Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 125(3S): 101807, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38431082

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to identify the survival benefit of chemotherapy in craniomaxillofacial osteosarcoma (CMFO) patients based on a US population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to select patients with CMFO from 1988 to 2016. Age and tumor size were grouped by X-tail. Cox analysis were used to estimate hazards ratios (HR) among patients. All of patients were divided into two cohorts by using Propensity Score Matching (PSM) method to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy. All prognostic factors were included in the nomograms which predict the median survival time. RESULTS: 410 patients were included in our study. The results of survival rate, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were showed no significant difference between the group of chemotherapy performed and the group without chemotherapy. PSM analysis also demonstrated the limited survival advantage of chemotherapy. Moreover, all factors were further incorporated to construct the novel nomograms and its concordance indices (C-index) for internal validation of OS prediction were 0.749 (95 %CI:0.731-0.767). CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not show the advantage of chemotherapy on the overall survival outcome of CMFO. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy was currently recommended in clinical treatment, more rigorous randomized controlled trials are still needed. Nomograms would assist clinicians in making more accurate survival evaluation and choosing the optimal medical treatment.


Subject(s)
Nomograms , Osteosarcoma , Propensity Score , SEER Program , Humans , Osteosarcoma/mortality , Osteosarcoma/drug therapy , Osteosarcoma/diagnosis , Osteosarcoma/pathology , Male , Female , SEER Program/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Adolescent , Middle Aged , Survival Rate , United States/epidemiology , Bone Neoplasms/mortality , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/diagnosis , Child , Young Adult , Neoadjuvant Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Aged , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Retrospective Studies
2.
J Craniofac Surg ; 31(2): e205-e208, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31977713

ABSTRACT

Parry-Romberg syndrome is a rare craniofacial disorder characterized by progressive hemifacial atrophy with systematic manifestations. The combination with hemimasticatory spasm is rare, with only 9 patients reported before. In this study, a study of a young male patient with Parry-Romberg syndrome and hemimasticatory spasm on his left side was presented. Radiologic examinations showed severe atrophy limited to subcutaneous tissue and electromyography demonstrated as hemimasticatory spasm. Injection of botulinum toxin type A was applied for the treatment of hemimasticatory spasm and after 2 separated injections, the patient was significantly relieved from symptom. The theory of focal demyelination of the trigeminal nerve peripheral brunches is the possible link between hemifacial atrophy and hemimasticatory spasm, although the pathogenesis of both diseases requires further study and current therapeutic methods are still limited to symptomatic treatments. Injection of botulinum toxin type A is an effective way to treat hemimasticatory spasm and autologous fat transplant is a promising solution to correct facial asymmetry.


Subject(s)
Facial Hemiatrophy/surgery , Spasm/surgery , Adult , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Electromyography , Facial Hemiatrophy/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Spasm/diagnostic imaging
3.
World J Gastroenterol ; 10(23): 3409-13, 2004 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15526357

ABSTRACT

AIM: In recent years, studies have suggested that Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with HCC. The present study was to determine the prevalence of EBV in HCC patients, and whether EBV acted synergistically with hepatitis viruses in HCC carcinogenesis. METHODS: Liver tissue 115 HCC patients and 26 non-carcinoma patients were studied. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to detect EBV BamHI W DNA, EBV LMP1 DNA, HBV X DNA, and HBV S DNA. Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) was performed to detect HCV RNA and HDV RNA. Immunohistochemistry was performed to detect LMP1, HBsAg, HBcAg and HCV. The positive ratios were compared between HCC group and control group by chi2 test. RESULTS: Totally, 78 HCC samples whose beta-globulin DNA was positively detected by amplified PCR were selected. PCR was performed in all cases for EBV DNA and HBV DNA. RT-PCR was performed in 18 cases for HCV RNA and HDV RNA. EBV BamHI W and EBV LMP1 were positive in 18 and 6 cases, respectively. HBV X gene and HBV S gene were positive in 42 and 27 cases respectively. HCV was positive in one of the 18 cases, and none was positive for HDV. The positive rates were 28.2% (22 of 78) for EBV DNA (BamHI W and/or LMP1) and 56.4% (44 of 78) for HBV DNA (X gene and/or S gene) respectively. In addition, 12 cases were positive for both EBV DNA and HBV DNA. Among the 26 cases in the control group, 2 cases were positive for EBV BamHI W, 4 positive for HBV X gene and 3 positive for HBV S gene. The positive rates were 8.0% (2 of 26) and 23.1% (6 of 26), respectively, for EBV DNA and HBV DNA. The result of DNA sequencing of BamHI W was 100% homologous with the corresponding sequence of B95-8. There was significant difference in EBV infection rate between HCC patients and controls (chi2 = 4.622, P<0.05). The difference in HBV infection rate was also significant (chi2 = 8.681, P<0.05). However, there was no obvious correlation between HBV and EBV in HCC patients (chi2 = 0.835, P>0.05). LMP1, HBV (HBsAg, HBcAg) and HCV were detected positively in 25, 45 and 6 of 78 cases of HCC tissues respectively. In the 26 control cases, the corresponding positive cases were 2, 4 and 0. The difference in EBV infection rate between HCC patients and control cases was statistically significant (chi2 = 6.02, P<0.05). The difference in HBV infection rate was also statistically significant (chi2 = 10.03, P<0.05). In the 25 cases with positive LMP1 expression, 6 were in the nuclei of tumor cells, 9 in the cytoplasm of tumor cells and 10 in mesenchymal lymphocyte cytoplasm. CONCLUSION: The existence of EBV infection in HCC tissues suggests that EBV may be involved in the hepatocellular carcinogenesis in China. HBV infection may be a major cause of HCC. There is no correlation between EBV and HBV in the development of HCC. The prevalence of HCV infection is low in our area, and HDV appears not to play a direct role in hepatocellular carcinogenesis.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/virology , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/epidemiology , Herpesvirus 4, Human/isolation & purification , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/virology , Adult , Aged , DNA, Viral/analysis , Female , Herpesvirus 4, Human/genetics , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...