symptoms compatible with COVID-19 disease (may include, but are not limited to fever, cough, shortness of breath, malaise, myalgia, headache, coryza) and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 within the first 7 days of symptom onset) (date/time of enrolment must be within the first 7 days of symptom onset) OR no symptoms but tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 within the last 48 hours (date/time of test must be within 48 hours of enrolment) 2. Male or female aged 18 years to 70 years old inclusive at screening 3. Willing and able to take daily saliva samples 4. Able to provide full informed consent and willing to comply with trial-related procedures Exclusion criteria are as follows: 1. Known hypersensitivity to any of the active ingredients or excipients in favipiravir and matched placebo, and in lopinavir/ritonavir and matched placebo (See Appendix 2) 2. Chronic liver disease at screening (known cirrhosis of any aetiology, chronic hepatitis (e.g. autoimmune, viral, steatohepatitis), cholangitis or any known elevation of liver aminotransferases with AST or ALT > 3 X ULN)* 3. Chronic kidney disease (stage 3 or beyond) at screening: eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 * 4. HIV infection, if untreated, detectable viral load or on protease inhibitor therapy 5. Any clinical condition which the investigator considers would make the participant unsuitable for the trial 6. Concomitant medications known to interact with favipiravir and matched placebo, and with lopinavir/ritonavir and matched placebo, and carry risk of toxicity for the participant 7. Current severe illness requiring hospitalisation 8. Pregnancy and/ or breastfeeding 9. Eligible female participants of childbearing potential and male participants with a partner of childbearing potential not willing to use highly effective contraceptive measures during the trial and within the time point specified following last trial treatment dose. 10. Participants enrolled in any other interventional drug or vaccine trial (co-enrolment in observational studies is acceptable) 11. Participants who have received the COVID-19 vaccine *Considering the importance of early treatment of COVID-19 to impact viral load, the absence of known chronic liver/ kidney disease will be confirmed verbally by the participant during pre-screening and Screening/Baseline visit. Safety blood samples will be collected at Screening/Baseline visit (Day 1) and test results will be examined as soon as they become available and within 24 hours. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Participants will be randomised 1:1:1:1 using a concealed online minimisation process into one of the following four arms: Arm 1: Favipiravir + Lopinavir/ritonavir Oral favipiravir at 1800mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 400mg four (4) times daily from Day 2 to Day 7 PLUS lopinavir/ritonavir at 400mg/100mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 200mg/50mg four (4) times daily from Day 2 to Day 7. Arm 2: Favipiravir + Lopinavir/ritonavir placebo Oral favipiravir at 1800mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 400mg four (4) times daily from Day 2 to Day 7 PLUS lopinavir/ritonavir matched placebo at 400mg/100mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 200mg/50mg four (4) times daily from Day 2 to Day 7. Arm 3: Favipiravir placebo + Lopinavir/ritonavir Oral favipiravir matched placebo at 1800mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 400mg four (4) times daily from Day 2 to Day 7 PLUS lopinavir/ritonavir at 400mg/100mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 200mg/50mg four (4) times daily from Day 2 to Day 7. Arm 4: Favipiravir placebo + Lopinavir/ritonavir placebo Oral favipiravir matched placebo at 1800mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 400mg four (4) times daily from Day 2 to Day 7 PLUS lopinavir/ritonavir matched placebo at 400mg/100mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 200mg/50mg four (4) times daily from Day 2 to Day 7. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is upper respiratory tract viral load at Day 5. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Percentage of participants with undetectable upper respiratory tract viral load after 5 days of therapy Proportion of participants with undetectable stool viral load after 7 days of therapy Rate of decrease in upper respiratory tract viral load during 7 days of therapy Duration of fever following commencement of trial medications Proportion of participants with hepatotoxicity after 7 days of therapy Proportion of participants with other medication-related toxicity after 7 days of therapy and 14 days post-randomisation Proportion of participants admitted to hospital with COVID-19 related illness Proportion of participants admitted to ICU with COVID-19 related illness Proportion of participants who have died with COVID-19 related illness Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of favipiravir Exploratory: Proportion of participants with deleterious or resistance-conferring mutations in SARS-CoV-2 RANDOMISATION: Participants will be randomised 1:1:1:1 using a concealed online minimisation process, with the following factors: trial site, age (≤ 55 vs > 55 years old), gender, obesity (BMI <30 vs ≥30), symptomatic or asymptomatic, current smoking status (Yes = current smoker, No = ex-smoker, never smoker), ethnicity (Caucasian, other) and presence or absence of comorbidity (defined as diabetes, hypertension, ischaemic heart disease (including previous myocardial infarction), other heart disease (arrhythmia and valvular heart disease), asthma, COPD, other chronic respiratory disease). BLINDING (MASKING): Participants and investigators will both be blinded to treatment allocation (double-blind). NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): 240 participants, 60 in each arm. TRIAL STATUS: Protocol version 4.0 dated 7th January 2021. Date of first enrolment: October 2020. Recruitment is ongoing, with anticipated finish date of 31st March 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The FLARE trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, trial identifying number NCT04499677 , date of registration 4th August 2020. FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.


