ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Screening individuals with AIDS for serum cryptococcal antigen (CrAg), followed by treatment of CrAg positives with antifungals, may prevent cryptococcal meningitis. This review examined data on CrAg screening and treatment in resource-limited settings. METHODS: We searched articles published during 2007-2014 on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of CrAg screening and treatment on the outcomes of mortality, morbidity, retention in care, quality of life, and/or prevention of ongoing HIV transmission. We rated overall quality of individual articles, summarized the body of evidence, the expected impact, and cost-effectiveness for each outcome. RESULTS: We identified 2613 articles. Eight met all inclusion criteria. Five studies addressed mortality and/or morbidity outcomes; all were observational and had small sample sizes; 3 lacked a comparison group. Ratings of study quality ranged from "medium" to "weak," and the quality of the overall body of evidence for mortality and morbidity outcomes was rated as "fair." The intervention's expected impact on mortality and morbidity was rated as "moderate." The 4 cost-effectiveness studies included in the analysis showed that CrAg screening and treatment interventions are highly cost-effective. No studies addressed retention in care, quality of life, or HIV transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Although limited, the body of evidence regarding CrAg screening and treatment suggests that the intervention may have an impact on preventing cryptococcal meningitis and death in persons with AIDS. Additional research is needed to quantify the intervention's effectiveness and identify optimal treatment dosing and implementation best practices.
Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Antigens, Fungal/immunology , Cryptococcus neoformans/immunology , HIV Infections/complications , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/diagnosis , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cryptococcus neoformans/isolation & purification , Developing Countries , Early Diagnosis , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Health Impact Assessment , Health Resources , Humans , Mass Screening , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/drug therapy , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/economics , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/epidemiology , Morbidity , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
SETTING: Public Health Facilities in South Africa. OBJECTIVE: To assess the current integration of TB and HIV services in South Africa, 2011. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of 49 randomly selected health facilities in South Africa. Trained interviewers administered a standardized questionnaire to one staff member responsible for TB and HIV in each facility on aspects of TB/HIV policy, integration and recording and reporting. We calculated and compared descriptive statistics by province and facility type. RESULTS: Of the 49 health facilities 35 (71%) provided isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) and 35 (71%) offered antiretroviral therapy (ART). Among assessed sites in February 2011, 2,512 patients were newly diagnosed with HIV infection, of whom 1,913 (76%) were screened for TB symptoms, and 616 of 1,332 (46%) of those screened negative for TB were initiated on IPT. Of 1,072 patients newly registered with TB in February 2011, 144 (13%) were already on ART prior to Tb clinical diagnosis, and 451 (42%) were newly diagnosed with HIV infection. Of those, 84 (19%) were initiated on ART. Primary health clinics were less likely to offer ART compared to district hospitals or community health centers (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: As of February 2011, integration of TB and HIV services is taking place in public medical facilities in South Africa. Among these services, IPT in people living with HIV and ART in TB patients are the least available.
