Slit1 Protein Regulates SVZ-Derived Precursor Mobilization in the Adult Demyelinated CNS.

Slit1 is a secreted axon guidance molecule, also involved in adult neurogenesis. In physiological conditions, Slit1 loss promotes ectopic dispersal of SVZ-derived neural precursors (SVZ-NPCs) into periventricular structures such as the corpus callosum. Demyelination of the corpus callosum triggers SVZ-NPC migration to ectopic locations and their recruitment by the lesion, suggesting a possible role for Slit1 in SVZ-NPCs ectopic dispersal regulation in pathological conditions. Here, we have investigated the function of Slit1 protein in the recruitment of SVZ-NPCs after CNS demyelination. We find that the dynamics of oligodendrogenesis and temporal profile of developmental myelination in Slit1 -/- mice are similar to Slit1 +/- controls. SVZ micro-dissection and RT-PCR from wild-type mice, show that Slits and Robos are physiologically regulated at the transcriptional level in response to corpus callosum demyelination suggesting their role in the process of SVZ-NPC ectopic migration in demyelinating conditions. Moreover, we find that the number of SVZ-NPCs recruited by the lesion increases in Sli1-/- mice compared to Slit1 +/- mice, leading to higher numbers of Olig2+ cells within the lesion. Time-lapse video-microscopy of immuno-purified NPCs shows that Slit1-deficient cells migrate faster and make more frequent directional changes than control NPCs, supporting a cell-autonomous mechanism of action of Slit1 in NPC migration. In conclusion, while Slit1 does not affect the normal developmental process of oligodendrogenesis and myelination, it regulates adult SVZ-NPC ectopic migration in response to demyelination, and consequently oligodendrocyte renewal within the lesion.

The brain within the tumor: new roles for axon guidance molecules in cancers.

Slits, semaphorins and netrins are three families of proteins that can attract or repel growing axons and migrating neurons in the developing nervous system of vertebrates and invertebrates. Recent studies have shown that they are widely expressed outside the nervous system and that they may play important roles in cancers. Several of the genes encoding these proteins are localized on chromosomal region associated with frequent loss-of-heterozygosity in tumors and cancer cell lines and there is also significant hypermethylation of their promoter suggesting that they may act as tumor suppressors. In addition, proteins in all these families and their receptors appear to control the vascularization of the tumors. Last, many axon guidance molecules also regulate cell migration and apoptosis in normal and tumorigenic tissues. Overall, this suggests that molecules that could mimick or block the activity of axon guidance molecules may be used as therapeutic agents for the treatment of malignancy.

Age-dependent effects of secreted Semaphorins 3A, 3F, and 3E on developing hippocampal axons: in vitro effects and phenotype of Semaphorin 3A (-/-) mice.

We studied the role of Semaphorins in the formation of hippocampal connections at embryonic and early postnatal stages. We show that the embryonic entorhinal cortex has a repulsive effect on embryonic hippocampal axons that disappears gradually at postnatal stages. Such chemorepulsion is blocked by Neuropilin-1 and -2 blocking antibodies. However, at perinatal stages, the inner layers of the entorhinal cortex attract CA1 axons. At these stages, Sema3A and Sema3F bind commissural and entorhinal axons. Sema3A and Sema3F repel hippocampal axons at E14-P2, but not at E13. A similar spatiotemporal pattern of chemorepulsion is observed for Sema3A on entorhinal axons, in contrast to Sema3F, which repels these axons only at postnatal ages. Sema3E also repels hippocampal axons but exclusively at E14. We show that Sema3A and Sema3F can induce the collapse of hippocampal growth cones and that membrane-bound Sema3A and Sema3F can guide hippocampal axons in the stripe assay. In sema3A (-/-) mice, the entorhinohippocampal projection is largely normal although single axons innervate aberrantly the stratum radiatum and the hilus. Thus, the chemorepulsion evoked by Sema3A, Sema3E, and Sema3F is dynamically regulated in the developing hippocampal formation.

Diversity and specificity of actions of Slit2 proteolytic fragments in axon guidance.

The Slits are secreted proteins that bind to Robo receptors and play a role in axon guidance and neuronal migration. In vertebrates, Slit2 is a major chemorepellent for developing axons and is involved in the control of midline crossing. In vivo, Slit2 is cleaved into 140 kDa N-terminal (Slit2-N) and 55-60 kDa C-terminal (Slit2-C) fragments, although the uncleaved/full-length form can also be isolated from brain extract. We explored the functional activities of Slit2 fragments by engineering mutant and truncated versions of Slit2 representing the N-, C-, and full/uncleavable (Slit2-U) fragments. Only Slit2-N and Slit2-U bind the Robo proteins. We found that in collagen gel, olfactory bulb (OB) but not dorsal root ganglia (DRG) axons are repelled by Slit2-N and Slit2-U. Moreover, only Slit2-N membranes or purified protein-induced OB growth cones collapse. Finally, we found that only recombinant Slit2-N could induce branching of DRG axons and that this effect was antagonized by Slit2-U. Therefore, different axons have distinct responses to Slit2 fragments, and these proteins have different growth-promoting capacities.

