Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 74(Suppl 2): 3304-3312, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35999950

ABSTRACT

Surge in the number of mucormycosis cases following second wave of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) infection posed several diagnostic and prognostic challenges. This study was aimed to describe clinical, diagnostic features and survival outcomes among patients of mucormycosis in post COVID-19 context. Retrospective chart review. This study included 44 COVID-19 positive screened cases who presented with clinical features suggestive of mucormycosis. Demography, clinical profile, diagnostic findings, and the treatment outcome are studied. Medical and surgical outcomes are summarised as frequencies and percentages. The reliability of microbiological, and radiological findings against the pathological findings was analyzed using Kappa statistics (k). Based on constellation of microbiological, pathological and radiological findings 28 cases (63%) confirmed with mucormycosis infection. The mean (SD) age was 54.9 (12.9) years and two-third were males. The majority (90%) of cases presented with the feature of facial swelling, headache nasal blockade. Inpatient care for treatment of COVID-19 was recorded in 33 (75%). Diabetes mellitus was the commonest comorbidity in 27 (61.4%), 38 (86.4%) cases were treated by steroids and 30 (68.2%) were given oxygen therapy. There is a strong agreement (k = 0.83) between pathological and microbiological investigations. In thirty-eight cases (86.3%) remission was achieved when assessed after 8 weeks. Of the 44 cases, four patients died. The results of the current study suggest that the disease residues and/or recurrences in critical areas are frequent in mucormycosis. However, using the strategy of screening at risk patients, diagnosing, treating them with combination of antifungals, surgical debridement, and timely follow up may help in improving outcomes as compared to pre COVID-19 era.

2.
Indian J Nephrol ; 32(1): 82-86, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35283567

ABSTRACT

A repeat renal transplantation is believed to confer the best survival advantage for allograft failure. The scarcity of matching donors at one end, coupled with the expanding pool of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) donors at the other end, lead us to consider the option of ABOi kidney re-transplantation. However, ABOi kidney re-transplantation is associated with heightened immunological risk due to the presence of two substantial immunological barriers. Concern, queries, and uncertainty exist over the course and outcome of this option. We prospectively studied five patients who underwent live-related ABOi re-transplantation after a failed previous transplant. Four patients (mean age 40.8 ± 6.6 years, 4 males) underwent a second renal transplant, whereas one patient had a third renal transplant. All patients received desensitization with rituximab, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin as per routine protocol. One patient required immunoadsorption to achieve the desired Anti-ABO titer. All five patients had good graft survival. One of them developed combined antibody and cell-mediated rejection and another antibody-mediated rejection. Live-related ABOi kidney re-transplantation could be a viable option for patients with a previously failed graft.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...