ABSTRACT
The aim of this multicenter, randomised, double-blind trial was to compare the efficacy and tolerance of oral disopyramide (D: 250 mg slow release twice daily) compared with cibenzoline (C: 130 mg twice daily) in the prevention of recurrences of atrial arrhythmias over a 6 month period. Sixty patients (mean age: 62 +/- 14 years; 37 men, 23 women; cardiac disease in 60% of cases) were randomised to two groups: C (N = 31) and D (N = 29). The commonest arrhythmia was atrial fibrillation (83%). The arrhythmia was recent (< 3 months) in 41% of patients and present for more than one year in 38% of patients. Sixteen patients of Group C (52%) and 11 of Group D (38%) had recurrences after an average of 79 +/- 58 days for Group C and 58 +/- 40 days for Group D (p = NS). The probability of absence of recurrence at 6 months was 36 +/- 11% in Group C and 55 +/- 10% in Group D (p = NS). Four patients in Group C (13%) and 13 patients in Group D (45%) had at least one unwanted side-effect (p = 0.009). Treatment was stopped because of side-effects in 2 patients in group C (6%) and 6 patients in Group D (21%). These results show that cibenzoline has a comparable efficacy for the prevention of recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia and is significantly better tolerated than disopyramide. This differences is mainly related to the marked anticholinergic effects of disopyramide.