Sensory axon response to substrate-bound Slit2 is modulated by laminin and cyclic GMP.

In vertebrates, Slit2 is a chemorepellent for some developing axons but stimulates axonal elongation and branching of sensory axons. In vivo, Slit2 is cleaved into 140-kDa N-terminal (Slit2-N) and 55- to 60-kDa C-terminal fragments, but the uncleaved/full-length form can also be isolated from brain extracts. As Slit2-N and full-length Slit2 bind tightly to cell membranes, we decided to explore the response of rat dorsal root ganglia (DRG) axons to substrate-bound Slit2 fragments in the stripe assay. Slit2 fragments were avoided by DRG axons when expressed on membranes or coated as stripes on laminin. However, when the Slit2 stripes were coated on fibronectin, DRG axons still avoided full-length Slit2 but grew preferentially on Slit2-N. DRG axon response to Slit2 fragments could be modulated by cGMP and by a laminin-1 peptide. These results strongly support the idea that extracellular matrix proteins modulate the response of growth cones to chemotropic molecules by modulating cyclic nucleotide levels.

Biological activity of soluble CD100. II. Soluble CD100, similarly to H-SemaIII, inhibits immune cell migration.

CD100 is a human 150-kDa homodimer expressed at the surface of most hemopoietic cells, and its gene belongs to the Ig and semaphorin gene families. Semaphorin genes encode soluble and membrane-bound proteins, most of which have been shown to act as chemorepellents on growth cone guidance. CD100 is discrete, as it is a transmembrane leukocyte surface molecule that can also exist in a soluble form. While our previous studies using mAbs suggested that the transmembrane form of CD100 plays a role in lymphocyte activation, no function was shown for its soluble form. Here, we investigated the effect of soluble CD100 in a cell migration assay; both CD100 spontaneously shed from a stable transfectant and soluble recombinant CD100 inhibited spontaneous and chemokine-induced migration of human monocytes. Interestingly, only the dimeric form of CD100 exerted an effect. Moreover, soluble CD100 inhibited migration of cells from monocytic and B cell lineages. A similar inhibitory effect on migration was observed with H-SemaIII, but not H-SemaIV, semaphorins. In addition, both CD100 and H-SemaIII were recognized by two CD100 mAbs in an ELISA, and one of these mAb abolished the inhibitory effect of each of these semaphorins. We also provide evidence that CD100 and H-SemaIII act through the same receptor on immune cells, which is not neuropilin-1. Furthermore, we describe a function on immune cells for H-SemaIII, a semaphorin to date only studied in the nervous system.

Evidence for intrinsic development of olfactory structures in Pax-6 mutant mice.

It has been reported that the arrival of primary olfactory axons is required to induce the development of the olfactory bulb (OB). On the other hand, the Sey(Neu)/Sey(Neu) mutant mouse (Small eye) has been previously described as a model for the absence of olfactory bulbs, owing to the lack of olfactory epithelium (OE). In the present report, we take advantage of this mutant and study a neural structure in the rostral pole of the telencephalon that phenotypically resembles the prospective OB. We named this formation olfactory bulb-like structure (OBLS). We also report the occurrence, in the mutants, of small epithelial vesicles in the malformed craneofacial pits, resembling an atrophic OE, although a mature olfactory nerve was not identified. Axonal tracing, birthdating, immunohistochemistry, and in situ hybridization using antibodies and probes expressed in the olfactory system, indicated that two distinct structures observed in the OBLS correspond to the main and accessory olfactory bulbs of the control mouse. We propose that the OBLS has developed independently of the external influences exerted by the olfactory nerve. The presence of a prospective OB in the mutants, without intervening olfactory fibers, suggests that intrinsic factors could define brain territories even in absence of the proper afferent innervation. The intrinsic mechanisms and environmental cues in the telencephalon could be sufficient to promote axonogenesis in the projection neurons of the OB and guide their axons in a lateral prospective tract, in the absence of olfactory axons.

Netrin-1-mediated axon outgrowth and cAMP production requires interaction with adenosine A2b receptor.

