Preliminary evaluation of the pattern cutting and the ligating loop virtual laparoscopic trainers.

INTRODUCTION: The Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) trainer is currently the standard for training and evaluating basic laparoscopic skills. However, its manual scoring system is time-consuming and subjective. The Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer (VBLaST©) is the virtual version of the FLS trainer which allows automatic and real time assessment of skill performance, as well as force feedback. In this study, the VBLaST© pattern cutting (VBLaST-PC©) and ligating loop (VBLaST-LL©) tasks were evaluated as part of a validation study. We hypothesized that performance would be similar on the FLS and VBLaST© trainers, and that subjects with more experience would perform better than those with less experience on both trainers. METHODS: Fifty-five subjects with varying surgical experience were recruited at the Learning Center during the 2013 SAGES annual meeting and were divided into two groups: experts (PGY 5, surgical fellows and surgical attendings) and novices (PGY 1-4). They were asked to perform the PC or the ligating loop task on the FLS and the VBLaST© trainers. Their performance scores for each trainer were calculated and compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the FLS and VBLaST© scores for either the PC or the ligating loop task. Experts' scores were significantly higher than the scores for novices on both trainers. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the subjects' performance on the VBLaST© trainer was similar to the FLS performance for both tasks. Both the VBLaST-PC© and the VBLaST-LL© tasks permitted discrimination between the novice and expert groups. Although concurrent and discriminant validity has been established, further studies to establish convergent and predictive validity are needed. Once validated as a training system for laparoscopic skills, the system is expected to overcome the current limitations of the FLS trainer.

Validation of the VBLaST peg transfer task: a first step toward an alternate training standard.

BACKGROUND: The FLS trainer lacks objective and automated assessments of laparoscopic performance and requires a large supply of relatively expensive consumables. Virtual reality simulation has a great potential as a training and assessment tool of laparoscopic skills and can overcome some limitations of the FLS trainer. This study was carried out to assess the value of our Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Surgical Trainer (VBLaST(©)) in the peg transfer task compared to the FLS trainer and its ability to differentiate performance between novice, intermediate, and expert groups. METHODS: Thirty subjects were divided into three groups: novices (PGY1-2, n = 10), intermediates (PGY3-4, n = 10), and experts (PGY5, surgical fellows and attendings, n = 10). All subjects performed ten trials of the peg transfer task on each simulator. Assessment of laparoscopic performance was based on FLS scoring while a questionnaire was used for subjective evaluation. RESULTS: The performance scores in the two simulators were correlated, though subjects performed significantly better in the FLS trainer. Experts performed better than novices only on the FLS trainer while no significant differences were observed between the other groups. Moreover, a significant learning effect was found on both trainers, with a greater improvement of performance on the VBLaST(©). Finally, 82.6% of the subjects preferred the FLS over the VBLaST(©) for surgical training which could be attributed to the novelty of the VR technology and existing deficiencies of the user interface for the VBLaST(©). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the VBLaST(©) reproduced faithfully some aspects of the FLS peg transfer task (such as color, size, and shape of the peg board, etc.) while other aspects require additional development. Future improvement of the user interface and haptic feedback will enhance the value of the system as an alternative to the FLS as the standard training tool for laparoscopic surgery skills.

[Seroepidemiological study of urogenital schistosomiasis in Algeria: the focus of Khemis el Kechna]. / Etude séro-épidémiologique de la bilharziose uro-génitale en Algérie: le foyer de Khémis el Kéchna.

Two foci of schistosomiasis are known to be active in Algeria, first in the north of the country, at wadi El Hamiz in relation with the dam of El Hamiz river in the commune of Khemis el Kechna; and the other in the south, in the Tassili N'Ajjer region (Djanet, Ihérir, Tamadjert). In relation with a preparatory phase of a control programme of the disease a sero-epidemiological study was performed in the focus of Khemis el Kechna in 1987-1988; 1,876 parasitological samples and 1,760 serological samples were collected. The parasitological prevalence was 4.90%, the serological prevalence was 15.6% with a wider distribution by age.

[Urinary bilharziasis in Djidiouia: still nothing to report]. / La bilharziose urinaire à Djidiouia: toujours rien à signaler.

The authors carried out 1043 urine examinations to look eggs of Schistosoma haematobium in Djidiouia, a known focus of urinary schistosomiasis. All these examinations were negative. However, the authors recommend vigilance because of the existence of Bulinus, the snail intermediate host in the area.