Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Altern Complement Med ; 25(5): 552-558, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30758216

ABSTRACT

Objective: An alcohol-free mouthwash of curcuminoids purified from the turmeric (Curcuma longa Linn.) rhizome was formulated using a cosolvent system, comprising chitosan and polyethylene glycol (PEG) 400, and determined for its efficacy and safety in management of denture stomatitis (DS) in comparison with a chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash. Design: A single-center, randomized, controlled parallel-arm trial was conducted. Setting: The study took place at the Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat-Yai, Thailand, between June 2016 and June 2017. Subjects: Participants were 20 years old or older adults of both genders, using removable dentures, and with a confirmed diagnosis of DS from an oral medicine specialist. Interventions: A total of 30 patients were randomly assigned to 3 different interventions, including the chitosan-curcuminoid (CHI-CUR) mouthwash, CHX mouthwash, and a vehicle formulation comprising chitosan and PEG 400. Ten milliliters of each intervention was given to the patient to be used for 30 sec, three times a day at 8 am, 12 pm, and 4 pm, for 2 weeks. Outcome measures: Outcome measures included complete relief of erythematous lesions under the denture and reduction in the number of candida colonies present in the denture-fitting surface. Results: Eight of 10 patients (80%) using the CHI-CUR mouthwash had a complete response after the 2-week treatment course compared with 30% of patients using the CHX mouthwash (p < 0.05). Both interventions exerted comparable anticandida efficacy. No oral or systemic adverse events that could possibly be related to the use of mouthwash were documented. Conclusions: The finding indicated that an alcohol-free CHI-CUR mouthwash may serve as a safe and potential topical therapeutic alternative in treating generalized or candida-associated DS.


Subject(s)
Chitosan/therapeutic use , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Curcumin/therapeutic use , Mouthwashes , Stomatitis, Denture/drug therapy , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mouthwashes/adverse effects , Mouthwashes/chemistry , Mouthwashes/therapeutic use , Patient Satisfaction , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Infect Chemother ; 24(5): 358-362, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29426774

ABSTRACT

To determine the susceptibility and minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of ceftazidime, the commonly used empirical antibiotic in patients with febrile neutropenia, in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from the intestinal microflora of pediatric patients with cancer, who received ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during chemotherapy, children younger than 18 years with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoma scheduled to undergo chemotherapy were randomized to receive oral ciprofloxacin 20 mg/kg/day or placebo from the beginning of their chemotherapy. Rectal swab cultures were taken before (R0) and at 1 (R1), 2 (R2), and 3 (R3) weeks during the intervention. The antimicrobial susceptibilities and MICs of ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin were determined via the E test. Of the total 87 patients enrolled, 44 received ciprofloxacin and 43 placebo. A total of 350 isolates were obtained, 62, 49, 46 and 22 from the ciprofloxacin group and 68, 54, 38 and 11 from the placebo group at R0, R1, R2 and R3, respectively. The percentages of ceftazidime susceptibility did not show significantly greater decreases from R0 to R1-R3 in the ciprofloxacin group compared to the placebo group. The MIC50s of ceftazidime showed significantly greater increases after ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during R1-R3 compared to R0 in the intervention group compared to the placebo group (R0, 0.12 vs. 0.12; R1, 0.19 vs. 0.12; R2, 0.19 vs. 0.12 and R3, 0.38 vs. 0.09 µg/mL, respectively). Due to the increasing MIC50 of ceftazidime over time after ciprofloxacin prophylaxis, the use of ceftazidime in patients who have previously had ciprofloxacin prophylaxis needs to be closely monitored.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Ceftazidime/pharmacology , Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia/drug therapy , Ciprofloxacin/adverse effects , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/drug effects , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/drug effects , Lymphoma/drug therapy , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Ceftazidime/administration & dosage , Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia/microbiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Ciprofloxacin/administration & dosage , Ciprofloxacin/pharmacology , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Humans , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Placebo Effect
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23691637

ABSTRACT

Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) infection creates problems for therapy. Previous studies have found MDR-PA is susceptible to colistin. We studied the in vitro susceptibility of MDR-PA to colistin and determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). One hundred MDR-PA isolates were obtained from patients at Songklanagarind Hospital, in southern Thailand, during January 2008-March 2011. Antimicrobial susceptibilities to amikacin (AK), ceftazidime (CAZ), ciprofloxacin (CIP), imipenem (IMP) and colistin (CO) were tested by standard disk diffusion method. The antimicrobial susceptibility to colistin and the MIC were determined with the E-test. The MDR-PA isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, amikacin and imipenem in 1, 5, 11 and 32%, respectively. There were 5 antimicrobial resistance patterns of MDR-PA: AK-CAZ-CIP-IMP (50%), AK-CAZ-CIP (32%), CAZ-CIP-IMP (11%), AK-CAZ-IMP (6%) and AK-CIP-IMP (1%). Colistin had good efficacy against MDR-PA (98% susceptibility rate). The MIC50 and MIC90 for colistin were 1.0 and 1.5 jig/ml, respectively. Only 2 MDR-PA isolates were resistant to colistin with the MICs of 3 and 12 microg/ml, respectively. The majority of MDR-PA isolates remained susceptible to colistin; therefore, colistin is a good option for treatment of MDR-PA.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Colistin/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/drug effects , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pseudomonas Infections/microbiology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification , Thailand/epidemiology
4.
J Oral Pathol Med ; 42(9): 698-704, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23586936