Subject(s)
Amides/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Lopinavir/therapeutic use , Pyrazines/therapeutic use , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , Viral Load , Ambulatory Care , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Drug Therapy, Combination , Early Medical Intervention , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , SARS-CoV-2 , United Kingdom
9.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 25(12): 2317-2319, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31742526

ABSTRACT

We report a case of a previously healthy man returning to the United Kingdom from Lithuania who developed rhombencephalitis and myeloradiculitis due to tick-borne encephalitis. These findings add to sparse data on tick-borne encephalitis virus phylogeny and associated neurologic syndromes and underscore the importance of vaccinating people traveling to endemic regions.


Subject(s)
Encephalitis Viruses, Tick-Borne , Encephalitis, Tick-Borne/diagnosis , Encephalitis, Tick-Borne/virology , Adult , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Biomarkers , Encephalitis Viruses, Tick-Borne/classification , Encephalitis Viruses, Tick-Borne/genetics , Genome, Viral , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Phylogeny , Symptom Assessment , United Kingdom
10.
BMC Med ; 16(1): 218, 2018 11 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30477484

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Plasmodium ovale spp. and P. malariae cause illness in endemic regions and returning travellers. Far less is known about these species than P. falciparum and P. vivax. METHODS: The UK national surveillance data, collected 1987 to 2015, were collated with the International Passenger Survey and climatic data to determine geographical, temporal and seasonal trends of imported P. ovale spp. and P. malariae infection. RESULTS: Of 52,242 notified cases of malaria, 6.04% (3157) were caused by P. ovale spp. and 1.61% (841) by P. malariae; mortality was 0.03% (1) and 0.12% (1), respectively. Almost all travellers acquired infection in West or East Africa. Infection rate per travel episode fell fivefold during the study period. The median latency of P. malariae and P. ovale spp. was 18 and 76 days, respectively; delayed presentation occurred with both species. The latency of P. ovale spp. infection imported from West Africa was significantly shorter in those arriving in the UK during the West African peak malarial season compared to those arriving outside it (44 days vs 94 days, p < 0.0001), implying that relapse synchronises with the period of high malarial transmission. This trend was not seen in P. ovale spp. imported from East Africa nor in P. malariae. CONCLUSION: In West Africa, where malaria transmission is highly seasonal, P. ovale spp. may have evolved to relapse during the malarial high transmission season. This has public health implications. Deaths are very rare, supporting current guidelines emphasising outpatient treatment. However, late presentations do occur.


