Factors associated with laxative use in schizophrenia patients treated with second-generation antipsychotics.

The aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with concomitant laxative use among schizophrenia patients discharged on second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) at two large psychiatric hospitals in Taiwan. Patients with schizophrenia who were discharged between 2006 and 2017 and received SGA monotherapy at discharge were included in the analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with regular laxative use at discharge. Multivariate Cox regression was used to determine the effect of laxative use at discharge on time to rehospitalization within one year. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to evaluate whether significant time trends existed for rates of laxative use at discharge during the study period. Among patients discharged on SGAs (n = 11,861), 3,336 (28.1%) also received concomitant laxatives. Advanced age and higher antipsychotic or anticholinergic doses were found to be associated with an increase in laxative use. Among SGAs, clozapine was associated with the highest rate of laxative use, followed by zotepine, quetiapine, olanzapine and risperidone. Additionally, risperidone, amisulpride, aripiprazole, paliperidone and ziprasidone were associated with comparable rates of laxative use. In contrast, sulpiride was least associated with laxative use among all SGAs. Regular laxative use at discharge was found to be significantly associated with psychiatric rehospitalization. Also, rate of laxative use at discharge increased significantly during the study period. Laxative use is common in schizophrenia patients treated with SGAs. For clinically significant constipation, switching to an SGA with a lower risk for constipation, and decreasing the doses of SGAs and anticholinergics should be considered.

Time to rehospitalization in patients with bipolar mania discharged on long-acting injectable or oral antipsychotics.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze time to rehospitalization in patients with bipolar mania discharged on long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) or oral antipsychotics (OAPs). Additionally, temporal trends in LAI prescription were investigated. METHODS: Patients with bipolar mania discharged from the study hospital on antipsychotics between 2006 and 2018 were included. Survival analysis was used to compare time to rehospitalization within one year of discharge between patients discharged on LAIs and OAPs, and between FGA-LAIs (first- generation antipsychotic) and SGA-LAIs (second-generation antipsychotic). The Cochrane-Armitage trend test was used to test whether a temporal trend existed for LAI prescription rates during the study period. RESULTS: The LAI group (n = 224) had a significantly lower rehospitalization rate and a significantly longer time to rehospitalization than the OAP group (n = 3836). Rehospitalization rate and time to rehospitalization were not significantly different between patients discharged on FGA-LAIs or SGA-LAIs. The LAI prescription rate grew significantly from 2.20% in 2006 to 11.58% in 2018 (Z = 5.5843, p < 0.0001). The prescription rate of SGA-LAIs also increased significantly (Z = 7.7141, p < 0.0001), but not the prescription rate of FGA-LAIs. LIMITATIONS: The treatment allocation is not randomized in this retrospective study. Furthermore, various clinical characteristics were unavailable in our analysis, such as symptom severity, functional impairment, and others. CONCLUSIONS: LAIs were significantly superior to OAPs in reducing rehospitalization risk. However, SGA-LAIs were comparable with FGA-LAIs in reducing rehospitalization risk. Use of LAIs increased significantly in discharged patients with bipolar disorder during the study period, especially SGA-LAIs.

Temporal trends in clozapine use at time of discharge among people with schizophrenia at two public psychiatric hospitals in Taiwan, 2006-2017.

Clozapine treatment remains the gold standard for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. This study aimed to describe temporal trends in clozapine use at discharge among patients with schizophrenia at two of the largest public psychiatric hospitals in Taiwan over a twelve-year period. Patients with schizophrenia discharged from the two study hospitals between 2006 and 2017 (n = 24,101) were included in the analysis. Antipsychotic augmentation was defined as concomitant use of a second antipsychotic as augmentation to clozapine treatment. Changes in the rate of clozapine use and antipsychotic augmentation at discharge over time were analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. Patients discharged on clozapine had significantly longer hospital stays than other patients. The rate of clozapine use at discharge increased from 13.8% to 20.0% over time (Z = 6.88, p < .0001). Concomitant use of anticholinergic medication was more common in patients receiving antipsychotic augmentation than clozapine antipsychotic monotherapy. Among patients discharged on clozapine, the rate of augmentation with a second antipsychotic increased from 19.1% to 36.2% over time (Z = 6.58, p < .0001). Among patients receiving antipsychotic augmentation, use of another second-generation antipsychotic as the augmentation agent grew from 32.6% to 65.5% over time (Z = 8.90, p < .0001). The increase in clozapine use was accompanied by an increase in concomitant use of a second antipsychotic as augmentation during the study period. Further studies are warranted to clarify the risk/benefit of this augmentation strategy. Clozapine may still be underutilized, and educational programs are needed to promote clinical use of clozapine.

