Identification and evolutionary analysis of novel exons and alternative splicing events using cross-species EST-to-genome comparisons in human, mouse and rat.

BACKGROUND: Alternative splicing (AS) is important for evolution and major biological functions in complex organisms. However, the extent of AS in mammals other than human and mouse is largely unknown, making it difficult to study AS evolution in mammals and its biomedical implications. RESULTS: Here we describe a cross-species EST-to-genome comparison algorithm (ENACE) that can identify novel exons for EST-scanty species and distinguish conserved and lineage-specific exons. The identified exons represent not only novel exons but also evolutionarily meaningful AS events that are not previously annotated. A genome-wide AS analysis in human, mouse and rat using ENACE reveals a total of 758 novel cassette-on exons and 167 novel retained introns that have no EST evidence from the same species. RT-PCR-sequencing experiments validated approximately 50 approximately 80% of the tested exons, indicating high presence of exons predicted by ENACE. ENACE is particularly powerful when applied to closely related species. In addition, our analysis shows that the ENACE-identified AS exons tend not to pass the nonsynonymous-to-synonymous substitution ratio test and not to contain protein domain, implying that such exons may be under positive selection or relaxed negative selection. These AS exons may contribute to considerable inter-species functional divergence. Our analysis further indicates that a large number of exons may have been gained or lost during mammalian evolution. Moreover, a functional analysis shows that inter-species divergence of AS events may be substantial in protein carriers and receptor proteins in mammals. These exons may be of interest to studies of AS evolution. The ENACE programs and sequences of the ENACE-identified AS events are available for download. CONCLUSION: ENACE can identify potential novel cassette exons and retained introns between closely related species using a comparative approach. It can also provide information regarding lineage- or species-specificity in transcript isoforms, which are important for evolutionary and functional studies.

Alternatively and constitutively spliced exons are subject to different evolutionary forces.

There has been a controversy on whether alternatively spliced exons (ASEs) evolve faster than constitutively spliced exons (CSEs). Although it has been noted that ASEs are subject to weaker selective constraints than CSEs, so they evolve faster, there have also been studies that indicated slower evolution in ASEs than in CSEs. In this study, we retrieve more than 5,000 human-mouse orthologous exons and calculate the synonymous (KS) and nonsynonymous (KA) substitution rates in these exons. Our results show that ASEs have higher KA values and higher KA/KS ratios than CSEs, indicating faster amino acid-level evolution in ASEs. The faster evolution may be in part due to weaker selective constraints. It is also possible that the faster rate is in part due to faster functional evolution in ASEs. On the other hand, the majority of ASEs have lower KS values than CSEs. With reference to the substitution rate in introns, we show that the KS values in ASEs are close to the neutral substitution rate, whereas the synonymous substitution rate in CSEs has likely been accelerated. The elevated synonymous rate in CSEs is not related to CpG dinucleotides or low-complexity regions of protein but may be weakly related to codon usage bias. The overall trends of higher KA and lower KS in ASEs than in CSEs are also observed in human-rat and mouse-rat comparisons. Therefore, our observations hold for mammals of different molecular clocks.