The netrins, a family of laminin-related secreted proteins, are critical in controlling axon elongation and pathfinding. The DCC (for deleted in colorectal cancer) protein was proposed as a receptor for netrin-1 in the light of many observations including the inhibition of netrin-1-mediated axon outgrowth and attraction in the presence of an anti-DCC antiserum, the similitude of nervous system defects in DCC and netrin-1 knockout mice and the results of receptor swapping experiments. Previous studies have failed to show a direct interaction of DCC with netrin-1 (ref. 10), suggesting the possibility of an additional receptor or co-receptor. Here we show that DCC interacts with the membrane-associated adenosine A2b receptor, a G-protein-coupled receptor that induces cAMP accumulation on binding adenosine. We show that A2b is actually a netrin-1 receptor and induces cAMP accumulation on binding netrin-1. Finally, we show that netrin-1-dependent outgrowth of dorsal spinal cord axons directly involves A2b. Together our results indicate that the growth-promoting function of netrin-1 may require a receptor complex containing DCC and A2b.

Analysis of the L1-deficient mouse phenotype reveals cross-talk between Sema3A and L1 signaling pathways in axonal guidance.

In humans, defects of the corticospinal tract have been attributed to mutations in the gene encoding L1 CAM, a phenotype that is reproduced in L1-deficient mice. Using coculture assays, we report that Sema3A secreted from the ventral spinal cord repels cortical axons from wild-type but not from L1-deficient mice. L1 and neuropilin-1 (NP-1) form a stable complex, and their extracellular domains can directly associate. Thus, L1 is a component of the Sema3A receptor complex, and L1 mutations may disrupt Sema3A signaling in the growth cone, leading to guidance errors. Addition of soluble L1Fc chimeric molecules does not restore Sema3A responsiveness of L1-deficient axons; instead, it converts the repulsion of wild-type axons into an attraction, further supporting a function for L1 in the Sema3A transducing pathways within the growth cone.

Neuropilin-2 regulates the development of selective cranial and sensory nerves and hippocampal mossy fiber projections.

Neuropilin-1 and neuropilin-2 bind differentially to different class 3 semaphorins and are thought to provide the ligand-binding moieties in receptor complexes mediating repulsive responses to these semaphorins. Here, we have studied the function of neuropilin-2 through analysis of a neuropilin-2 mutant mouse, which is viable and fertile. Repulsive responses of sympathetic and hippocampal neurons to Sema3F but not to Sema3A are abolished in the mutant. Marked defects are observed in the development of several cranial nerves, in the initial central projections of spinal sensory axons, and in the anterior commissure, habenulo-interpeduncular tract, and the projections of hippocampal mossyfiber axons in the infrapyramidal bundle. Our results show that neuropilin-2 is an essential component of the Sema3F receptor and identify key roles for neuropilin-2 in axon guidance in the PNS and CNS.

Plexins are a large family of receptors for transmembrane, secreted, and GPI-anchored semaphorins in vertebrates.

In Drosophila, plexin A is a functional receptor for semaphorin-1a. Here we show that the human plexin gene family comprises at least nine members in four subfamilies. Plexin-B1 is a receptor for the transmembrane semaphorin Sema4D (CD100), and plexin-C1 is a receptor for the GPI-anchored semaphorin Sema7A (Sema-K1). Secreted (class 3) semaphorins do not bind directly to plexins, but rather plexins associate with neuropilins, coreceptors for these semaphorins. Plexins are widely expressed: in neurons, the expression of a truncated plexin-A1 protein blocks axon repulsion by Sema3A. The cytoplasmic domain of plexins associates with a tyrosine kinase activity. Plexins may also act as ligands mediating repulsion in epithelial cells in vitro. We conclude that plexins are receptors for multiple (and perhaps all) classes of semaphorins, either alone or in combination with neuropilins, and trigger a novel signal transduction pathway controlling cell repulsion.

Chemoattraction and chemorepulsion of olfactory bulb axons by different secreted semaphorins.

During development, growth cones can be guided at a distance by diffusible factors, which are attractants and/or repellents. The semaphorins are the largest family of repulsive axon guidance molecules. Secreted semaphorins bind neuropilin receptors and repel sensory, sympathetic, motor, and forebrain axons. We found that in rat embryos, the olfactory epithelium releases a diffusible factor that repels olfactory bulb axons. In addition, Sema A and Sema IV, but not Sema III, Sema E, or Sema H, are able to orient in vitro the growth of olfactory bulb axons; Sema IV has a strong repulsive action, whereas Sema A appears to attract those axons. The expression patterns of sema A and sema IV in the developing olfactory system confirm that they may play a cooperative role in the formation of the lateral olfactory tract. This also represents a further evidence for a chemoattractive function of secreted semaphorins.