Subject(s)
Malaria/epidemiology , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Plasmodium malariae , Plasmodium ovale , Travel , United Kingdom/epidemiology
11.
Travel Med Infect Dis ; 19: 28-32, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28943374

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing the cause of fever in the returned traveller is challenging. Efforts often focus on identifying 'exotic' pathogens. Primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections cause clinical features that overlap with many exotic pathogens. The age-matched seroprevalence of both EBV and CMV is greater in tropical than temperate areas. We describe the clinical and laboratory features of returned travellers diagnosed with primary CMV and EBV syndromes. METHODS: Patients with laboratory-confirmed primary EBV and CMV infections who had attended the Hospital for Tropical Diseases (HTD), London between 1st October 2011 and 1st October 2016 were identified. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained and analysed. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with primary EBV infection and 31 with primary CMV infection were identified. The commonest presenting features of both infections were fever (81.1%), headache (50.9%) and arthralgia/myalgia (49.1%). Cervical lymphadenopathy was seen more frequently with EBV than with CMV (59.1% vs. 25.8%, P = 0.02). Transaminitis (79.2%) and lymphocytosis (52.8%) were the commonest laboratory abnormalities in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Primary EBV and CMV infections are important causes of febrile illness in returning travellers. Identification of these pathogens prevents unnecessary, expensive investigations for more 'exotic' pathogens and impacts clinical management for example facilitating prognostication and antimicrobial stewardship.


Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections/complications , Cytomegalovirus Infections/epidemiology , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/complications , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/epidemiology , Fever/etiology , Travel-Related Illness , Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/diagnosis , Humans , London
12.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 23(1): 137-139, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27748650

ABSTRACT

Zika virus is normally transmitted by mosquitos, but cases of sexual transmission have been reported. We describe a patient with symptomatic Zika virus infection in whom the virus was detected in semen for 92 days. Our findings support recommendations for 6 months of barrier contraceptive use after symptomatic Zika virus infection.


Subject(s)
Semen/virology , Zika Virus Infection/virology , Zika Virus/isolation & purification , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Brazil , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Male , Middle Aged , RNA, Viral/urine , Time Factors , Travel , United Kingdom , Zika Virus/genetics , Zika Virus/immunology , Zika Virus/pathogenicity , Zika Virus Infection/blood , Zika Virus Infection/transmission , Zika Virus Infection/urine
13.
Tuberculosis (Edinb) ; 94(3): 226-37, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24572168

ABSTRACT

The efficacy of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination in protection against pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is highly variable between populations. One possible explanation for this variability is increased exposure of certain populations to non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). This study used a murine model to determine the effect that exposure to NTM after BCG vaccination had on the efficacy of BCG against aerosol Mycobacterium tuberculosis challenge. The effects of administering live Mycobacterium avium (MA) by an oral route and killed MA by a systemic route on BCG-induced protection were evaluated. CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were profiled to define the immunological mechanisms underlying any effect on BCG efficacy. BCG efficacy was enhanced by exposure to killed MA administered by a systemic route; T helper 1 and T helper 17 responses were associated with increased protection. BCG efficacy was reduced by exposure to live MA administered by the oral route; T helper 2 cells were associated with reduced protection. These findings demonstrate that exposure to NTM can induce opposite effects on BCG efficacy depending on route of exposure and viability of NTM. A reproducible model of NTM exposure would be valuable in the evaluation of novel TB vaccine candidates.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/pharmacology , BCG Vaccine/pharmacology , Mycobacterium avium Complex/immunology , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/immunology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/immunology , Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Administration, Inhalation , Administration, Oral , Aerosols , Animals , BCG Vaccine/administration & dosage , BCG Vaccine/immunology , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Cytokines/metabolism , Female , Immunity, Cellular/immunology , Lymph Nodes/immunology , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Spleen/immunology , Th1 Cells/immunology , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology , Vaccines, Attenuated/pharmacology , Vaccines, Live, Unattenuated/immunology , Vaccines, Live, Unattenuated/pharmacology
14.
BMJ ; 344: e2116, 2012 Mar 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22454091

