The effectiveness of atrial fibrillation special clinic on oral anticoagulant use for high risk atrial fibrillation patients managed in the community.

BACKGROUND: Service gaps exist in oral anticoagulant (OAC) use among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care. The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical effectiveness of a community dwelling Atrial Fibrillation Special Clinic (AFSC) run by primary care physicians by evaluating its impact on OAC use and the control of modifiable cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in high risk AF patients. METHOD: Quasi-experimental study was conducted in AFSC run by public primary care physicians in Hong Kong. Study subjects were high risk AF patients with CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥ 2, who had been followed up (FU) at AFSC for at least one year from 01 August, 2019 to 31 October, 2020. OAC usage and modifiable CVD risk factor control were compared before and after one year of FU at AFSC. Drug-related adverse events, emergency attendance or hospitalisation episodes, survival and mortality rates after one year FU at AFSC were also reviewed. RESULTS: Among the 299 high risk AF patients included in the study, significant increase in OAC use was observed from 58.5% at baseline to 82.6% after one year FU in AFSC (P < 0.001). Concerning CVD risk factor control, the average diastolic blood pressure level was significantly reduced (P = 0.009) and the satisfactory blood pressure control rate in non-diabetic patients was markedly improved after one year FU (P = 0.049). However, the average HbA1c and LDL-c levels remained static. The annual incidence rate of ischaemic stroke/systemic embolism was 0.4%, intra-cranial haemorrhage was 0.4%, major bleeding episode was 3.2% and all-cause mortality was 4.3%, all of which were comparable to reports in the literature. CONCLUSION: AFSC is effective in enhancing OAC use and maintaining optimal modifiable CVD risk factor control among high risk AF patients managed in primary care setting, and therefore may reduce AF-associated morbidity and mortality in the long run.

A Community-Based Participatory Research Approach to Developing and Testing Social and Behavioural Interventions to Reduce the Spread of SARS-CoV-2: A Protocol for the 'COPAR for COVID' Programme of Research with Five Interconnected Studies in the Hong Kong Context.

BACKGROUND: While a number of population preventive measures for COVID-19 exist that help to decrease the spread of the virus in the community, there are still many areas in preventative efforts that need improvement or refinement, particularly as new strains of the virus develop. Some of the key issues currently include incorrect and/or inconsistent use of face masks, low acceptance of early screening or vaccination for COVID-19, vaccine hesitance, and misinformation. This is particularly the case in some vulnerable populations, such as older people with chronic illnesses, ethnic minorities who may not speak the mainstream language well and children. The current protocol introduces a large programme of research through five interrelated studies that all focus on social and behavioural interventions to improve different aspects of community-related preventative indicators. Hence, the specific objectives of the overall programme are to (1) increase early testing for COVID-19 and promote the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines in the community (Study 1); (2) increase COVID-19-related health literacy and vaccine literacy and promote improved preventative measures in minority ethnic groups, chronically ill populations and caregivers (Study 2); (3) strengthen the public's motivation to stay at home and avoid nonessential high-risk activities (Study 3); (4) decrease COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy (Study 4); and (5) enhance the adherence to COVID-19-related hygiene practices and the uptake of early testing in school children (Study 5). METHODS: We will utilise a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach in the proposed studies. All studies will incorporate an intervention development phase in conjunction with key community stakeholders, a feasibility study and an execution stage. A variety of self-reported and objective-based measures will be used to assess various outcomes, based on the focus of each study, in both the short- and long-term, including, for example, the 8-item self-reported eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEAL) and objective measures such as vaccine uptake. DISCUSSION: Theory-driven interventions will address each study's focus (e.g., social distancing, promotion of vaccine uptake, eHealth education, preventive measures and early detection). Improvements are expected to be seen in the outcomes of vulnerable and high-risk groups. Decreased infection rates are expected due to improved preventative behaviours and increased vaccine uptake. Long-term sustainability of the approach will be achieved through the CBPR model. The publication of this protocol can assist not only in sharing a large-scale and complex community-based design, but will also allow all to learn from this, so that we will have better insight in the future whether sharing of study designs can elicit timely research initiatives.