A Comparison of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics With Oral Antipsychotics on Time to Rehospitalization Within 1 Year of Discharge in Elderly Patients With Schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) in elderly patients with schizophrenia remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the effect of LAIs with oral antipsychotics (OAPs) on time to rehospitalization within 1 year of discharge in this population. Other factors potentially associated with time to rehospitalization and trends in LAI prescription rates during the study period were also investigated. METHODS: Patients over 60 years of age with schizophrenia discharged between 2006 and 2017 were followed for 1 year under naturalistic conditions. Survival analysis was used in the comparison between LAIs and OAPs regarding time to rehospitalization. Covariates thought to affect time to rehospitalization were also analyzed. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to evaluate whether a time trend existed for LAI prescription rates. RESULTS: The LAIs group had a significantly lower rehospitalization rate and a significantly longer time to rehospitalization within 1 year of discharge than the OAPs group. Other factors that were associated with a longer time to rehospitalization included a shorter index hospitalization during the time of the study and fewer previous hospitalizations. No significant time trend was found for LAI prescription rates during the study period. However, the prescription rate of second-generation LAIs grew significantly. CONCLUSION: LAIs were found superior to OAPs in preventing rehospitalization. A continuous increase in second-generation LAI prescription rate may be due to the better side-effect profile of second-generation LAIs compared to first-generation LAIs. More studies investigating the effectiveness of LAIs in elderly patients with schizophrenia are needed in the future.

Time to Rehospitalization in Patients With Schizophrenia Receiving Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics or Oral Antipsychotics.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate and compare time to rehospitalization in patients with schizophrenia receiving long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) after discharge with those receiving oral antipsychotics. Additionally, the trend of LAIs prescription rates was investigated. METHODS: Patients with schizophrenia (n = 13 087), who were discharged from the study hospital from 2006 to 2017, were followed-up under naturalistic conditions in the year after discharge. The primary outcome was time to rehospitalization. Survival analysis was used in the comparisons between LAIs and oral antipsychotics and between FGA-LAIs and SGA-LAIs. Simple linear regression and Cochrane-Armitage trend test were used to test whether a time trend existed for LAIs prescription rates. RESULTS: In the 1 year following discharge, patients in the LAIs group had a significantly lower rehospitalization rate and a significantly lengthened time to rehospitalization than those in the oral antipsychotics group. Rehospitalization rate and time to rehospitalization were not significantly different in patients receiving FGA-LAIs or SGA-LAIs. A significantly higher percentage of patients treated with FGA-LAIs received anticholinergic agents than those treated with SGA-LAIs. The LAIs prescription rate grew significantly from 2006 to 2017 by an average of 0.5% per year. CONCLUSIONS: LAIs were significantly superior to oral antipsychotics in reducing rehospitalization risk, whereas SGA-LAIs were comparable with FGA-LAIs in reducing rehospitalization risk. However, use of concomitant anticholinergic agents was less frequent in the SGA-LAIs group than in the FGA-LAIs group. Increase in LAIs prescription rate may be due to growing experiences and success among clinicians in treating patients with LAIs.

Factors affecting time to remission for inpatients with bipolar mania - A naturalistic Taiwanese study.

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder is a complicated and chronic mental disorder. This study investigated factors affecting time to remission for inpatients with bipolar mania after 4 weeks of acute treatment. METHODS: This naturalistic study recruited inpatients with bipolar mania for acute treatment. Symptom severity was assessed using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4. Patients were included if they had had assessments at weeks 0 and 1 Remission was defined as an YMRS score ≤ 12. The Cox regression analysis was used to analyze factors associated with time to remission after 4 weeks of acute treatment. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty-nine patients entered the analysis. Seventy-one of the 449 subjects (15.8%) reached symptomatic remission within 4 weeks of acute treatment. Using forward multivariate Cox regression analysis, comorbid substance use disorders, earlier age at onset, and greater manic symptom severity at baseline found to be statistically significant predictors of a longer time to reach remission after 4 weeks of treatment. LIMITATIONS: As a retrospective chart review and naturalistic design, placebo effect and potentially confounding factors such as the possibility of missing records may have limited our results. CONCLUSIONS: Early identification and intervention with integrated therapy is considered to shorten time to remission for patients at high risk of poor treatment outcome. More studies are needed in other real-world settings to generalize our results.