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine which travellers with malaria are at greatest risk of dying, highlighting factors which can be used to target health messages to travellers. DESIGN: Observational study based on 20 years of UK national data. SETTING: National register of malaria cases. PARTICIPANTS: 25,054 patients notified with Plasmodium falciparum malaria, of whom 184 died, between 1987 and 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison between those with falciparum malaria who died and non-fatal cases, including age, reason for travel, country of birth, time of year diagnosed, malaria prophylaxis used. RESULTS: Mortality increased steadily with age, with a case fatality of 25/548 (4.6%) in people aged >65 years, adjusted odds ratio 10.68 (95% confidence interval 6.4 to 17.8), P<0.001 compared with 18-35 year olds. There were no deaths in the ≤ 5 year age group. Case fatality was 3.0% (81/2740 cases) in tourists compared with 0.32% (26/8077) in travellers visiting friends and relatives (adjusted odds ratio 8.2 (5.1 to 13.3), P<0.001). Those born in African countries with endemic malaria had a case fatality of 0.4% (36/8937) compared with 2.4% (142/5849) in others (adjusted odds ratio 4.6 (3.1 to 9.9), P<0.001). Case fatality was particularly high from the Gambia. There was an inverse correlation in mortality between region of presentation and number of cases seen in the region (R(2) = 0.72, P<0.001). Most delay in fatal cases was in seeking care. CONCLUSIONS: Most travellers acquiring malaria are of African heritage visiting friends and relatives. In contrast the risks of dying from malaria once acquired are highest in the elderly, tourists, and those presenting in areas in which malaria is seldom seen. Doctors often do not think of these as high risk groups for malaria; for this reason they are important groups to target in pre-travel advice.


Subject(s)
Emigration and Immigration , Malaria, Falciparum/mortality , Travel , Adolescent , Adult , Africa/ethnology , Age Distribution , Aged , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Malaria, Falciparum/ethnology , Malaria, Falciparum/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young Adult
15.
PLoS One ; 6(10): e26434, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22046285

ABSTRACT

The lack of an effective TB vaccine hinders current efforts in combating the TB pandemic. One theory as to why BCG is less protective in tropical countries is that exposure to non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) reduces BCG efficacy. There are currently several new TB vaccines in clinical trials, and NTM exposure may also be relevant in this context. NTM exposure cannot be accurately evaluated in the absence of specific antigens; those which are known to be present in NTM and absent from M. tuberculosis and BCG. We therefore used a bioinformatic pipeline to define proteins which are present in common NTM and absent from the M. tuberculosis complex, using protein BLAST, TBLASTN and a short sequence protein BLAST to ensure the specificity of this process. We then assessed immune responses to these proteins, in healthy South Africans and in patients from the United Kingdom and United States with documented exposure to NTM. Low level responses were detected to a cluster of proteins from the mammalian cell entry family, and to a cluster of hypothetical proteins, using ex vivo ELISpot and a 6 day proliferation assay. These early findings may provide a basis for characterising exposure to NTM at a population level, which has applications in the field of TB vaccine design as well as in the development of diagnostic tests.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Mycobacterium/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Tuberculosis Vaccines/immunology , BCG Vaccine/immunology , Bacterial Proteins/administration & dosage , Bacterial Proteins/immunology , Bacterial Vaccines/immunology , Computational Biology , Humans , South Africa , United Kingdom , United States
16.
Trends Pharmacol Sci ; 32(10): 601-6, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21803435

ABSTRACT

An effective tuberculosis (TB) vaccine could have a significant impact on the current TB pandemic. The past decade has seen sustained global investment into reaching this goal; currently there are several promising vaccines in clinical trials. Current strategies include the development of an improved bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine to be given at birth and a booster vaccine to be administered after BCG. Here, we describe the current vaccination strategy and review the main issues in novel TB vaccine development. Potential vaccine candidates are evaluated in pre-clinical animal models, and the most promising go into clinical testing; a vaccine candidate is evaluated in at least one model before progressing to early clinical trials. The main challenge in early trials is the lack of a defined correlate of vaccine-induced immune protection. Following this, large efficacy trials are undertaken, which face the daunting challenges of cost, logistics and trial site capacity.