Slit2-Mediated chemorepulsion and collapse of developing forebrain axons.

Diffusible chemorepellents play a major role in guiding developing axons toward their correct targets by preventing them from entering or steering them away from certain regions. Genetic studies in Drosophila revealed a novel repulsive guidance system that prevents inappropriate axons from crossing the CNS midline; this repulsive system is mediated by the Roundabout (Robo) receptor and its secreted ligand Slit. In rodents, Robo and Slit are expressed in the spinal cord and Slit can repel spinal motor axons in vitro. Here, we extend these findings into higher brain centers by showing that Robo1 and Robo2, as well as Slit1 and Slit2, are often expressed in complementary patterns in the developing forebrain. Furthermore, we show that human Slit2 can repel olfactory and hippocampal axons and collapse their growth cones.

Cloning, expression, and genetic mapping of Sema W, a member of the semaphorin family.

The semaphorins comprise a large family of membrane-bound and secreted proteins, some of which have been shown to function in axon guidance. We have cloned a transmembrane semaphorin, Sema W, that belongs to the class IV subgroup of the semaphorin family. The mouse and rat forms of Sema W show 97% amino acid sequence identity with each other, and each shows about 91% identity with the human form. The gene for Sema W is divided into 15 exons, up to 4 of which are absent in the human cDNAs that we sequenced. Unlike many other semaphorins, Sema W is expressed at low levels in the developing embryo but was found to be expressed at high levels in the adult central nervous system and lung. Functional studies with purified membrane fractions from COS7 cells transfected with a Sema W expression plasmid showed that Sema W has growth-cone collapse activity against retinal ganglion-cell axons, indicating that vertebrate transmembrane semaphorins, like secreted semaphorins, can collapse growth cones. Genetic mapping of human SEMAW with human/hamster radiation hybrids localized the gene to chromosome 2p13. Genetic mapping of mouse Semaw with mouse/hamster radiation hybrids localized the gene to chromosome 6, and physical mapping placed the gene on bacteria artificial chromosomes carrying microsatellite markers D6Mit70 and D6Mit189. This localization places Semaw within the locus for motor neuron degeneration 2, making it an attractive candidate gene for this disease.

Cloning and characterization of a novel class VI semaphorin, semaphorin Y.

Semaphorins comprise a large family of proteins implicated in axonal guidance. We cloned a novel transmembrane semaphorin, semaphorin Y (Sema Y), which has a class VI sema domain. Sema Y shows growth cone collapsing activity on DRG neurons in vitro, and the target regions of the DRG neurons express sema Y mRNA during development. Sema Y may be a stop signal for these neurons in their target areas. Interestingly, sema Y mRNA was also detected in other neurons and their targets. Two isoforms of Sema Y derived from alternative splicing were identified and their expression was found to be regulated in a tissue- and age-dependent manner. Distribution of sema Y mRNA suggests that Sema Y might also be important during maintenance of axonal connections and/or differentiation and migration of cells. Sequence comparison among class VI semaphorins revealed two short conserved sequence stretches in their cytoplasmic domains, suggesting interaction of these semaphorins with a common intracellular component(s).

Semaphorins III and IV repel hippocampal axons via two distinct receptors.

The semaphorins are the largest family of repulsive axon guidance molecules. Secreted semaphorins bind neuropilin receptors and repel sensory, sympathetic and motor axons. Here we show that CA1, CA3 and dentate gyrus axons from E15-E17 mouse embryo explants are selectively repelled by entorhinal cortex and neocortex. The secreted semaphorins Sema III and Sema IV and their receptors Neuropilin-1 and -2 are expressed in the hippocampal formation during appropriate stages. Sema III and Sema IV strongly repel CA1, CA3 and dentate gyrus axons; entorhinal axons are only repelled by Sema III. An antibody against Neuropilin-1 blocks the repulsive action of Sema III and the entorhinal cortex, but has no effect on Sema IV-induced repulsion. Thus, chemorepulsion plays a role in axon guidance in the hippocampus, secreted semaphorins are likely to be responsible for this action, and the same axons can be repelled by two distinct semaphorins via two different receptors.

Many major CNS axon projections develop normally in the absence of semaphorin III.