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine (i) effects of lawsone methyl ether (LME) mouthwash on antifungal drug resistance of oral Candida, (ii) effects of LME mouthwash on changes in genotype of oral Candida, and (iii) allergy and subjects' satisfaction on LME mouthwash in comparison with chlorhexidine (CHX). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in HIV-infected subjects and denture wearers receiving either LME or CHX mouthwash. Candidal culture by oral rinse technique was performed as baseline and after using the mouthwash for 2 weeks. Antifungal drug resistance and changes in genotype of oral Candida were assessed by microdilution assay, inverted repeat polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism assays, respectively. Allergy and subjects' satisfaction on the mouthwashes were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Twenty-nine HIV-infected subjects (age range, 26-54 years; mean age, 41 years) and 38 denture wearers (age range, 27-76 years; mean age, 55 years) were enrolled. C. albicans was the most common specie found in both groups followed by C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, and C. glabrata. Neither antifungal drug resistance nor significant changes in genotyping of Candida were noted among those receiving LME mouthwash. Subjects' satisfaction on taste and smell of LME mouthwash was comparable to that of CHX. CONCLUSIONS: Use of LME mouthwash for 2 weeks neither led to antifungal drug resistance nor significant changes in genotype of oral Candida. Thus, LME may be an alternative mouthwash in prophylaxis of oral candidiasis among those at risk of developing the disease.


Subject(s)
AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candida/drug effects , Candidiasis, Oral/prevention & control , HIV Infections/microbiology , Mouthwashes/therapeutic use , Naphthoquinones/therapeutic use , Stomatitis, Denture/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Candida/classification , Candida albicans/isolation & purification , Candida glabrata/isolation & purification , Candida tropicalis/isolation & purification , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Fungal , Female , Genotype , Humans , Hypersensitivity/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Smell/drug effects , Taste/drug effects
5.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 32(3): e94-8, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23080291

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fluoroquinolones reduce occurrence of fever in adult cancer patients who develop neutropenia, but there has been no randomized controlled trial in children, and there are only a few studies considering resistance in intestinal floral after ciprofloxacin has been used. METHODS: Children younger than 18 years with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoma scheduled to undergo chemotherapy were randomized to receive oral ciprofloxacin 20mg/kg/day or placebo from the beginning of their chemotherapy. Rectal swab cultures were taken before and at 1 and/or 2 weeks after the intervention. RESULTS: Of the total of 95 patients, 45 and 50 patients received ciprofloxacin and placebo, respectively. Of the 71 patients who developed neutropenia, the proportion of children who developed fever was significantly lower in the ciprofloxacin group than in the placebo group (17/34 [50.0%] versus 27/37 [73.0%]; absolute difference in risk, -23.0%; 95% confidence interval: -45.0% to -0.9%; P = 0.046). Ciprofloxacin significantly reduced the occurrence of febrile episodes in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the induction phase of chemotherapy, but not in patients with lymphoma or in the consolidation phase of chemotherapy. Adverse effects were not different between the groups. After intervention, the percentages of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae susceptible to ciprofloxacin were significantly lower in the ciprofloxacin group. CONCLUSION: Ciprofloxacin can prevent fever in neutropenic patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia during the induction phase of chemotherapy with good tolerance and no serious side effects. Due to the selective pressure of intestinal flora resistance to ciprofloxacin, the long-term effectiveness needs further investigation.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Ciprofloxacin/administration & dosage , Fever/prevention & control , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Neutropenia/complications , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Ciprofloxacin/adverse effects , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Female , Humans , Infant , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Male , Placebos/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Rectum/microbiology , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Med Assoc Thai ; 92(7): 947-51, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19626815

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To detect inducible clindamycin (CL) resistance in staphylococci by disk diffusion induction test (D-test). MATERIAL AND METHOD: One thousand one hundred eighty clinical isolates of staphylococci were tested for inducible CL resistance by placing erythromycin (E) disk and clindamycin disk 12 mm apart (edge to edge) on Mueller-Hinton agar plate inoculated with staphylococci. The flattening of CL zone (D-shaped zone) near E disk indicated an inducible CL resistance was observed after 18-24 h of incubation. RESULTS: Inducible CL resistance was detected in 9.9% of staphylococci isolates. It was found in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) more than methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) 35.9%, 4.7%, and 5.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: To avoid misinterpretation of CL result, D-test is recommended for routine detecting of inducible CL resistance in staphylococci. It provides the confident laboratory report of CL as resistant (D-shaped zone positive) or as susceptible (D-shaped zone negative) particular for E resistant isolates.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Clindamycin/pharmacology , Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests , Staphylococcus/drug effects , Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests/methods , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...