Subject(s)
Tuberculosis Vaccines/administration & dosage , Tuberculosis Vaccines/immunology , Tuberculosis/immunology , Tuberculosis/prevention & control , Animals , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Humans , Vaccination/methods
17.
J Infect ; 60(1): 1-20, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19931558

ABSTRACT

Eosinophilia is a common finding in returning travellers and migrants, and in this group it often indicates an underlying helminth infection. Infections are frequently either asymptomatic or associated with non-specific symptoms, but some can cause severe disease. Here the British Infection Society guidelines group reviews common and serious infectious causes of eosinophilia, and outlines a scheme for investigating returning travellers and migrants. All returning travellers and migrants with eosinophilia should be investigated with concentrated stool microscopy and strongyloides serology, in addition to tests specific to the region they have visited. Terminal urine microscopy and serology for schistosomiasis should also be performed in those returning from Africa. Eosinophilia is also a feature of significant non-infective conditions, which should be considered.


Subject(s)
Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/parasitology , Helminthiasis/diagnosis , Transients and Migrants , Travel , Tropical Climate , Eosinophilia/etiology , Feces/parasitology , Geography , Helminthiasis/complications , Humans , Serologic Tests , United Kingdom
18.
Trop Med Int Health ; 13(8): 1042-6, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18631317

ABSTRACT

Tuberculous (TB) meningitis is difficult to diagnose and has a high mortality rate, particularly when presentation is delayed. A diagnostic index developed in Vietnam, an area of low-HIV seroprevalence, has been proposed as a means to differentiate TB meningitis from acute bacterial meningitis using clinical and laboratory features. We applied this index over a 4-month period to adults presenting with meningitis to an urban teaching hospital in Malawi, where HIV seroprevalence is 70% among medical inpatients. Eighty-five consecutive eligible patients were studied. Nine had TB meningitis, 64 bacterial meningitis and 12 cryptococcal meningitis. The sensitivity of the diagnostic index for predicting TB meningitis was 78%, with a specificity of 43%, too low to be used in the diagnosis of TB meningitis in this setting. This finding is likely to be generalizable to other southern African countries with similarly high-HIV seroprevalences.


Subject(s)
Meningitis, Cryptococcal/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Meningeal/diagnosis , Adult , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , HIV Seroprevalence , Hospitals, Teaching , Hospitals, Urban , Humans , Malawi/epidemiology , Male , Meningitis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Meningitis, Bacterial/epidemiology , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tuberculosis, Meningeal/epidemiology
19.
Trends Parasitol ; 23(10): 462-5, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17888737

ABSTRACT

Long-term travellers have a high risk of acquiring malaria, and also of discontinuing malaria prophylaxis. A review by Lin Chen and colleagues addresses the relatively neglected area of malaria prevention in long-term travellers. The essential elements of malaria prevention are discussed: awareness of risk, bite avoidance, chemoprophylaxis, rapid diagnosis, stand-by emergency treatment, and the importance of tailoring recommendations to the individual.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Malaria, Falciparum/prevention & control , Plasmodium falciparum/growth & development , Travel , Animals , Chemoprevention/methods , Humans , Patient Compliance
20.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 5(2): 199-204, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17402835

ABSTRACT

Quinine and the artemisinin-derivative drugs artesunate and artemether are effective treatments for severe falciparum malaria. Trials comparing artemether with quinine have not demonstrated convincing evidence of a mortality advantage for artemether. The South East Asian Quinine Artesunate Malaria Trial (SEAQUAMAT), a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial in 1461 adults with severe malaria in Asia compared artesunate with quinine. Mortality was 15% in the artesunate group and 22% in the quinine group, a reduction of 34.7% (95% confidence interval: 18.5-47.6%) in the artesunate group, with almost all the benefit reported in those with high parasite counts. Artesunate should constitute first-line treatment for severe malaria in Asia. These results can probably be generalized to the treatment of severe malaria in adults from all areas, especially in those with hyperparasitemia. However, it is unclear whether these results can be generalized to children in Africa, who constitute the majority of those who die from severe malaria worldwide.


Subject(s)
Artemisinins/therapeutic use , Malaria, Falciparum/drug therapy , Quinine/therapeutic use , Sesquiterpenes/therapeutic use , Animals , Artemether , Artesunate , Humans , Malaria, Falciparum/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...