The semaphorins constitute a large gene family of transmembrane and secreted molecules, many of which are expressed in the nervous system. Genetic studies in Drosophila have revealed a role for semaphorins in axon guidance and synapse formation, and several in vitro studies in mice have demonstrated a dramatic chemorepellent effect of semaphorin III (Sema III) on the axons of several populations of neurons. To investigate the function of Sema III during in vivo axon guidance in the mammalian CNS, we studied the development of axonal projections in mutant mice lacking Sema III. Projections were studied for which either the in vitro evidence suggests a role for Sema III in axon guidance (e.g., cerebellar mossy fibers, thalamocortical axons, or cranial motor neurons) or the in vivo expression suggests a role for Sema III in axon guidance (e.g., cerebellar Purkinje cells, neocortex). We find that many major axonal projections, including climbing fiber, mossy fiber, thalamocortical, and basal forebrain projections and cranial nerves, develop normally in the absence of Sema III. Despite its in vitro function and in vivo expression, it appears as if Sema III is not absolutely required for the formation of many major CNS tracts. Such data are consistent with recent models suggesting that axon guidance is controlled by a balance of forces resulting from multiple guidance cues. Our data lead us to suggest that if Sema III functions in part to guide the formation of major axonal projections, then it does so in combination with both other semaphorins and other families of guidance molecules.

Neuropilin-2, a novel member of the neuropilin family, is a high affinity receptor for the semaphorins Sema E and Sema IV but not Sema III.

Semaphorins are a large family of secreted and transmembrane proteins, several of which are implicated in repulsive axon guidance. Neuropilin (neuropilin-1) was recently identified as a receptor for Collapsin-1/Semaphorin III/D (Sema III). We report the identification of a related protein, neuropilin-2, whose mRNA is expressed by developing neurons in a pattern largely, though not completely, nonoverlapping with that of neuropilin-1. Unlike neuropilin-1, which binds with high affinity to the three structurally related semaphorins Sema III, Sema E, and Sema IV, neuropilin-2 shows high affinity binding only to Sema E and Sema IV, not Sema III. These results identify neuropilins as a family of receptors (or components of receptors) for at least one semaphorin subfamily. They also suggest that the specificity of action of different members of this subfamily may be determined by the complement of neuropilins expressed by responsive cells.

The embryonic cerebellum contains topographic cues that guide developing inferior olivary axons.

The formation of the olivocerebellar projection is supposed to be regulated by positional information shared between pre- and postsynaptic neurons. However, experimental evidence to support this hypothesis is missing. In the chick, caudal neurons in the inferior olive project to the anterior cerebellum and rostral ones to the posterior cerebellum. We here report in vitro experiments that strongly support the existence of anteroposterior polarity cues in the embryonic cerebellum. We developed an in vitro system that was easily accessible to experimental manipulations. Large hindbrain explants of E7.5-E8 chick embryos, containing the cerebellum and its attached brainstem, were plated and studied using axonal tracing methods. In these cultures, we have shown that the normal anteroposterior topography of the olivocerebellar projection was acquired, even when the cerebellar lamella was detached from the brainstem and placed again in its original position. We also found that, following various experimental rotations of the anteroposterior axis of the cerebellum, the rostromedian olivary neurons still project to the posterior vermis and the caudolateral neurons to the anterior vermis, that now have inverted locations. Thus, the rotation of the target region results in the rotation of the projection. In addition, we have shown that the formation of the projection map could be due to the inability of rostromedian inferior olivary axons to grow in the anterior cerebellum. All these experiments strongly indicate that olivocerebellar fibers recognize within their target region polarity cues that organize their anteroposterior topography, and we suggest that Purkinje cells might carry these cues.

Development of the olivocerebellar projection.

The establishment of orderly axonal projections is one of the essential steps in the formation of central networks. In this review, we discuss several of the current hypotheses on the mechanisms and molecules which govern this developmental process, using the olivocerebellar system as a model. During the formation of the olivocerebellar projection, there is a simultaneous and independent process of parcellation of the inferior olive and of the cerebellum. During embryogenesis, Purkinje cells in the cerebellar cortex and inferior olivary neurons are subdivided into small subsets of biochemically distinct compartments. We propose that this parcellation is involved in matching groups of olivary neurons to their corresponding subsets of target Purkinje cells. In vitro, the rotation of the anteroposterior axis of the cerebellum is followed by an equivalent inversion of the olivocerebellar projection. Olivary axons still project to the same Purkinje cells, suggesting that the formation of the olivocerebellar projection is regulated by positional information shared between pre- and postsynaptic neurons. We suggest that, in the chick embryo, the cell adhesion molecule BEN/SC1/DM-GRASP could be one of the target recognition molecules controlling the development of the olivocerebellar projection. These results also emphasize that coarse grained projection maps can form through chemoaffinity mechanisms, independent of the activity of the interacting neurons.